实践torch.fx第一篇——基于Pytorch的模型优化量化神器
今天聊一下比较重要的torch.fx，也趁着这次机会把之前的torch.fx笔记整理下，笔记大概拆成三份，分别对应三篇：
什么是torch.fx
基于torch.fx做量化
基于torch.fx量化部署到TensorRT
本文对应第一篇，主要介绍torch.fx和基本使用方法。废话不多说，直接开始吧！
什么是Torch.FX
torch.fx是Pytorch 1.8出来的一套工具或者说一个库，是做python-to-python code transformation，大意就是可以把pytorch中的python前向代码转换为你想要的样子，官方介绍如下：
We apply this principle in torch.fx, a program capture and transformation library for PyTorch written entirely in Python and optimized for high developer productivity by ML practitioners 上述来源于FX的论文，感兴趣的可以看TORCH.FX: PRACTICAL PROGRAM CAPTURE AND TRANSFORMATION FOR DEEP LEARNING IN PYTHON[1]这篇，知乎上也有一篇不错的解读[2]，这里就不复述了。不过本文也会介绍论文中的内容，更多的是以实践的角度。
核心的关键词是program capture和transformation library，这两个概念很重要。
那么FX怎么用呢？直观了解一下，我们定义了一个pytorch.nn.module：
class MyModule(torch.nn.Module):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
self.param = torch.nn.Parameter(torch.rand(3, 4))
self.linear = torch.nn.Linear(4, 5)
def forward(self, x):
return self.linear(x + self.param).clamp(min=0.0, max=1.0)很简单地继承于torch.nn.Module的Module（熟悉pytorch的应该都懂）。其中前向forward函数也记录了这个module的具体操作逻辑。
如果我们想把这个Module中forward中的一部分操作逻辑self.linear(x + self.param).clamp(min=0.0, max=1.0)的clamp部分替换为sigmoid，应该怎么搞呢？
当然可以直接改代码么，但是如果这些操作很多，或者说你写了很多模块，或者说你想要做很多实验（某些模块中改某些模块中不改），再这样就比较烦琐了。
这时候就需要FX，不需要我们手动修改代码（就是自己改这个forward实现），只需要设定好规则，使用torch.fx，带入这个模型实例进去，跑一下代码。然后你的这个MyModule中forward部分就会变为self.linear(x + self.param).sigmoid()：
module = MyModule()
from torch.fx import symbolic_trace
# Symbolic tracing frontend - captures the semantics of the module
symbolic_traced : torch.fx.GraphModule = symbolic_trace(module)
# High-level intermediate representation (IR) - Graph representation
# 打印查看FX的IR
print(symbolic_traced.graph)
"""
graph():
%x : [#users=1] = placeholder[target=x]
%param : [#users=1] = get_attr[target=param]
%add : [#users=1] = call_function[target=operator.add](args = (%x, %param "#users=1] = call_function[target=operator.add"), kwargs = {})
%linear : [#users=1] = call_module[target=linear](args = (%add, "#users=1] = call_module[target=linear"), kwargs = {})
%clamp : [#users=1] = call_method[target=clamp](args = (%linear, "#users=1] = call_method[target=clamp"), kwargs = {min: 0.0, max: 1.0})
return clamp
"""
# Code generation - valid Python code
# 通过FX生成的代码，可以视为module中的forward代码
print(symbolic_traced.code)
"""
def forward(self, x):
param = self.param
add = x + param; x = param = None
linear = self.linear(add); add = None
clamp = linear.clamp(min = 0.0, max = 1.0); linear = None
return clamp
"""这样，FX会帮助你修改这个Module，并且修改好的这个model就和平常一样使用就可以，注意这里，FX capture 了你写的forward代码，然后进行了transform，修改了其中的操作。
当然这只是很简单很简单的fx的一个功能，我们还可以通过fx：
融合两个op，比如conv和bn
去掉某些op
替换某些op
在某些op后插入一些op或者其他操作
等等等等。
可能大家会疑惑，这些操作是不是很像AI编译器中的PASS，而操作对象也是神经网络这种DAG（有向无环图）。其实吧，FX你也可以理解为是一种编译器，不过这个编译器最终产生的可执行文件，而是python->python，最终的产物还是基于Pytorch规则的python代码，也就是为什么FX一直说自己是Python-to-Python (or Module-to-Module) transformation toolkit而不是compiler了。
FX目前大部分API已经稳定（在torch-1.10中正式发布），使用起来历史包袱不大。
fx的官方介绍：
https://pytorch.org/docs/stable/fx.html
torch.fx与量化的关系
FX的出现第一利好是基于Pytorch的量化工具，这也是我介绍FX的一个原因。借助FX可以很方便地对pytorch模型做量化操作，之前商汤就出了一个基于fx的量化工具MQBench[3]。
对于量化来说，不论是PTQ（需要插入观察op来收集每一层的激活分布以及权重分布）还是QTA（需要插入fake量化节点来模拟量化），都会涉及到fx的功能。所以如果想基于Pytorch框架来做量化，建议直接上手torch.fx。
fx在pytorch-1.10中已经处于stable状态，大部分API已经稳定了，我也拿torch.fx量化了几个模型，最终搞到TensorRT上，涉及到卷积、BN、反卷积、add、concat等基本操作，使用的版本是Pytorch-1.10和TensorRT-8.2。
其中fx部分自己修改了下源码，补充了一些op。这里我是直接把最新release的pytorch中的fx部分摘出来，然后pip安装torch-1.10.0+cu113-cp38-cp38-linux_x86_64.whl，两者搭配食用。
与TorchScript的区别
其实一开始torch.fx出现的时候也想过这两个有啥区别，都是先解析模型、然后生成IR、然后基于IR做一些优化，最后生成一个最终版的优化后的模型，难道一个是python版本的一个是C++版？肯定没有这么简单。当你FX用多了，会发现FX和torchscript的定位是不一样的，FX更侧重于对模型进行一些功能性的改变（比如批量增加、修改某个操作，比如增加统计操作，比如量化）；而torchscript更侧重于优化当前模型的性能，并且可以脱离python，仅在C++环境运行。
借一句官方大佬的回答：
torch.fx is different from TorchScript in that it is a platform for Python-to-Python transformations of PyTorch code. TorchScript, on the other hand, is more targeted at moving PyTorch programs outside of Python for deployment purposes. In this sense, FX and TorchScript are orthogonal to each other, and can even be composed with each other (e.g. transform PyTorch programs with FX, then subsequently export to TorchScript for deployment).
