今天偶然看到IntentService 源码,看了一会觉得很好玩也有很多启动知识点,遂记录下。
public abstract class IntentService extends Service {
private volatile Looper mServiceLooper;
private volatile ServiceHandler mServiceHandler;
private String mName;
private boolean mRedelivery;
private final class ServiceHandler extends Handler {
public ServiceHandler(Looper looper) {
super(looper);
}
@Override
public void handleMessage(Message msg) {
onHandleIntent((Intent)msg.obj);
stopSelf(msg.arg1);
}
}
/**
* Creates an IntentService. Invoked by your subclass's constructor.
*
* @param name Used to name the worker thread, important only for debugging.
*/
public IntentService(String name) {
super();
mName = name;
}
/**
* Sets intent redelivery preferences. Usually called from the constructor
* with your preferred semantics.
*
* If enabled is true,
* {@link #onStartCommand(Intent, int, int)} will return
* {@link Service#START_REDELIVER_INTENT}, so if this process dies before
* {@link #onHandleIntent(Intent)} returns, the process will be restarted
* and the intent redelivered. If multiple Intents have been sent, only
* the most recent one is guaranteed to be redelivered.
*
*
If enabled is false (the default),
* {@link #onStartCommand(Intent, int, int)} will return
* {@link Service#START_NOT_STICKY}, and if the process dies, the Intent
* dies along with it.
*/
public void setIntentRedelivery(boolean enabled) {
mRedelivery = enabled;
}
@Override
public void onCreate() {
// TODO: It would be nice to have an option to hold a partial wakelock
// during processing, and to have a static startService(Context, Intent)
// method that would launch the service & hand off a wakelock.
super.onCreate();
HandlerThread thread = new HandlerThread("IntentService[" + mName + "]");
thread.start();
mServiceLooper = thread.getLooper();
mServiceHandler = new ServiceHandler(mServiceLooper);
}
@Override
public void onStart(@Nullable Intent intent, int startId) {
Message msg = mServiceHandler.obtainMessage();
msg.arg1 = startId;
msg.obj = intent;
mServiceHandler.sendMessage(msg);
}
/**
* You should not override this method for your IntentService. Instead,
* override {@link #onHandleIntent}, which the system calls when the IntentService
* receives a start request.
* @see android.app.Service#onStartCommand
*/
@Override
public int onStartCommand(@Nullable Intent intent, int flags, int startId) {
onStart(intent, startId);
return mRedelivery ? START_REDELIVER_INTENT : START_NOT_STICKY;
}
@Override
public void onDestroy() {
mServiceLooper.quit();
}
/**
* Unless you provide binding for your service, you don't need to implement this
* method, because the default implementation returns null.
* @see android.app.Service#onBind
*/
@Override
@Nullable
public IBinder onBind(Intent intent) {
return null;
}
/**
* This method is invoked on the worker thread with a request to process.
* Only one Intent is processed at a time, but the processing happens on a
* worker thread that runs independently from other application logic.
* So, if this code takes a long time, it will hold up other requests to
* the same IntentService, but it will not hold up anything else.
* When all requests have been handled, the IntentService stops itself,
* so you should not call {@link #stopSelf}.
*
* @param intent The value passed to {@link
* android.content.Context#startService(Intent)}.
* This may be null if the service is being restarted after
* its process has gone away; see
* {@link android.app.Service#onStartCommand}
* for details.
*/
@WorkerThread
protected abstract void onHandleIntent(@Nullable Intent intent);
}
内部类继承了Handler,并且持有了一个Handler 对象。onHandleIntent()方法是IntentService 抽象类的抽象方法,继承了IntentService 就必须实现该方法,并且在handleMessage 里调用了该方法。
private volatile ServiceHandler mServiceHandler;
private final class ServiceHandler extends Handler {
public ServiceHandler(Looper looper) {
super(looper);
}
@Override
public void handleMessage(Message msg) {
onHandleIntent((Intent)msg.obj);
stopSelf(msg.arg1);
}
}
看到这里 Handler.obtainMessage()
@Override
public void onStart(@Nullable Intent intent, int startId) {
Message msg = mServiceHandler.obtainMessage();
msg.arg1 = startId;
msg.obj = intent;
mServiceHandler.sendMessage(msg);
}
public final Message obtainMessage(){
return Message.obtain(this);
}
public static Message obtain(Handler h) {
Message m = obtain();
m.target = h;
return m;
}
/**
* Return a new Message instance from the global pool. Allows us to
* avoid allocating new objects in many cases.
*/
public static Message obtain() {
synchronized (sPoolSync) {
if (sPool != null) {
Message m = sPool;
sPool = m.next;
m.next = null;
m.flags = 0; // clear in-use flag
sPoolSize--;
return m;
}
}
return new Message();
}
从全局池中返回一个新的Message实例,允许我们避免在很多情况下分配新的对象。
这里是从MessagePool 中取一个Message,区分于我们自己 new Message
static也是各个业务方可以去全局修改;
volatile是处理多线程锁的替代方案,对应有时需要实时的修改共享资源的变量,被volatile修复的变量的值可以立刻被业务方取得最新的值。
不过,猛地感觉,nnd,这不是一样么,static是静态的,所以理论上也可以在不同线程去访问,能访问也就是能修改,所以这里老穆在网上搜了搜 相关的资料,把这个知识点在加强下:
变量放在主存区上,使用该变量的每个线程,都将从主存区拷贝一份到自己的工作区上进行操作。
volatile, 声明这个字段易变(可能被多个线程使用),Java内存模型负责各个线程的工作区与主存区的该字段的值保持同步,即一致性。
static, 声明这个字段是静态的(可能被多个实例共享),在主存区上该类的所有实例的该字段为同一个变量,即唯一性。
volatile, 声明变量值的一致性;static,声明变量的唯一性。
此外,volatile同步机制不同于synchronized, 前者是内存同步,后者不仅包含内存同步(一致性),且保证线程互斥(互斥性)。
static 只是声明变量在主存上的唯一性,不能保证工作区与主存区变量值的一致性;除非变量的值是不可变的,即再加上final的修饰符,否则static声明的变量,不是线程安全的。
下面摘自Java语言规范(Java Language Specification)的官方解释:
1) If a field is declared static, there exists exactly one incarnation of the field, no matter how many instances (possibly zero) of the class may eventually be created.
2) A field may be declared volatile, in which case the Java Memory Model ensures that all threads see a consistent value for the variable。
——转自 http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4e1e357d0101i486.html
—— 待更新