[译] Jason Chen回答:百度和谷歌的区别在哪里

文章来源:Quora
问题:What is the difference between Baidu and Google?
答主:Jason Chen


正文翻译:五月花开


正文:


[译] Jason Chen回答:百度和谷歌的区别在哪里_第1张图片

Here is the difference between the searching results of Baidu and Google by the same key word" three point perspective pictures".

以上是在百度和谷歌输入相同的关键词“三点透视图”后出现的索搜结果差异。

And the other best example for the difference between them is Google developed AI to win the most brilliant Go player in the world and Baidu just uses it to serve take-away food.

两者差异的另一最佳例子无疑是谷歌研发的AI(人工智能)打败了世界上最聪明的围棋手,而百度只用它来做外卖。

Their difference is like the difference between the earth and the sky, the night and the day.

他们两者之间的差异简直是天差地别。


Update 1:

第一次更新:

As certain fans of Baidu claimed "three point" is ambiguous in Chinese and my example failed to prove Baidu's defect. I just added one from millions of such cases:

由于百度的某些拥护者宣称“三点”在中文意义中模糊不清,因此我的例子不能用于证明百度的缺陷。我就从数以万计的例子中再加一个:

[译] Jason Chen回答:百度和谷歌的区别在哪里_第2张图片

[译] Jason Chen回答:百度和谷歌的区别在哪里_第3张图片

Here is the search result for " many noblemen in the court are wearing strange and colorful clothes",which was a famous quote from Chinese classic literature .Google found the accurate sources of such quote.

以上是输入“艳装怪服,遍见朝士”这句中国古文的经典名言呈现的搜索结果。谷歌找出了这句名言的正确来源。

And as usual,Baidu provided porn pictures and books to you again.

百度的结果则一如往常,仍旧是色情图片和黄书。


Update 2 on May 4th:

5月4日第二次更新:

It is a pity after Baidu Bashed Over Student’s Cancer Death became the hottest public event in China these days there are still many defend for Baidu.

《Baidu Bashed Over Student’s Cancer Death》成了近些日子中国最热议的公众事件,但遗憾的是,仍然有很多为百度辩白的声音。

Baidu' evil is really beyond your imagination.

百度的邪恶之处实则超出你的想象。

Just hours ago Zhihu, Chinese version of Quora suspended accounts of six top writers forever due to their gross violation of community rules and causing disorders in Zhihu(http://www.huxiu.com/article/147576/1.html) i.e. they are suspected to be invovled in writing articles defending and acquitting Baidu after paid by PR companies which were obviously employed by Baidu. The following Wechat dialogues were between one of the top writers, Zhang Zhaojie who got suspended later and other Zhihu users:

几个小时前,6个知乎大号因为违反社区规则和干扰社区秩序被知乎(中国版Quora)永久封号(相关网页)。他们被怀疑受到百度雇佣的公关公司的利益好处而写文维护和洗白百度。以下微信对话来自其中一个大号张兆杰(其随后被封号)和其他知乎用户之间的互动:

[译] Jason Chen回答:百度和谷歌的区别在哪里_第4张图片

in which Zhang (who was apprently hired by the PR company to do the dirty job) had prepared drafts of articles acquitting Baidu and other users complained this time was too risky.

在对话中,张(很明显他是被公关公司雇佣的水军)准备了为百度洗白的文章草稿,其他用户则抱怨该时间点风险太大。

I am sure the similar practice and users are very likely to exist in Quora too, as Baidu knows Quora is very influential in English world, which is the most important part of Baidu' s international market.

我相信Quora很可能也存在类似的事件和用户,毕竟百度知道Quora在英语言国家是非常有影响力的,而这正是百度国际市场最重要的部分。

Some Baidu's defenders claimed when they input"three point perspective picture" in my example and now the result is normal, then accused me of fabricating the data and my dirty mentality of obsession with porn to show off their cheap moral superiority.

一些百度的拥护者宣称,当他们按照我的例子在百度输入“三点透视图”后,现在得到的结果是正常的,随后他们指责我捏造数据以及我自己对色情信息有变态的痴迷,以此来炫耀他们廉价的道德优越感。

Ok, now I can tell you guys this comparison was not first done by me and some intelligent users already did the research since 2014.

好吧,现在我来告诉你们,这份比较并非是我第一个完成的,早在2014年就有一些智慧人士做了这份调查。

The article 三点透视图在google和百度的区别_ 百度知道, was the same comparison done under Baidu Knows It in 2015, which was launched by Baidu itself, did Baidu fabricate the data itself ?

百度自己发起了相同的对比调查,这篇《三点透视图在google和百度的区别_百度知道》收录在2015年的百度知道,难道百度自己捏造了数据?

