- 《CPython Internals》阅读笔记：p336-p352
codists
读书笔记python
《CPythonInternals》学习第17天，p336-p352总结，总计17页。一、技术总结1.GDBGDB是GNUDbugger的缩写。(1)安装sudoaptinstallgdb(2)创建.gdbinit文件touch~/.gdbinitvim~/.gdbinit(3)配置.gdbinit文件add-auto-load-safe-path/project/cpython注：1./proj
- 《CPython Internals》阅读笔记：p336-p352
python
《CPythonInternals》学习第17天，p336-p352总结，总计17页。一、技术总结1.GDBGDB是GNUDbugger的缩写。(1)安装sudoaptinstallgdb(2)创建.gdbinit文件touch~/.gdbinitvim~/.gdbinit(3)配置.gdbinit文件add-auto-load-safe-path/project/cpython注：1./proj
- 爬取电影天堂
越哥的女人
爬取每部电影的详细信息分析每页的url，可以得到规律是：第t页的url为：http://dytt8.net/html/gndy/dyzz/list_23_t.html于是可以先分析第一页，然后对页数进循环，就可得到所有最新电影的详细信息。fromlxmlimportetreeheaders={"User-Agent":"Mozilla/5.0(WindowsNT6.1;Win64;x64)Appl
- 【论文速读】| 评估并提高大语言模型生成的安全攻击探测器的鲁棒性
llm
基本信息原文标题：EvaluatingandImprovingtheRobustnessofSecurityAttackDetectorsGeneratedbyLLMs原文作者：SamuelePasini,JinhanKim,TommasoAiello,RocíoCabreraLozoya,AntoninoSabetta,PaoloTonella作者单位：UniversitàdellaSvizze
- C++项目设计：构建高性能、线程安全的日志系统
泡沫o0
C++项目设计：理论实践与创新c++linux开发语言c语言设计模式
C++项目设计：构建高性能、线程安全的日志系统一、引言（Introduction）1.1日志系统的重要性（ImportanceofLoggingSystem）1.2日志系统的基本要求（BasicRequirementsofLoggingSystem）1.2.1高性能（HighPerformance）1.2.2线程安全（ThreadSafety）1.2.3易用性（EaseofUse）1.2.4可扩展
- Python算法模糊匹配：FuzzyWuzzy深度剖析，从入门到精通，解决你所有需要匹配的需求
kdayjj966
python算法开发语言
在数据科学和文本处理的世界中，字符串匹配是一个非常普遍的问题。FuzzyWuzzy作为一个强大的Python库，通过模糊匹配技术解决了许多由于拼写错误、格式不一致引起的问题。本文将详细介绍FuzzyWuzzy，从基本概念到高级应用，帮助你掌握这一工具。目录FuzzyWuzzy简介安装与快速开始基础用法3.1简单比例匹配3.2部分匹配3.3比例匹配集高级用法4.1令牌排序匹配4.2令牌集合匹配实际应
- 如何在Docker上构建Node.js应用程序
cunchi4221
dockerjavapythonvuelinuxViewUI
Dockerhasbeenthelatesttrendingtopicoverthepastcoupleofyearsandifyouhaven’tbeentospaceorspentsometimeinthecaves,youprobablymusthavecomeacrossthistechbuzzword.在过去的几年中，Docker一直是最新的趋势话题，如果您没有去过太空或在洞穴中度过了一
- 元素滚动和内容居中同时存在时，flex 布局的 safe 关键字，保证dom元素滚动的时候不溢出
我有一棵树
javascript前端css
假设你有一个元素div，同时设置了flex布局居中和overflow:auto/scroll。为了防止内容溢出，我们可以使用safe这个属性，比如display:flex;justify-content:safecenter;align-items:safecenter;overflow-y:scroll;这样就可能保证元素在滚动的时候内容能够显示全。但是注意，这个safe的属性，兼容性不太好。注
- MySQL--mysqld、mysql_safe、mysql.server、mysqladmin几种启动和停止服务使用说明
m0_74823683
面试学习路线阿里巴巴mysqladbandroid
您好，我是贾斯汀，欢迎进来学习的小伙伴~【学习背景】本文对Linux下启动和停止mysql服务最常用的几种方式进行讲解：（1）mysqld（2）mysqld_safe（3）mysql.server（4）mysqladmin关于这几种文件和命令对mysql服务的启动和停止的使用，本文会分别进行介绍，还有一些关键的事项，比如生产环境对于MySQL服务的启动和停止是非常谨慎的一件事，不是每一种方式都适合
- ios storekit_在iOS 14中的应用购买和storekit中
weixin_26745865
iospython
iosstorekitMuchofthebuzzatWWDC2020wasgivenovertoSwiftUI2.0andARKit,soyoushouldforgiveyourselfformissingaseismicchangetotheStoreKitframework—achangethatwillmakeyourlifeasanappdeveloperfareasier.WWDC202
- 《终极指南：在 Ubuntu 24.04 上轻松安装 ROS 2 Jazzy》
X_taiyang18
ROS人工智能python机器人
在Ubuntu24.04上安装ROS2Jazzy文章目录在Ubuntu24.04上安装ROS2Jazzy一、前提准备二、安装ROS2Jazzy1.**安装所需依赖**2.**设置ROS2软件源**3.**更新并安装ROS2Jazzy**4.**配置环境变量**5.**安装其他开发工具（可选）**三、测试ROS2安装1.**运行ROS2示例程序**四、故障排除五、卸载ROS2其他注意事项*RCM（R
- PenSafe（水洞扫描工具）
不一样的信息安全
工具安全web安全网络安全
免责声明本系列工具仅供安全专业人员进行已授权环境使用，此工具所提供的功能只为网络安全人员对自己所负责的网站、服务器等（包括但不限于）进行检测或维护参考，未经授权请勿利用工具中的功能对任何计算机系统进行入侵操作。利用此工具所提供的信息而造成的直接或间接后果和损失，均由使用者本人负责。工具地址：点击领取PenSafe（水洞扫描工具）简介渗透测试安全（PenetrationTesting+Safe）：在
- 浅拷贝和深拷贝的逻辑剖析
彭彭不吃虫子
python
1.请问下面代码执行之后，变量e的内容是？FVPKR&.dZi4l|='6antuk+ezo>>>d={"小甲鱼":"千年王八，万年龟。"}>>>e=d.copy()>>>d["小甲鱼"]="666"答：Poweredby+9|BeC#(~820TEvSKq.[g!FZz>>>e{'小甲鱼':'千年王八，万年龟。'}解析：其实这跟列表的道理是一样的，浅拷贝第一层的修改是不会相互影响的，但是对于嵌套
- buu-[GYCTF2020]Ezsqli
有点水啊
buuctf-websqlwebsqlpython
朴实无华一张图片，一个输入框，图片太大就不放了1是Nu1L，2是V&N，剩下都是“ErrorOccuredWhenFetchResult.”fuzz一下，507的都是被过滤了的过滤了关键的information，要用到无列名注入，找库名时需要用到用到5.7版本新增的sys库利用sys库里的三个表都行schema_table_statistics/schema_table_statistics_wi
- Stable Diffusion 3(SD 3)模型分享
szboy2003
stablediffusion图像处理视觉检测AI作画
整理了StableDiffusion3(SD3)模型，分享如下：sd3_medium.safetensors链接:https://pan.baidu.com/s/1aYq0MTmKj0U9fBNexV-7sw?pwd=5566提取码:5566sd3_medium_incl_clips_t5xxlfp8.safetensors链接:https://pan.baidu.com/s/1cg3zESBk0
- 数据库服务体系结构
旦沐已成舟
数据库的日子数据库
1.数据库服务应用配置服务进行配置有什么作用？实现服务运行启动实现某些功能应用配置有三种方式？利用编译安装进行配置编写配置文件信息,.默认的配置文件:/etc/my.cnf利用启动命令参数配置信息，mysqld_safe--skip-grant-tables--skip-networking&#配置文件内容有[]的部分表示对客户端或者服务端的配置区域[mysqld]user=mysqlbasedi
- SpringBoot 整合 Grizzly
❀͜͡傀儡师
springboot后端java
SpringBoot整合Grizzly是一种提高Web应用性能的有效方式，尤其适用于需要处理大量并发请求的高流量网站。Grizzly是一个高性能的、异步的、非阻塞的HTTP服务器框架，它可以与SpringBoot一起提供比传统的Tomcat或Jetty更高的吞吐量和更低的延迟。为什么选择Grizzly？Grizzly作为一个基于NIO（Non-blockingI/O）的服务器框架，它特别适合于处理
- 17-7 向量数据库之野望7 - PostgreSQL 和pgvector
拉达曼迪斯II
AIGC学习数据库管理工具AI创业数据库postgresql人工智能机器学习AIGC搜索引擎
PostgreSQL是一款功能强大的开源对象关系数据库系统，它已将其功能扩展到传统数据管理之外，通过pgvector扩展支持矢量数据。这一新增功能满足了对高效处理高维矢量数据日益增长的需求，这些数据通常用于机器学习、自然语言处理(NLP)和推荐系统等应用。https://github.com/mazzasaverio/find-your-opensource-project什么是pgvector？
