系列文章
Dubbo分析Serialize层
Dubbo分析之Transport层
Dubbo分析之Exchange 层
Dubbo分析之Protocol层
前言
紧接着上文Dubbo分析之Exchange层,继续分析protocol远程调用层,官方介绍:封装RPC调用,以Invocation, Result为中心,扩展接口为Protocol, Invoker, Exporter;
Protocol接口类分析
Protocol可以说是Dubbo的核心层了,在此基础上可以扩展很多主流的服务,比如:redis,Memcached,rmi,WebService,http(tomcat,jetty)等等;下面看一下接口类源码:
public interface Protocol {
/**
* 暴露远程服务:
* 1. 协议在接收请求时,应记录请求来源方地址信息:RpcContext.getContext().setRemoteAddress();
* 2. export()必须是幂等的,也就是暴露同一个URL的Invoker两次,和暴露一次没有区别。
* 3. export()传入的Invoker由框架实现并传入,协议不需要关心。
*
* @param 服务的类型
* @param invoker 服务的执行体
* @return exporter 暴露服务的引用,用于取消暴露
* @throws RpcException 当暴露服务出错时抛出,比如端口已占用
*/
Exporter export(Invoker invoker) throws RpcException;
/**
* 引用远程服务:
* 1. 当用户调用refer()所返回的Invoker对象的invoke()方法时,协议需相应执行同URL远端export()传入的Invoker对象的invoke()方法。
* 2. refer()返回的Invoker由协议实现,协议通常需要在此Invoker中发送远程请求。
* 3. 当url中有设置check=false时,连接失败不能抛出异常,需内部自动恢复。
*
* @param 服务的类型
* @param type 服务的类型
* @param url 远程服务的URL地址
* @return invoker 服务的本地代理
* @throws RpcException 当连接服务提供方失败时抛出
*/
Invoker refer(Class type, URL url) throws RpcException;
}
主要定义了2个接口,一个是暴露远程服务,另一个是引用远程服务,其实就是服务端和客户端;dubbo提供了对多种服务的扩展,可以查看META-INF/dubbo/internal/com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.Protocol:
filter=com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.protocol.ProtocolFilterWrapper
listener=com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.protocol.ProtocolListenerWrapper
mock=com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.support.MockProtocol
dubbo=com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.protocol.dubbo.DubboProtocol
injvm=com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.protocol.injvm.InjvmProtocol
rmi=com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.protocol.rmi.RmiProtocol
hessian=com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.protocol.hessian.HessianProtocol
com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.protocol.http.HttpProtocol
com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.protocol.webservice.WebServiceProtocol
thrift=com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.protocol.thrift.ThriftProtocol
memcached=com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.protocol.memcached.MemcachedProtocol
redis=com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.protocol.redis.RedisProtocol
rest=com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.protocol.rest.RestProtocol
registry=com.alibaba.dubbo.registry.integration.RegistryProtocol
qos=com.alibaba.dubbo.qos.protocol.QosProtocolWrapper
dubbo协议是默认提供的协议,其他扩展的协议包括:hessian,http(tomcat,jetty),injvm,memcached,redis,rest,rmi,thrift,webservice;以上扩展的协议有些仅仅是作为引用远程服务存在(客户端),比如redis,memcached,通过特定的命令对缓存进行操作;当然也可以扩展自己的协议,分别实现接口类Protocol, Invoker, Exporter;之前分别介绍的serialize层,transport层以及exchange层主要是在使用默认的DubboProtocol才依赖这几个底层,其他扩展协议直接依赖第三方扩展包;
下面重点分析一下DubboProtocol类,首先看一下refer实现方法:
public Invoker refer(Class serviceType, URL url) throws RpcException {
optimizeSerialization(url);
// create rpc invoker.