大意就是，FX仅仅是做Python2Python的转换，不像Torchscript一样是为了做部署(脱离Python这个环境，在C++中运行)而做转换。两者没什么关系，不冲突，用FX转换后的模型也可以用torchscript继续转换，两者是正交的。
Python to Python?
不过需要注意的是，FX的代码生成式由Python到Python。也就是说，FX生成的代码，和我们平常使用nn.Module搭建的网络没区别，可以直接使用Pytorch的eager mode跑，不像torchscript一样，是另一套runtime（我们跑torchscript的时候其实调用的是一个VM，也就是虚拟机，通过VM在C++中跑通过torchscript导出的模型）。
因此fx转换后的模型类型和nn.Module一毛一样，所以对nn.Module能做的，对转换后的模型也能做，咱们可以连续套娃：
自己写的Module -> fx后还是Module -> 连续fx变化 -> 得到最终的fx模型
FX的IR和Jit的IR
这俩IR不一样，FX的IR相较Jit的来说，有两个优点：
FX紧密地整合到Python的runtime中，因为FX可以更加精准地捕获
prograim representations，不像jit.trace有时候会出错。FX的Graph和
torch.nn.module没啥区别，其IR没有那么底层，所以说用起来更简单，效率也会提升。
这里简单列一下FX的IR，很简单，只有六种，大概功能就是调函数、提取attr、获取输入输出等:
placeholderrepresents a function input. Thenameattribute specifies the name this value will take on.targetis similarly the name of the argument.argsholds either: 1) nothing, or 2) a single argument denoting the default parameter of the function input.kwargsis don't-care. Placeholders correspond to the function parameters (e.g.x) in the graph printout.get_attrretrieves a parameter from the module hierarchy.nameis similarly the name the result of the fetch is assigned to.targetis the fully-qualified name of the parameter's position in the module hierarchy.argsandkwargsare don't-carecall_functionapplies a free function to some values.nameis similarly the name of the value to assign to.targetis the function to be applied.argsandkwargsrepresent the arguments to the function, following the Python calling conventioncall_moduleapplies a module in the module hierarchy'sforward()method to given arguments.nameis as previous.targetis the fully-qualified name of the module in the module hierarchy to call.argsandkwargsrepresent the arguments to invoke the module on, including the self argument.call_methodcalls a method on a value.nameis as similar.targetis the string name of the method to apply to theselfargument.argsandkwargsrepresent the arguments to invoke the module on, including the self argumentoutputcontains the output of the traced function in itsargs[0]attribute. This corresponds to the "return" statement in the Graph printout.
相比torchscript的IR，FX的可就简单多了，我们理解使用起来也很简单。
symbolic tracer
回到一开头示例的那段代码，其中有一行是symbolic_traced : torch.fx.GraphModule = symbolic_trace(module)，这里核心就是symbolic_trace函数，也就是FX解析、转换模型的起点。这个函数其实内部是这样的：
@compatibility(is_backward_compatible=True)
def symbolic_trace(root : Union[torch.nn.Module, Callable[..., Any]], concrete_args: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None,
enable_cpatching: bool = False) -> GraphModule:
"""
Symbolic tracing API
Given an ``nn.Module`` or function instance ``root``, this function will return a ``GraphModule``
constructed by recording operations seen while tracing through ``root``.
...
"""
tracer = Tracer(enable_cpatching=enable_cpatching)
graph = tracer.trace(root, concrete_args)
name = root.__class__.__name__ if isinstance(root, torch.nn.Module) else root.__name__
return GraphModule(tracer.root, graph, name)首先会创建一个Tracer类然后使用成员函数trace我们的torch.nn.Module。我们在trace这个模型之后，就可以对这个模型进行修改了：
def transform(m: nn.Module,
tracer_class : type = torch.fx.Tracer) -> torch.nn.Module:
# Step 1: Acquire a Graph representing the code in `m`
# 使用 Tracer 类对象去trace模型 m
# 这边是拆开了，这个transform函数就是实现torch.fx.symbolic_trace的功能
graph : torch.fx.Graph = tracer_class().trace(m)
# Step 2: 这里就可以任意修改模型了，这也是重点
graph = ...
