Atom1.0 英文文档
Network Working Group M. Nottingham, Ed.
Request for Comments: 4287 R. Sayre, Ed.
Category: Standards Track December 2005
The Atom Syndication Format
Status of This Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).
Abstract
This document specifies Atom, an XML-based Web content and metadata
syndication format.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ....................................................3
1.1. Examples ...................................................3
1.2. Namespace and Version ......................................5
1.3. Notational Conventions .....................................5
2. Atom Documents ..................................................6
3. Common Atom Constructs ..........................................7
3.1. Text Constructs ............................................7
3.1.1. The "type" Attribute ................................8
3.2. Person Constructs .........................................10
3.2.1. The "atom:name" Element ............................10
3.2.2. The "atom:uri" Element .............................10
3.2.3. The "atom:email" Element ...........................10
3.3. Date Constructs ...........................................10
4. Atom Element Definitions .......................................11
4.1. Container Elements ........................................11
4.1.1. The "atom:feed" Element ............................11
4.1.2. The "atom:entry" Element ...........................13
4.1.3. The "atom:content" Element .........................14
4.2. Metadata Elements .........................................17
4.2.1. The "atom:author" Element ..........................17
4.2.2. The "atom:category" Element ........................18
4.2.3. The "atom:contributor" Element .....................18
Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005
4.2.4. The "atom:generator" Element .......................18
4.2.5. The "atom:icon" Element ............................19
4.2.6. The "atom:id" Element ..............................19
4.2.7. The "atom:link" Element ............................21
4.2.8. The "atom:logo" Element ............................23
4.2.9. The "atom:published" Element .......................23
4.2.10. The "atom:rights" Element .........................24
4.2.11. The "atom:source" Element .........................24
4.2.12. The "atom:subtitle" Element .......................25
4.2.13. The "atom:summary" Element ........................25
4.2.14. The "atom:title" Element ..........................25
4.2.15. The "atom:updated" Element ........................25
5. Securing Atom Documents ........................................26
5.1. Digital Signatures ........................................26
5.2. Encryption ................................................27
5.3. Signing and Encrypting ....................................28
6. Extending Atom .................................................28
6.1. Extensions from Non-Atom Vocabularies .....................28
6.2. Extensions to the Atom Vocabulary .........................28
6.3. Processing Foreign Markup .................................28
6.4. Extension Elements ........................................29
6.4.1. Simple Extension Elements ..........................29
6.4.2. Structured Extension Elements ......................29
7. IANA Considerations ............................................30
7.1. Registry of Link Relations ................................31
8. Security Considerations ........................................31
8.1. HTML and XHTML Content ....................................31
8.2. URIs ......................................................31
8.3. IRIs ......................................................31
8.4. Spoofing ..................................................31
8.5. Encryption and Signing ....................................32
9. References .....................................................32
9.1. Normative References ......................................32
9.2. Informative References ....................................34
Appendix A. Contributors ..........................................35
Appendix B. RELAX NG Compact Schema ...............................35
Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005
1. Introduction
Atom is an XML-based document format that describes lists of related
information known as "feeds". Feeds are composed of a number of
items, known as "entries", each with an extensible set of attached
metadata. For example, each entry has a title.
The primary use case that Atom addresses is the syndication of Web
content such as weblogs and news headlines to Web sites as well as
directly to user agents.
1.1. Examples
A brief, single-entry Atom Feed Document:
Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005
A more extensive, single-entry Atom Feed Document:
A <em>lot</em> of effort
went into making this effortless
hreflang="en" href="http://example.org/"/>
href="http://example.org/feed.atom"/>
Example Toolkit
href="http://example.org/2005/04/02/atom"/>
href="http://example.org/audio/ph34r_my_podcast.mp3"/>
xml:base="http://diveintomark.org/">
[Update: The Atom draft is finished.]
Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005
1.2. Namespace and Version
The XML Namespaces URI [W3C.REC-xml-names-19990114] for the XML data
format described in this specification is:
http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom
For convenience, this data format may be referred to as "Atom 1.0".
This specification uses "Atom" internally.
1.3. Notational Conventions
This specification describes conformance in terms of two artifacts:
Atom Feed Documents and Atom Entry Documents. Additionally, it
places some requirements on Atom Processors.
This specification uses the namespace prefix "atom:" for the
Namespace URI identified in Section 1.2, above. Note that the choice
of namespace prefix is arbitrary and not semantically significant.
