先看整个字符串是不是一个匹配。如果没有发现匹配,它去掉最后字符串中的最后一个字符,并再次尝试。如果还是没有发现匹配,那么 再次去掉最后一个字符串,这个过程会一直重复直到发现一个匹配或者字符串不剩任何字符。简单量词都是贪婪量词。 |
惰性量词:
先看字符串中的第一个字母是不是一个匹配,如果单独着一个字符还不够,就读入下一个字符,组成两个字符的字符串。如果还没有发现匹配,惰性量词继续从字符串中添加字符直到发现一个匹配或者整个字符串都检查过也没有匹配。惰性量词和贪婪量词的工作方式恰好相反。 |
支配量词:
只尝试匹配整个字符串。如果整个字符串不能产生匹配,不做进一步尝试。 |
贪婪量词 惰性量词 支配量词 描述
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
? ?? ?+ 可以出现0次或1次,但至多出现1次
* *? *+ 可以出现任意次,也可以不出现
+ +? ++ 出现1次或多次,但至少出现1次
{n} {n}? {n}+ 一定出现n次
{n,m} {n,m}? {n,m}+ 至少出现n次,但至多不能超过m次
{n,} {n,}? {n,}+ 可以出现任意次,但至少出现n次
例如:我们要从字符串abbbaabbbaaabbb1234中获得abbb,aabbb,aaabbb的匹配
1、贪婪量词
1 var regexp = /.*bbb/g; 2 var a = str.match(regexp); 3 alert(a.length); //output:1 4 alert(a[0]); //output:abbbaabbbaaabbb |
贪婪量词的工作过程可以这样表示:
a)abbbaabbbaaabbb1234
b)abbbaabbbaaabbb123
c)abbbaabbbaaabbb12
d)abbbaabbbaaabbb1
e)abbbaabbbaaabbb //true
可以看到,贪婪量词在取得一次匹配后就会停止工作,虽然我们加了'g'(全局匹配)
2、惰性量词
1 var regexp = /.*?bbb/g; 2 var a = str.match(regexp); 3 alert(a.length); //output:3 4 alert(a[0]); //output:abbb 5 alert(a[1]); //output:aabbb 6 alert(a[2]); //output:aaabbb |
惰性量词的工作过程可以这样表示:
a)a
b)ab
c)abb
d)abbb //保存结果,并从下一个位置重新开始
e)a
f)aa
g)aab
h)aabb
j)aabbb //保存结果,并从下一个位置重新开始
e)a
e)aa
e)aaa
e)aaab
e)aaabb
e)aaabbb //保存结果,并从下一个位置重新开始
由于JS是不支持支配量词的,所以支配量词我们只能用JAVA来演示:
1 String string = "abbbaabbbaaabbb1234"; 2 Pattern p = Pattern.compile(".*+bbb"); 3 Matcher m = p.matcher(string); 4 System.out.println(m.find()); //output:false 5 |
因为支配量词采用一刀切的匹配方式,如:
a)abbbaabbbaaabbb1234 //false
下面的转来慢慢看:
X?
,
X??
and
X?+
do exactly the same thing, since they all promise to match "
X
, once or not at all". There are subtle implementation differences which will be explained near the end of this section.
Greedy | Reluctant | Possessive | Meaning |
---|---|---|---|
X? |
X?? |
X?+ |
X , once or not at all |
X* |
X*? |
X*+ |
X , zero or more times |
X+ |
X+? |
X++ |
X , one or more times |
X{n} |
X{n}? |
X{n}+ |
X , exactly n times |
X{n,} |
X{n,}? |
X{n,}+ |
X , at least n times |
X{n,m} |
X{n,m}? |
X{n,m}+ |
X , at least n but not more thanm times |
Let's start our look at greedy quantifiers by creating three different regular expressions: the letter "a" followed by either?
, *
, or +
. Let's see what happens when these expressions are tested against an empty input string""
:
Enter your regex: a? Enter input string to search: I found the text "" starting at index 0 and ending at index 0. Enter your regex: a* Enter input string to search: I found the text "" starting at index 0 and ending at index 0. Enter your regex: a+ Enter input string to search: No match found.
a?
and
a*
both allow for zero occurrences of the letter
a
. You'll also notice that the start and end indices are both zero, which is unlike any of the examples we've seen so far. The empty input string
""
has no length, so the test simply matches nothing at index 0.Matches of this sort are known as a
zero-length matches.A zero-length match can occur in several cases: in an empty input string, at the beginning of an input string, after the last character of an input string, or in between any two characters of an input string. Zero-length matches are easily identifiable because they always start and end at the same index position.