# Step 3: Construct a Module to return
return torch.fx.GraphModule(m, graph)修改之后的模型可以直接拿来用，也可以通过graph_module.to_folder，把这个模型摘出来当做单独的模块去使用（这个之后说）。整体的流程大概就是这样：
symbolic tracing -> intermediate representation -> transforms -> Python code generation。
各自的功能为：
symbolic
The symbolic tracer performs “symbolic execution” of the Python code. It feeds fake values, called Proxies, through the code. Operations on theses Proxies are recorded. More information about symbolic tracing can be found in the symbolic_trace() and Tracer documentation.
intermediate representation
The intermediate representation is the container for the operations that were recorded during symbolic tracing. It consists of a list of Nodes that represent function inputs, callsites (to functions, methods, or torch.nn.Module instances), and return values. More information about the IR can be found in the documentation for Graph. The IR is the format on which transformations are applied.
Python code generation
Python code generation is what makes FX a Python-to-Python (or Module-to-Module) transformation toolkit. For each Graph IR, we can create valid Python code matching the Graph’s semantics. This functionality is wrapped up in GraphModule, which is a torch.nn.Module instance that holds a Graph as well as a forward method generated from the Graph.
上述就是FX的三个核心功能。
Proxy/Retracing是symbolic trace的核心。因为我对Proxy/Retracing的理解还不是很深，这里就不擅自描述了，摘一下官方的介绍：
Proxy objects are Node wrappers that flow through the program during symbolic tracing and record all the operations (torch function calls, method calls, operators) that they touch into the growing FX Graph.
If you’re doing graph transforms, you can wrap your own Proxy method around a raw Node so that you can use the overloaded operators to add additional things to a Graph.
相关结构
FX主要的结构就是Graph和GraphModule了，其中A Graph is a data structure that represents a method on a GraphModule。可以理解为Graph中存放着网络中最关键的Node，这些node就是网络中的一个个节点（比如卷积、relu、add、concat等等），这些node记录了对应的method和输入输出信息，从而可以串起来组成网络的逻辑。
通过print_tabular()可以将graph中的node信息打印出来：
import torch
import torch.fx
class MyModule(torch.nn.Module):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
self.param = torch.nn.Parameter(torch.rand(3, 4))
self.linear = torch.nn.Linear(4, 5)
def forward(self, x):
return torch.topk(torch.sum(
self.linear(x + self.linear.weight).relu(), dim=-1), 3)
m = MyModule()
gm = torch.fx.symbolic_trace(m)
# 这里打印module中的node
gm.graph.print_tabular()打印信息如下：
graph中的node
可以看到，对于输入x，对应的IR类型是placeholder；对于权重信息，对应的IR类型是get_attr；对于具体的实际操作（add、linear、sum、relu、topk等），对应着call_function、call_module这俩IR，最后的输出对应着output这个IR。
同时还打印了每个node的输入信息和额外的参数信息，通过这些信息就可以把node连起来。
不过光有graph是不够的，还需要GraphModule。GraphModule继承于torch.nn.Module，包含了前向forward函数和网络中模块需要的参数，这些参数会被graph中的node调用。
总结一下，那就是graph中的node包含了网络的逻辑信息，然后这些node前后调用关系会被FX重新组合为GraphModule中FX生成的前向forward代码（可以通过traced.code打印出来），而这些生成的代码会需要GraphModule中的参数信息来保证顺利执行。
修改Graph
既然知道graph中包含了网络的顺序执行信息，那么想要修改网络，直接修改node就可以：
import torch
import torch.fx
# Sample module
class M(torch.nn.Module):
def forward(self, x, y):
return torch.add(x, y)
def transform(m: torch.nn.Module,
tracer_class : type = fx.Tracer) -> torch.nn.Module:
graph : fx.Graph = tracer_class().trace(m)
# 对于graph中的node，FX会以顺序的形式来表示这个网络
# 所以我们可以直接for循环来遍历：
for node in graph.nodes:
# 检测该node的IR类型是否是call_function
if node.op == 'call_function':
# 修改node.target为torch.mul，网络也因此变了
if node.target == torch.add:
node.target = torch.mul
graph.lint() # Does some checks to make sure the
# Graph is well-formed.
return fx.GraphModule(m, graph)简单提一句，node.target代表call_function中call的是哪个target，而torch.add也就是pytorch自带的操作op，调用这个node的时候会实际调用到torch.add。
优雅地修改graph网络
上述直接修改简单粗暴，FX也贴心地为我们提供了Graph rewrites工具，我们可以借助这些工具方便地增加或者删除某一个node：
# Specifies the insertion point. Any nodes added to the
# Graph within this scope will be inserted after `node`
with traced.graph.inserting_after(node):
# Insert a new `call_function` node calling `torch.relu`
new_node = traced.graph.call_function(
torch.relu, args=(node,))
