一次排查@CacheEvict注解失效的经历

笔者简单看了一下《Spring实战》中的demo,然后就应用到业务代码中了,本以为如此简单的事情,竟然在代码提交后的1个周,被同事发现。selectByTaskId()方法查出来的数据总是过时的。

代码如下:

@Cacheable("taskParamsCache")
List<TaskParams> selectByTaskId(Long taskId);
// ...
// ...
@CacheEvict("taskParamsCache")
int deleteByTaskId(Long taskId);

想要的效果是当程序调用selectByTaskId()方法时,把结果缓存下来,然后在调用deleteByTaskId()方法时,将缓存清空。

经过数据库数据对比之后,把问题排查的方向定位在@CacheEvict注解失效了。

下面是笔者通过源码跟踪排查问题的过程:

  1. 在deleteByTaskId()方法的调用出打断点,跟进代码到spring生成的代理层。
@Override
		@Nullable
		public Object intercept(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args, MethodProxy methodProxy) throws Throwable {
			Object oldProxy = null;
			boolean setProxyContext = false;
			Object target = null;
			TargetSource targetSource = this.advised.getTargetSource();
			try {
				if (this.advised.exposeProxy) {
					// Make invocation available if necessary.
					oldProxy = AopContext.setCurrentProxy(proxy);
					setProxyContext = true;
				}
				// Get as late as possible to minimize the time we "own" the target, in case it comes from a pool...
				target = targetSource.getTarget();
				Class<?> targetClass = (target != null ? target.getClass() : null);
				List<Object> chain = this.advised.getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice(method, targetClass);
				Object retVal;
				// Check whether we only have one InvokerInterceptor: that is,
				// no real advice, but just reflective invocation of the target.
				if (chain.isEmpty() && Modifier.isPublic(method.getModifiers())) {
					// We can skip creating a MethodInvocation: just invoke the target directly.
					// Note that the final invoker must be an InvokerInterceptor, so we know
					// it does nothing but a reflective operation on the target, and no hot
					// swapping or fancy proxying.
					Object[] argsToUse = AopProxyUtils.adaptArgumentsIfNecessary(method, args);
					retVal = methodProxy.invoke(target, argsToUse);
				}
				else {
					// We need to create a method invocation...
					retVal = new CglibMethodInvocation(proxy, target, method, args, targetClass, chain, methodProxy).proceed();
				}
				retVal = processReturnType(proxy, target, method, retVal);
				return retVal;
			}
			finally {
				if (target != null && !targetSource.isStatic()) {
					targetSource.releaseTarget(target);
				}
				if (setProxyContext) {
					// Restore old proxy.
					AopContext.setCurrentProxy(oldProxy);
				}
			}
		}

通过getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice获取到当前方法的拦截器,里面包含了CacheIneterceptor,说明注解被spring检测到了。
在这里插入图片描述
进入CglibMethodInvocation(proxy, target, method, args, targetClass, chain, methodProxy).proceed()方法内部

  • org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation#proceed
@Override
	@Nullable
	public Object proceed() throws Throwable {
		//	We start with an index of -1 and increment early.
		if (this.currentInterceptorIndex == this.interceptorsAndDynamicMethodMatchers.size() - 1) {
			return invokeJoinpoint();
		}

		Object interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice =
				this.interceptorsAndDynamicMethodMatchers.get(++this.currentInterceptorIndex);
		if (interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice instanceof InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatcher) {
			// Evaluate dynamic method matcher here: static part will already have
			// been evaluated and found to match.
			InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatcher dm =
					(InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatcher) interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice;
			if (dm.methodMatcher.matches(this.method, this.targetClass, this.arguments)) {
				return dm.interceptor.invoke(this);
			}
			else {
				// Dynamic matching failed.
				// Skip this interceptor and invoke the next in the chain.
				return proceed();
			}
		}
		else {
			// It's an interceptor, so we just invoke it: The pointcut will have
			// been evaluated statically before this object was constructed.
			return ((MethodInterceptor) interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice).invoke(this);
		}
	}

this.interceptorsAndDynamicMethodMatchers.get(++this.currentInterceptorIndex)方法取第一个拦截器,正是我们要关注的CacheIneterceptor,然后调用((MethodInterceptor) interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice).invoke(this)方法,继续跟进

  • org.springframework.cache.interceptor.CacheInterceptor#invoke
@Override
	@Nullable
	public Object invoke(final MethodInvocation invocation) throws Throwable {
		Method method = invocation.getMethod();

		CacheOperationInvoker aopAllianceInvoker = () -> {
			try {
				return invocation.proceed();
			}
			catch (Throwable ex) {
				throw new CacheOperationInvoker.ThrowableWrapper(ex);
			}
		};

		try {
			return execute(aopAllianceInvoker, invocation.getThis(), method, invocation.getArguments());
		}
		catch (CacheOperationInvoker.ThrowableWrapper th) {
			throw th.getOriginal();
		}
	}