Let's explore zero-length matches with a few more examples. Change the input string to a single letter "a" and you'll notice something interesting:
Enter your regex: a? Enter input string to search: a I found the text "a" starting at index 0 and ending at index 1. I found the text "" starting at index 1 and ending at index 1. Enter your regex: a* Enter input string to search: a I found the text "a" starting at index 0 and ending at index 1. I found the text "" starting at index 1 and ending at index 1. Enter your regex: a+ Enter input string to search: a I found the text "a" starting at index 0 and ending at index 1.
Now change the input string to the letter "a" five times in a row and you'll get the following:
Enter your regex: a? Enter input string to search: aaaaa I found the text "a" starting at index 0 and ending at index 1. I found the text "a" starting at index 1 and ending at index 2. I found the text "a" starting at index 2 and ending at index 3. I found the text "a" starting at index 3 and ending at index 4. I found the text "a" starting at index 4 and ending at index 5. I found the text "" starting at index 5 and ending at index 5. Enter your regex: a* Enter input string to search: aaaaa I found the text "aaaaa" starting at index 0 and ending at index 5. I found the text "" starting at index 5 and ending at index 5. Enter your regex: a+ Enter input string to search: aaaaa I found the text "aaaaa" starting at index 0 and ending at index 5.
a?
finds an individual match for each character, since it matches when "a" appears zero or one times.The expression
a*
finds two separate matches: all of the letter "a"'s in the first match, then the zero-length match after the last character at index 5. And finally,
a+
matches all occurrences of the letter "a", ignoring the presence of "nothing" at the last index.
At this point, you might be wondering what the results would be if the first two quantifiers encounter a letter other than "a". For example, what happens if it encounters the letter "b", as in "ababaaaab"?
Let's find out:
Enter your regex: a? Enter input string to search: ababaaaab I found the text "a" starting at index 0 and ending at index 1. I found the text "" starting at index 1 and ending at index 1. I found the text "a" starting at index 2 and ending at index 3. I found the text "" starting at index 3 and ending at index 3. I found the text "a" starting at index 4 and ending at index 5. I found the text "a" starting at index 5 and ending at index 6. I found the text "a" starting at index 6 and ending at index 7. I found the text "a" starting at index 7 and ending at index 8. I found the text "" starting at index 8 and ending at index 8. I found the text "" starting at index 9 and ending at index 9. Enter your regex: a* Enter input string to search: ababaaaab I found the text "a" starting at index 0 and ending at index 1. I found the text "" starting at index 1 and ending at index 1. I found the text "a" starting at index 2 and ending at index 3. I found the text "" starting at index 3 and ending at index 3. I found the text "aaaa" starting at index 4 and ending at index 8. I found the text "" starting at index 8 and ending at index 8. I found the text "" starting at index 9 and ending at index 9. Enter your regex: a+ Enter input string to search: ababaaaab I found the text "a" starting at index 0 and ending at index 1. I found the text "a" starting at index 2 and ending at index 3. I found the text "aaaa" starting at index 4 and ending at index 8.
a?
is not specifically looking for the letter "b"; it's merely looking for the presence (or lack thereof) of the letter "a". If the quantifier allows for a match of "a" zero times, anything in the input string that's not an "a"will show up as a zero-length match. The remaining a's are matched according to the rules discussed in the previous examples.
To match a pattern exactly n number of times, simplyspecify the number inside a set of braces:
Enter your regex: a{3} Enter input string to search: aa No match found. Enter your regex: a{3} Enter input string to search: aaa I found the text "aaa" starting at index 0 and ending at index 3. Enter your regex: a{3} Enter input string to search: aaaa I found the text "aaa" starting at index 0 and ending at index 3.
a{3}
is searching for three occurrences of the letter "a" in a row. The first test fails because the input string does nothave enough a's to match against. The second test contains exactly 3 a's in the input string, which triggers a match. The third test also triggers a match because there are exactly 3 a's at the beginning of the input string. Anything following that is irrelevant to the first match. If the pattern should appear again after that point, it would trigger subsequent matches:
Enter your regex: a{3} Enter input string to search: aaaaaaaaa I found the text "aaa" starting at index 0 and ending at index 3. I found the text "aaa" starting at index 3 and ending at index 6. I found the text "aaa" starting at index 6 and ending at index 9.