DubboInvoker invoker = new DubboInvoker(serviceType, url, getClients(url), invokers);
invokers.add(invoker);
return invoker;
}
在客户端定一个的每个dubbo:reference,都会在此处实例化一个对应的DubboInvoker;在方法内部首先对序列化优化进行处理,主要是对Kryo,FST等序列化方式进行优化,此方法不仅在客户端,同时服务器端也存在;接下来就是创建了一个DubboInvoker,同时创建与服务器端的连接:
private ExchangeClient[] getClients(URL url) {
// whether to share connection
boolean service_share_connect = false;
int connections = url.getParameter(Constants.CONNECTIONS_KEY, 0);
// if not configured, connection is shared, otherwise, one connection for one service
if (connections == 0) {
service_share_connect = true;
connections = 1;
}
ExchangeClient[] clients = new ExchangeClient[connections];
for (int i = 0; i < clients.length; i++) {
if (service_share_connect) {
clients[i] = getSharedClient(url);
} else {
clients[i] = initClient(url);
}
}
return clients;
}
默认向指定的服务器创建一个连接,可以通过指定connections设置建立多个连接,在并发比较大的情况下可以设置多个;
private ExchangeClient initClient(URL url) {
// client type setting.
String str = url.getParameter(Constants.CLIENT_KEY, url.getParameter(Constants.SERVER_KEY, Constants.DEFAULT_REMOTING_CLIENT));
url = url.addParameter(Constants.CODEC_KEY, DubboCodec.NAME);
// enable heartbeat by default
url = url.addParameterIfAbsent(Constants.HEARTBEAT_KEY, String.valueOf(Constants.DEFAULT_HEARTBEAT));
// BIO is not allowed since it has severe performance issue.
if (str != null && str.length() > 0 && !ExtensionLoader.getExtensionLoader(Transporter.class).hasExtension(str)) {
throw new RpcException("Unsupported client type: " + str + "," +
" supported client type is " + StringUtils.join(ExtensionLoader.getExtensionLoader(Transporter.class).getSupportedExtensions(), " "));
}
ExchangeClient client;
try {
// connection should be lazy
if (url.getParameter(Constants.LAZY_CONNECT_KEY, false)) {
client = new LazyConnectExchangeClient(url, requestHandler);
} else {
client = Exchangers.connect(url, requestHandler);
}
} catch (RemotingException e) {
throw new RpcException("Fail to create remoting client for service(" + url + "): " + e.getMessage(), e);
}
return client;
}
此方法主要通过Exchange层接口来和服务端建立连接,同时提供了懒连接的方式,要等到真正发送请求的时候才建立连接,返回ExchangeClient;DubboInvoker内部通过ExchangeClient来发送请求给服务端;再来看一下export方法:
public Exporter export(Invoker invoker) throws RpcException {
URL url = invoker.getUrl();
// export service.
String key = serviceKey(url);
DubboExporter exporter = new DubboExporter(invoker, key, exporterMap);
exporterMap.put(key, exporter);
//export an stub service for dispatching event
Boolean isStubSupportEvent = url.getParameter(Constants.STUB_EVENT_KEY, Constants.DEFAULT_STUB_EVENT);
Boolean isCallbackservice = url.getParameter(Constants.IS_CALLBACK_SERVICE, false);
if (isStubSupportEvent && !isCallbackservice) {
String stubServiceMethods = url.getParameter(Constants.STUB_EVENT_METHODS_KEY);
if (stubServiceMethods == null || stubServiceMethods.length() == 0) {
if (logger.isWarnEnabled()) {
logger.warn(new IllegalStateException("consumer [" + url.getParameter(Constants.INTERFACE_KEY) +
"], has set stubproxy support event ,but no stub methods founded."));
}
} else {
stubServiceMethodsMap.put(url.getServiceKey(), stubServiceMethods);
}
}
openServer(url);
optimizeSerialization(url);
return exporter;
}
每个dubbo:service都会绑定一个Exporter,首先通过url获取一个key(包括:port,serviceName,serviceVersion,serviceGroup),然后将实例化的DubboExporter通过key值保存在一个Map中,后续在接收到消息的时候从新定位到具体的Exporter;接下来就是创建服务器:
private void openServer(URL url) {
// find server.