# We want all places that used the value of `node` to
# now use that value after the `relu` call we've added.
# We use the `replace_all_uses_with` API to do this.
node.replace_all_uses_with(new_node)借助replace_pattern来修改网络
Graph rewrites工具都有了（相关概念是来源于编译器），那么match pattern肯定也有了，我们可以通过 replace_pattern()来对整个graph进行修改。pattern的话可以用fx自带的也可以自己添加自己的规则:
# Sample module
class M(torch.nn.Module):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
def forward(self, x, w1, w2):
val1 = torch.neg(w1)
m1 = torch.cat([val1, w2]).sum()
val2 = torch.neg(w1)
m2 = torch.cat([val2, w2]).sum()
return x + torch.max(m1) + torch.max(m2)
# Symbolically trace an instance of `M`
traced = symbolic_trace(M())
# Define the pattern.
def pattern(a1, a2):
val1 = torch.neg(a1)
return torch.cat([val1, a2]).sum()
# Define the replacement (same rules as the pattern)
def replacement(w1, w2):
return torch.stack([w1, w2])
# Replace `pattern` with `replacement` in `traced`
replace_pattern(traced, pattern, replacement)
# After calling `replace_pattern`, the generated code is:
'''
def forward(self, x, w1, w2):
stack = torch.stack([w1, w2])
max_1 = torch.max(stack); stack = None
add = x + max_1; x = max_1 = None
stack_1 = torch.stack([w1, w2]); w1 = w2 = None
max_2 = torch.max(stack_1); stack_1 = None
add_1 = add + max_2; add = max_2 = None
return add_1
'''Interpreter
Interpreter，即解释器，这个名字用的好。其实就是以一个比较优雅的方式循环一个Graph的node并且执行它们，并同时顺带完成一些任务。比如我们想看下模型在运行期间每一层的shape变化：
import torch
import torch.fx
from torch.fx.node import Node
from typing import Dict
class ShapeProp:
"""
Shape propagation. This class takes a `GraphModule`.
Then, its `propagate` method executes the `GraphModule`
node-by-node with the given arguments. As each operation
executes, the ShapeProp class stores away the shape and
element type for the output values of each operation on
the `shape` and `dtype` attributes of the operation's
`Node`.
"""
def __init__(self, mod):
self.mod = mod
self.graph = mod.graph
self.modules = dict(self.mod.named_modules())
def propagate(self, *args):
args_iter = iter(args)
env : Dict[str, Node] = {}
def load_arg(a):
return torch.fx.graph.map_arg(a, lambda n: env[n.name])
def fetch_attr(target : str):
target_atoms = target.split('.')
attr_itr = self.mod
for i, atom in enumerate(target_atoms):
if not hasattr(attr_itr, atom):
raise RuntimeError(f"Node referenced nonexistant target {'.'.join(target_atoms[:i])}")
attr_itr = getattr(attr_itr, atom)
return attr_itr
for node in self.graph.nodes:
if node.op == 'placeholder':
result = next(args_iter)
elif node.op == 'get_attr':
result = fetch_attr(node.target)
elif node.op == 'call_function':
result = node.target(*load_arg(node.args), **load_arg(node.kwargs))
elif node.op == 'call_method':
self_obj, *args = load_arg(node.args)
kwargs = load_arg(node.kwargs)
result = getattr(self_obj, node.target)(*args, **kwargs)
elif node.op == 'call_module':
result = self.modules[node.target](*load_arg(node.args "node.target"), **load_arg(node.kwargs))
# This is the only code specific to shape propagation.
# you can delete this `if` branch and this becomes
# a generic GraphModule interpreter.
if isinstance(result, torch.Tensor):
node.shape = result.shape
node.dtype = result.dtype
env[node.name] = result
return load_arg(self.graph.result)上述的propagate函数很简单，遍历一遍node然后记录信息到node.shape和node.dtype中。FX也提供了interpreter类，存放了一些util的function，我们直接继承就可以使用（类似于上面这个ShapeProp）。
Transformer
Transformer就是对torch.nn.Module做一些变换，这些变换我们可以封装成一个函数或者写到类里头，其实Transformer也可以叫做PASS，总之就是对网络进行一些修改。比如这样：
import torch
import torch.fx
def transform(m: nn.Module,
tracer_class : type = torch.fx.Tracer) -> torch.nn.Module:
# Step 1: Acquire a Graph representing the code in `m`
# trace nn.Module
graph : torch.fx.Graph = tracer_class().trace(m)
# Step 2: 这里对Graph进行修改
graph = ...
# Step 3: Construct a Module to return
return torch.fx.GraphModule(m, graph)Your transform will take in an torch.nn.Module, acquire a Graph from it, do some modifications, and return a new torch.nn.Module. You should think of the torch.nn.Module that your FX transform returns as identical to a regular torch.nn.Module – you can pass it to another FX transform, you can pass it to TorchScript, or you can run it. Ensuring that the inputs and outputs of your FX transform are a torch.nn.Module will allow for composability.
当然也可以直接修改GraphModule，没必要非要返回一个新的：
import torch
import torch.fx
def transform(m : nn.Module) -> nn.Module:
gm : torch.fx.GraphModule = torch.fx.symbolic_trace(m)
# 这里修改 gm.graph
# <...>
# Recompile the forward() method of `gm` from its Graph
gm.recompile()
return gm需要注意，gm.recompile()这句必须是要加上的，我们修改graph后，需要recompile来重新生成forward代码。
举个FX的栗子
铺垫了那么多，简单举一个FX的实际例子吧，这里我们用FX去量化一个基于CenterNet框架的目标检测模型，backbone使用的是Resnet50，限于篇幅，本篇只介绍trace完模型和fuse的部分，量化和导出trt之后的文章再说。
首先搭建CenterNet模型，然后进行trace：
model = FXCenterNet()
tracer = Tracer()
graph_module = GraphModule(model, tracer.trace(model))其中trace的函数如下，大概就是遍历model中的操作，按照规则转换为node存放到graph中，包含attr和op、输入输出等信息，最终返回graph这个IR结构：
@compatibility(is_backward_compatible=True)
def trace(self, root: Union[torch.nn.Module, Callable[..., Any]], concrete_args: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None) -> Graph:
# root FXCenterNet
if isinstance(root, torch.nn.Module):
self.root = root
fn = type(root).forward
self.submodule_paths = {mod: name for name, mod in root.named_modules()}
else:
self.root = torch.nn.Module()
fn = root
tracer_cls: Optional[Type['Tracer']] = getattr(self, '__class__', None)
self.graph = Graph(tracer_cls=tracer_cls)
# 这里大概就是遍历root中的操作，按照规则转换为node存放到graph中，
# 包含attr和op、输入输出等信息，最终返回graph这个IR结构
...
return self.graph生成的self.graph类型是torch.fx.graph.Graph。
self.graph
调用self.graph.print_tabular()打印graph的node信息，可以看到熟悉的resnet-50-backbone的结构，以IR的形式组织起来：
生成centernet-graph中的node信息
生成graph后，开始组装GraphModule，GraphModule是由graph生成的，GraphModule会把graph的node中的参数和模块信息复制一份到自己：
@compatibility(is_backward_compatible=True)
class GraphModule(torch.nn.Module):
def __new__(cls: 'Type[GraphModule]', *args, **kwargs):
for t in cls.__mro__:
c = t.__qualname__.split('.')[-1]
if c != 'GraphModuleImpl':
cls = t
break
class GraphModuleImpl(cls): # type: ignore[misc, valid-type]
pass
return super().__new__(GraphModuleImpl)
@compatibility(is_backward_compatible=True)
def __init__(self,
root: Union[torch.nn.Module, Dict[str, Any]],
graph: Graph,
class_name: str = 'GraphModule'):
super().__init__()
self.__class__.__name__ = class_name
if isinstance(root, torch.nn.Module):
if hasattr(root, 'training'):
self.training = root.training
# 这里拷贝graph中的参数信息和模块信息到self也就是GraphModule中
for node in graph.nodes:
if node.op in ['get_attr', 'call_module']:
assert isinstance(node.target, str)
_copy_attr(root, self, node.target)
elif isinstance(root, dict):
targets_to_copy = []
for node in graph.nodes:
if node.op in ['get_attr', 'call_module']:
assert isinstance(node.target, str)
if node.target not in root:
raise RuntimeError('Node ' + str(node) + ' referenced target ' + node.target +
' but that target was not provided in ``root``!')
targets_to_copy.append(node.target)
targets_to_copy.sort(key=lambda t: t.count('.'))
for target_to_copy in targets_to_copy:
_assign_attr(root[target_to_copy], self, target_to_copy)
else:
raise RuntimeError('Unsupported type ' + str(root) + ' passed for root!')
self.graph = graph
self._tracer_cls = None
if self.graph._tracer_cls and '' not in self.graph._tracer_cls.__qualname__:
self._tracer_cls = self.graph._tracer_cls
__jit_unused_properties__ = ['graph'] 最终graph_module中包含了生成的代码，通过print(graph_module.code)打印出来：
def forward(self, input):
input_1 = input
upsampler_deconv_layers_0_bias = getattr(self.upsampler.deconv_layers, "0").bias
...
