Volley学习(RequestQueue分析)
Volley的RequestQueue用来缓存请求处理器CacheDispatch和网络请求处理器NetworkDispatch来处理Request的。当我们调用RequestQueue.start()是，两个处理器开始运行起来，等待Request的到来。
public void start() {
stop(); // Make sure any currently running dispatchers are stopped.
// Create the cache dispatcher and start it.
mCacheDispatcher = new CacheDispatcher(mCacheQueue, mNetworkQueue, mCache, mDelivery);
mCacheDispatcher.start();
// Create network dispatchers (and corresponding threads) up to the pool size.
for (int i = 0; i < mDispatchers.length; i++) {
NetworkDispatcher networkDispatcher = new NetworkDispatcher(mNetworkQueue, mNetwork,
mCache, mDelivery);
mDispatchers[i] = networkDispatcher;
networkDispatcher.start();
}
}
Volley先读缓存然后，没有cache hit的话再从网络上获取，所以先启动CacheDispatcher，然后启动NetworkDispatcher。不过在启动处理器前先调用stop()函数清除掉以前RequestQueue里的过期的Dispatcher(Dispatcher都是继承Thread)。以防影响性能。Volley启动一个CacheDispatcher和4个NetworkDispatcher,之所以这样设计，个人人为是主要考虑到网络图片的下载，所以利用多个NetworkDispatcher来处理网络请求。然后看一下stop()函数。
public void stop() {
if (mCacheDispatcher != null) {
mCacheDispatcher.quit();
}
for (int i = 0; i < mDispatchers.length; i++) {
if (mDispatchers[i] != null) {
mDispatchers[i].quit();
}
}
}
调用Dispatcher的quit()函数来结束线程。以NetworkDispatcher.quit()为例：
public void quit() {
mQuit = true;
interrupt();
}
函数将mQuit变量置为true。为什么要这样做，因为在networkdispatcher线程中的中断异常处理中，判断mQuit的值，如果真，则退出循环，结束线程。否则continue,继续从Queue中去取Request处理。
try {
// Take a request from the queue.
request = mQueue.take();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
// We may have been interrupted because it was time to quit.
if (mQuit) {
return;
}
continue;
}
接下来，看下RequestQueue的add函数。
public Request add(Request request) {
// Tag the request as belonging to this queue and add it to the set of current requests.
request.setRequestQueue(this);
synchronized (mCurrentRequests) {
mCurrentRequests.add(request);
}
// Process requests in the order they are added.
request.setSequence(getSequenceNumber());
request.addMarker("add-to-queue");
// If the request is uncacheable, skip the cache queue and go straight to the network.
if (!request.shouldCache()) {
mNetworkQueue.add(request);
return request;
}
// Insert request into stage if there's already a request with the same cache key in flight.
synchronized (mWaitingRequests) {
String cacheKey = request.getCacheKey();
if (mWaitingRequests.containsKey(cacheKey)) {
// There is already a request in flight. Queue up.
Queue<Request> stagedRequests = mWaitingRequests.get(cacheKey);
if (stagedRequests == null) {
stagedRequests = new LinkedList<Request>();
}
stagedRequests.add(request);
mWaitingRequests.put(cacheKey, stagedRequests);
if (VolleyLog.DEBUG) {
VolleyLog.v("Request for cacheKey=%s is in flight, putting on hold.", cacheKey);
}
} else {
// Insert 'null' queue for this cacheKey, indicating there is now a request in
// flight.
mWaitingRequests.put(cacheKey, null);
mCacheQueue.add(request);
}
return request;
}
}
首先将Request加入到mCurrentRequests中，因为存在多个线程竞争的问题，在这个代码块上进行了同步。然后request.setSequence().为当前Request分配一个序列号，为什么这样做，因为我们下面要将Request放到NetworkQueue中或者CacheQueue中，这两个队列都是PriorityBlockingQueue，里面的元素是根据自定义的权重来排序的。PriorityBlockingQueue里的元素须实现Comparable接口，来看下我们这里的Requeset的实现：
@Override
public int compareTo(Request<T> other) {
Priority left = this.getPriority();
Priority right = other.getPriority();
// High-priority requests are "lesser" so they are sorted to the front.