This report一个关键词展现百度与谷歌之间的区别_网易新闻中心 was from Netease in 2014, which used the same example to interpret the difference between Baidu and Google, did Netease fabricated the data too?

2014年,由网易出具的一份报告《一个关键词展现百度与谷歌之间的区别_网易新闻中心》使用了相同的例子来阐述百度和谷歌之间的区别,难道网易也捏造了数据?

It is no secret Baidu as an evil company plagued by scandals from time to time, paid great attention to monitoring of any piece of adverse news or post, then it would spare no effort to eliminate and erase such harmful message, including using PR companies to do the dirty work. As such kind of typical bad examples being discovered by Baidu, it was no surprise Baidu had already chopped up the corpse and obliterated all traces as it was so easy for it to do that. Of course you can call it fixing it when it's wrong .

作为一个行恶的公司,百度饱受丑闻困扰,大力关注并管控任何负面新闻或报道,随后不遗余力的消除这些恶意留言,包括雇佣公关公司做不光彩的行为,以上这些早已不是什么秘密。由于百度发现了此类典型的负面案例,因此毁尸灭迹抹杀一切痕迹也是意料之中的事,毕竟这对百度来说太容易了。当然你也可以把这说成是“知错就改”。

However, as an arrogant devil, Baidu has left too much shit during long time practice and there is an old Chinese saying" You can't make a crab walk straight"as the gene of evil is inherent in Baidu. Just minutes ago I input the key word" female"in both Baidu and Google, and then I got these:

然而百度是个骄傲自大的魔鬼,在长期实操过程中留下了太多烂摊子。百度的作恶基因与生俱来,就像中国那句古话“江山易改,本性难移”。就在几分钟之前,我同时在百度和谷歌输入关键字“女性”并得到了如下结果:

[译] Jason Chen回答:百度和谷歌的区别在哪里_第5张图片

The first result is female pictures in Baidu image, then the second is the gential system of female under Baidu Baike, the third is the advertisement for female masturbation tools;

第一个结果是百度图片下的女性图片,第二个是百度百科下的女性生殖系统,第三个是女性自慰工具的广告;

[译] Jason Chen回答:百度和谷歌的区别在哪里_第6张图片

And the first of Google result is a website on private chats between women, the second is Wikipedia's article on female, the third is a female fashion style website.

谷歌搜索的第一个结果是女性私人聊天的网站,第二个是维基百科关于女性的词条,第三个是女性时尚风格网站。

Is Baidu's imbicile and evil not self evident? Anyone can find it by trying more key words like that. But I am afraid those who defend Baidu, most of which are from China and they can't enjoy the privilege of free access to Google. Therefore, there is no way they can fully understand what is good and right when talking about Baidu and Google.

百度的低俗和邪恶难道还不够明显吗?任何人都可以尝试输入更多类似的关键字发现两者的差异。但我恐怕那些袒护百度的人(大部分是中国人),他们不可能享受到自由访问谷歌的权限。因此,当我们谈及百度和谷歌的时候,他们也不可能完全了解好坏是非。

http://bbs.tianya.cn/post-worldl... is another Chinese post on the search results of Active Charcoal of both Google and Baidu. As usual, the former provides knowledge, the latter sells you advertisement.

另一则中国帖子(http://bbs.tianya.cn/post-worldl...) 发布了在谷歌和百度上同时搜索“活性炭”得到的结果。老样子,谷歌提供知识,百度卖你广告。

If you are good at Chinese, you can find millions of Chinese posts complained about Baidu's misleading and fabricated searching results, among which there are many detailed and convincing articles on Baidu's evils on Zhihu, most of them have not been blocked or covered by Baidu yet.

如果你中文够好,你可以找到成千上万的中文帖子抱怨百度误导以及虚构搜索结果。这其中包括许多知乎上描述百度恶行的文章,有图有真相,大部分还未被百度阻止或和谐。

As for Baidu's AI achievement, some mentioned certain works and Andrew Ng. Is Andrew Ng the Almighty God and can make an evil different? He is a normal person with flesh and bloodand no one can deny his working for Baidu is partly for money. And can you tell me after joined Baidu did he make any meaningful achievement when compared with Google?

对于百度的AI成就,一些人提到了吴恩达和特定的作品。吴恩达是否就是万能的主,能让魔鬼变天使?他也只是一个有血有肉的普通人,没人能否认他为百度工作一部分原因是为了钱。那么你可以告诉我,和谷歌相比,他在加入百度后做了什么有意义的事吗?

后续两段与问题没太大关系,故省去不翻。

-End-

上期译文:[译]为什么中国人很少承认他们的错误|Why the Chinese seldom admit their mistakes

译文仅供学习交流,不用于商业用途。未经许可,严禁转载。

你可能感兴趣的:([译] Jason Chen回答:百度和谷歌的区别在哪里)