- 【MySQL】Mysql数据库导入导出sql文件、备份数据库、迁移数据库
程序员洲洲
数据库数据库mysql导入导出sqlsql文件备份迁移
本文摘要：本文提出了xxx的实用开发小技巧。作者介绍：我是程序员洲洲，一个热爱写作的非著名程序员。CSDN全栈优质领域创作者、华为云博客社区云享专家、阿里云博客社区专家博主。同时欢迎大家关注其他专栏，我将分享Web前后端开发、人工智能、机器学习、深度学习从0到1系列文章。同时洲洲已经建立了程序员技术交流群，如果您感兴趣，可以私信我加入我的社群，也可以直接vx联系（文末有名片）v：bdizztt随时
- 使用vue3实现语音交互的前端页面
张正栋
交互前端
代码地址：https://github.com/ZZD3627/my-third-vue.git需求1.前端实现录音并将音频传到通过http请求将音频传递到后端2.基于后端识别的语音及后端返回的内容进行语音沟通实现1.使用MediaRecorder在前端使用录音功能2.使用SpeechSynthesis实现将后端传来的文字进行播放其中一个页面的代码：import{ref,onMounted}fro
- 2024年最新IDE激活码，激活到2099年，可用一辈子！
熊文豪
intellij-ideajavaideidea
KQ8KMJ77TY-eyJsaWNlbnNlSWQiOiJLUThLTUo3N1RZIiwibGljZW5zZWVOYW1lIjoiVW5pdmVyc2l0YXMgTmVnZXJpIE1hbGFuZyIsImxpY2Vuc2VlVHlwZSI6IkNMQVNTUk9PTSIsImFzc2lnbmVlTmFtZSI6IkpldOWFqOWutuahtiDorqTlh4blupflkI0iLCJhc
- 小程序适配底部安全距离
dingcho
前端小程序
方案一onLoad(options){const{screenHeight,safeArea,windowHeight}=wx.getWindowInfo()letsafeBottom=windowHeightif(safeArea?.bottom){safeBottom=safeArea.bottom}safeBottom=screenHeight-safeBottomthis.setData(
- 【论文速读】| 利用大语言模型在灰盒模糊测试中生成初始种子
云起无垠
论文速读/精读语言模型p2p人工智能
基本信息论文标题:HarnessingLargeLanguageModelsforSeedGenerationinGreyb0xFuzzing作者:WenxuanShi,YunhangZhang,XinyuXing,JunXu作者单位:NorthwesternUniversity,UniversityofUtah关键词:Greyb0xfuzzing,LargeLanguageModels,Seed
- uniapp 微信小程序，底部安全距离适配，针对安卓iPhone不同型号手机
沐雨MUYU_
uni-app微信小程序android
1、全局定义底部安全距离//前提：项目中安装了vuex或其他状态管理工具//文件位置src/store/index.tsimport{createStore}from'vuex';exportdefaultcreateStore({state(){return{safeBottom:''//底部安全距离};},mutations:{...},actions:{...},getters:{safeB
- 1233 : C语言/C++单词倒置（ZZNUOJ）⭐⭐
*TQK*
ZZNUOJ题目合集c++数据结构c语言算法
题目描述（难度⭐⭐）最近birdfly收到了女友的几份信件，为了只要他俩知道信件的秘密，女友把信件里的每个单词都倒置了。这样只有birdfly将它们倒置过来才能明白女友的心思了。为此birdfly还特意请你编写程序帮他解决一下这个问题。简单起见假定每封信只包含英文单词和空格，每两个单词之间有一个空格。且长度不超过100，每个单词长度不超过50。输入输入有多组样例，每组样例输入一行英文（单词和空格）
- 【Astro】如何在Astro上借助Cloudflare D1和Drizzle ORM打造全栈应用？一文带你搞定！
eclipsercp
毕业设计开发环境搭建开发语言全栈
如何在Astro上借助CloudflareD1和DrizzleORM打造全栈应用？一文带你搞定！文章目录如何在Astro上借助CloudflareD1和DrizzleORM打造全栈应用？一文带你搞定！前言一、Astro简介与优势二、CloudflareD1简介三、DrizzleORM简介四、在Astro上实现全栈开发的步骤1.安装Astro2.添加Cloudflare适配器3.部署到Cloudfl
- 安装雷池WAF遇到 Pool overlaps with other one on this address space 怎么办
linuxubuntu运维
这个错误一般出现在手动安装的过程中，原因是.env里面默认的网段已经被使用造成了冲突，解决方案如下编辑.env找到下面这一行，改成其他不冲突网段SUBNET_PREFIX=xx.xx.xx重启服务cd/data/safeline&&dockercomposeup-d
- 【论文速读】| Pipe-Cleaner:使用安全策略的灵活模糊测试
漏洞框架
基本信息原文标题:Pipe-Cleaner:FlexibleFuzzingUsingSecurityPolicies原文作者:AllisonNaaktgeboren,SeanNobleAnderson,AndrewTolmach,GregSullivan作者单位:PortlandStateUniversity,CharlesStarkDraperLaboratory关键词:fuzzing,secu
- 【概率论与数理统计】第三章 多维随机变量及其分布(3)
Arthur古德曼
概率论与数理统计概率论多维随机变量二维随机变量独立性概率分布夏明亮
2随机变量的独立性2.1两个随机变量的独立性在多维随机变量中各分量的取值有时会互相影响，但有时也会毫无影响。例如，一个人的身高XXX和体重YYY之间就会互相影响，但与收入ZZZ一般就没什么影响。这里，我们根据两个事件的独立性引出两个随机变量的独立性：之前我们这样描述：事件{X≤x}\{X\lex\}{X≤x}与事件{Y≤y}\{Y\ley\}{Y≤y}的积事件{X≤x,Y≤y}\{X\lex,\Y
- 如何限制用户运行 chmod 777 命令 ？
linux
为chmod创建自定义脚本包装可以帮助您管理和限制某些chmod命令的使用，例如防止设置777权限。下面是如何在linux的系统中创建这样一个脚本的基本示例。Step1:CreatetheScript打开终端，并使用文本编辑器创建脚本。sudonano/usr/local/bin/safe_chmod将以下内容添加到文件中：#!/bin/bash#Customscriptwrapperforchm
- 辗转相处求最大公约数
沐刃青蛟
C++漏洞
无言面对”江东父老“了，接触编程一年了，今天发现还不会辗转相除法求最大公约数。惭愧惭愧！
为此，总结一下以方便日后忘了好查找。
1.输入要比较的两个数a,b
忽略：2.比较大小（因为后面要的是大的数对小的数做%操作）
3.辗转相除（用循环不停的取余，如a%b,直至b=0）
4.最后的a为两数的最大公约数
&
- F5负载均衡会话保持技术及原理技术白皮书
bijian1013
F5负载均衡
一.什么是会话保持？ 在大多数电子商务的应用系统或者需要进行用户身份认证的在线系统中，一个客户与服务器经常经过好几次的交互过程才能完成一笔交易或者是一个请求的完成。由于这几次交互过程是密切相关的，服务器在进行这些交互过程的某一个交互步骤时，往往需要了解上一次交互过程的处理结果，或者上几步的交互过程结果，服务器进行下
- Object.equals方法：重载还是覆盖
Cwind
javagenericsoverrideoverload
本文译自StackOverflow上对此问题的讨论。
原问题链接
在阅读Joshua Bloch的《Effective Java（第二版）》第8条“覆盖equals时请遵守通用约定”时对如下论述有疑问：
“不要将equals声明中的Object对象替换为其他的类型。程序员编写出下面这样的equals方法并不鲜见，这会使程序员花上数个小时都搞不清它为什么不能正常工作：”
pu
- 初始线程
15700786134
暑假学习的第一课是讲线程，任务是是界面上的一条线运动起来。
既然是在界面上，那必定得先有一个界面，所以第一步就是，自己的类继承JAVA中的JFrame，在新建的类中写一个界面，代码如下：
public class ShapeFr
- Linux的tcpdump
被触发
tcpdump
用简单的话来定义tcpdump，就是：dump the traffic on a network，根据使用者的定义对网络上的数据包进行截获的包分析工具。 tcpdump可以将网络中传送的数据包的“头”完全截获下来提供分析。它支 持针对网络层、协议、主机、网络或端口的过滤，并提供and、or、not等逻辑语句来帮助你去掉无用的信息。
实用命令实例
默认启动
tcpdump
普通情况下，直
- 安卓程序listview优化后还是卡顿
肆无忌惮_
ListView
最近用eclipse开发一个安卓app，listview使用baseadapter，里面有一个ImageView和两个TextView。使用了Holder内部类进行优化了还是很卡顿。后来发现是图片资源的问题。把一张分辨率高的图片放在了drawable-mdpi文件夹下，当我在每个item中显示，他都要进行缩放，导致很卡顿。解决办法是把这个高分辨率图片放到drawable-xxhdpi下。
&nb
- 扩展easyUI tab控件，添加加载遮罩效果
知了ing
jquery
(function () {
$.extend($.fn.tabs.methods, {
//显示遮罩
loading: function (jq, msg) {
return jq.each(function () {
var panel = $(this).tabs(&
- gradle上传jar到nexus
矮蛋蛋
gradle
原文地址：
