TCP/IP Illustrated Episode 22

Attacks on the Link Layer

Attacking layers below TCP/IP in order to affect the operations of TCP/IP networks has been a popular approach because much of the link-layer information is not shared by the higher layers and can therefore be somewhat difficult to detect and mitigate. Nevertheless, many such attacks are now well understood, and we mention a few of them here to better understand how problems at the link layer can affect higher-layer operations.

ARP: Address Resolution Protocol

Introduction

We have seen that the IP protocol is designed to provide interoperability of packet switching across a large variety of physical network types. Doing so requires, among other things, converting between the addresses used by the network-layer software and those interpreted by the underlying network hardware. Generally, network interface hardware has one primary hardware address (e.g., a 48-bit value for an Ethernet or 802.11 wireless interface). Frames exchanged by the hardware must be addressed to the correct interface using the correct hardware addresses; otherwise, no data can be transferred. But a conventional IPv4 network works with its own addresses: 32-bit IPv4 addresses. Knowing a host’s IP address is insufficient for the system to send a frame to that host efficiently on networks where hardware addresses are used. The operating system software (i.e., the Ethernet driver) must know the destination’s hardware address to send data directly. For TCP/IP networks, the Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) [RFC0826] provides a dynamic mapping between IPv4 addresses and the hardware addresses used by various network technologies. ARP is used with IPv4 only; IPv6 uses the Neighbor Discovery Protocol, which is incorporated into ICMPv6.

Note

A related protocol that provides the reverse mapping from ARP, called RARP, was
used by systems lacking a disk drive (normally diskless workstations or X terminals).
It is rarely used today and requires manual configuration by the system
administrator. See [RFC0903] for details.

An Example

Whenever we use Internet services, such as opening a Web page with a browser, our local computer must determine how to contact the server in which we are interested. The most basic decision it makes is whether that service is local (part of the same IP subnetwork) or remote. If it is remote, a router is required to reach the destination. ARP operates only when reaching those systems on the same IP subnet. For this example, then, let us assume that we use a Web browser to contact the following URL:

http://10.0.0.1

Note that this URL contains an IPv4 address rather than the more common domain or host name. The reason for using the address here is to underscore the fact that our demonstration of ARP is most relevant to systems sharing the same IPv4 prefix (see Chapter 2). Here, we use a URL containing an address identifying a local Web server and explore how direct delivery operates. Such local servers are becoming more common as embedded devices such as printers and VoIP adapters include built-in Web servers for configuration.

Direct Delivery and ARP
In this section, we enumerate the steps taken in direct delivery, focusing on the
operation of ARP. Direct delivery takes place when an IP datagram is sent to an
IP address with the same IP prefix as the sender’s. It plays an important role in
the general method of forwarding of IP datagrams (see Chapter 5). The following
list captures the basic operation of direct delivery with IPv4, using the previous
example:

1.The application, in this case a Web browser, calls a special function to parse the URL to see if it contains a host name. Here it does not, so the application uses the 32-bit IPv4 address 10.0.0.1.
2.The application asks the TCP protocol to establish a connection with 10.0.0.1.
3.TCP attempts to send a connection request segment to the remote host by sending an IPv4 datagram to 10.0.0.1.
4.Because we are assuming that the address 10.0.0.1 is using the same network prefix as our sending host, the datagram can be sent directly to that address without going through a router.
5.Assuming that Ethernet-compatible addressing is being used on the IPv4 subnet, the sending host must convert the 32-bit IPv4 destination address into a 48-bit Ethernet-style address. Using the terminology from [RFC0826], a translation is required from the logical Internet address to its corresponding physical hardware address. This is the function of ARP. ARP works in its normal form only for broadcast networks, where the link layer is able to deliver a single message to all attached network devices. This is an important requirement imposed by the operation of ARP. On non-broadcast networks (sometimes called NBMA for non-broadcast multiple access), other, more complex mapping protocols may be required [RFC2332].
6.ARP sends an Ethernet frame called an ARP request to every host on the shared link-layer segment. This is called a link-layer broadcast. We show the broadcast domain in Figure 4-1 with a crosshatched box. The ARP request contains the IPv4 address of the destination host (10.0.0.1) and seeks an answer to the following question: “If you are configured with IPv4 address 10.0.0.1 as one of your own, please respond to me with your MAC address.”
7.With ARP, all systems in the same broadcast domain receive ARP requests. This includes systems that may not be running the IPv4 or IPv6 protocols at all but does not include systems on different VLANs, if they are supported (see Chapter 3 for details on VLANs). Provided there exists an attached system using the IPv4 address specified in the request, it alone responds with an ARP reply. This reply contains the IPv4 address (for matching with the request) and the corresponding MAC address. The reply does not ordinarily use broadcast but is directed only to the sender. The host receiving the ARP request also learns of the sender’s IPv4-to-MAC address mapping at this time and records it in memory for later use (see Section 4.3).
8.The ARP reply is then received by the original sender of the request, and the datagram that forced the ARP request/reply to be exchanged can now be sent.
9. The sender now sends the datagram directly to the destination host by encapsulating it in an Ethernet frame and using the Ethernet address learned by the ARP exchange as the destination Ethernet address. Because the Ethernet address refers only to the correct destination host, no other hosts or routers receive the datagram. Thus, when only direct delivery is used, no router is required.

ARP is used in multi-access link-layer networks running IPv4, where each host has its own primary hardware address. Point-to-point links such as PPP (see Chapter 3) do not use ARP. When these links are established (normally by action of the user or a system boot), the system is told of the addresses in use at each end of the link. Because hardware addresses are not involved, there is no need for address resolution or ARP.

你可能感兴趣的:(TCP/IP,Illustrated,tcp/ip,网络,服务器)