进入execute方法

protected Object execute(CacheOperationInvoker invoker, Object target, Method method, Object[] args) {
		// Check whether aspect is enabled (to cope with cases where the AJ is pulled in automatically)
		if (this.initialized) {
			Class<?> targetClass = getTargetClass(target);
			CacheOperationSource cacheOperationSource = getCacheOperationSource();
			if (cacheOperationSource != null) {
				Collection<CacheOperation> operations = cacheOperationSource.getCacheOperations(method, targetClass);
				if (!CollectionUtils.isEmpty(operations)) {
					return execute(invoker, method,
							new CacheOperationContexts(operations, method, args, target, targetClass));
				}
			}
		}

		return invoker.invoke();
	}

cacheOperationSource记录系统中所有使用了缓存的方法,cacheOperationSource.getCacheOperations(method, targetClass)能获取deleteByTaskId()方法缓存元数据,然后执行execute()方法

@Nullable
	private Object execute(final CacheOperationInvoker invoker, Method method, CacheOperationContexts contexts) {
		// Special handling of synchronized invocation
		if (contexts.isSynchronized()) {
			CacheOperationContext context = contexts.get(CacheableOperation.class).iterator().next();
			if (isConditionPassing(context, CacheOperationExpressionEvaluator.NO_RESULT)) {
				Object key = generateKey(context, CacheOperationExpressionEvaluator.NO_RESULT);
				Cache cache = context.getCaches().iterator().next();
				try {
					return wrapCacheValue(method, cache.get(key, () -> unwrapReturnValue(invokeOperation(invoker))));
				}
				catch (Cache.ValueRetrievalException ex) {
					// The invoker wraps any Throwable in a ThrowableWrapper instance so we
					// can just make sure that one bubbles up the stack.
					throw (CacheOperationInvoker.ThrowableWrapper) ex.getCause();
				}
			}
			else {
				// No caching required, only call the underlying method
				return invokeOperation(invoker);
			}
		}


		// Process any early evictions
		processCacheEvicts(contexts.get(CacheEvictOperation.class), true,
				CacheOperationExpressionEvaluator.NO_RESULT);

		// Check if we have a cached item matching the conditions
		Cache.ValueWrapper cacheHit = findCachedItem(contexts.get(CacheableOperation.class));

		// Collect puts from any @Cacheable miss, if no cached item is found
		List<CachePutRequest> cachePutRequests = new LinkedList<>();
		if (cacheHit == null) {
			collectPutRequests(contexts.get(CacheableOperation.class),
					CacheOperationExpressionEvaluator.NO_RESULT, cachePutRequests);
		}

		Object cacheValue;
		Object returnValue;

		if (cacheHit != null && cachePutRequests.isEmpty() && !hasCachePut(contexts)) {
			// If there are no put requests, just use the cache hit
			cacheValue = cacheHit.get();
			returnValue = wrapCacheValue(method, cacheValue);
		}
		else {
			// Invoke the method if we don't have a cache hit
			returnValue = invokeOperation(invoker);
			cacheValue = unwrapReturnValue(returnValue);
		}

		// Collect any explicit @CachePuts
		collectPutRequests(contexts.get(CachePutOperation.class), cacheValue, cachePutRequests);

		// Process any collected put requests, either from @CachePut or a @Cacheable miss
		for (CachePutRequest cachePutRequest : cachePutRequests) {
			cachePutRequest.apply(cacheValue);
		}

		// Process any late evictions
		processCacheEvicts(contexts.get(CacheEvictOperation.class), false, cacheValue);

		return returnValue;
	}

这里大致过程是:
先执行beforInvokeEvict ---- 执行数据库delete操作 --- 执行CachePut操作 ---- 执行afterInvokeEvict
我们的注解是方法调用后再使缓存失效,直接所以有效的操作应在倒数第2行

private void performCacheEvict(
			CacheOperationContext context, CacheEvictOperation operation, @Nullable Object result) {

		Object key = null;
		for (Cache cache : context.getCaches()) {
			if (operation.isCacheWide()) {
				logInvalidating(context, operation, null);
				doClear(cache);
			}
			else {
				if (key == null) {
					key = generateKey(context, result);
				}
				logInvalidating(context, operation, key);
				doEvict(cache, key);
			}
		}
	}

这里通过context.getCaches()获取到name为taskParamsCache的缓存
在这里插入图片描述
然后generateKey生成key,注意这里,发现生成的key是com.xxx.xxx.atomic.impl.xxxxdeleteByTaskId982,但是缓存中的key却是com.xxx.xxx.atomic.impl.xxxxselectByTaskId982,下面调用的doEvict(cache, key)方法不再跟进了,就是从cache中移除key对应值。明显这里key对应不上的,这也是导致@CacheEvict没有生效的原因。

总结:
笔者还是太大意了,当时看了注解@CacheEvict的对key的注释:
一次排查@CacheEvict注解失效的经历_第1张图片
大意就是如果没有指定key,那就会使用方法所有参数生成一个key,明显com.xxx.xxx.atomic.impl.xxxxselectByTaskId982是方法名 + 参数,可是你没说把方法名还加上了啊,说好的只用参数呢,哈哈,这个bug是笔者使用不当引出的,很多人不会犯这种低级错误。

解决办法就是使用SpEL明确定义key

@Cacheable(value = "taskParamsCache", key = "#taskId")
List<TaskParams> selectByTaskId(Long taskId);
// ...
// ...
@CacheEvict(value = "taskParamsCache", key = "#taskId")
int deleteByTaskId(Long taskId);

你可能感兴趣的:(Spring,Boot)