head_angle_0 = getattr(self.head.angle, "0")(upsampler_deconv_layers_11); upsampler_deconv_layers_11 = None
head_angle_1 = getattr(self.head.angle, "1")(head_angle_0); head_angle_0 = None
head_angle_2 = getattr(self.head.angle, "2")(head_angle_1); head_angle_1 = None
return {'hm': head_hm_2, 'wh': head_wh_2, 'reg': head_reg_2, 'angle': head_angle_2}这个时候我们就有了trace后的Module，这个Module和原始模型并没有区别，forward函数也是按照原始模型的forward生成的。因为我们只是简单地trace了一遍，所以相同输入结果也是一样的：graph_module(input) == original_model(input)，毕竟没干啥特殊的。
OP融合
接下来就是fuse，这里直接调用FX提供的fuse函数，其实里头也就是调用了Fuser：
def _fuse_fx(
graph_module: GraphModule,
is_qat: bool,
fuse_custom_config_dict: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None,
backend_config_dict: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None,
) -> GraphModule:
r""" Internal helper function to fuse modules in preparation for quantization
Args:
graph_module: GraphModule object from symbolic tracing (torch.fx.symbolic_trace)
"""
_check_is_graph_module(graph_module)
fuser = Fuser()
return fuser.fuse(
graph_module, is_qat, fuse_custom_config_dict, backend_config_dict)来看看Fuser都干了啥，其实很简单，就是遍历一遍input_graph = model.graph中的node，然后根据指定好的fuse规则进行融合，融合会涉及到修改graph结构：
class Fuser:
def fuse(
self,
model: GraphModule,
is_qat: bool,
fuse_custom_config_dict: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None,
backend_config_dict: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None,
) -> GraphModule:
if fuse_custom_config_dict is None:
fuse_custom_config_dict = {}
input_root = model
input_graph = model.graph
# 这里首先copy 原始模型中的named_modules中，之后会根据fuse情况进行修改
self.modules = dict(input_root.named_modules())
...
# 这里查找匹配的fuse pattern
fusion_pairs = self._find_matches(
input_root, input_graph, fusion_pattern_to_fuse_handler_cls)
self.fused_graph = Graph()
env: Dict[Any, Any] = {}
def load_arg(a):
return map_arg(a, lambda node: env[node.name])
def get_root_node(node_pattern):
while not isinstance(node_pattern[-1], Node):
node_pattern = node_pattern[-1]
return node_pattern[-1]
for node in input_graph.nodes:
maybe_last_node, pattern, matched_node_pattern, obj = \
fusion_pairs.get(node.name, (None, None, None, None))
if maybe_last_node is node:
assert obj is not None
# TODO: currently we hard code the root node, which only works for
# a sequence of ops and assume the root node is the last node,
# we want to make this more general to support more complex patterns
root_node = get_root_node(matched_node_pattern) # 寻找fuse的根node
env[node.name] = obj.fuse( # 这里将self传入，对self进行修改
self, load_arg, root_node, matched_node_pattern, # type: ignore[arg-type]
fuse_custom_config_dict, fuser_method_mapping, is_qat)
elif maybe_last_node is None:
env[node.name] = self.fused_graph.node_copy(node, load_arg)
# node matched in patterns and is not root is removed here
preserved_attributes = set(fuse_custom_config_dict.get("preserved_attributes", []))
model = FusedGraphModule(input_root, self.fused_graph, preserved_attributes)
return model
def _find_matches(
self, root: GraphModule, graph: Graph,
patterns: Dict[Pattern, Callable]
) -> Dict[str, Tuple[Node, Pattern, NodePattern, FuseHandler]]:
modules = dict(root.named_modules())
match_map : Dict[str, Tuple[Node, Pattern, NodePattern, FuseHandler]] = {} # node name -> (root_node, match_value)
def apply_match(pattern, node, match, matched_node_pattern):
if isinstance(pattern, tuple):
s, *args = pattern
current_node_pattern: List[Node] = []
apply_match(s, node, match, current_node_pattern)
for subpattern, arg in zip(args, node.args):
apply_match(subpattern, arg, match, current_node_pattern)
matched_node_pattern.append(tuple(current_node_pattern))
else:
# the first pattern matches will take precedence
if node.name not in match_map:
matched_node_pattern.append(node)
root_node, pattern, handler = match
match_map[node.name] = (root_node, pattern, matched_node_pattern, handler)
# 这里就是match过程
for node in reversed(graph.nodes):
if node.name not in match_map:
for pattern, value in patterns.items():
matched_node_pattern: List[Node] = []
if is_match(modules, node, pattern):
apply_match(pattern, node, (node, pattern, value(self, node)), matched_node_pattern)
return match_map至于定义了哪些fuse的规则，可以在pytorch/torch/ao/quantization/fx/fusion_patterns.py这里头找到：
# /ao/quantization/fx/fusion_patterns.py
@register_fusion_pattern((torch.nn.ReLU, torch.nn.Conv1d))
@register_fusion_pattern((torch.nn.ReLU, torch.nn.Conv2d))
@register_fusion_pattern((torch.nn.ReLU, torch.nn.Conv3d))
@register_fusion_pattern((torch.nn.functional.relu, torch.nn.Conv1d))
@register_fusion_pattern((torch.nn.functional.relu, torch.nn.Conv2d))
@register_fusion_pattern((torch.nn.functional.relu, torch.nn.Conv3d))
@register_fusion_pattern((torch.nn.BatchNorm1d, torch.nn.Conv1d))
@register_fusion_pattern((torch.nn.BatchNorm2d, torch.nn.Conv2d))
@register_fusion_pattern((torch.nn.BatchNorm3d, torch.nn.Conv3d))
@register_fusion_pattern((torch.nn.ReLU, (torch.nn.BatchNorm1d, torch.nn.Conv1d)))
@register_fusion_pattern((torch.nn.ReLU, (torch.nn.BatchNorm2d, torch.nn.Conv2d)))
@register_fusion_pattern((torch.nn.ReLU, (torch.nn.BatchNorm3d, torch.nn.Conv3d)))
@register_fusion_pattern((torch.nn.functional.relu, (torch.nn.BatchNorm1d, torch.nn.Conv1d)))
@register_fusion_pattern((torch.nn.functional.relu, (torch.nn.BatchNorm2d, torch.nn.Conv2d)))
@register_fusion_pattern((torch.nn.functional.relu, (torch.nn.BatchNorm3d, torch.nn.Conv3d)))
@register_fusion_pattern((torch.nn.BatchNorm1d, torch.nn.Linear))
class DefaultFuseHandler(FuseHandler):
def __init__(
self,
quantizer: QuantizerCls,
node: Node):
super().__init__(quantizer, node)
def fuse(...):
# 这里执行实际的融合操作具体的融合操作在DefaultFuseHandler类中的fuse方法内执行，找到对应的fuser_method，然后调用，返回融合后的fused_module使用setattr来修改网络的modules，同样也会通过node_copy修改graph中的node：
matched_module_types = get_matched_types(matched_modules)
module_parent_name, module_name = _parent_name(root_node.target)
fuser_method = get_fuser_method_new(matched_module_types, fuser_method_mapping)
# TODO: change the signature for fuser_method to take matched module patterns
# as input
fused_module = fuser_method(is_qat, *matched_modules)