https://docs.gradle.org/current/userguide/maven_plugin.html
configurations {
deployerJars
}
dependencies {
deployerJars "org.apache.maven.wagon
- 千万条数据外网导入数据库的解决方案。
alleni123
sqlmysql
从某网上爬了数千万的数据，存在文本中。
然后要导入mysql数据库。
悲剧的是数据库和我存数据的服务器不在一个内网里面。。
ping了一下， 19ms的延迟。
于是下面的代码是没用的。
ps = con.prepareStatement(sql);
ps.setString(1, info.getYear())............;
ps.exec
- JAVA IO InputStreamReader和OutputStreamReader
百合不是茶
JAVA.io操作 字符流
这是第三篇关于java.io的文章了，从开始对io的不了解-->熟悉--->模糊，是这几天来对文件操作中最大的感受，本来自己认为的熟悉了的，刚刚在回想起前面学的好像又不是很清晰了，模糊对我现在或许是最好的鼓励 我会更加的去学 加油！：
JAVA的API提供了另外一种数据保存途径，使用字符流来保存的，字符流只能保存字符形式的流
字节流和字符的难点：a,怎么将读到的数据
- MO、MT解读
bijian1013
GSM
MO= Mobile originate，上行，即用户上发给SP的信息。MT= Mobile Terminate，下行，即SP端下发给用户的信息；
上行:mo提交短信到短信中心下行:mt短信中心向特定的用户转发短信，你的短信是这样的，你所提交的短信，投递的地址是短信中心。短信中心收到你的短信后，存储转发，转发的时候就会根据你填写的接收方号码寻找路由，下发。在彩信领域是一样的道理。下行业务：由SP
- 五个JavaScript基础问题
bijian1013
JavaScriptcallapplythisHoisting
下面是五个关于前端相关的基础问题，但却很能体现JavaScript的基本功底。
问题1：Scope作用范围
考虑下面的代码：
(function() {
var a = b = 5;
})();
console.log(b);
什么会被打印在控制台上？
回答：
上面的代码会打印 5。
&nbs
- 【Thrift二】Thrift Hello World
bit1129
Hello world
本篇，不考虑细节问题和为什么，先照葫芦画瓢写一个Thrift版本的Hello World，了解Thrift RPC服务开发的基本流程
1. 在Intellij中创建一个Maven模块，加入对Thrift的依赖，同时还要加上slf4j依赖，如果不加slf4j依赖，在后面启动Thrift Server时会报错
<dependency>
- 【Avro一】Avro入门
bit1129
入门
本文的目的主要是总结下基于Avro Schema代码生成，然后进行序列化和反序列化开发的基本流程。需要指出的是，Avro并不要求一定得根据Schema文件生成代码，这对于动态类型语言很有用。
1. 添加Maven依赖
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<proj
- 安装nginx+ngx_lua支持WAF防护功能
ronin47
需要的软件:LuaJIT-2.0.0.tar.gz nginx-1.4.4.tar.gz &nb
- java-5.查找最小的K个元素-使用最大堆
bylijinnan
java
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Random;
public class MinKElement {
/**
* 5.最小的K个元素
* I would like to use MaxHeap.
* using QuickSort is also OK
*/
public static void
- TCP的TIME-WAIT
bylijinnan
socket
原文连接：
http://vincent.bernat.im/en/blog/2014-tcp-time-wait-state-linux.html
以下为对原文的阅读笔记
说明：
主动关闭的一方称为local end，被动关闭的一方称为remote end
本地IP、本地端口、远端IP、远端端口这一“四元组”称为quadruplet，也称为socket
1、TIME_WA
- jquery ajax 序列化表单
coder_xpf
Jquery ajax 序列化
checkbox 如果不设定值，默认选中值为on；设定值之后，选中则为设定的值
<input type="checkbox" name="favor" id="favor" checked="checked"/>
$("#favor&quo
- Apache集群乱码和最高并发控制
cuisuqiang
apachetomcat并发集群乱码
都知道如果使用Http访问，那么在Connector中增加URIEncoding即可，其实使用AJP时也一样，增加useBodyEncodingForURI和URIEncoding即可。
最大连接数也是一样的，增加maxThreads属性即可，如下，配置如下：
<Connector maxThreads="300" port="8019" prot
- websocket
dalan_123
websocket
一、低延迟的客户端-服务器 和 服务器-客户端的连接
很多时候所谓的http的请求、响应的模式，都是客户端加载一个网页，直到用户在进行下一次点击的时候，什么都不会发生。并且所有的http的通信都是客户端控制的，这时候就需要用户的互动或定期轮训的，以便从服务器端加载新的数据。
通常采用的技术比如推送和comet（使用http长连接、无需安装浏览器安装插件的两种方式：基于ajax的长
- 菜鸟分析网络执法官
dcj3sjt126com
网络
最近在论坛上看到很多贴子在讨论网络执法官的问题。菜鸟我正好知道这回事情.人道"人之患好为人师" 手里忍不住,就写点东西吧. 我也很忙.又没有MM,又没有MONEY....晕倒有点跑题.
OK,闲话少说,切如正题. 要了解网络执法官的原理. 就要先了解局域网的通信的原理.
前面我们看到了.在以太网上传输的都是具有以太网头的数据包.
- Android相对布局属性全集
dcj3sjt126com
android
RelativeLayout布局android:layout_marginTop="25dip" //顶部距离android:gravity="left" //空间布局位置android:layout_marginLeft="15dip //距离左边距
// 相对于给定ID控件android:layout_above 将该控件的底部置于给定ID的
- Tomcat内存设置详解
eksliang
jvmtomcattomcat内存设置
Java内存溢出详解
一、常见的Java内存溢出有以下三种：
1. java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space ----JVM Heap（堆）溢出JVM在启动的时候会自动设置JVM Heap的值，其初始空间(即-Xms)是物理内存的1/64，最大空间(-Xmx)不可超过物理内存。
可以利用JVM提
- Java6 JVM参数选项
greatwqs
javaHotSpotjvmjvm参数JVM Options
Java 6 JVM参数选项大全（中文版）
作者：Ken Wu
Email:
[email protected]
转载本文档请注明原文链接 http://kenwublog.com/docs/java6-jvm-options-chinese-edition.htm！
本文是基于最新的SUN官方文档Java SE 6 Hotspot VM Opt
- weblogic创建JMC
i5land
weblogicjms
进入 weblogic控制太
1.创建持久化存储
--Services--Persistant Stores--new--Create FileStores--name随便起--target默认--Directory写入在本机建立的文件夹的路径--ok
2.创建JMS服务器
--Services--Messaging--JMS Servers--new--name随便起--Pers
- 基于 DHT 网络的磁力链接和BT种子的搜索引擎架构
justjavac
DHT
上周开发了一个磁力链接和 BT 种子的搜索引擎 {Magnet & Torrent}，本文简单介绍一下主要的系统功能和用到的技术。
系统包括几个独立的部分：
使用 Python 的 Scrapy 框架开发的网络爬虫，用来爬取磁力链接和种子；
使用 PHP CI 框架开发的简易网站；
搜索引擎目前直接使用的 MySQL，将来可以考虑使
- sql添加、删除表中的列
macroli
sql
添加没有默认值：alter table Test add BazaarType char(1)
有默认值的添加列：alter table Test add BazaarType char(1) default(0)
删除没有默认值的列：alter table Test drop COLUMN BazaarType
删除有默认值的列：先删除约束（默认值）alter table Test DRO
- PHP中二维数组的排序方法
abc123456789cba
排序二维数组PHP
<?php/*** @package BugFree* @version $Id: FunctionsMain.inc.php,v 1.32 2005/09/24 11:38:37 wwccss Exp $*** Sort an two-dimension array by some level
- hive优化之------控制hive任务中的map数和reduce数
superlxw1234
hivehive优化
一、 控制hive任务中的map数: 1. 通常情况下，作业会通过input的目录产生一个或者多个map任务。 主要的决定因素有： input的文件总个数，input的文件大小，集群设置的文件块大小(目前为128M, 可在hive中通过set dfs.block.size;命令查看到，该参数不能自定义修改)；2.
