本篇文章带着以下问题继续分析surfaceflinger的源码:
先看看Surface这个类的定义,主要是定义了很多与GraphicBuffer相关的操作。
class Surface
: public ANativeObjectBase<ANativeWindow, Surface, RefBase>
{
public:
/*
* creates a Surface from the given IGraphicBufferProducer (which concrete
* implementation is a BufferQueue).
*
* Surface is mainly state-less while it's disconnected, it can be
* viewed as a glorified IGraphicBufferProducer holder. It's therefore
* safe to create other Surfaces from the same IGraphicBufferProducer.
*
* However, once a Surface is connected, it'll prevent other Surfaces
* referring to the same IGraphicBufferProducer to become connected and
* therefore prevent them to be used as actual producers of buffers.
*
* the controlledByApp flag indicates that this Surface (producer) is
* controlled by the application. This flag is used at connect time.
*/
explicit Surface(const sp<IGraphicBufferProducer>& bufferProducer,
bool controlledByApp = false);
...............................;
virtual int dequeueBuffer(ANativeWindowBuffer** buffer, int* fenceFd);
virtual int cancelBuffer(ANativeWindowBuffer* buffer, int fenceFd);
virtual int queueBuffer(ANativeWindowBuffer* buffer, int fenceFd);
..............................;
sp<IGraphicBufferProducer> mGraphicBufferProducer;
......................;
来翻译下这段代码中的注释:
creates a Surface from the given IGraphicBufferProducer (which concrete implementation is a BufferQueue).
Surface is mainly state-less while it’s disconnected, it can be viewed as a glorified IGraphicBufferProducer holder. It’s therefore safe to > create other Surfaces from the same IGraphicBufferProducer.
However, once a Surface is connected, it’ll prevent other Surfaces referring to the same IGraphicBufferProducer to become connected and therefore prevent them to be used as actual producers of buffers.
通过指定的IGraphicBufferProducer来创建一个Surface,而IGraphicBufferProducer是由具体的BufferQueue实现的。
当未连接时,Surface基本上是无状态的,可以把Surface看成是IGraphicBufferProducer光荣的持有者。因此此时可以使用相同的IGraphicBufferProducer去创建其他Surface。
当时一旦Surface已经连接,它将会阻止其他持有相同IGraphicBufferProducer的Surface编程连接状态,从而阻止他们被用作buffers的实际生产者。
从上面的注释来看,Surface需要一个IGraphicBufferProducer,而IGraphicBufferProducer由BufferQueue实现的。Surface在使用之前还需要connect。一堆问题随之而来:
在网络上找到一个surface的demo:https://github.com/yrzroger/NativeSFDemo
将代码整理后,其主要代码逻辑如下:
//1. 创建surfaceComposerClient
sp<SurfaceComposerClient> surfaceComposerClient = new SurfaceComposerClient
//2. 通过surfaceComposerClient创建Surface
sp<SurfaceControl> surfaceControl = surfaceComposerClient->createSurface(mName, .......);
//3. 设置surface的状态
SurfaceComposerClient::Transaction{}
.setLayer(surfaceControl, std::numeric_limits<int32_t>::max())
.show(surfaceControl)
.apply();
sp<ANativeWindow> nativeWindow = mSurfaceControl->getSurface();
//4. 连接surface
native_window_api_connect(nativeWindow, NATIVE_WINDOW_API_CPU);
ative_window_set_xxxxxx(.........);
while(!quit) {
//5. 获取一个input buffer
nativeWindow->dequeueBuffer(nativeWindow, &nativeBuffer, &releaseFenceFd);
sp<GraphicBuffer> buf(GraphicBuffer::from(nativeBuffer));
// 6.写input buffer
memcp(buf, .....);
// 7.将写好的input buffer存入buffer queue
nativeWindow->queueBuffer(nativeWindow, buf->getNativeBuffer(), acquireFenceFd);
}
从上面的代码流程来看,Surface是包在surfaceComposerClient内部的。先看看surfaceComposerClient的代码。
sp<SurfaceControl> SurfaceComposerClient::createSurface(const String8& name, uint32_t w, uint32_t h,
PixelFormat format, uint32_t flags,
SurfaceControl* parent,
LayerMetadata metadata,
uint32_t* outTransformHint) {
sp<SurfaceControl> s;
createSurfaceChecked(name, w, h, format, &s, flags, parent, std::move(metadata),
outTransformHint);
return s;
}
status_t SurfaceComposerClient::createSurfaceChecked(const String8& name, uint32_t w, uint32_t h,
PixelFormat format,
sp<SurfaceControl>* outSurface, uint32_t flags,
SurfaceControl* parent, LayerMetadata metadata,
uint32_t* outTransformHint) {
sp<SurfaceControl> sur;
status_t err = mStatus;
if (mStatus == NO_ERROR) {
sp<IBinder> handle;
sp<IGraphicBufferProducer> gbp;
uint32_t transformHint = 0;
//下面这句代码,可以获得IGraphicBufferProducer,卧槽,这不就是创建Surface需要的么 ?