# TODO: maybe add a pass to cleanup bn modules?
setattr(quantizer.modules[module_parent_name], module_name, fused_module) # 往fuse控制的新模型中加入 新的modules
return quantizer.fused_graph.node_copy(root_node, load_arg) # 往fuse控制的新graph中加入forward参数其中，Conv+bn+relu的融合细节会调用pytorch/torch/ao/quantization/fuser_method_mappings.py中的fuse_conv_bn_relu函数：
def fuse_conv_bn_relu(is_qat, conv, bn, relu):
assert(conv.training == bn.training == relu.training),\
"Conv and BN both must be in the same mode (train or eval)."
fused_module : Optional[Type[nn.Sequential]] = None
map_to_fused_module_eval = {
nn.Conv1d: nni.ConvReLU1d,
nn.Conv2d: nni.ConvReLU2d,
nn.Conv3d: nni.ConvReLU3d,
}
fused_module = map_to_fused_module_eval.get(type(conv), None)
if fused_module is not None:
fused_conv = nn.utils.fusion.fuse_conv_bn_eval(conv, bn)
return fused_module(fused_conv, relu)
else:
raise NotImplementedError("Cannot fuse eval modules: {}".format((conv, bn, relu)))上述fused_module为torch.nn.intrinsic.modules.fused.ConvReLU2d类，会调用fuse_conv_bn_eval来实际吸bn到conv：
def fuse_conv_bn_eval(conv, bn, transpose=False):
assert(not (conv.training or bn.training)), "Fusion only for eval!"
fused_conv = copy.deepcopy(conv)
fused_conv.weight, fused_conv.bias = \
fuse_conv_bn_weights(fused_conv.weight, fused_conv.bias,
bn.running_mean, bn.running_var, bn.eps, bn.weight, bn.bias, transpose)
return fused_conv
def fuse_conv_bn_weights(conv_w, conv_b, bn_rm, bn_rv, bn_eps, bn_w, bn_b, transpose=False):
if conv_b is None:
conv_b = torch.zeros_like(bn_rm)
if bn_w is None:
bn_w = torch.ones_like(bn_rm)
if bn_b is None:
bn_b = torch.zeros_like(bn_rm)
bn_var_rsqrt = torch.rsqrt(bn_rv + bn_eps)
if transpose:
shape = [1, -1] + [1] * (len(conv_w.shape) - 2)
else:
shape = [-1, 1] + [1] * (len(conv_w.shape) - 2)
conv_w = conv_w * (bn_w * bn_var_rsqrt).reshape(shape)
conv_b = (conv_b - bn_rm) * bn_var_rsqrt * bn_w + bn_b
return torch.nn.Parameter(conv_w), torch.nn.Parameter(conv_b)吸完后，得到新的conv，然后带入ConvReLU2d类。
class ConvReLU2d(_FusedModule):
r"""This is a sequential container which calls the Conv2d and ReLU modules.
During quantization this will be replaced with the corresponding fused module."""
def __init__(self, conv, relu):
assert type(conv) == Conv2d and type(relu) == ReLU, \
'Incorrect types for input modules{}{}'.format(
type(conv), type(relu))
super().__init__(conv, relu)整体流程就是conv + bn->conv然后conv + relu -> ConvReLU2d。
fuse后的code就清爽很多了，bn和relu都被融合进去了（当然还有其他融合）:
def forward(self, input):
input_1 = input
backbone_conv1 = self.backbone.conv1(input_1)
backbone_maxpool = self.backbone.maxpool(backbone_relu)
backbone_layer1_0_conv1 = getattr(self.backbone.layer1, "0").conv1(backbone_maxpool)
backbone_layer1_0_conv2 = getattr(self.backbone.layer1, "0").conv2(backbone_layer1_0_relu)
backbone_layer1_0_conv3 = getattr(self.backbone.layer1, "0").conv3(backbone_layer1_0_relu_1)
...