- Spring Boot 1.2.4 发布
wiselyman
spring boot
Spring Boot 1.2.4已于6.4日发布，repo.spring.io and Maven Central可以下载(推荐使用maven或者gradle构建下载)。
这是一个维护版本，包含了一些修复small number of fixes,建议所有的用户升级。
Spring Boot 1.3的第一个里程碑版本将在几天后发布，包含许多
Great, how about a landing page so people can easily query a url they come across in search results? Mcafee has a FF plugin for their, SiteAdvisor service.
Opendns offers a service that's opt-in, to filter "adult" sites. Why doesn't Google offer that ability in it's search results? That's "safe browsing" for the family, work and malware.
Thank you.
I agree with Pando,
what about a Landing Page with a form and a "Safe Browsing" option on your SERPs?
Like Pando, I should very much like to see a Firefox add-on which, in the manner of the McAfee SiteAdvisor, provided users with a small notice icon in the status bar regarding the present status of a web site they have visited, the clicking of which gave access to more detailed information....
Henri
nice one :)
Its nice to work. But as nothig is perfect, there always a reason for improvement.
Hey Guys.. I put together a page so you can easily query to check your site.
Safe Browsing Diagnostic Tool
I'm trying to help out on a problem everyone seems to have, so hopefully this isn't considered shameless self promotion, and canned.
Nice, Jake ; thanks !...
Henri
FYI.. I had a comment on my blog to create a bookmarklet... Sooo.. I did. You can check it out here.
Safe Browsing Bookmarklet
My attempt to draw the bookmärklet to my Swiftweasel [Firefox optimised for Linux] 2.0.0.14 browser toolbar failed, as did my attempt to draw it to my Google Toolbar (the above on Ubuntu Hardy). So instead I right-clicked the box for the website URL and chose «Create Custom Search» Voila ! - a nice little «GT» icon on my Google Toolbar which links to Jake's «Google Safe Browing Diagnostic» blog....
Henri
Isn't this vulnerable to a man-in-the-middle attack?
The API is unencrypted.
In other words, if a mitm were able to remove hash codes from the lists that Firefox requests, they could circumvent the antiphishing feature in Firefox.
Even the MD5 checksum calc on the lists would be vulnerable. It could simply be rewritten to match the list supplied by the mitm.
MD5 only guarantees the integrity of the communication from the source (which is no use if the source is in fact a mitm).
This is an acutely important issue in the UK, where advertising firms like Phorm are trying to impose their foul behavioural marketing garbage on ISP customers.
It would mean big name ISPs like BT , Virgin Media, TalkTalk were effectively operating a 24x7 mitm attack on their own customers.
The only solution I can think would be an encrypted HTTPS API that would allow clients to authenticate the source of the anti-phishing data.
Pete
Interesting security tool. Someone needs to run a comparison of this vs SiteAdvisor on 100 "clean" and 100 "infected' sites. Would be interesting to see the results.
On a side note - it would be interesting to see if Google checks for malware at the time you make the request, or only as part of the last crawl.
Jake, nice work with the browsing tool. Glad someone is making this even easier for the average user to use.
http://www.MBridge.com
As a small information security vendor, I'd be interested in a derivative of this tool that points to the meanest, nastiest websites at the moment to stress our anti-malware tools. Is this plausible?
I am now on the other side, a user of our web site posted a redirect link on our web site to another web site that distributed malware.
Now our web site is listed as compromises in google listing and also there is a huge alert for firefox users. We know that our web site is not infected now, but the big damage for our business was not the virus itself, but Google alerts to our customers. This is creating a big problem for our business now.
You should have tools for us, the hackers victims to request a fast review.
I understand clearly that end users should be alerted, however, you are still publishing an alert about a dangerous web site, while the web site is not longer dangerous.
This whole Google-Borg type thing is a major pain in a webmaster's @ss... and it could potentially kill a business. The system in place for reviews is slow and in many cases wrong, or very lacking in information on how a webmaster can fix things to make the Google Borg happy once again. I see a major class action lawsuit just waiting to happen.
I totally agree with Bryce.
I think that before Google says that your website can 'harm your computer', it should warn the owner of the site first... then if the owner doesn't do anything, THEN say those nasty words, and scarce people out of looking at your site.
There should be a better process... especially since Google is such a powerful force in the world of searching.
Stop protecting dummies. I am being blocked from a site I know is safe. This is really making me mad because everywhere I turn, policies are being made because people don't know how to take care of themselves. This is not the Soviet Union. I didn't buy an apple for a reason...I KNOW HOW TO USE A COMPUTER. Google stop limiting what I can do.
It is not necessarily protecting dummies, but protecting everyone. Google doesn't keep you from viewing the site, it simply provides a warning mechanism to let people know there have been problems. Is it bad that your browser tells you that a site's security certificate is expired or that you are leaving a secure connection?
@grafilab - if a user on your site can post a redirect link, you have problems with your site, and users should be warned, because who knows where they'll get redirected next... I admit that there needs to be a re-assessment application somewhere, but then if you we're a spammer, you would get re-assessed, and then just put the malware back up..
By saying there was a problem in the last X months, you let the visitor know there was an issue, and that it may have been resolved.
To my mind, Jake makes some very valid points here. Categorising people who are less familiar with computers or the internet as «dummies» is both absurd and singularly unhelpful ; as lectures at the latest Black Hat conference made quite evident, we all need protection from certain criminal elements who are making use of weakness in our applications and in the structure of the internet itself. Google is to be applauded for working to make the net safer. Users who find this too intrusive can always choose, e g, another search engine - in particular, as they, at least in their own estimation, are not «dummies»....
Henri
The other way around this, or course, is to use another search engine !!!!
Which makes me realise how powerful google is becoming.
I'm with the majority of the others in the comments here. I, too, have gone to the other side. Yes, my site got hacked, and I've been flagged. The majority of the damage is to your reputation. You are going to lose your visitors. After getting flagged, I completely rebuilt my site in a day. But, now, I have to wait for google while I lose visitors.
Google should rethink what they are doing to the web masters. Now, they are assuming that the webmaster is the bad guy.
Before flagging a website, they should contact the webmaster. The webmaster can easily take down the site and effect repairs. If not, then flag it.
You know, "This site is down for maintenance". Please come back soon". That would be a sensible solution. What is taking place now, is not sensible. Did they ask the Google user base about this before taking action? I doubt it. To subject your customers with this malware flag is a disservice to all using Google. This is like a big brother act.
What makes it worse... I'm running my sites on Joomla. Has anybody at google tried to maintain a Joomla website while that nasty malware flag is in the way. I doubt it. Plus, it is next to impossible to access your Joomla administrator with that malware flag in place. Bad idea, Google.
Please rethink what you are doing with this malware flagging.
Larry
Echoing everyone's sentiments here. My site was flagged, I repaired the supposedly infected pages, and STILL Google says my site is hosting malware! WTF!!!!! The once great reputation of my site is now toast. THANKS GOOGLE!
There is another solution by checking website’s IP address.
The website’s IP address (on Internet) is allocated by IANA, RIR, and ISP etc. Based on this information, ISPs build Internet backbone routing table. Because of IP routing, website’s IP address must be legitimate, routable and reachable. Therefore website cannot fake its IP address as well. Also, most companies do not change their IP address (block) because of the complexity of updating/testing backbone routing table.
We can create a white list based on the IP address. If a website’s IP address is not on the white list, then the user will not accept any download from this site. Any phishing website can be detected as well. This white list will not change often (due to most companies don’t change its IP address), small (finite number of IP address – at least for IPv4) and easy to maintain.
A white-list idea has always had it's merits in thought, but it's been difficult to pull off due to high-maintenance of the list itself.
Companies not on the list, would need to make a request, and then there would be investigation to determine whether the company (and thus the IP) is not going to be used maliciously.
For malicious attack, the white list will have well known organizations that provide executable code to the user. For example, major software companies that distribute application codes, fixes, device driver, etc. For phishing protection, the list will include all major financial institutions. This white list is not intended to include all websites that do not pose threat to the user. This will keep the list small and easy to maintain. The user can always modify this list for her/his needs.
I was surprised at the power of Google Safe Browsing diagnostic page. At the time of browsing with Google Chrome one week ago, I discovered the website falsified by illegal computer access, and reported to the authority concerned. In some browsers, it was only Google Chrome that it was effective to detect server system tampering.