Enter your regex: a{3,} Enter input string to search: aaaaaaaaa I found the text "aaaaaaaaa" starting at index 0 and ending at index 9.
Finally, to specify an upper limit on the number of occurances, add a second number inside the braces:
Enter your regex: a{3,6} // find at least 3 (but no more than 6) a's in a row Enter input string to search: aaaaaaaaa I found the text "aaaaaa" starting at index 0 and ending at index 6. I found the text "aaa" starting at index 6 and ending at index 9.
[abc]+
(a or b or c, one or more times) or
(abc)+
(the group "abc", one or more times).
Let's illustrate by specifying the group (dog)
, three times in a row.
Enter your regex: (dog){3} Enter input string to search: dogdogdogdogdogdog I found the text "dogdogdog" starting at index 0 and ending at index 9. I found the text "dogdogdog" starting at index 9 and ending at index 18. Enter your regex: dog{3} Enter input string to search: dogdogdogdogdogdog No match found.
{3}
now applies only to the letter "g".
Similarly, we can apply a quantifier to an entire character class:
Enter your regex: [abc]{3} Enter input string to search: abccabaaaccbbbc I found the text "abc" starting at index 0 and ending at index 3. I found the text "cab" starting at index 3 and ending at index 6. I found the text "aaa" starting at index 6 and ending at index 9. I found the text "ccb" starting at index 9 and ending at index 12. I found the text "bbc" starting at index 12 and ending at index 15. Enter your regex: abc{3} Enter input string to search: abccabaaaccbbbc No match found.
{3}
applies to the entire character classin the first example, but only to the letter "c" in the second.
Greedy quantifiers are considered "greedy" because they force the matcher to read in, oreat, the entire input string prior to attempting the first match. If the first match attempt (the entire input string) fails, the matcher backs off the input string by one characterand tries again, repeating the process until a match is found or there are no more characters left to back off from. Depending on the quantifier used in the expression, the last thing it will try matching against is 1 or 0 characters.
The reluctant quantifiers, however, take the opposite approach: They start at the beginning of the input string, then reluctantly eat one character at a time looking for a match. The last thing they try is the entire input string.
Finally, the possessive quantifiers always eat the entire input string, trying once (and only once) for a match. Unlike the greedy quantifiers, possessive quantifiers never back off, even if doing so would allow the overall match to succeed.
To illustrate, consider the input string xfooxxxxxxfoo
.
Enter your regex: .*foo // greedy quantifier Enter input string to search: xfooxxxxxxfoo I found the text "xfooxxxxxxfoo" starting at index 0 and ending at index 13. Enter your regex: .*?foo // reluctant quantifier Enter input string to search: xfooxxxxxxfoo I found the text "xfoo" starting at index 0 and ending at index 4. I found the text "xxxxxxfoo" starting at index 4 and ending at index 13. Enter your regex: .*+foo // possessive quantifier Enter input string to search: xfooxxxxxxfoo No match found.
.*
to find "anything", zero or more times, followed by the letters
"f" "o" "o"
. Because the quantifier is greedy, the
.*
portion of the expression first eats the entire input string. At this point, the overall expression cannot succeed, because the last three letters (
"f" "o" "o"
) have already been consumed. So the matcher slowly backs off one letter at a time until the rightmost occurrence of "foo" has been regurgitated, at which point the match succeeds and the search ends.
The second example, however, is reluctant, so it starts by first consuming "nothing". Because "foo" doesn't appear at the beginning of the string, it's forced to swallow the first letter (an "x"), which triggers the first match at 0 and 4. Our test harnesscontinues the process until the input string is exhausted. It finds another match at 4 and 13.
The third example fails to find a match because the quantifier is possessive. In this case, the entire input string is consumed by.*+
, leaving nothing left over to satisfy the "foo" at the end of the expression.Use a possessive quantifier for situations where you want to seize all of something without ever backing off; it will outperform the equivalentgreedy quantifier in cases where the match is not immediately found.