技术分享 | 大量 Opening tables 案例分析

作者:xuty
本文来源:原创投稿
*爱可生开源社区出品,原创内容未经授权不得随意使用,转载请联系小编并注明来源。

一、现象

某项目反馈系统非常卡,登陆 MySQL 后发现大量 SQL 处于 Opening tables 状态,断断续续,一会好一会又出现,比较离奇。

技术分享 | 大量 Opening tables 案例分析_第1张图片

之前遇到过类似的问题现象,是由于 MySQL 开启了 AHI(自适应哈希索引)后如果 DROPTRUNCATE 一张大表,MySQL 会同时删除 buffer pool 中对应表上的 AHI,这个过程需会持有一把数据字典锁(非常重的锁),导致其他用户线程因为无法获数据字典锁而处于 Opening tables 状态。

但是这里检查过所有的会话 SQL,并没有发现有 DROP 或者 TRUNCATE 语句,所以应该不是上述的这种问题,而是其他的原因导致了类似的现象。

值得怀疑的是,这台 MySQL 服务器的磁盘写入性能很差,会不会是因为磁盘写入太差导致这个现象?

技术分享 | 大量 Opening tables 案例分析_第2张图片

因为一时间没法排查出具体原因,所以针对 MySQL 进程打了个快照,方便事后详细排查。

二、分析栈帧

用 pt-pmp 工具处理下快照后,内容比较多,这里只显示一些比较重要的堆栈:

1402 
pthread_cond_wait,wait(os0event.cc:165),os_event::wait_low(os0event.cc:165),sync_array_wait_event(sync0arr.cc:475),TTASEventMutex::wait(ut0mutex.ic:89),spin_and_try_lock(ib0mutex.h:850),enter(ib0mutex.h:850),PolicyMutex(ib0mutex.h:850),dict_table_open_on_name(dict0dict.cc:1238),ha_innobase::open_dict_table(ha_innodb.cc:6250),ha_innobase::open(ha_innodb.cc:5888),handler::ha_open(handler.cc:2759),open_table_from_share(table.cc:3353),open_table(sql_base.cc:3559),open_and_process_table(sql_base.cc:5145),open_tables(sql_base.cc:5145),open_tables_for_query(sql_base.cc:6531),execute_sqlcom_select(sql_parse.cc:5127),mysql_execute_command(sql_parse.cc:2792),mysql_parse(sql_parse.cc:5582),dispatch_command(sql_parse.cc:1458),do_command(sql_parse.cc:999),handle_connection(connection_handler_per_thread.cc:300),pfs_spawn_thread(pfs.cc:2190),start_thread(libpthread.so.0),clone(libc.so.6)

36 
nanosleep(libpthread.so.0),os_thread_sleep(os0thread.cc:279),buf_flush_wait_flushed(buf0flu.cc:2074),log_preflush_pool_modified_pages(log0log.cc:1531),log_checkpoint_margin(log0log.cc:1973),log_check_margins(log0log.cc:1973),log_free_check(log0log.ic:491),row_ins_sec_index_entry(log0log.ic:491),row_ins_index_entry(row0ins.cc:3460),row_ins_index_entry_step(row0ins.cc:3460),row_ins(row0ins.cc:3460),row_ins_step(row0ins.cc:3460),row_insert_for_mysql_using_ins_graph(row0mysql.cc:1738),ha_innobase::write_row(ha_innodb.cc:7566),handler::ha_write_row(handler.cc:7991),write_record(sql_insert.cc:1873),Sql_cmd_insert::mysql_insert(sql_insert.cc:769),Sql_cmd_insert::execute(sql_insert.cc:3105),mysql_execute_command(sql_parse.cc:3566),mysql_parse(sql_parse.cc:5582),dispatch_command(sql_parse.cc:1458),do_command(sql_parse.cc:999),handle_connection(connection_handler_per_thread.cc:300),pfs_spawn_thread(pfs.cc:2190),start_thread(libpthread.so.0),clone(libc.so.6)