// Equal priorities are sorted by sequence number to provide FIFO ordering.
return left == right ?
this.mSequence - other.mSequence :
right.ordinal() - left.ordinal();
}
Request的策略是现根据每个Request的Priority来判断，如果两个Request的Priority相同，那么载根据两个Request的Sequence来进行判断队列里的先后顺序。
1 public enum Priority { 2 LOW, 3 NORMAL, 4 HIGH, 5 IMMEDIATE 6 }
给当前Request加上序列后，判断一下当前Request是否需要缓存，如果不需要则直接把Request加入到NetworkQueue队列里。如果需要缓存，取出Request的缓存键，从mWaitingRequests里看下有没有Request的缓存键.在RequestQueue中有四个队列。mCurrentRequests，mWaitingRequests，mCacheQueue，mNetworkQueue。每当一个请求到来时，先加入到mCurrentRequests,然后判断当前Request是否需要缓存，如果不用缓存的Request，则直接加入到mNetworkQueue队列中等待网络处理器(NetWorkDispatcher)去处理。如果需要缓存的话，根据Request获取相应的cacheKey,如果cacheKey不存在的话，说明这个需要缓存的Request是第一次请求。那么将cacheKey放入到mWaitingRequests队列里。(这里插播一下，mCurrentRequests存放的是所有交由RequestQueue处理的Request,mWaitingRequests里存放的是mCacheQueue里已经有相同url的Request,mWatiingRequests的出现就是为了避免不必要的网络数据获取)，并将Request放入到mCacheQueue中以做处理。
1 // Insert 'null' queue for this cacheKey, indicating there is now a request in 2 // flight. 3 mWaitingRequests.put(cacheKey, null); 4 mCacheQueue.add(request);
如果cacheKey存在的话，说明已经有相同的Request正在处理（这里的cacheKey是通过getUrl()得到的,也就是创建Request时的url)。这时将此Request放入到mWaitingRequest队列中等待In-flight Request的处理结果。
add完然后看finish(Request req);
1 void finish(Request request) { 2 // Remove from the set of requests currently being processed. 3 synchronized (mCurrentRequests) { 4 mCurrentRequests.remove(request); 5 } 6 7 if (request.shouldCache()) { 8 synchronized (mWaitingRequests) { 9 String cacheKey = request.getCacheKey(); 10 Queue<Request> waitingRequests = mWaitingRequests.remove(cacheKey); 11 if (waitingRequests != null) { 12 if (VolleyLog.DEBUG) { 13 VolleyLog.v("Releasing %d waiting requests for cacheKey=%s.", 14 waitingRequests.size(), cacheKey); 15 } 16 // Process all queued up requests. They won't be considered as in flight, but 17 // that's not a problem as the cache has been primed by 'request'. 18 mCacheQueue.addAll(waitingRequests); 19 } 20 } 21 } 22 }
首先先从mCurrentRequests集合中remove掉当前Request,然后在mWaitingRequests中去掉当前的Request.然后将此Request对应的mWaitingRequest中存储的Request放到mCacheQueue中等待处理（因为此时对应的url的网络数据已经加载到本地，所以这些mWaitingRequests里的Request被处理时直接从本地解析，不用耗时的网络获取一遍）。
RequestQueue类中还有一个CancelAll()函数，它的作用是根据指定的Request tag来删除响应的Request.
public void cancelAll(RequestFilter filter) {
synchronized (mCurrentRequests) {
for (Request<?> request : mCurrentRequests) {
if (filter.apply(request)) {
request.cancel();
}
}
}
}
/**
* Cancels all requests in this queue with the given tag. Tag must be non-null
* and equality is by identity.
*/
public void cancelAll(final Object tag) {
if (tag == null) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Cannot cancelAll with a null tag");
}
cancelAll(new RequestFilter() {
@Override
public boolean apply(Request<?> request) {
return request.getTag() == tag;
}
});
}