String key = url.getAddress();
//client can export a service which's only for server to invoke
boolean isServer = url.getParameter(Constants.IS_SERVER_KEY, true);
if (isServer) {
ExchangeServer server = serverMap.get(key);
if (server == null) {
serverMap.put(key, createServer(url));
} else {
// server supports reset, use together with override
server.reset(url);
}
}
}
private ExchangeServer createServer(URL url) {
// send readonly event when server closes, it's enabled by default
url = url.addParameterIfAbsent(Constants.CHANNEL_READONLYEVENT_SENT_KEY, Boolean.TRUE.toString());
// enable heartbeat by default
url = url.addParameterIfAbsent(Constants.HEARTBEAT_KEY, String.valueOf(Constants.DEFAULT_HEARTBEAT));
String str = url.getParameter(Constants.SERVER_KEY, Constants.DEFAULT_REMOTING_SERVER);
if (str != null && str.length() > 0 && !ExtensionLoader.getExtensionLoader(Transporter.class).hasExtension(str))
throw new RpcException("Unsupported server type: " + str + ", url: " + url);
url = url.addParameter(Constants.CODEC_KEY, DubboCodec.NAME);
ExchangeServer server;
try {
server = Exchangers.bind(url, requestHandler);
} catch (RemotingException e) {
throw new RpcException("Fail to start server(url: " + url + ") " + e.getMessage(), e);
}
str = url.getParameter(Constants.CLIENT_KEY);
if (str != null && str.length() > 0) {
Set supportedTypes = ExtensionLoader.getExtensionLoader(Transporter.class).getSupportedExtensions();
if (!supportedTypes.contains(str)) {
throw new RpcException("Unsupported client type: " + str);
}
}
return server;
}
以上主要就是通过Exchangers的bind方法来启动服务器,并返回对应的ExchangeServer,同样也保存在本地的Map中;最后同样做了序列化优化处理;
Invoker类分析
refer()返回的Invoker由协议实现,协议通常需要在此Invoker中发送远程请求,export()传入的Invoker由框架实现并传入,协议不需要关心;接口类如下:
public interface Invoker extends Node {
Class getInterface();
Result invoke(Invocation invocation) throws RpcException;
}
本节介绍的是refer方法返回的Invoker,默认的dubbo协议下,实现了DubboInvoker,实现了其中的invoke方法,此方法在客户端调用远程方法的时候会被调用;
public Result invoke(Invocation inv) throws RpcException {
if (destroyed.get()) {
throw new RpcException("Rpc invoker for service " + this + " on consumer " + NetUtils.getLocalHost()
+ " use dubbo version " + Version.getVersion()
+ " is DESTROYED, can not be invoked any more!");
}
RpcInvocation invocation = (RpcInvocation) inv;
invocation.setInvoker(this);
if (attachment != null && attachment.size() > 0) {
invocation.addAttachmentsIfAbsent(attachment);
}
Map contextAttachments = RpcContext.getContext().getAttachments();
if (contextAttachments != null) {
/**
* invocation.addAttachmentsIfAbsent(context){@link RpcInvocation#addAttachmentsIfAbsent(Map)}should not be used here,
* because the {@link RpcContext#setAttachment(String, String)} is passed in the Filter when the call is triggered
* by the built-in retry mechanism of the Dubbo. The attachment to update RpcContext will no longer work, which is
* a mistake in most cases (for example, through Filter to RpcContext output traceId and spanId and other information).
*/
invocation.addAttachments(contextAttachments);
}
if (getUrl().getMethodParameter(invocation.getMethodName(), Constants.ASYNC_KEY, false)) {
invocation.setAttachment(Constants.ASYNC_KEY, Boolean.TRUE.toString());
}
RpcUtils.attachInvocationIdIfAsync(getUrl(), invocation);
try {
return doInvoke(invocation);
} catch (InvocationTargetException e) { // biz exception
Throwable te = e.getTargetException();
if (te == null) {
return new RpcResult(e);
} else {
if (te instanceof RpcException) {
((RpcException) te).setCode(RpcException.BIZ_EXCEPTION);
}
return new RpcResult(te);
}
} catch (RpcException e) {
if (e.isBiz()) {
return new RpcResult(e);
} else {
throw e;
}
} catch (Throwable e) {
return new RpcResult(e);
}
}
protected abstract Result doInvoke(Invocation invocation) throws Throwable;
在DubboInvoker的抽象类中提供了invoke方法,做统一的附件(Attachment)处理,方法传入的参数是一个RpcInvocation对象,包含了方法调用的相关参数:
public class RpcInvocation implements Invocation, Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = -4355285085441097045L;
private String methodName;
private Class>[] parameterTypes;
private Object[] arguments;
private Map attachments;
private transient Invoker> invoker;
....省略...
