clumulate paper experience.
Topic
Purpose
Scope
Results
Conclusion
宗旨就是先说一个领域的重要性,但是之前工作哪里不足,本文提出方法可以解决,并介绍基本方法框架,然后给出实验结果,并在结尾得出结论。
After reading the introduction, the reader must have a clear idea of what to expect from the rest of your research paper.It is often recommended that the introduction section of the paper is written after finishing the other sections of the paper. This is because it is difficult to figure out what exactly to put in the in troduction section of the paper until you have seen the big picture.
General introduction
Problem definition
Gaps in the literature
Problems solution
Aims & objectives
Significance and advantages of your work
注意的地方:
科研小白容易犯的错误:在摘要中加入了“个人对研究结果的主观评价”!科研小白容易犯的错误:在摘要中加入了“个人对研究结果的主观评价”!
经典句子积累:
1.
介绍一个领域是什么,有什么缺陷的经典连句。
The literature review should clearly demonstrate that the author has a good knowledge of the research area. Literature review typically occupies one or two passages in the introduction section. A well-written literature review should provide a critical appraisal of previous studies related to the current research area rather than a simple summary of prior works. The author shouldn’t shy away from pointing out the shortcomings of previous works. However, criticising other’s work without any basis can weaken your paper. This is a perfect place to coin your research question and justify the need for such a study. It is also worth pointing out towards the end of the review that your study is unique and there is no direct literature addressing this issue. Add a few sentences about the significance of your research and how this will add value to the body of knowledge.
写法: 先简单总结一下之前相关工作做了什么,然后再逐个分析: 这个工作做了什么,那个工作做了什么,其他工作做了什么。要注意中间插入联系和有依据的评价。最后总结一下之前相关工作的缺点和重要关注的地方,引出自己的工作。(记住要提出问题,然后让自己的方法去解决问题。)
Previous literature
Limitations of previous research
Research questions
Research to be explored
总结:一般三五个subsection,分别review下相关的topics,同样不光讲previous work做了啥,更要讲自己的方法跟前人工作有啥不同
The methods section that follows the introduction section should provide a clear description of the experimental procedure, and the reasons behind the choice of specific experimental methods. The methods section should be elaborate enough so that the readers can repeat the experimental procedure and reproduce the results. The scientific rigor of the paper is judged by your materials and methods section, so make sure you elaborate on all the fine details of your experiment. Explain the procedures step-by-step by splitting the main section into multiple sub-sections. Order procedures chronologically with subheadings. Use past tense to describe what you did since you are reporting on a completed experiment. The methods section should describe how the research question was answered and explain how the results were analyzed. Clearly explain various statistical methods used for significance testing and the reasons behind the choice.
Experimental setup
Data collection
Data analysis
Statistical testing
Assumptions
Remit of the experiment
The results and discussion sections are one of the challenging sections to write. It is important to plan this section carefully as it may contain a large amount of scientific data that needs to be presented in a clear and concise fashion. The purpose of a Results section is to present the key results of your research. Results and discussions can either be combined into one section or organized as separate sections depending on the requirements of the journal to which you are submitting your research paper. Use subsections and subheadings to improve readability and clarity. Number all tables and figures with descriptive titles. Present your results as figures and tables and point the reader to relevant items while discussing the results. This section should highlight significant or interesting findings along with P values for statistical tests. Be sure to include negative results and highlight potential limitations of the paper. You will be criticised by the reviewers if you don’t discuss the shortcomings of your research. This often makes up for a great discussion section, so do not be afraid to highlight them.
Findings
Comparison with prior studies
Limitations of your work
Casual arguments
Speculations
Deductive arguments
Overall summary
Further research
don’t need it necessarily.