Can anyone help me? My site is getting a malware flag when using Google search for "assisted living san jose", but the wording on the flag refers to someone else's website (some site in Russia). If I go into my own site by entering the url directly and look at the code, there is nothing wrong with it. My site is www.assistedlivingsanjose.com . I am completely baffled by this. The malware flag doesn't even have any code associated with it when you try to "view source". Thanks for any suggestions in advance. [email protected]
hi
my site is affected by malwares :( dont know how .. i dont know how to remove this problem :( is there idea please .. i have research a lot but all side gives just an idea they dont know how to detect that and remove :(...... Forr this google must create a free software by which we check what is the problem inour site.. becozz there is great loss of business if you site will show such messages....and i think i dont have such other issue that i am doing some thing unethical thing which will harm other sites or computer:(
Just found out that my site (which has been going for 10 years in many forms)is now unwise to visit. My reputation - built before Google was born is now sullied and I cannot do anything to fix it but re- design the entire site from scratch and wait 90 days is a long time in web land
Our site has been blocked even though Google's own diagnostic page says ABSOLUTELY NOTHING IS WRONG. This is a completely unfair and malicious attack on OUR business. There needs to be greater quality control so as to avoid unnecessary and harmful false alarms.
Yes, we have the same problem. Bacause of google ignorance and bad organization even they don't know what they are doing. Our site was marked as suspicios without any reason nor proof. And of course google does not bother to even respons to our requests to explain what was the reason for doing so. We also use networksolutions WatchDog which is more competent than google.
Many of you are angry because you feel that you have done nothing wrong.. it is being discovered in many cases that the webmasters only wrong was not protecting their domain name, and creating a security whole in which subdomains of your site are hijacked and host malware. If you haven't updated your whois information.. do it.
Google is not just randomly attacking your site... someone could be hijacking your domain. Also.. if you are doing any type of link trading (another no-no) you may be linking to a site that has malware... The company you keep!
I thought Google was blocking my site, but then I checked further. Actually, someone hacked the server that hosts my website and installed malware that advised my site visitors that there is a possible virus. If I go to my site directly, there's no warning, however, if I go there from a search result page of any search engine, it warns of a possible virus (and offers to sell me software to cure the problem). The only solution I could come up with was to change hosting companies, since Globat would not admit their server had been hacked. Also, I found some malicious code for pornography keywords embedded at the bottom of my website when I did a view "page source." --patrick
I'm a webmaster and my site was hacked and I fixed in 2 days, but Google still is warning the public that my site is dangerous. I submitted it for review and it's been 24 hours and still no review. I don't understand why Google can't immediately review a site that it has labeled as dangerous when a review is requested by the Webmaster.
I'm sure they could if they wanted too. I have a reasonable proof. The proof is Googles action when clicked the button to have the site verified . . . it was verified within less than 1 minute . . . almost instanly. Therefore, I'm sure Google could write the code to review a site immediately.
I just got flagged and the supposed "malware" sites that google alleges are tied to my site were reviewed 4 days later and no suspicious activity was found on them. But I am still flagged for being tied to them.
First of all, I don't know how I am even tied to them because google doesn't specify what pages they found this "malware" on.
Second of all if those sites aren't malicious or suspicious, why am I???
Third of all googles pages run you in circles and don't make any sense to me.
I happen to be very computer illiterate and it would take me a long time to rebuild my website because someone else built it for me originally and now I don't know how to get ahold of him.
Oh yeah, and I responded to the e-mail google sent me about my account suspension and the reply I got back was about billing questions.
WTF! This is ridiculous. I wish there was a contact number for google so I could take to a person to resolve this more quickly.
So thanks google for totally f-ing my business in a time of economic hardship. You might want to contact people first before you put up a red flag on their main source of advertising. If there is a class action lawsuit, sign me up!!!
@Puffboobie
If you need help with your site.. contact me jbohall[at]virante.com
Good luck
I have some web content at the free web hosting site www.freewebtown.com
I am absolutely sure that there is no malware on my site.
However, it seems that Google has blocked the entire freewebtown domain as an "attack site".
I find that unfortunate. Probably someone is abusing that free service to post some malware. Then, Google should block the sites on the domain where it has found malware, not the whole domain. (If Google found malware on someone's personal site on AOL, would it block the entire AOL domain? If someone posted malware on a Geocities site, would all Yahoo be blocked? What about if someone posted malware on a Google Site?)
Freewebtown is the best free web hosting service I have found, with a lot of space available per person, no ads put on the pages (unlike other free services, such as Geocities), no file size limit. Unlike Google Sites, you can use FTP to upload content created elsewhere.
I am sure that the vast majority of sites on Freewebtown are legitimate, with no malware. Should all the good sites be blocked, due to a few bad ones? Just block the bad ones!
I am a teacher, earn no money from the sites, it is something I use to provide information and help to my students. (Being for young students, it is important that the pages not have ads on them.) Freewebtown is the best host I could find for that.
I sure hope that Google stops blocking the whole domain!
Is anyone listening?
My web site AIDSvideos.org was hacked on July 4th, 2008. I discovered the problem in late July when Google blocked the site (so Google's malware service DID perform a useful function at that point) and promptly fixed it. I've reviewed every character of every page on the site to ensure nothing remains from the hackers. Yet five months later, after SIX requests through their system to be removed from the list, Google is still blocking my web site yet providing no explanation or justification in their review request responses for why they're doing this. One other site has removed their link to our site until this is resolved. Prospective donors and volunteers ask about it. I use iPowerWeb hosting. It's a shared server. Is this guilt by association of some kind? Do I have to switch hosting companies? Google--are you listening? What do I have to do to get off this list?
Hi
our site is affected by malwares : (dont know how .. we dont know how to remove this problem ) is there idea please .. We have research a lot but all side gives just an idea they dont know how to detect that and remove there is great loss of business.
Plese reply
My site http://sarkari-naukri.blogspot.com has been flaged as Malware. Google shows that only one page is infacting but it has not notieid which one. I have more than 4000 paged in my site and how can I narrow donw to the infacted page. I am sure my site is clean as it runs on blogger site only.
I have requrested for review it again but two days have passed and nothing has happend. I am llosing visitors ans reputation. Google should have informed me so that I could have taken action.
Anyone whao has bloger site and had been effected by same Malware flag, Please help me to remove the badwares.
Regards,
Manisha
New Delhi India
http://sarkari-naukri.blogspot.com
My site had also been flagged, even though I went through all my files and checked every single one of them. My hosting provider has also found nothing wrong with my website, and get this: only certain Firefox users are blocked from viewing my site. It is only showed as a Reported Attack Site on my laptop and my friend's, but everybody else can still view it.
2 issues here:
1) I am fairly sure I have not hosted any malware and have done scans to ensure this is so. I do not see how my website can be flagged as a reported attack site. This has happened before and the block only went away when I bought a dedicated IP in Oct 08 (recommended by my hosting provider), but it is back again.
2) If your Safe Browsing is meant to protect Firefox/Google users, why is it that from the 10 users I have asked to view my site, only 2 get the block sign? Even if your safe browsing page has "correctly" identified an attack site, I find it strange that not everybody is "protected".
Lastly, I have a recommendation: Your diagnostic page is most useless in informing webhosts what the problem is, and where the problem is. I have showed the whole page to my hosting provider, hostmonster.com and they told me that it wasn't helpful at all - if you block a site, the least you should do is better explain why.
Regards,
Liew Qi
([email protected] if you would kindly reply though I highly doubt it)
I still stick to my statement that I made on August 16th. The idea that Google flags a site before contacting the webmaster is a lousy thing to do. As for community service in this arena, Google has none. They should provide help, and not just make their own customer base look bad. Surely, if google had worthy competition in the analytics arena, things would be different.
Liew, you make some very sound points.. As a webmaster, I empathize with your request for more information, I'm sure google has a really sound reason for not giving out this information... Specifically.. If you are a malicious hacker, and you can easily check your site to see if/why you are being flagged, it makes it much easier to troubleshoot until you no longer trigger the tool, even though your site is still malicious.
I believe it would be a safe bet that you have, or have recently had, something awry with your site.. check things like subdomain hijacking, any type of link cloaking, outbound links to malicious sites, check your javascript, and check your site vulnerability.
For some reason my problem 3 months ago wasn't resolved until I got a dedicated IP... but since then I have deleted all my subdomains, I don't use any javascript (not that I can recall), outbound links were only to haloscan.com, deviantart.com and livejournal.com and also to hostmonster.com
I recently downloaded Acunetix Web free and it didn't pick up anything.
The only php files I have on my domain are those I coded on Notepad, and they are mostly a bunch of includes to other pages on my site.