1 
pthread_cond_wait,wait(os0event.cc:165),os_event::wait_low(os0event.cc:165),buf_dblwr_flush_buffered_writes(buf0dblwr.cc:979),buf_dblwr_add_to_batch(buf0dblwr.cc:1154),buf_flush_write_block_low(buf0flu.cc:1099),buf_flush_page(buf0flu.cc:1099),buf_flush_try_neighbors(buf0flu.cc:1453),buf_flush_page_and_try_neighbors(buf0flu.cc:1453),buf_do_flush_list_batch(buf0flu.cc:1780),buf_flush_batch(buf0flu.cc:1780),buf_flush_do_batch(buf0flu.cc:1780),pc_flush_slot(buf0flu.cc:2874),buf_flush_page_cleaner_worker(buf0flu.cc:3504),start_thread(libpthread.so.0),clone(libc.so.6)

1
nanosleep(libpthread.so.0),os_thread_sleep(os0thread.cc:279),buf_flush_wait_flushed(buf0flu.cc:2074),log_preflush_pool_modified_pages(log0log.cc:1531),log_checkpoint_margin(log0log.cc:1973),log_check_margins(log0log.cc:1973),log_free_check(log0log.ic:491),que_run_threads_low(log0log.ic:491),que_run_threads(log0log.ic:491),trx_purge(trx0purge.cc:1883),srv_do_purge(srv0srv.cc:2631),srv_purge_coordinator_thread(srv0srv.cc:2631),start_thread(libpthread.so.0),clone(libc.so.6)

1
nanosleep(libpthread.so.0),os_thread_sleep(os0thread.cc:279),buf_flush_wait_flushed(buf0flu.cc:2074),log_preflush_pool_modified_pages(log0log.cc:1531),log_checkpoint_margin(log0log.cc:1973),log_check_margins(log0log.cc:1973),log_free_check(log0log.ic:491),que_run_threads_low(log0log.ic:491),que_run_threads(log0log.ic:491),que_eval_sql(que0que.cc:1232),dict_stats_exec_sql(dict0stats.cc:311),dict_stats_save(dict0stats.cc:2415),dict_stats_update(dict0stats.cc:3112),dict_stats_process_entry_from_recalc_pool(dict0stats_bg.cc:356),dict_stats_thread(dict0stats_bg.cc:356),start_thread(libpthread.so.0),clone(libc.so.6)

其中 1402 个线程是处于自旋状态,因为无法拿到对应的 Mutex 锁而进行忙等,应该就是对应我们看到的大量 Opening tables 的线程,但是具体什么锁需要跟踪下 MySQL 源码才能知道。

36 个线程都是 insert 操作,最后都再等待 buf_flush_wait_flushed,貌似是等待刷盘操作。

最后三个线程分别是:

  1. page_cleaner:后台刷脏线程,最后处于 buf_dblwr_flush_buffered_writes
  2. purge_thread:purge 线程(清理 undo),最后处于 buf_flush_wait_flushed
  3. dict_stats_thread:统计信息更新线程,最后处于 buf_flush_wait_flushed

简单分析下这些线程,发现 insert、pugre_thread、dict_stats_thread 的最后一部分堆栈调用都是如下:

log_free_check
 -> log_check_margins
  -> log_checkpoint_margin
   -> log_preflush_pool_modified_pages
    -> buf_flush_wait_flushed
     -> os_thread_sleep

三、源码跟踪

Server version: 5.7.22-log MySQL Community Server (GPL)

这里我把源码分析主要拆成 2 块,第一块是分析 1402 个线程的堆栈,看下是在等待什么锁资源,第二块是分析这个锁资源被哪个线程占用了,为啥不释放?