Atom is specified using terms from the XML Infoset
[W3C.REC-xml-infoset-20040204]. However, this specification uses a
shorthand for two common terms: the phrase "Information Item" is
omitted when naming Element Information Items and Attribute
Information Items. Therefore, when this specification uses the term
"element," it is referring to an Element Information Item in Infoset
terms. Likewise, when it uses the term "attribute," it is referring
to an Attribute Information Item.
Some sections of this specification are illustrated with fragments of
a non-normative RELAX NG Compact schema [RELAX-NG]. However, the
text of this specification provides the definition of conformance. A
complete schema appears in Appendix B.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14, [RFC2119], as
scoped to those conformance targets.
Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005
2. Atom Documents
This specification describes two kinds of Atom Documents: Atom Feed
Documents and Atom Entry Documents.
An Atom Feed Document is a representation of an Atom feed, including
metadata about the feed, and some or all of the entries associated
with it. Its root is the atom:feed element.
An Atom Entry Document represents exactly one Atom entry, outside of
the context of an Atom feed. Its root is the atom:entry element.
namespace atom = "http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
start = atomFeed | atomEntry
Both kinds of Atom Documents are specified in terms of the XML
Information Set, serialized as XML 1.0 [W3C.REC-xml-20040204] and
identified with the "application/atom+xml" media type. Atom
Documents MUST be well-formed XML. This specification does not
define a DTD for Atom Documents, and hence does not require them to
be valid (in the sense used by XML).
Atom allows the use of IRIs [RFC3987]. Every URI [RFC3986] is also
an IRI, so a URI may be used wherever below an IRI is named. There
are two special considerations: (1) when an IRI that is not also a
URI is given for dereferencing, it MUST be mapped to a URI using the
steps in Section 3.1 of [RFC3987] and (2) when an IRI is serving as
an atom:id value, it MUST NOT be so mapped, so that the comparison
works as described in Section 4.2.6.1.
Any element defined by this specification MAY have an xml:base
attribute [W3C.REC-xmlbase-20010627]. When xml:base is used in an
Atom Document, it serves the function described in section 5.1.1 of
[RFC3986], establishing the base URI (or IRI) for resolving any
relative references found within the effective scope of the xml:base
attribute.
Any element defined by this specification MAY have an xml:lang
attribute, whose content indicates the natural language for the
element and its descendents. The language context is only
significant for elements and attributes declared to be "Language-
Sensitive" by this specification. Requirements regarding the content
and interpretation of xml:lang are specified in XML 1.0
[W3C.REC-xml-20040204], Section 2.12.
Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005
atomCommonAttributes =
attribute xml:base { atomUri }?,
attribute xml:lang { atomLanguageTag }?,
undefinedAttribute*
Atom is an extensible format. See Section 6 of this document for a
full description of how Atom Documents can be extended.
Atom Processors MAY keep state sourced from Atom Feed Documents and
combine them with other Atom Feed Documents, in order to facilitate a
contiguous view of the contents of a feed. The manner in which Atom
Feed Documents are combined in order to reconstruct a feed (e.g.,
updating entries and metadata, dealing with missing entries) is out
of the scope of this specification.
3. Common Atom Constructs
Many of Atom's elements share a few common structures. This section
defines those structures and their requirements for convenient
reference by the appropriate element definitions.
When an element is identified as being a particular kind of
construct, it inherits the corresponding requirements from that
construct's definition in this section.
Note that there MUST NOT be any white space in a Date construct or in
any IRI. Some XML-emitting implementations erroneously insert white
space around values by default, and such implementations will emit
invalid Atom Documents.
3.1. Text Constructs
A Text construct contains human-readable text, usually in small
quantities. The content of Text constructs is Language-Sensitive.
atomPlainTextConstruct =
atomCommonAttributes,
attribute type { "text" | "html" }?,
text
atomXHTMLTextConstruct =
atomCommonAttributes,
attribute type { "xhtml" },
xhtmlDiv
atomTextConstruct = atomPlainTextConstruct | atomXHTMLTextConstruct
Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005
3.1.1. The "type" Attribute
Text constructs MAY have a "type" attribute. When present, the value
MUST be one of "text", "html", or "xhtml". If the "type" attribute
is not provided, Atom Processors MUST behave as though it were
present with a value of "text". Unlike the atom:content element
defined in Section 4.1.3, MIME media types [MIMEREG] MUST NOT be used
as values for the "type" attribute on Text constructs.
3.1.1.1. Text
Example atom:title with text content:
...
...