I can understand why Google would not want malicious hackers to know where their "mistakes" are, but considering most of these blocks happen to newbie webmasters like me, if we do not know where the malicious content is coming from, how are we supposed to know to remove it and stop it from spreading around? As for hackers, with a block in place, even without telling them information would already alert them to modify their codes. I say either give us a full proper block which works on all Firefox browsers with at least some indication of where the problem is, and not some in-between safe browsing system which doesn't benefit the majority of users.
Regards,
Liew Qi
Hi,
My web site www.bharatbook.com was also flagged as malware. Because the site was infected with iframe code. Now i have removed the code from the web site and restored the old back up the database. And i have given a request a review in google sitemap. But still in google search its showing as This site may harm your computer..
It would be great if any one kindly suggest what to do to remove this statement in google search. As now the web site is free from malware.
Thanks
Webmaster for www.bharatbook.com
The ancillary problem is that companies like Anchiva pick up the Google blocks and completely prohibit users from accessing sites at a job or through a network. Many of these sites are used by people for their jobs or at lunch.
Google also seems to flag sites that are put up by groups that disagree with their politics. This could be because people who do not like those sites complain to Google or intentionally hack the site and not be technically Google's fault but it is still disconcerting
For example
http://www.lucianne.com
has been flagged for months and they have completely rebuilt the site. They were hacked by a group in the PRC who were implanting code in post. The problem is solved but Google still flags them
I don't agree with nearly everything the posters on that site say but the links to newspaper articles are a very useful service.
FYI:
1) Many of these problems are occurring because you are hosted on a shared IP, and someone else on the server (could be another site on that shared hosting account).. is doing malicious activity. This is the same type of bad neighbor rule that google will use to penalize you in SEO
2) It takes up to 90 days following a successful clean spider of your site (ip address)... so 3 months after everything is fixed AND Google confirms that it is fixed, your site should be restored.
3) Many times a hacker will place malicious code embedded in an image on your server, or in an iframe. Othertimes, they will write a script that will generate new pages on your server without your knowledge. You can never be certain that your code is clean unless you have a backup that you restore, or you re-check it by hand.
Virante.com offers a diagnosis outlining point of entry for any of these attacks, as well as an action plan to resolve the issue. Cost is $250/hour, and generally takes 2-3 hours.
Why are Linux (fedora forums) popping up wit this intermediate page that makes it hard to get to research info? Make the forward link clickable!
Its odd to visit a page that I had visited yesterday with no problems, while today it has been flagged. Would be good if it tells you why its being flagged.
Taking a quick search on "google browsing diagnostics" - resulted in this page being flagged as well... Is it running amok ?
My website, digitaldesktops.biz is flagged as having malware.
The only things on my website are image downloads in zip format, and an .swf flash file showing a handful of other images I created.
I have links to various affiliate programmes all connected with the artworld, DAZ, Renderosity, E-on software, 3D Commune.
That is it. Nothing more - yet a friend alerted me today of this flag.
It would be a better tool if it got things right and didn't put people off clean sites !!
nice post, what if my site has not found under any malicious practice but what if my site was hosted with one network and that network has some malicious software and malware to his site or server. Does it affects my positions in SERP. Or does my site get penalty for the same, coz i m facing problem of sudden ranking lose, so want to confirm it here. Your answers are appreciable. thanks.
I'm with all of you who are complaining about the length of time it takes Google to review and unlock the site, and the fact they lock it without notification. It took my client's customer to notify her. She didn't even know her online business was locked. Lots of other people's businesses are affected as well. I'm wondering if this could actually be a criminal offense? If these web businesses were actual buildings and someone came in and took them over and kept everyone else out, isn't there a name for that? Theft? They could certainly be sued for monetary loss. My client's site is banned now yet her site is clean. She's losing money. Google is stealing from her. Her husband is an attorney. I think they are planning to "talk" to Google. Since Google is in our backyard, it's easy for them to do so. Google needs to be made aware of the fact that they are hurting businesses. Hopefully, they'll respond well and change their practices.
FYI... CHECK THE IP ADDRESS OF YOUR SITE BEFORE CLAIMING THAT YOUR SITE IS CLEAN... YOU COULD BE SHARING AN IP WITH A MALWARE SITE (SHARING AN IP MEANS YOU'RE SITE IS ON THE SAME COMPUTER).
If you are on a compromised server, which we have seen to be the issue in many of these cases, then your site will be flagged. Solution.. move to a dedicated IP.
A dedicated IP costs money --" It's the server provider's fault for not removing the site with malware, and not the fault of others who share the same server. Google ____ sucks (insert your hosting provider there) and check to see if they have security issues covered.
I found that one of my sites had it's htaccess hacked. Apparently this is quite a common problem; check all your htaccess files (above and below your public_html) folder with a word editor (like Notepad) and make sure it's completely empty. I found some random crap inserted into mine and after deleting it the Google block was lifted. Change your FTP passwords regularly or try a secure FTP program.
I agree with Pando,
what about a Landing Page with a form and a "Safe Browsing" option
I am the webmaster for
http://ukc.ksea.org/ukc2009
This site does not host any malware but for some reason google is showing it as malware.
I would appreciate it if such warnings are removed.
It is critical for our conference success.
Thanks
We happend the same; blocked and no advise. Unfortunately google was right and we had a file (javascript) with maleware. How many time do we have to wait to solve it? to google remove the advise (as an internet media with an average of 25.000 unic daily visitors every hour means too many people) So I would like to make some refelxions:
1st.- why there´s not a human contact to advise/talk to say the problem is solved?
2nd.- why google doesn´t help to determinate the file that compromises the security? -obviously if they know it, I dont know this point-
3rd.- if that helps, the problem in our server was with a javascript named JScript.js that loaded a gif from the sites: 51of.net and web.51.la that tried to install a file from g00gleadserver[dot]com/set.htm
We don´t know who placed/overwrote the file but the fact was it was malware.
Now we have to wait to a review of our site, but don´t know when nor who will make it... and meanwhile the time passes and our visitors now receive a false advise (big responsibility have google assumed, we hope you will be consequent with it. It´s very hard to make a brand and very easy to damage it)
JAE
Content Manager
Informativos.Net
I had similar problem like JAE.
What Google is doing is just not acceptable.
Even if we cleaned our website we had to wait 24hours for new scan with some imprecise information where the problem is.
We should talk in minutes not days like google is doing right now.
And for god sake give us some decent scan tool so we dont have to wait for good to bless us and tell us how our website is infected.
To VIP Multimedia:
I used a very fancy tool (freeware -I think developed by microsoft or someone related to it as you can see in the help menu-) to determine where the infection came from. It´s here (http://www.fiddler2.com/Fiddler2/version.asp)
It´s name is Fiddler and once installed you start it and then your web browser (you can find a direct access in your toolbar -IE and FireFox-) Since then all the traffic between a server and your web browser is traced (suspicius files are also marked in red) so you can trace what file is acting dangerously. In my case I saw a .js calling a .gif that pointed to a malware site. Was easy because we host all files in our own servers so something loading from 'outside' was very easy to trace.
Wait about 24h after solved to be recogniced as safe again by google... :(
JAE
Content Manager
Informativos.Net
Hi All
We are a small business and have had the same problem with Google putting a notice on our site without any notice to us - (come on google, please start informing us as first as our small business feeds our family and im sure im not the only one).
When we received the email from google, it was quite a big shock as we only ever upload information via copy and paste to our site from word documents which are written from computers that have very up to date anti-virus and anti-malware software.
I am in the same area as all of you, google has told me i have a problem but will not explain what it is, i then have checked a Norton webchecking tool and my site is completley clean - here are the results - so i am a little confused
https://safeweb.norton.com/report/show?url=faa-uk.com
I have spent the whole weekend reading what to do (a huge thank you too all of you for taking the time to describe your problems and possible solutions)
I would advise you all to first check every link you have with the google checking tool to make sure the links are clean, then remove any sub-domains and link directory links (these could be a source of problems). Next go to www.malwarebytes.org (great reviews) to check if your own system is in anyway infected which could lead to infected uploads.
Finally I have come accross a very interesting article that may help others - this is our last step before we submit for a review.
http://kb.siteground.com/article/How_to_check_your_website_for_malicious_content.html
Fingers crossed this helps - I will certainly keep you all updated
Once a gain a huge Thank you for all your comments and suggestions. Keep up the great work.
F Armstrong
Well, to add more confusion this weekend we have been banned by google (again) The funny thing is that we have do nothing (except review the code and ask for an external auditory who said our servers were clean -very expensive conclusion due to the weekend and night work- and recommended us... wait.
Exactly... without do anything the alert has been removed 48 h later!!