先来看第一部分,过程就是从 MySQL 快照中找到一个如下类似的线程(这里去掉了一些参数显示),然后从 MySQL 源码中一步一步分析函数调用。

#0  0x00007efc61303965 in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#1  0x0000000000ffb03b in wait at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/storage/innobase/os/os0event.cc:165
#2  os_event::wait_low at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/storage/innobase/os/os0event.cc:335
#3  0x00000000010a0ce9 in sync_array_wait_event at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/storage/innobase/sync/sync0arr.cc:475
#4  0x0000000000f8c1c4 in TTASEventMutex::wait at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/storage/innobase/include/ut0mutex.ic:89
#5  0x0000000000f8c33b in spin_and_try_lock at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/storage/innobase/include/ib0mutex.h:850
#6  enter at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/storage/innobase/include/ib0mutex.h:707
#7  PolicyMutex >::enter at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/storage/innobase/include/ib0mutex.h:987
#8  0x0000000001152f41 in dict_table_open_on_name at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/storage/innobase/dict/dict0dict.cc:1238
#9  0x0000000000f72a73 in ha_innobase::open_dict_table at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/storage/innobase/handler/ha_innodb.cc:6250
#10 0x0000000000f8273b in ha_innobase::open at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/storage/innobase/handler/ha_innodb.cc:5888
#11 0x000000000081b33e in handler::ha_open at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/sql/handler.cc:2759
#12 0x0000000000dc239a in open_table_from_share at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/sql/table.cc:3353
#13 0x0000000000cc18b9 in open_table at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/sql/sql_base.cc:3559
#14 0x0000000000cc52b6 in open_and_process_table at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/sql/sql_base.cc:5145
#15 open_tables at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/sql/sql_base.cc:5756
#16 0x0000000000cc5e62 in open_tables_for_query at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/sql/sql_base.cc:6531
#17 0x0000000000d14ff6 in execute_sqlcom_select at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/sql/sql_parse.cc:5127
#18 0x0000000000d18bce in mysql_execute_command at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/sql/sql_parse.cc:2792
#19 0x0000000000d1aaad in mysql_parse at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/sql/sql_parse.cc:5582
#20 0x0000000000d1bcca in dispatch_command at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/sql/sql_parse.cc:1458
#21 0x0000000000d1cb74 in do_command at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/sql/sql_parse.cc:999
#22 0x0000000000dedaec in handle_connection at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/sql/conn_handler/connection_handler_per_thread.cc:300
#23 0x0000000001256a94 in pfs_spawn_thread at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/storage/perfschema/pfs.cc:2190
#24 0x00007efc612ffdd5 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#25 0x00007efc5fdb8ead in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6

分析过后,发现这种线程,最终是在 dict_table_open_on_name 函数中(注意函数行数为 1238,与堆栈一致),因为无法获取 dict_sys->mutex,这把数据字典锁而产生自旋等待。

技术分享 | 大量 Opening tables 案例分析_第3张图片

再来看第二部分,dict_sys->mutex 被哪个线程占了,为啥不释放?这里有个小技巧,就是只需要分析总数为 1 的函数调用,因为这把数据字典锁同一时间只能被一个线程占用,那这里主要是就是最后 3 个线程。先从最可疑的线程开始,即 dict_stats_thread,因为它也有一个 dict~

#0  0x00007efc61306e3d in nanosleep () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#1  0x0000000000ffb7a0 in os_thread_sleep at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/storage/innobase/os/os0thread.cc:279
#2  0x0000000001135779 in buf_flush_wait_flushed at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/storage/innobase/buf/buf0flu.cc:2074
#3  0x0000000000fd4589 in log_preflush_pool_modified_pages at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/storage/innobase/log/log0log.cc:1531
#4  0x0000000000fd7a69 in log_checkpoint_margin at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/storage/innobase/log/log0log.cc:1973
#5  log_check_margins at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/storage/innobase/log/log0log.cc:2065
#6  0x000000000101af4d in log_free_check at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/storage/innobase/include/log0log.ic:491
#7  que_run_threads_low at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/storage/innobase/que/que0que.cc:1109
#8  que_run_threads at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/storage/innobase/que/que0que.cc:1155
#9  0x000000000101b86e in que_eval_sql at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/storage/innobase/que/que0que.cc:1232
#10 0x0000000001176b9c in dict_stats_exec_sql at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/storage/innobase/dict/dict0stats.cc:311
#11 0x0000000001179346 in dict_stats_save at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/storage/innobase/dict/dict0stats.cc:2415
#12 0x000000000117a9ca in dict_stats_update at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/storage/innobase/dict/dict0stats.cc:3112
#13 0x000000000117cc3a in dict_stats_process_entry_from_recalc_pool at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/storage/innobase/dict/dict0stats_bg.cc:356
#14 dict_stats_thread at /export/home/pb2/build/sb_0-27500212-1520171728.22/mysql-5.7.22/storage/innobase/dict/dict0stats_bg.cc:445
#15 0x00007efc612ffdd5 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#16 0x00007efc5fdb8ead in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6