}
包含了方法名称,方法参数,参数值,附件信息;可能你会发现没有接口,版本等信息,这些信息其实包含在附件中;在invoke方法中首先处理的就是把attachment信息保存到RpcInvocation中;接下来就是调用DubboInvoker中的doInvoke方法:
protected Result doInvoke(final Invocation invocation) throws Throwable {
RpcInvocation inv = (RpcInvocation) invocation;
final String methodName = RpcUtils.getMethodName(invocation);
inv.setAttachment(Constants.PATH_KEY, getUrl().getPath());
inv.setAttachment(Constants.VERSION_KEY, version);
ExchangeClient currentClient;
if (clients.length == 1) {
currentClient = clients[0];
} else {
currentClient = clients[index.getAndIncrement() % clients.length];
}
try {
boolean isAsync = RpcUtils.isAsync(getUrl(), invocation);
boolean isOneway = RpcUtils.isOneway(getUrl(), invocation);
int timeout = getUrl().getMethodParameter(methodName, Constants.TIMEOUT_KEY, Constants.DEFAULT_TIMEOUT);
if (isOneway) {
boolean isSent = getUrl().getMethodParameter(methodName, Constants.SENT_KEY, false);
currentClient.send(inv, isSent);
RpcContext.getContext().setFuture(null);
return new RpcResult();
} else if (isAsync) {
ResponseFuture future = currentClient.request(inv, timeout);
RpcContext.getContext().setFuture(new FutureAdapter
此方法首先获取ExchangeClient,如果实例化了多个ExchangeClient,会通过顺序的方式遍历使用ExchangeClient;通过ExchangeClient将RpcInvocation发送给服务器端,提供了三种发送方式:单边通信方式,双边通信(同步),双边通信(异步);在上文Dubbo分析之Exchange层中,发送完请求之后直接返回DefaultFuture参数,如果调用get方法将阻塞直到返回结果或者超时,同步方式就是直接调用get方法,阻塞等待结果,下面重点看一下异步方式;异步方式将返回的DefaultFuture放入了RpcContext中,然后返回了一个空对象,这里其实使用了ThreadLocal功能,所以每次在客户端业务代码中,调用完异步请求,都需要通过RpcContext获取ResponseFuture,比如:
// 此调用会立即返回null
fooService.findFoo(fooId);
// 拿到调用的Future引用,当结果返回后,会被通知和设置到此Future
Future fooFuture = RpcContext.getContext().getFuture();
// 此调用会立即返回null
barService.findBar(barId);
// 拿到调用的Future引用,当结果返回后,会被通知和设置到此Future
Future barFuture = RpcContext.getContext().getFuture();
// 此时findFoo和findBar的请求同时在执行,客户端不需要启动多线程来支持并行,而是借助NIO的非阻塞完成
// 如果foo已返回,直接拿到返回值,否则线程wait住,等待foo返回后,线程会被notify唤醒
Foo foo = fooFuture.get();
// 同理等待bar返回
Bar bar = barFuture.get();
// 如果foo需要5秒返回,bar需要6秒返回,实际只需等6秒,即可获取到foo和bar,进行接下来的处理。
官网的一个列子,很好的说明了异步的使用方式以及其优势;
Exporter类分析
在上文Dubbo分析之Exchange层中,服务端接收到消息之后,调用handler的reply方法处理消息,而此handler定义在DubboProtocol中,如下:
private ExchangeHandler requestHandler = new ExchangeHandlerAdapter() {
@Override
public Object reply(ExchangeChannel channel, Object message) throws RemotingException {
if (message instanceof Invocation) {
Invocation inv = (Invocation) message;
Invoker> invoker = getInvoker(channel, inv);
// need to consider backward-compatibility if it's a callback
if (Boolean.TRUE.toString().equals(inv.getAttachments().get(IS_CALLBACK_SERVICE_INVOKE))) {
String methodsStr = invoker.getUrl().getParameters().get("methods");
boolean hasMethod = false;
if (methodsStr == null || methodsStr.indexOf(",") == -1) {
hasMethod = inv.getMethodName().equals(methodsStr);
} else {
String[] methods = methodsStr.split(",");
for (String method : methods) {
if (inv.getMethodName().equals(method)) {
hasMethod = true;
break;
}
}
}
if (!hasMethod) {
logger.warn(new IllegalStateException("The methodName " + inv.getMethodName()
+ " not found in callback service interface ,invoke will be ignored."