// mClient是个什么玩意 ?后面再深入分析
err = mClient->createSurface(name, w, h, format, flags, parentHandle, std::move(metadata),
&handle, &gbp, &transformHint);
if (outTransformHint) {
*outTransformHint = transformHint;
}
if (err == NO_ERROR) {
//创建一个SurfaceControl,看来Surface的创建在SurfaceControl中了。
*outSurface = new SurfaceControl(this, handle, gbp, transformHint);
}
}
return err;
}
SurfaceControl中创建Surface对象
sp<Surface> SurfaceControl::getSurface() const
{
Mutex::Autolock _l(mLock);
if (mSurfaceData == nullptr) {
return generateSurfaceLocked();
}
return mSurfaceData;
}
//将mGraphicBufferProducer作为参数创建Surface
sp<Surface> SurfaceControl::generateSurfaceLocked() const
{
// This surface is always consumed by SurfaceFlinger, so the
// producerControlledByApp value doesn't matter; using false.
mSurfaceData = new Surface(mGraphicBufferProducer, false);
return mSurfaceData;
}
至此,Surface的创建已经找到地方了。那么继续找BufferQueue是在哪里创建的?
上面SurfaceComposerClient由这句代码可以获取IGraphicBufferProducer,那么BufferQueue肯定与此相关,那么来看看这个是什么。
mClient->createSurface(…)
sp<ISurfaceComposerClient> mClient;
//实际上这玩意是一个Binder对象,是一个代理,其实体在surfaceflinger进程中。
void SurfaceComposerClient::onFirstRef() {
//获取surfacecomposer的代理,其实体就是SurfaceFlinger这个类
//class SurfaceFlinger : public BnSurfaceComposer,
// public PriorityDumper,
// public ClientCache::ErasedRecipient,
// private IBinder::DeathRecipient,
// private HWC2::ComposerCallback,
// private ISchedulerCallback {
// .............;
// };
// sf->createConnection() 实际上是执行sp SurfaceFlinger::createConnection()
// 这里涉及Android binder的知识,暂不深究。后面会出独立篇幅来研究Binder
sp<ISurfaceComposer> sf(ComposerService::getComposerService());
if (sf != nullptr && mStatus == NO_INIT) {
sp<ISurfaceComposerClient> conn;
//在surfaceflinger中创建SurfaceComposerClient的实体,返回SurfaceComposerClient的代理
conn = sf->createConnection();
if (conn != nullptr) {
mClient = conn;
mStatus = NO_ERROR;
}
}
}
sp<ISurfaceComposerClient> SurfaceFlinger::createConnection() {
const sp<Client> client = new Client(this);
return client->initCheck() == NO_ERROR ? client : nullptr;
}
上面代码已经解释SurfaceComposerClient中sp mClient为surfaceflinger中Client的代理。
那么mClient->createSurface(…)实际执行的是surfaceflinger的Client接口:Client::createSurface(…)
那么看看此接口中是如何创建IGraphicBufferProducer的?
status_t Client::createSurface(const String8& name, uint32_t w, uint32_t h, PixelFormat format,
uint32_t flags, const sp<IBinder>& parentHandle,
LayerMetadata metadata, sp<IBinder>* handle,
sp<IGraphicBufferProducer>* gbp, uint32_t* outTransformHint) {
// We rely on createLayer to check permissions.
return mFlinger->createLayer(name, this, w, h, format, flags, std::move(metadata), handle, gbp,
parentHandle, nullptr, outTransformHint);
}
从下面的代码看是BufferQueueLayer中创建IGraphicBufferProducer
status_t SurfaceFlinger::createLayer(const String8& name, const sp<Client>& client, uint32_t w,
uint32_t h, PixelFormat format, uint32_t flags,
LayerMetadata metadata, sp<IBinder>* handle,
sp<IGraphicBufferProducer>* gbp,
const sp<IBinder>& parentHandle, const sp<Layer>& parentLayer,
uint32_t* outTransformHint) {
sp<Layer> layer;
std::string uniqueName = getUniqueLayerName(name.string());
bool primaryDisplayOnly = false;
switch (flags & ISurfaceComposerClient::eFXSurfaceMask) {
case ISurfaceComposerClient::eFXSurfaceBufferQueue:
//一般普通的surface对应的是BufferQueueLayer
result = createBufferQueueLayer(client, std::move(uniqueName), w, h, flags,
std::move(metadata), format, handle, gbp, &layer);
break;
case ISurfaceComposerClient::eFXSurfaceBufferState:
result = createBufferStateLayer(client, std::move(uniqueName), w, h, flags,
std::move(metadata), handle, &layer);
break;
case ISurfaceComposerClient::eFXSurfaceEffect:
result = createEffectLayer(client, std::move(uniqueName), w, h, flags,
std::move(metadata), handle, &layer);
break;
case ISurfaceComposerClient::eFXSurfaceContainer:
result = createContainerLayer(client, std::move(uniqueName), w, h, flags,
std::move(metadata), handle, &layer);
break;
...........;
}
result = addClientLayer(client, *handle, *gbp, layer, parentHandle, parentLayer,
addToCurrentState, outTransformHint);