What? Yes! has been a false positive that has been blocking our traffic and giving alerts to our visitors all the weekend FOR FREE!!!
Incredible... :(
P.D: obviously no signs of life by google
My site was just flagged just for the simple reason it was hosted on a shared server with another site that really did have malicious software.
This is insane, we are a fansite for a radio program. We don't even have any ads running let alone any desire to harm peoples computers.
Googles action may have caused us unrepairable damage for no reason.
We are good people that got squashed for no reason.
www.theoandavirus.com
Ps. The radio program is on XM satellite radio. The name of the channel is "The Virus".
Hi Bill,
Google makes the point that if you are on a compromised server, that it is possible that any infection could also cause harm from your site as well and you would never know it.
Simple solution.. get a dedicated IP.
I have used Fiddler to sniff the traffic on your site and seems there´s no problem actually. Just ask for a review of your site (google tools) and wait... in less than 24h you should be ON again.
Good Luck!
JAE
Informativos.Net
I run a parsonal image gallery for my friends and I on a my server, I have no domain name, only myself as Admin, Only I myself has FTP access and I also Have a dedicated IP. I have also used multiple checkers to ensure that I am Virus and Malware free.
I'd like to know how Google's usualy stellar service could go so wrong?
www.dinisohbet.org is clean web site and there aren't malware or trojan but google still says this web site is bad. what can I do.
Hi, uniqbr:
Your ste seems clean (as far as I can see with fiddler -diag. tool-) What you have to do is... WAIT. Yes, wait, waiy, wait untill someone in google decide to unban your site.
Patience...
JAE
Informativos.Net
@uniqbrc
http://dinisohbet. org/ was very much dangerous when we checked it. If you do believe it's cleaned up, you can file for a review via the Webmasters Console.
Hosting your website on a shared server is not necessarily the kiss of death. I have had my site up for 14 years, only three of those were on my own server with dedicated IP addresses (and my own DNS server). For the other 11 years I was hosted remotely on professional ISPs (Best and Speakeasy). The only time I was attacked and flagged was when I had my own server and was not paying enough attention to it.
So properly run ISPs can guard your web site, and its server, effectively. Pick the right one.
I think this stinks. I get a warning on a page i built for my dad and have no way of knowing what googole is talking about. Its "Malicious software is hosted on 1 domain(s), including martuz.cn/."--what is this all about? The only ad I have on my page is google!
so peole can't come to dad's site and I don't know why!
PS to "Natalie said... I totally agree with Bryce.
I think that before Google says that your website can 'harm your computer', it should warn the owner of the site first... then if the owner doesn't do anything, THEN say those nasty words, and scarce people out of looking at your site."
I agree with both of them--but even it it did warn me first--I don't know what they are talking about--how about a warning that take you to a page that tells you what to do to get rid of their suspected problem!!!! My warning tells me I have a link to a malicious --where is the link????? I can't find it!
Kathy said...
" I'm wondering if this could actually be a criminal offense? If these web businesses were actual buildings and someone came in and took them over and kept everyone else out, isn't there a name for that? Theft? They could certainly be sued for monetary loss. My client's site is banned now yet her site is clean. She's losing money. Google is stealing from her. Her husband is an attorney. I think they are planning to "talk" to Google. Since Google is in our backyard, it's easy for them to do so. Google needs to be made aware of the fact that they are hurting businesses."
IF ANYONE INITIATES A LAWSUIT PLEASE LET ME KNOW AS THIS IS INSANE--i HAVE NO WAY TO PAY $250 AN HOUR TO FIND THE PROBLEM AND WAIT 3 MONTHS FOR GOOGLE TO "CLEAN ME." Shelly{at}day-by-day{dot}org
would anyone be willing to check my website? www.fairlytradedorganics.com
It was flagged by google and my customers are complaining they can't access information they need (download spec sheets etc). My hosting services (bluehost.com) says that everything is fine
Thanks!
Bare Bear... ur problem is being reported as having to do with traffic-resources.cn... I would start by eliminating any scripts calling from that site.
If possible.. disable any scripts running on your site period.. and work them back in as you test.
Hi, please please please can someone tell me what is wrong with my site, google webmaster has my site as suspicious and has put a warning sign on my site (www.hiagra.com) my site is very straight forward, the only script i have on in webmaster and analytics, so i dont understand why it is doing this.
It is causing me sales and as my only income source it is worrying.
Please can someone direct me how to be taken off the so called list.
Many thanks
Marc
It seems I have to stop using Chrome as this warnign feature has now flagged the whole domain of getdropbox.com, a very handy file sharing/ "virtual memory stick" service I subscribe to. (And with thousands of users, BTW) Way to go Google!
Mikko..
getdropbox.com doesn't show any type of warnings for me... I'm using google chrome...
Also, if I try the tool here - http://www.grapethinking.com/google-safe-browsing-diagnostic and type in getdropbox.com.. google reports the domain as safe..
But note, Jake and Mikko, that suspect content - 119 of a total of 1183 sites - was detected by the tool on the site, with the last detection[s] occuring today, 2009-06-12. That «thousands of users» may utilise its services hardly improves the situation....
Henri
can anyone check if my site has malware funoyun.com, my site is currently block, but i checked it already. thanks
Hi,
Some long time ago you could have accesses http://sb.google.com/safebrowsing/update?version=goog-black-url:1:1 and see a part of the black list.
Is there any way you can retrieve / have access to the black list of URLs Google's SB is storing?
I mean, the SB API lets you check against the db a specific URL, but I would like to search their list for a specific URL format, not knowing the exact URL to check the db if it has it or not.
Thanks,
Today I found that Fragrantblossom, the site that I count on very heavily on, was blacklisted by google for malware. I deleted the entire site, and made a new one, uploaded it. Google, I can't wait weeks for you to get around to approving my site. My husband works for automotive and we need to make a living here. Please unblacklist my site!
I also have just had my first experience of having my hosting account hacked and received an email from Google.
I am completely in agreement that you do this Google, but I have 2 suggestions:
1. When you warn web visitors under our link in the search engines, you could also say that in many cases the site they are trying to visit will have been hacked by some 3rd party and it is highly likely that the site itself is a good site - or words to that effect - because if I had come across your wording when doing a web search I would NEVER knowingly come back to that site again!
2. PLEASE, please make your 'help pages' easier to follow - as someone else said above, you give explanations with link, after link ...after link, but I still haven't found out (after 2 hours of reading) how to submit my site to google to get the ban lifted. (btw, this applies to nearly all your help pages. I know you have great info but some of us would need a year to read it all ;)
Miranda
Google, when you ban sites without contacting the webmaster, and most of us are honest, decent people who are trying to make a living online as you are, you are making it hard for us to compete. My customers have been calling in to ask what happened and I've hardly gotten work done this week. Please lift that ban! I have erased all the files and put a brand new website up.
Please work with webmasters BEFORE you restrict the page. Offer us a fix it for a fee! I'd pay the fee over having my site banned with no warning.
from lightmountainphotography.com
It is unconscionable for google to block a site without first advising the webmaster that there is a problem. Especially since they block the site 90 days after noticing the problem and block the site without having revisited it in the past 90 days.
It is a highhanded practice that smacks of contempt.
I believe that the only way that google will change this practice of blocking a site without giving warning to the weebmaster so the site can be cleaned up is a class action suit by all the business who lose income as a result of this shortsighted practice by google
I am the webmaster for
http://trainingtag.com
This site does not host any malware but for some reason google is showing it as malware.
I would appreciate it if such warnings are removed. and please it is very difficult to wait weeks for a review. please take necessery steps to minimize the review time.
Thanks
I've only recently become aware of this feature and it sounds great. However, as point out by many others sites I manage for clients were marked as having malware.
And at one point in time this was true (which I'm glad I was told about by this feature); however, I've fixed the problem, but the sites are still getting labeled saying "This site may harm your computer".
http://brashwebdesign.com
http://theroofmd.com
http://contemporaryphoto-fl.com
I've followed all the suggestions about contacting Google as well as Badware Website Clearinghouse, but the turn around time is a little crazy 3 months (90 days).
Please help me fix this so I don't lose clients and ultimately my lively hood.
Thanks,
It seems this issue has been fixed now.
Using the Badware Website Clearinghouse seems to have helped speed up the turn around time.
There is absolutely no malware on my website at myshortpencil.com. Yet, there is no way to tell Google that it is libeling my site and have it withdraw its assertion via the Firefox browser that my site is "A Reported Attack Site!"
It appears that my site is being blocked because other domains at my hosting service may have badware, but mine doesn't. If Google claims a site has badware, it ought to point specifically to the problem.
Who do I complain to at GOOGLE about this serious attack on my website?