+ " please update the api interface. url is:"
+ invoker.getUrl()) + " ,invocation is :" + inv);
return null;
}
}
RpcContext.getContext().setRemoteAddress(channel.getRemoteAddress());
return invoker.invoke(inv);
}
throw new RemotingException(channel, "Unsupported request: "
+ (message == null ? null : (message.getClass().getName() + ": " + message))
+ ", channel: consumer: " + channel.getRemoteAddress() + " --> provider: " + channel.getLocalAddress());
}
...省略...
}
服务端接收到message就是上面的RpcInvocation,里面包含了接口,方法,参数等信息,服务器端通过反射的方式来处理;首先获取了对应的DubboExporter,如果获取,通过key(包括:port,serviceName,serviceVersion,serviceGroup)获取对应的DubboExporter,然后调用DubboExporter中的invoker,此时的invoker是系统传过来的,不像客户端Invoker是协议端自己创建的,系统创建的invoker,以链表的方式存在,内部调用对应的filter,具体有哪些filter,在启动服务时已经初始化好了在ProtocolFilterWrapper的buildInvokerChain中,具体有哪些filter可以查看META-INF/dubbo/internal/com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.Filter:
cache=com.alibaba.dubbo.cache.filter.CacheFilter
validation=com.alibaba.dubbo.validation.filter.ValidationFilter
echo=com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.filter.EchoFilter
generic=com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.filter.GenericFilter
genericimpl=com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.filter.GenericImplFilter
token=com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.filter.TokenFilter
accesslog=com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.filter.AccessLogFilter
activelimit=com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.filter.ActiveLimitFilter
classloader=com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.filter.ClassLoaderFilter
context=com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.filter.ContextFilter
consumercontext=com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.filter.ConsumerContextFilter
exception=com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.filter.ExceptionFilter
executelimit=com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.filter.ExecuteLimitFilter
deprecated=com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.filter.DeprecatedFilter
compatible=com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.filter.CompatibleFilter
timeout=com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.filter.TimeoutFilter
trace=com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.protocol.dubbo.filter.TraceFilter
future=com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.protocol.dubbo.filter.FutureFilter
monitor=com.alibaba.dubbo.monitor.support.MonitorFilter
这里列出了所有的filter,包含消费端和服务端,具体使用哪些,通过filter的注解@Activate来进行过滤,每个filter就行了分组;具体执行的顺序是怎么样的,同样在注解里面指定了,格式如下:
@Activate(group = Constants.PROVIDER, order = -110000)
@Activate(group = Constants.PROVIDER, order = -10000)
@Activate(group = Constants.CONSUMER, value = Constants.GENERIC_KEY, order = 20000)
每个固定的filter有各自的功能,同样也可以进行扩展,处理完了交给下一个,最后通过反射调用返回RpcResult;
总结
本文大体介绍了一下Protocol层使用的默认dubbo协议介绍,Protocol层还对其他第三方协议进行了扩展,后面会继续介绍;另外关于filter还可以在详细介绍一下;
示例代码地址
https://github.com/ksfzhaohui...
https://gitee.com/OutOfMemory...