Java8中使用stream进行分组统计和普通实现的分组统计的性能对比

    在ImportNew上面看到一篇文章:http://www.importnew.com/14841.html,说的是使用Java8的对集合采用流操作的新特性,替代旧的使用循环对集合操作的方式,使用Java8的流操作功能对集合进行分组,以及对相应的内容进行去重等操作等,使用Java8编写的代码可读性和理解性都有了非常大的提高,是非常值得称称赞的。

    Java8通过流对集合的分组操作,让分组功能实现起来就非常容易了,我就想对其性能做一下比较,看看这二者之间是否有差距。

    我把ImportNew上面的示例做了一下扩充,在原来的Article对像中增加了国家和省份两个,后续的示例就根据国家和省份进行二维分组统计,然后比较一下性能和效率。

    Article对像:    

/**
 * ClassName:Article 
* Date: 2018年5月8日 上午10:31:03
* * @author fenglibin * @version * @see */ public class Article { private final String title; private final String author; private final List tags; private final String countryCode; private final String province; public Article(String title, String author, List tags, String countryCode, String province){ this.title = title; this.author = author; this.tags = tags; this.countryCode = countryCode; this.province = province; } public String getTitle() { return title; } public String getAuthor() { return author; } public List getTags() { return tags; } public String getCountryCode() { return countryCode; } public String getProvince() { return province; } }

    准备一些测试数据:

private static List
articles = new ArrayList
(); static { Article a1 = new Article("Hello World", "Tom", Arrays.asList("Hello", "World", "Tom"), "CN", "GD"); Article a2 = new Article("Thank you teacher", "Bruce", Arrays.asList("Thank", "you", "teacher", "Bruce"), "CN", "GX"); Article a3 = new Article("Work is amazing", "Tom", Arrays.asList("Work", "amazing", "Tom"), "CN", "GD"); Article a4 = new Article("New City", "Lucy", Arrays.asList("New", "City", "Lucy", "Good"), "US", "OT"); articles.add(a1); articles.add(a2); articles.add(a3); articles.add(a4); }

    使用普通的分组方式进行分组:

/**
     * 通过for循环逻辑,编程上会麻烦点,但是效率上高很多
     */
    private static void groupByCountryAndProvince_byNormal() {
        Map>> result = new HashMap>>();
        for (Article article : articles) {
            Map> pMap = result.get(article.getCountryCode());
            if(pMap==null) {
                pMap = new HashMap>();
                result.put(article.getCountryCode(), pMap);
            }
            List
list = pMap.get(article.getProvince()); if(list==null) { list = new ArrayList
(); pMap.put(article.getProvince(), list); } list.add(article); } result.forEach((cc, map) -> { System.out.println("Country Code is:" + cc); map.forEach((pc, list) -> { System.out.println(" Province Code is:" + pc); list.forEach((article) -> { System.out.println(" Article titile is:" + article.getTitle() + ",author is:" + article.getAuthor()); }); }); }); }

    使用串行流的方式进行分组:

/**
     * 以串行流的方式,通过Collectors做多维度的分组,非常方便,但是性能上很差
     */
    private static void groupByCountryAndProvince() {
        Map>> result = articles.stream()
                .collect(Collectors.groupingBy(Article::getCountryCode,
                                                Collectors.groupingBy(Article::getProvince)));
        result.forEach((cc, map) -> {
            System.out.println("Country Code is:" + cc);
            map.forEach((pc, list) -> {
                System.out.println("    Province Code is:" + pc);
                list.forEach((article) -> {
                    System.out.println("        Article titile is:" + article.getTitle() + ",author is:"
                                       + article.getAuthor());
                });
            });
        });
    }

    使用并行流的方式进行分组:

/**
     * 以并行流的方式,通过Collectors做多维度的分组,性能上比串行流的效率就高很多了
     * 实现方式也很简单,只需要将stream()修改为parallelStream()实现。
     */
    private static void groupByCountryAndProvinceParallel() {
        Map>> result = articles.parallelStream()
                .collect(Collectors.groupingBy(Article::getCountryCode,
                                                    Collectors.groupingBy(Article::getProvince)));
        result.forEach((cc, map) -> {
            System.out.println("Country Code is:" + cc);
            map.forEach((pc, list) -> {
                System.out.println("    Province Code is:" + pc);
                list.forEach((article) -> {
                    System.out.println("        Article titile is:" + article.getTitle() + ",author is:"
                                       + article.getAuthor());
                });
            });
        });
    }

    加入以下代码执行:

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
        groupByCountryAndProvince();
        long end = System.currentTimeMillis();
        System.out.println("串行流分组使用时长(毫秒):" + (end - start)+"\n");
        
        start = System.currentTimeMillis();
        groupByCountryAndProvinceParallel();
        end = System.currentTimeMillis();
        System.out.println("并行流分组使用时长(毫秒):" + (end - start)+"\n");
        
        start = System.currentTimeMillis();
        groupByCountryAndProvince_byNormal();
        end = System.currentTimeMillis();
        System.out.println("普通分组使用时长(毫秒):" + (end - start));
    }

得到的结果如下:

Country Code is:CN
    Province Code is:GX
        Article titile is:Thank you teacher,author is:Bruce
    Province Code is:GD
        Article titile is:Hello World,author is:Tom
        Article titile is:Work is amazing,author is:Tom
Country Code is:US
    Province Code is:OT
        Article titile is:New City,author is:Lucy
串行流分组使用时长(毫秒):70


Country Code is:CN
    Province Code is:GX
        Article titile is:Thank you teacher,author is:Bruce
    Province Code is:GD
        Article titile is:Hello World,author is:Tom
        Article titile is:Work is amazing,author is:Tom
Country Code is:US
    Province Code is:OT
        Article titile is:New City,author is:Lucy
并行流分组使用时长(毫秒):5


Country Code is:CN
    Province Code is:GX
        Article titile is:Thank you teacher,author is:Bruce
    Province Code is:GD
        Article titile is:Hello World,author is:Tom
        Article titile is:Work is amazing,author is:Tom
Country Code is:US
    Province Code is:OT
        Article titile is:New City,author is:Lucy
普通分组使用时长(毫秒):1
    执行多次也基本上是类似的效果,因此通过以上示例可以看出,在代码的编写上确实优化了不少,但即使通过并行流的方式,性能上的差距也不少,在真实的应用场景中特别是高并发的场景中,使用的时候还是需要多考虑,毕竟鱼和熊掌不可兼容了。

你可能感兴趣的:(java8)