标题:ReLayNet: Retinal Layer and Fluid Segmentation of Macular Optical Coherence Tomography using Fully Convolutional Networks
作者:Roy, Abhijit Guha,Conjeti, Sailesh,Karri, Sri Phani Krishna,Sheet, Debdoot,Katouzian, Amin,Wachinger, Christian,Navab, Nassir
来源:CVPR 2017
arXiv:https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.02161
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is used for non-invasive diagnosis of diabetic macular edema assessing the retinal layers. In this paper, we propose a new fully convolutional deep architecture, termed ReLayNet, for end-to-end segmentation of retinal layers and fluid masses in eye OCT scans. ReLayNet uses a contracting path of convolutional blocks (encoders) to learn a hierarchy of contextual features, followed by an expansive path of convolutional blocks (decoders) for semantic segmentation. ReLayNet is trained to optimize a joint loss function comprising ofweighted logistic regression and Dice overlap loss. The framework is validated on a publicly available benchmark dataset with comparisons against five state-of-the-art segmentation methods including two deep learning based approaches to substantiate its effectiveness.
本文提出了一种新的深度学习网络结构ReLayNet
,用于正常人和DME
患者的OCT图像层次分割。ReLayNet
借鉴U-Net
的思想,分为下采样和上采样两个步骤,在训练过程中同时使用了交叉熵和Dice overlap loss函数进行优化。实验结果与5个state-of-the-art
的分割方法进行比较,该方法具有更好的表现。
本文要分割的层次:
最终结果是分为10个类别,其中7条边界+视网膜上面区域(RaR)+RPE下面区域(RbR)+Fluid。
Pooling
与Unpooling
:
Weighted multi-class logistic loss
:
Dice loss
:
全局的损失函数:
Frobenius
范数,为惩罚项目。训练的目标:
整个训练过程如下:
全部的数据来自杜克大学公布的10个DME患者个体的数据,共110张。其中每张图像都有视网膜8个层次的标定数据。点此链接下载。
Fig. 6. Layer and fluid predictions of a Test OCT B-scan near fovea with DME manifestation, shown in (a) with the expert 1 annotations in (b), expert 2 annotations in (c), ReLayNet predictions in (d) and predictions of the defined 5 comparative methods in (e-i). CM-GDP and CM-LSE doesn’t include predictions for fluid. The fovea is indicated by the yellow arrow. The region with a small fluid mass is shown by a small white box
Fig. 7. Layer predictions of Test OCT B-scan with no fluid mass, shown in (a) with the expert 1 annotations in (b), expert 2 annotations in (c), ReLayNet predictions in (d) and predictions of the defined 5 comparative methods in (e-i).
评价指标:
CE:estimated contour error for each layer分割的边界误差
Dice:Dice overlap score
MAD-LAT:the error in estimated thickness map厚度图的误差
与其它方法的对比:
本文方法不同参数的对比:验证skip connections
、joint loss functions
和depth of network
:
交叉验证的结果:
黄斑中心不同区域的厚度差: