其中第三条可使用下面的命令查看所有线程的状态 strace -f -p 15427strace vs. ltrace:
strace追踪系统函数(对应man 2);
ltrace追踪库函数(对应man 3),ltrace也可同时追踪系统函数(参数-S)。
Strace is quite simply a tool that traces the execution of system calls. In its simplest form it can trace the execution of a binary from start to end, and output a line of text with the name of the system call, the arguments and the return value for every system call over the lifetime of the process.
But it can do a lot more:
If you've used other Unix systems, this is similar to "truss". Another (much more comprehensive) is Sun'sDtrace.
This is just scratching the surface, and in no particular order of importance:
Ever tried figuring out why some program doesn't read the config file you thought it should? Had to wrestle with custom compiled or distro-specific binaries that read their config from what you consider the "wrong" location?
The naive approach:
$ strace php 2>&1 | grep php.ini open("/usr/local/bin/php.ini", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/usr/local/lib/php.ini", O_RDONLY) = 4 lstat64("/usr/local/lib/php.ini", {st_mode=S_IFLNK|0777, st_size=27, ...}) = 0 readlink("/usr/local/lib/php.ini", "/usr/local/Zend/etc/php.ini", 4096) = 27 lstat64("/usr/local/Zend/etc/php.ini", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0664, st_size=40971, ...}) = 0
So this version of PHP reads php.ini from /usr/local/lib/php.ini (but it tries /usr/local/bin first).
The more sophisticated approach if I only care about a specific syscall:
$ strace -e open php 2>&1 | grep php.ini open("/usr/local/bin/php.ini", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/usr/local/lib/php.ini", O_RDONLY) = 4
The same approach work for a lot of other things. Have multiple versions of a library installed at different paths and wonder exactly which actually gets loaded? etc.
Ever run into a program that silently refuse to read a file it doesn't have read access to, but you only figured out after swearing for ages because you thought it didn't actually find the file? Well, you already know what to do:
$ strace -e open,access 2>&1 | grep your-filename
Look for an open() or access() syscall that fails
Ever had a process suddenly hog lots of CPU? Or had a process seem to be hanging?
Then you find the pid, and do this:
root@dev:~# strace -p 15427 Process 15427 attached - interrupt to quit futex(0x402f4900, FUTEX_WAIT, 2, NULL Process 15427 detached
Ah. So in this case it's hanging in a call to futex(). Incidentally in this case it doesn't tell us all that much - hanging on a futex can be caused by a lot of things (a futex is a locking mechanism in the Linux kernel). The above is from a normally working but idle Apache child process that's just waiting to be handed a request.
But "strace -p" is highly useful because it removes a lot of guesswork, and often removes the need for restarting an app with more extensive logging (or even recompile it).
You can always recompile an app with profiling turned on, and for accurate information, especially about what parts of your own code that is taking time that is what you should do. But often it is tremendously useful to be able to just quickly attach strace to a process to see what it's currently spending time on, especially to diagnose problems. Is that 90% CPU use because it's actually doing real work, or is something spinning out of control.
Here's what you do:
root@dev:~# strace -c -p 11084 Process 11084 attached - interrupt to quit Process 11084 detached % time seconds usecs/call calls errors syscall ------ ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ---------------- 94.59 0.001014 48 21 select 2.89 0.000031 1 21 getppid 2.52 0.000027 1 21 time ------ ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ---------------- 100.00 0.001072 63 total root@dev:~#
After you've started strace with -c -p you just wait for as long as you care to, and then exit with ctrl-c. Strace will spit out profiling data as above.
In this case, it's an idle Postgres "postmaster" process that's spending most of it's time quietly waiting in select(). In this case it's calling getppid() and time() in between each select() call, which is a fairly standard event loop.
You can also run this "start to finish", here with "ls":
root@dev:~# strace -c >/dev/null ls % time seconds usecs/call calls errors syscall ------ ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ---------------- 23.62 0.000205 103 2 getdents64 18.78 0.000163 15 11 1 open 15.09 0.000131 19 7 read 12.79 0.000111 7 16 old_mmap 7.03 0.000061 6 11 close 4.84 0.000042 11 4 munmap 4.84 0.000042 11 4 mmap2 4.03 0.000035 6 6 6 access 3.80 0.000033 3 11 fstat64 1.38 0.000012 3 4 brk 0.92 0.000008 3 3 3 ioctl 0.69 0.000006 6 1 uname 0.58 0.000005 5 1 set_thread_area 0.35 0.000003 3 1 write 0.35 0.000003 3 1 rt_sigaction 0.35 0.000003 3 1 fcntl64 0.23 0.000002 2 1 getrlimit 0.23 0.000002 2 1 set_tid_address 0.12 0.000001 1 1 rt_sigprocmask ------ ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ---------------- 100.00 0.000868 87 10 total
Pretty much what you'd expect, it spents most of it's time in two calls to read the directory entries (only two since it was run on a small directory).
Debugging why some process isn't connecting to a remote server can be exceedingly frustrating. DNS can fail, connect can hang, the server might send something unexpected back etc. You can use tcpdump to analyze a lot of that, and that too is a very nice tool, but a lot of the time strace will give you less chatter, simply because it will only ever return data related to the syscalls generated by "your" process. If you're trying to figure out what one of hundreds of running processes connecting to the same database server does for example (where picking out the right connection with tcpdump is a nightmare), strace makes life a lot easier.
This is an example of a trace of "nc" connecting to www.news.com on port 80 without any problems:
$ strace -e poll,select,connect,recvfrom,sendto nc www.news.com 80 sendto(3, "\24\0\0\0\26\0\1\3\255\373NH\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 20, 0, {sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=0, groups=00000000}, 12) = 20 connect(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path="/var/run/nscd/socket"}, 110) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) connect(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path="/var/run/nscd/socket"}, 110) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) connect(3, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(53), sin_addr=inet_addr("62.30.112.39")}, 28) = 0 poll([{fd=3, events=POLLOUT, revents=POLLOUT}], 1, 0) = 1 sendto(3, "\213\321\1\0\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\3www\4news\3com\0\0\34\0\1", 30, MSG_NOSIGNAL, NULL, 0) = 30 poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN, revents=POLLIN}], 1, 5000) = 1 recvfrom(3, "\213\321\201\200\0\1\0\1\0\1\0\0\3www\4news\3com\0\0\34\0\1\300\f"..., 1024, 0, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(53), sin_addr=inet_addr("62.30.112.39")}, [16]) = 153 connect(3, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(53), sin_addr=inet_addr("62.30.112.39")}, 28) = 0 poll([{fd=3, events=POLLOUT, revents=POLLOUT}], 1, 0) = 1 sendto(3, "k\374\1\0\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\3www\4news\3com\0\0\1\0\1", 30, MSG_NOSIGNAL, NULL, 0) = 30 poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN, revents=POLLIN}], 1, 5000) = 1 recvfrom(3, "k\374\201\200\0\1\0\2\0\0\0\0\3www\4news\3com\0\0\1\0\1\300\f"..., 1024, 0, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(53), sin_addr=inet_addr("62.30.112.39")}, [16]) = 106 connect(3, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(53), sin_addr=inet_addr("62.30.112.39")}, 28) = 0 poll([{fd=3, events=POLLOUT, revents=POLLOUT}], 1, 0) = 1 sendto(3, "\\\2\1\0\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\3www\4news\3com\0\0\1\0\1", 30, MSG_NOSIGNAL, NULL, 0) = 30 poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN, revents=POLLIN}], 1, 5000) = 1 recvfrom(3, "\\\2\201\200\0\1\0\2\0\0\0\0\3www\4news\3com\0\0\1\0\1\300\f"..., 1024, 0, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(53), sin_addr=inet_addr("62.30.112.39")}, [16]) = 106 connect(3, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(80), sin_addr=inet_addr("216.239.122.102")}, 16) = -1 EINPROGRESS (Operation now in progress) select(4, NULL, [3], NULL, NULL) = 1 (out [3])
So what happens here?
Notice the connection attempts to /var/run/nscd/socket? They mean nc first tries to connect to NSCD - the Name Service Cache Daemon - which is usually used in setups that rely on NIS, YP, LDAP or similar directory protocols for name lookups. In this case the connects fails.
It then moves on to DNS (DNS is port 53, hence the "sin_port=htons(53)" in the following connect. You can see it then does a "sendto()" call, sending a DNS packet that contains www.news.com. It then reads back a packet. For whatever reason it tries three times, the last with a slightly different request. My best guess why in this case is that www.news.com is a CNAME (an "alias"), and the multiple requests may just be an artifact of how nc deals with that.
Then in the end, it finally issues a connect() to the IP it found. Notice it returns EINPROGRESS. That means the connect was non-blocking - nc wants to go on processing. It then calls select(), which succeeds when the connection was successful.
Try adding "read" and "write" to the list of syscalls given to strace and enter a string when connected, and you'll get something like this:
read(0, "test\n", 1024) = 5 write(3, "test\n", 5) = 5 poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN, revents=POLLIN}, {fd=0, events=POLLIN}], 2, -1) = 1 read(3, "This shows it reading "test" + linefeed from standard in, and writing it back out to the network connection, then calling poll() to wait for a reply, reading the reply from the network connection and writing it to standard out. Everything seems to be working right.
Other ideas?
I'd love to hear from you if you use strace in particularly creative ways. E-mail me ([email protected]) or post comments.