head_reg_0 = getattr(self.head.reg, "0")(upsampler_deconv_layers_11)
head_reg_2 = getattr(self.head.reg, "2")(head_reg_1)
head_angle_0 = getattr(self.head.angle, "0")(upsampler_deconv_layers_11)
head_angle_2 = getattr(self.head.angle, "2")(head_angle_1)
return {'hm': head_hm_2, 'wh': head_wh_2, 'reg': head_reg_2, 'angle': head_angle_2}至此，就得到了trace后和fuse后的模型，可以看到融合后的ConvReLU2d模块。
trace后以及fuse后的module
这个GraphModule和torch.nn.module的使用方式一模一样，可以简单输入一个image验证一下。
下一篇中我们会对这个GraphModule进行量化操作。
如何debug
那么我们得到了最终的GraphModule，该如何debug呢，也就是一步一步单独调试。这也是有办法的，调试fx生成model的方式有三种：
直接通过pdb进行debug
我们是可以进入FX的Generated Code中的，也可以设置断点：
FX生成的代码是可以debug进去的
打印生成的代码，并且和Module组合
因为graph中的node包含了指定逻辑，GraphModule中包含了模型权重等信息，而这些权重信息是通过原始的Module获取的，那么我们可以直接将生成的code放到原始Module子类的forward中，组成一个新的Module来调用。
# Assume that `traced` is a GraphModule that has undergone some
# number of transforms
# Copy this code for later
print(traced)
# Print the code generated from symbolic tracing. This outputs:
"""
def forward(self, y):
x = self.x
add_1 = x + y; x = y = None
return add_1
"""
# 这里继承原始的Module
class SubclassM(M):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
# 把生成的代码粘到这里
def forward(self, y):
x = self.x
add_1 = x + y; x = y = None
return add_1
# Create an instance of the original, untraced Module. Then, create an
# instance of the Module with the copied `forward` function. We can
# now compare the output of both the original and the traced version.
pre_trace = M()
post_trace = SubclassM()是不是很符合常识！
使用to_folder函数
就像之前例子里说到的，GraphModule.to_folder()是一个神奇的函数，可以直接将FX生成的module导出为一个文件夹，文件夹中包含了模型需要的参数(.pt格式)和模型的定义。
FX代码导出fold
而module.py的代码也帮你生成好了：
# 导出的module.py中
import torch
from torch.nn import *
class FusedModel(torch.nn.Module):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
# 这里加载权重参数信息
self.backbone = torch.load(r'fx_debug/backbone.pt')
self.load_state_dict(torch.load(r'fx_debug/state_dict.pt'))
...
def forward(self, input):
# 这里就是生成的code部分，也帮你写到forward中了
input_1 = input
backbone_conv1 = self.backbone.conv1(input_1)
backbone_maxpool = self.backbone.maxpool(backbone_relu)
backbone_layer1_0_conv1 = getattr(self.backbone.layer1, "0").conv1(backbone_maxpool)
...
head_angle_0 = getattr(self.head.angle, "0")(upsampler_deconv_layers_11)
head_angle_2 = getattr(self.head.angle, "2")(head_angle_1)
return {'hm': head_hm_2, 'wh': head_wh_2, 'reg': head_reg_2, 'angle': head_angle_2}是不是很强大？！
我们也可以修改这个生成的代码来做其他方面的实验（不过这个导出有一些bug，不知道是不是我使用姿势不对）。
一些限制
torch.fx也是有一些限制的（毕竟不可能十全十美）。
因为Symbolic execution[4]的限制。Proxy object cannot be iterated. This can be attempted when the Proxy is used in a loop or as a *args or **kwargs function argument. See the torch.fx docs on pytorch.org for a more detailed explanation of what types of control flow can be traced, and check out the Proxy docstring for help troubleshooting Proxy iteration errors
The main limitation of symbolic tracing is it does not currently support dynamic control flow. That is, loops or if statements where the condition may depend on the input values of the program.
更详细的限制可以看官方的介绍：
https://pytorch.org/docs/stable/fx.html
就先写到这里吧，关于FX的功能使用更多是在量化过程中体现了，下一篇的量化实操中，会结合量化过程来理解FX，同时也会总结下PTQ量化的流程和注意点，我是老潘，我们下一篇再见~
参考链接
https://pytorch.org/docs/stable/fx.html
https://discuss.pytorch.org/t/torch-fx-vs-torch-jit-script/100299
参考资料
[1]
TORCH.FX: PRACTICAL PROGRAM CAPTURE AND TRANSFORMATION FOR DEEP LEARNING IN PYTHON: https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.08429
[2]解读: https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/449908382
[3]MQBench: https://github.com/ModelTC/MQBench
[4]Symbolic execution: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbolic_execution
往期回顾
量化番外篇——TensorRT-8的量化细节
各种姿势的debug(从python一路debug到C++)
实现TensorRT自定义插件(plugin)自由！
关注“oldpan博客”，持续酝酿深度质量文
我是老潘，我们下期见~
打上星标✨不再错过老潘的及时推文
如果觉得有收获，来个点赞加好看