• EBS plus: S3 storage is more expensive. (0.15 $/Gb > 0.1$/Gb)

  • S3 plus: Serving static files from EBS may influence my web server's performance negatively. Is this true? Does serving images affect a server performance notably? For S3, my server will not be responsible for serving static files.

  • S3 plus: Serving static files from EBS may result in I/O cost, though it will probably be minor.

  • EBS plus: People say EBS is faster.

  • S3 plus: People say S3 is safer for persistence.

  • EBS plus: There is no need to learn an API: it is straightforward to save the images to an EBS volume.


EBS：S3存储更昂贵。（0.15美元/ GB > 0.1美元/ GB）
S3 +：从EBS服务静态文件可能会负面影响我的Web服务器的性能。这是真的吗？服务图像会显著影响服务器性能吗？对于S3，我的服务器不负责运行静态文件。
S3+：从EBS服务静态文件可能导致I/O成本，虽然它可能是次要的。
EBS：人们说EBS更快。
S3 Plus：人们说S3对于持久性更安全。
EBS Plus：没有必要学习API：将图像保存到EBS卷中是很简单的