同样根据该线程的函数调用,去 MySQL 源码里一步一步跟踪,看下是否占用了数据字典锁,比较幸运,在 dict_stats_save 函数中发现其拿走了数据字典锁,然后进入dict_stats_exec_sql 函数执行更新统计信息的 SQL,而且期间并未释放数据字典锁(这块需要去函数分支中检查,因为函数较多,这里省略说明),如下:

技术分享 | 大量 Opening tables 案例分析_第4张图片

找到数据字典锁被 dict_stats_thread 占用后就得分析为啥它不释放呢,我们继续往下看堆栈,这块就得去着重分析下 log_free_check 开始往下的函数,之前也提到过,insert、pugre_thread、dict_stats_thread 等线程最后都是跑得这段逻辑。

dict_stats_save
 -> dict_stats_exec_sql
  -> que_eval_sql
   -> que_run_threads
    -> que_run_threads_low
     -> log_free_check /* Check that there is enough space in the log to accommodate possible log entries by this query step. */
      -> log_check_margins /* Checks that there is enough free space in the log to start a new query step.Flushes the log buffer or makes a new checkpoint if necessary. */
       -> log_checkpoint_margin /* Tries to establish a big enough margin of free space in the log groups, such that a new log entry can be catenated without an immediate need for a checkpoint. */
        -> log_preflush_pool_modified_pages /* Advances the smallest lsn for which there are unflushed dirty blocks in the buffer pool. */
         -> buf_flush_wait_flushed /* Waits until a flush batch of the given lsn ends */
          -> os_thread_sleep

这段逻辑主要是先判断 log buffer 可用空间是否达到临界值(log->buf_free > log->max_buf_free),达到的话需要将 log buffer 中的日志先刷到 redo log 中。

然后判断 innodb buffer pool 中脏页占比是否达到临界值((log->lsn - oldest_lsn) > log->max_modified_age_sync),达到的话需要进行同步刷脏页,这个过程可能会比较久,且阻塞当前其他写入进程。

最后判断 checkpoint 是否达到临界值(对比 log->lsn - log->last_checkpoint_lsn max_checkpoint_agemax_checkpoint_age_async 3 个值的大小),分别选择进行同步 checkpoint、异步 checkpoint、或是不做 checkpoint。

这里最后进入的是 log_preflush_pool_modified_pages,就是同步刷脏页的过程,刷脏页的过程就是唤醒 page clean thread 进行写入,而自身则处于 buf_flush_wait_flushed 函数中,一直等待刷脏页完成,就如我们之前堆栈中看到的一样,insert、pugre_thread、dict_stats_thread 等线程均在等待 page clean thread 刷新脏页。

技术分享 | 大量 Opening tables 案例分析_第5张图片

这块可能我理解的不是很透彻~,大家有兴趣可以去看下 MySQL · 引擎特性 · InnoDB redo log漫游 里面介绍的非常详细。

四、总结

根据上述堆栈分析,总结下来,还是由于磁盘写入性能太差,导致了 innodb buffer pool 中脏页 LSN 落后当前 LSN 太多,达到临界值后,触发了 MySQL 的同步刷脏机制,期间会卡住所有正在进行写入的线程,即诸多 insert 语句、purge 线程、还有 dict_stats_thread(统计信息更新线程)均被阻塞。

我们一开始看到的许多会话处于 Opening tables 的现象,可以说是一个比较巧合的事。当某张表的数据量变化达到一定量级(默认 10%),就触发了后台的 dict_stats_thread,它会拿着 dict_sys->mutex(数据字典锁)去更新对应表上面的统计信息,但是更新过程中卡在同步刷脏页步骤,无法及时释放 dict_sys->mutex,因此很多 SQL 会因为无法拿到 dict_sys->mutex 而处于 Opening tables 状态。

附录:

http://mysql.taobao.org/month...
http://blog.itpub.net/7728585...
https://my.oschina.net/yejr/b...
https://developer.aliyun.com/...
http://mysql.taobao.org/month...

你可能感兴趣的:(mysql)