I had a similar problem last year. Someone hacked our website and put some porn keywords into it. I did a "view source" and found previously unknown porn keywords and removed them from our site. But the warning message remained. The hackers true aim was to sell software to "fix" the problem. They also hacked the server where my site was hosted, at Globat.com. Unfortunately, I was could not convince Globat to move my site to a different server. The problem finally went away when I moved my site to a different hosting service. The "Warning" page disappeared within one day. My friend who was giving me tech support theorizes that somehow, the hackers had inserted code on the former hosting server (not my website) that served up the warning message in response to any request for our website that came via a search engine. Google can't fix the problem since it's not really their warning message--it just looks like it comes from Google.
I hope that Google will take the difficulties described by site owners on this forum seriously. The adventures of a Swedish site owner who found his site suddenly blocked on Google without prior notification were portrayed today on a media programme on Sveriges Radio ; the site owner, though willing to correct any problems, found himself utterly unable to come into contact with anyone at Google who could help him resolve the difficulty. It was only after a journalist at Sweden's largest media complex had intervened that Google took contact with the site owner. Stories of this type do not help Google's reputation, particularly when, as in the present case, they are true. Given the firm's absolute dominance in the search industry, Google is going to have to find a better way to deal with problem sites than that it employs today - a new policy will no doubt be costly, but it is absolutely necessary....
Henri
It turns out there was a malware script inserted into my index.htm and index.html files that started with
(script)var f18Dp4="9Bk29Bk";var bIllCc="79k";var IOWlLGaq="k%68Bk";var sqVRWw="Bk65Bk%"
It appears that the infection came in through WordPress. I was running version 2.7 and found the infection in my theme editor in the script for the main page. Even though I scanned my site with CPanel's virus checker and my hosting service said that Google's alert couldn't be confirmed by it, the malware was there! I have no ads on my site and allow no posting without my approval in the blog, but the malware got in. I spent 12 hours fixing my site and I'm still not sure if I got it all.
In my opinion, GOOGLE ought to have the duty to tell people which specific web pages it finds the malware in. I have hundreds of webpages that I've accumulated over 10 years. It's impossible for me to check every page.
My hosting service said I might be able to run grep -R \"(script)var\" to have the computer search for that combination of characters in all of my webpages, but I haven't tried it yet.
Google won't let me write the tag
"script," so take out () and put in <> for what I really mean.
Also, there's another problem. I followed Google's instructions to have my site resubmitted for a rescan but the link Google said to click on in Webmaster Tools doesn't exist. So, I resubmitted my site at stopbadware.org.
Google needs to do what's right here -- not what's easy. It feeds off website owners. The least it can do is provide accurate information on its webpages and provide the information about where exactly it found the malware.
It turns out that Google did provide the link to request a review of the presence of malware in the Webmaster Tools. It turned up about 24 hours after my site was blacklisted.
The best website explaining how to fix your website is http://25yearsofprogramming.com/blog/20071223.htm
And the site that found all the malware on my site was http://wam.dasient.com/wam/
The second best was http://www.unmaskparasites.com/
As we mentioned in our announcement, reviews are usually done within 24 hours.
You should be able to get more prompt responses in our webmaster forum and in Badware Busters.
Also see our recent blog post for more details about how reviews work, how long they take, and how to get more help.
Thanks to myshortpencil for that info and those links. I've sorted it this time around but in case there's a 'next time', links will be very useful
@myshortpencil.. thanks for the info of about those useful sites.
btw my site: http://moneytiseonline.com also tagged as a harmful site, but I already cleaned it. I also changed the template and removed all the ad links and suspicious third party links.
Any idea on how many days before those warnings will be totally removed?
hello everyone
now i clean my site and refresh my hosting account from service providers, but same problem in google search and webmaster not accept my site,show this massage. (This site may be distributing malware. More Details)same matter block my site, i cant use ftp or widget. try and check my site and review me plz
regard
www.rohfun.com/blog
hello friends:
my website www.karasc.com
is already have a problem , it had involved a virous one month ago but nowit is clean and safe,so google engine marked it as a problem with virous until now, we couldn't use the website,i need a help..pleaseeee
regard
anahid
I have to say I was really really upset with google for banning--I wanted o join a lawsuit. However, turns out i was getting attacked from some i-frame viruses--AVG could not find them. My host had to lock me out until I could find the problem. I went to Avast--anti virus and they found stuff hiding in my registry--so I had to go from AVG free version to Avast pro 9I paid 79.00 I think) but it was worth it. I cleaned my computer with avast and used some malware just for good measure.
I resubmitted to google and in one day they cleared me. BUT I have to say i subscribe to their "tools" and have them check my pages until they are clear--they do it right away. i think the folks that have to wait are not subscribed to their "web tools". I hope that helps.
Taking into account the fact that Google are a huge enterprise..... (really its just people running a database, a very large database) I don't think I've ever experienced such a lack of ability to communicate with actual people.
Us for instance, we're the victims of hackers - not hackers. Hacking on the internet is a huge problem.... there's a whole industry thriving around it - you'd think Google would be brilliant at dealing with the problem of stressed out webmasters, the victims of hackers.
But they're not.
Google should send the one or two people (the folks who make the decisions as to how the victims of hacking are dealt with maybe?) on a course with Apple. Apple are brilliant at communicating with people using the internet. I'd buy almost anything from Apple because I like the way they deal.
I wouldn't buy anything from Google.
@snapper12
Why should google spend their resources and $$ to help you fix your security problems? They aren't the internet police to help you find out how/who broke into your site or provide you with someone to talk to when your inability to "lock your doors" (or that of the hosting company you do pay $ to) results in your site getting hacked.
Google is not apple... they don't make mp3 players, they don't sell software or music.. If you were a paying customer for one of their non-FREE services (like adwords), they do provide support. They have no obligation to include your website in their index, and they have no obligation to take down warnings when your site is serving malicious content. They also do not have any obligation to help you troubleshoot the issue... The mere fact that they tell you about it should be appreciated.
If you want customer support, look to the place where you are actually a customer... your hosting company, your website developer, etc... They are the ones who left you vulnerable, and they are the ones you've PAID money too..
Sorry for the rant, I just hate it when people get something for free and then whine cause they aren't getting more. I'm just waiting for @snapper to start fielding calls and providing tech support to the visitors to his site who now have malware on their computers. Get a life!
My experience is that most Google-flagged sites have been hacked by someone who has obtained the FTP password from a compromised computer used by the web site owner.
So run anti-malware checks on your own computers and change your FTP passwords from time to time, folks.
As for cleaning the web site, look for obfuscated Javascript in the HTML pages, and for .htaccess files in web site subdirectories that are telling Apache to redirect visitors.
Hope this helps.
Dear All,
Please help me to fix my website
it's has been attack I already go to google master tools but now still problem.
my website : http://www.bestmanadoguide.com
Thanks and all the best
A good mashup of this tools in http://secureurlchecker.appspot.com/
I need to contact someone at google.
My site is absolutely clean. I checked for malware on webmaster tools, and it says Google has not detected any malware on this site.
but it still comes up with a malware error on chrome and safari browsers, but it's fine on firefox or internet explorer.
the site is digitaldubbed.com
Can someone please review the site as i cannot request it be reviewed because it says that there is nothing wrong with it when i go to the malware section.
PLEASE HELP.
Thanks
-Digital Dubbed
hello, hope you can help me with this, just today, i found my blog with a malware on it and i could not find the source on how i can remove it,
The website at www.melandriaromero.net contains elements from the site newbloggingtipz.blogspot.com, which appears to host malware – software that can hurt your computer or otherwise operate without your consent. Just visiting a site that contains malware can infect your computer.
For detailed information about the problems with these elements, visit the Google Safe Browsing diagnostic page for newbloggingtipz.blogspot.com.
Learn more about how to protect yourself from harmful software online.
i really wanted to erase this malware to my site. hope to hear from you soon.
[email protected]
IAs with so many other falsely accused website owners, I need to contact someone at google.
My site is absolutely clean having been completely re-uploaded and thoroughly cleaned - not that any tools that any software or person could find in the original site!!
The site is masterpiecesphotography.com.au and is a commercial site which thanks to Google's incorrect, misleading and probably illegal notices, is making my potential customers go elsewhere.
Of EXTREME concern is the fact that at no point did I ever receive any sort of warning from Google about the alleged initial "malware issue" before these warning were applied.
Of even greater concern is the fact that this "problem" raised it's head at the same time I stopped my Google advertising programme - I hope this is just a coincidence!!
Can someone please review the site immediately and provide me a person with whom i can discuss these disturbing issues.
I have a business to run and Google are preventing it from operating properly!!!!
without my page have a problem google turns into a virus alert what can be done;
this is my site katharismos-saloniou.gr and is CLEAR!!!