.........................;
return result;
}
继续看下IGraphicBufferProducer的代码:
status_t SurfaceFlinger::createBufferQueueLayer(const sp<Client>& client, std::string name,
uint32_t w, uint32_t h, uint32_t flags,
LayerMetadata metadata, PixelFormat& format,
sp<IBinder>* handle,
sp<IGraphicBufferProducer>* gbp,
sp<Layer>* outLayer) {
.........................................;
sp<BufferQueueLayer> layer;
LayerCreationArgs args(this, client, std::move(name), w, h, flags, std::move(metadata));
args.textureName = getNewTexture();
{
Mutex::Autolock lock(mStateLock);
//创建BufferQueueLayer
layer = getFactory().createBufferQueueLayer(args);
}
status_t err = layer->setDefaultBufferProperties(w, h, format);
if (err == NO_ERROR) {
*handle = layer->getHandle();
//获取IGraphicBufferProducer
*gbp = layer->getProducer();
*outLayer = layer;
}
return err;
}
sp<BufferQueueLayer> DefaultFactory::createBufferQueueLayer(const LayerCreationArgs& args) {
return new BufferQueueLayer(args);
}
layer的继承关系:
class BufferQueueLayer : public BufferLayer {
.........;
}
class BufferLayer : public Layer {
.........;
}
class Layer : public virtual RefBase, compositionengine::LayerFE {
............;
}
BufferQueueLayer在哪里创建BufferQueue的呢 ?
void BufferQueueLayer::onFirstRef() {
BufferLayer::onFirstRef();
// Creates a custom BufferQueue for SurfaceFlingerConsumer to use
sp<IGraphicBufferProducer> producer;
sp<IGraphicBufferConsumer> consumer;
//创建BufferQueue
mFlinger->getFactory().createBufferQueue(&producer, &consumer, true);
mProducer = mFlinger->getFactory().createMonitoredProducer(producer, mFlinger, this);
mConsumer =
mFlinger->getFactory().createBufferLayerConsumer(consumer, mFlinger->getRenderEngine(),
................................;
}
void DefaultFactory::createBufferQueue(sp<IGraphicBufferProducer>* outProducer,
sp<IGraphicBufferConsumer>* outConsumer,
bool consumerIsSurfaceFlinger) {
BufferQueue::createBufferQueue(outProducer, outConsumer, consumerIsSurfaceFlinger);
}
void BufferQueue::createBufferQueue(sp<IGraphicBufferProducer>* outProducer,
sp<IGraphicBufferConsumer>* outConsumer,
bool consumerIsSurfaceFlinger) {
sp<BufferQueueCore> core(new BufferQueueCore());
sp<IGraphicBufferProducer> producer(new BufferQueueProducer(core, consumerIsSurfaceFlinger));
sp<IGraphicBufferConsumer> consumer(new BufferQueueConsumer(core));
*outProducer = producer;
*outConsumer = consumer;
}
所以用于创建Surface的IGraphicBufferProducer实际为BufferQueueProducer, 而IGraphicBufferConsumer实际为BufferQueueConsumer储存在BufferQueueLayer中。
native_window_api_connect(nativeWindow, NATIVE_WINDOW_API_CPU);
这个c接口最终是调用下面Surface::connect(…)
int Surface::connect(int api, const sp<IProducerListener>& listener, bool reportBufferRemoval) {
...................;
int err = mGraphicBufferProducer->connect(listener, api, mProducerControlledByApp, &output);
....................;
return err;
}
status_t BufferQueueProducer::connect(const sp<IProducerListener>& listener,
int api, bool producerControlledByApp, QueueBufferOutput *output) {
//如果已经连接过,就不允许再链接。也就是BufferQueueCore只允许由一个connected producer
if (mCore->mConnectedApi != BufferQueueCore::NO_CONNECTED_API) {
BQ_LOGE("connect: already connected (cur=%d req=%d)",
mCore->mConnectedApi, api);
return BAD_VALUE;
}
..........................;
int status = NO_ERROR;
switch (api) {
case NATIVE_WINDOW_API_EGL:
case NATIVE_WINDOW_API_CPU:
case NATIVE_WINDOW_API_MEDIA:
case NATIVE_WINDOW_API_CAMERA:
mCore->mConnectedApi = api;
output->width = mCore->mDefaultWidth;
output->height = mCore->mDefaultHeight;
output->transformHint = mCore->mTransformHintInUse = mCore->mTransformHint;
output->numPendingBuffers =
static_cast<uint32_t>(mCore->mQueue.size());
output->nextFrameNumber = mCore->mFrameCounter + 1;
output->bufferReplaced = false;
output->maxBufferCount = mCore->mMaxBufferCount;
................................;
}
..........................................;
return status;
}
从上面的代码逻辑来看,surface connect的对象是surface中的producer对应的BufferQueueCore,BufferQueueCore同一时间只能链接一个producer因此可以阻止多次链接的问题。另外在connect的时候会获取BufferQueueCore的一些信息。