被我们忽略的HttpSession线程安全问题

1. 背景

最近在读《Java concurrency in practice》(Java并发实战),其中1.4节提到了Java web的线程安全问题时有如下一段话:

Servlets and JPSs, as well as servlet filters and objects stored in scoped containers like ServletContext and HttpSession, 
simply have to be thread-safe.

Servlet, JSP, Servlet filter 以及保存在 ServletContext、HttpSession 中的对象必须是线程安全的。含义有两点:

1)Servlet, JSP, Servlet filter 必须是线程安全的(JSP的本质其实就是servlet);

2)保存在ServletContext、HttpSession中的对象必须是线程安全的;

servlet和servelt filter必须是线程安全的,这个一般是不存在什么问题的,只要我们的servlet和servlet filter中没有实例属性或者实例属性是”不可变对象“就基本没有问题。但是保存在ServletContext和HttpSession中的对象必须是线程安全的,这一点似乎一直被我们忽略掉了。在Java web项目中,我们经常要将一个登录的用户保存在HttpSession中,而这个User对象就是像下面定义的一样的一个Java bean:

复制代码

public class User {
    private int id;
    private String userName;
    private String password;
    // ... ...
    
    public int getId() {
        return id;
    }
    public void setId(int id) {
        this.id = id;
    }
    public String getUserName() {
        return userName;
    }
    public void setUserName(String userName) {
        this.userName = userName;
    }
    public String getPassword() {
        return password;
    }
    public void setPassword(String password) {
        this.password = password;
    }
}

复制代码

2. 源码分析

下面分析一下为什么将一个这样的Java对象保存在HttpSession中是有问题的,至少在线程安全方面不严谨的,可能会出现并发问题。

Tomcat8.0中HttpSession的源码在org.apache.catalina.session.StandardSession.java文件中,源码如下(截取我们需要的部分):

复制代码

public class StandardSession implements HttpSession, Session, Serializable {
    // ----------------------------------------------------- Instance Variables
    /**
     * The collection of user data attributes associated with this Session.
     */
    protected Map attributes = new ConcurrentHashMap<>();

   /**
     * Return the object bound with the specified name in this session, or
     * null if no object is bound with that name.
     *
     * @param name Name of the attribute to be returned
     *
     * @exception IllegalStateException if this method is called on an
     *  invalidated session
     */
    @Override
    public Object  getAttribute(String name) {

        if (!isValidInternal())
            throw new IllegalStateException
                (sm.getString("standardSession.getAttribute.ise"));

        if (name == null) return null;

        return (attributes.get(name));

    }

   /**
     * Bind an object to this session, using the specified name.  If an object
     * of the same name is already bound to this session, the object is
     * replaced.
     * 

* After this method executes, and if the object implements * HttpSessionBindingListener, the container calls * valueBound() on the object. * * @param name Name to which the object is bound, cannot be null * @param value Object to be bound, cannot be null * @param notify whether to notify session listeners * @exception IllegalArgumentException if an attempt is made to add a * non-serializable object in an environment marked distributable. * @exception IllegalStateException if this method is called on an * invalidated session */ public void setAttribute(String name, Object value, boolean notify) { // Name cannot be null if (name == null) throw new IllegalArgumentException (sm.getString("standardSession.setAttribute.namenull")); // Null value is the same as removeAttribute() if (value == null) { removeAttribute(name); return; } // ... ... // Replace or add this attribute Object unbound = attributes.put(name, value); // ... ... } /** * Release all object references, and initialize instance variables, in * preparation for reuse of this object. */ @Override public void recycle() { // Reset the instance variables associated with this Session attributes.clear(); // ... ... } /** * Write a serialized version of this session object to the specified * object output stream. *

* IMPLEMENTATION NOTE: The owning Manager will not be stored * in the serialized representation of this Session. After calling * readObject(), you must set the associated Manager * explicitly. *

* IMPLEMENTATION NOTE: Any attribute that is not Serializable * will be unbound from the session, with appropriate actions if it * implements HttpSessionBindingListener. If you do not want any such * attributes, be sure the distributable property of the * associated Manager is set to true. * * @param stream The output stream to write to * * @exception IOException if an input/output error occurs */ protected void doWriteObject(ObjectOutputStream stream) throws IOException { // ... ... // Accumulate the names of serializable and non-serializable attributes String keys[] = keys(); ArrayList saveNames = new ArrayList<>(); ArrayList saveValues = new ArrayList<>(); for (int i = 0; i < keys.length; i++) { Object value = attributes.get(keys[i]); if (value == null) continue; else if ( (value instanceof Serializable) && (!exclude(keys[i]) )) { saveNames.add(keys[i]); saveValues.add(value); } else { removeAttributeInternal(keys[i], true); } } // Serialize the attribute count and the Serializable attributes int n = saveNames.size(); stream.writeObject(Integer.valueOf(n)); for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) { stream.writeObject(saveNames.get(i)); try { stream.writeObject(saveValues.get(i)); // ... ... } catch (NotSerializableException e) { // ... ... } } } }

复制代码

我们看到每一个独立的HttpSession中保存的所有属性,是存储在一个独立的ConcurrentHashMap中的:

protected Map attributes = new ConcurrentHashMap<>();

所以我可以看到 HttpSession.getAttribute(), HttpSession.setAttribute() 等等方法就都是线程安全的。

另外如果我们要将一个对象保存在HttpSession中时,那么该对象应该是可序列化的。不然在进行HttpSession的持久化时,就会被抛弃了,无法恢复了:

            else if ( (value instanceof Serializable)
                    && (!exclude(keys[i]) )) {
                saveNames.add(keys[i]);
                saveValues.add(value);
            } else {
                removeAttributeInternal(keys[i], true);
            }

所以从源码的分析,我们得出了下面的结论:

1)HttpSession.getAttribute(), HttpSession.setAttribute() 等等方法都是线程安全的;

2)要保存在HttpSession中对象应该是序列化的;

虽然getAttribute,setAttribute是线程安全的了,那么下面的代码就是线程安全的吗?

session.setAttribute("user", user);

User user = (User)session.getAttribute("user", user);

不是线程安全的!因为User对象不是线程安全的,假如有一个线程执行下面的操作:

User user = (User)session.getAttribute("user", user);

user.setName("xxx");

那么显然就会存在并发问题。因为会出现:有多个线程访问同一个对象 user, 并且至少有一个线程在修改该对象。但是在通常情况下,我们的Java web程序都是这么写的,为什么又没有出现问题呢?原因是:在web中 ”多个线程访问同一个对象 user, 并且至少有一个线程在修改该对象“ 这样的情况极少出现;因为我们使用HttpSession的目的是在内存中暂时保存信息,便于快速访问,所以我们一般不会进行下面的操作:

User user = (User)session.getAttribute("user", user);

user.setName("xxx");

我们一般是只使用对从HttpSession中的对象使用get方法来获得信息,一般不会对”从HttpSession中获得的对象“调用set方法来修改它;而是直接调用 setAttribute来进行设置或者替换成一个新的。

3. 结论

所以结论是:如果你能保证不会对”从HttpSession中获得的对象“调用set方法来修改它,那么保存在HttpSession中的对象可以不是线程安全的(因为他是”事实不可变对象“,并且ConcurrentHashMap保证了它是被”安全发布的“);但是如果你不能保证这一点,那么你必须要实现”保存在HttpSession中的对象必须是线程安全“。不然的话,就存在并发问题。

使Java bean线程安全的最简单方法,就是在所有的get/set方法都加上synchronized。

你可能感兴趣的:(安全,python,hive)