JEPG: 为什么诚实的建议比高度知情的建议更有说服力 | 唧唧堂论文解析
picture from Internet
è§è | §§°¤
è§| §§° Yuan,Wen
¨éè |
éèèèéèè(The implicit honesty premium: Why honest advice is more persuasive than highly informed advice)èè§èè202004è¨éè(Journal of Experimental Psychology: General)èèUriel HaranShaul Shalvi
èéé
èéèéèè¨èè1) èè2è訧ééèé§è±°è§èèèé訤èèèèééè
±èéèè°è¨è觰¤±é(chance uncertainty)(epistemic uncertainty)è±éèéè豧è·è¨°¤§ééè訤è°è1) è§èèèéè¨2) è¨èèèéèèé
é1
觱è
èè(¨è§)éèèèèéèè
訨MTurké240褧è±èè(Mage=37.42, §147)éèèè20ééè¤è°èèèè·±ééèèèèèéèè1è谱跱èè10¤(¨)èèé¨é¨é¨10èèèéèéèèéè·±(è)§èè§èé褨èèèèè·è褷¤°è·±
ééè¨(èèèéèèèèéèé)(èèèéèèèèéé)èè¨é(èè°è¨èè·èèè: 0%=¨è100%¨è)
è¤èè¨èè§(F(1,237)=10.02, p=.007, ·2=.04)èèè¨(F(1,157)=7.25, p=.008, ·2=.04)è±(Fs¤1.08, ps.30, ·2<.01)§(M = 12.23, SD = 3.43)è¤èè(M = 10.29, SD = 3.63; M = 10.96, SD = 3.89)è¤è(t(237) = 3.20, p = .002, d = 0.42)§(M = 43.56%, SD = 29.93)èè¤é(t(237) = 2.51, p = .01, d = 0.33)
é2
éé1¨±¨§è±èè¨
èè2(¨è)3(èè¨éé)èèéèè
訨MTurké285褧è±èè(Mage=37.42, §147)¨6èèè°è¤°°è·è跱訧èèèèèèA¨é¨6B5C4D3¤¨(è)èèéè()
ééè±(èèè·±èèèé·)è(§èé§èéèéé)è¨[è¨=(°-°)/(è-°); Harvey & Fischer, 1997]
è±±(F(1,250) = 1.31, p = .25)èè(F(1,213) = 10.16, p = .002, ·2 = .05)ééé(F(1,213) = 5.45, p = .02, ·2 = .03)èééé(F(1,213) = 14.66, p < .001, ·2 = .06)èè¨é訨é(5èt(58) = 2.22, p = .03, d = 0.574èt(49) = 2.29, p = .03, d = 0.65)èéè¨éèè¨é訷
é3
¨èè¨é
èè(¨è)éèèèèéèè
訨MTurké360èè(Mage=35.15, §169)¨èèè6°é±éé¤è°èèèè·±é訧èèèèéèèééè谱跱èè2éé¤èé°é(¨)èèé¨é¨¨2èèèééèèè·±(è)èèèEARS-4éè¨(Tannenbaum et al., 2017)¨
é( = .03, p = .03)( = .04, p = .007)ééè¨è許éè騰(indirect effect = -.01, SE =.006, 95% CI [-.03, -.0004]), è¨è(indirect effect = .006, SE =.006, 95% CI [-.004, .02])
é4
éééèè
èè2(¨è)2(éè±é)èèéèè
訨MTurké200褧豤§èè(Mage=36.6, §107)éèé¨éèèè15ééè¤è°èèèè·±ééèèèèèéèèèè°6 (é-¨)¨è6èè°èèè(-¨)èèèè°9¨6èèèèé(é-è)¨è6èèèèèé[]°èèè°é(-è)èèèèééè¤10éé褤ééè
¨èé, éé(é-¨)¨è¤(t(196) = 3.36, p = .001, d = 0.48)訤èèéè±°è¨(t(96) = 2.79, p = .006, d = 0.57)
é5
éèè
èè2(¨è)2(éè±é)èèéèè
訨MTurké211èè(Mage=36.33, §107)éé°é2èèèéè¨èè°°èè4¤éèèèééèèè¤3è2èèèéé°
é(-è)¨è°(t(203) = 2.95, p = .004, d = 0.41)èè¤èèééè±è¨(: M = 0.34, SD = 0.16; é: M = 0.42, SD = 0.22), t(98) = 2.16, p = .03, d = 0.44)
è
¨é°è§éè¨èè§è¨¨èèé°è±±é°è許éè騰éé°éèéè¨èééèè¨è
1éèèèèèé¨è¨±¨¤éè¨
2ééè豨è°ééèè±èèèèèè±èè¨è§è¨èèè訧±
è
Haran, U., & Shalvi, S. (2020). The implicit honesty premium: Why honest advice is more persuasive than highlyinformed advice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(4), 757-773.
Harvey, N., & Fischer, I. (1997). Taking advice: Accepting help, improving judgment, and sharing responsibility.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70(2), 117133.
Tannenbaum, D., Fox, C. R., & Ulkumen, G. (2017). Judgment extremity and accuracy under epistemic versusaleatory uncertainty. Management Science, 63(2), 497518.
è§è: ¤
éèé¤è¨§§èè§
¨è
èé
èé
¨°éè·
§èè