If the value is "text", the content of the Text construct MUST NOT
contain child elements. Such text is intended to be presented to
humans in a readable fashion. Thus, Atom Processors MAY collapse
white space (including line breaks) and display the text using
typographic techniques such as justification and proportional fonts.
3.1.1.2. HTML
Example atom:title with HTML content:
...
...
If the value of "type" is "html", the content of the Text construct
MUST NOT contain child elements and SHOULD be suitable for handling
as HTML [HTML]. Any markup within MUST be escaped; for example,
"
" as "<br>". HTML markup within SHOULD be such that it could
validly appear directly within an HTML unescaping. Atom Processors that display such content MAY use that markup to aid in its display. Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 8] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 3.1.1.3. XHTML Example atom:title with XHTML content: ... ... If the value of "type" is "xhtml", the content of the Text construct MUST be a single XHTML div element [XHTML] and SHOULD be suitable for handling as XHTML. The XHTML div element itself MUST NOT be considered part of the content. Atom Processors that display the content MAY use the markup to aid in displaying it. The escaped versions of characters such as "&" and ">" represent those characters, not markup. Examples of valid XHTML content: ... This is XHTML content. ... This is ... The following example assumes that the XHTML namespace has been bound to the "xh" prefix earlier in the document: ... This is ... Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 9] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 3.2. Person Constructs A Person construct is an element that describes a person, corporation, or similar entity (hereafter, 'person'). atomPersonConstruct = atomCommonAttributes, (element atom:name { text } & element atom:uri { atomUri }? & element atom:email { atomEmailAddress }? & extensionElement*) This specification assigns no significance to the order of appearance of the child elements in a Person construct. Person constructs allow extension Metadata elements (see Section 6.4). 3.2.1. The "atom:name" Element The "atom:name" element's content conveys a human-readable name for the person. The content of atom:name is Language-Sensitive. Person constructs MUST contain exactly one "atom:name" element. 3.2.2. The "atom:uri" Element The "atom:uri" element's content conveys an IRI associated with the person. Person constructs MAY contain an atom:uri element, but MUST NOT contain more than one. The content of atom:uri in a Person construct MUST be an IRI reference [RFC3987]. 3.2.3. The "atom:email" Element The "atom:email" element's content conveys an e-mail address associated with the person. Person constructs MAY contain an atom:email element, but MUST NOT contain more than one. Its content MUST conform to the "addr-spec" production in [RFC2822]. 3.3. Date Constructs A Date construct is an element whose content MUST conform to the "date-time" production in [RFC3339]. In addition, an uppercase "T" character MUST be used to separate date and time, and an uppercase "Z" character MUST be present in the absence of a numeric time zone offset. atomDateConstruct = atomCommonAttributes, xsd:dateTime Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 10] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 Such date values happen to be compatible with the following specifications: [ISO.8601.1988], [W3C.NOTE-datetime-19980827], and [W3C.REC-xmlschema-2-20041028]. Example Date constructs: Date values SHOULD be as accurate as possible. For example, it would be generally inappropriate for a publishing system to apply the same timestamp to several entries that were published during the course of a single day. 4. Atom Element Definitions 4.1. Container Elements 4.1.1. The "atom:feed" Element The "atom:feed" element is the document (i.e., top-level) element of an Atom Feed Document, acting as a container for metadata and data associated with the feed. Its element children consist of metadata elements followed by zero or more atom:entry child elements. atomFeed = element atom:feed { atomCommonAttributes, (atomAuthor* & atomCategory* & atomContributor* & atomGenerator? & atomIcon? & atomId & atomLink* & atomLogo? & atomRights? & atomSubtitle? & atomTitle & atomUpdated & extensionElement*), atomEntry* } This specification assigns no significance to the order of atom:entry elements within the feed. Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 11] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 The following child elements are defined by this specification (note that the presence of some of these elements is required): o atom:feed elements MUST contain one or more atom:author elements, unless all of the atom:feed element's child atom:entry elements contain at least one atom:author element. o atom:feed elements MAY contain any number of atom:category elements. o atom:feed elements MAY contain any number of atom:contributor elements. o atom:feed elements MUST NOT contain more than one atom:generator element. o atom:feed elements MUST NOT contain more than one atom:icon element. o atom:feed elements MUST NOT contain more than one atom:logo element. o atom:feed elements MUST contain exactly one atom:id element. o atom:feed elements SHOULD contain one atom:link element with a rel attribute value of "self". This is the preferred URI for retrieving Atom Feed Documents representing this Atom feed. o atom:feed elements MUST NOT contain more than one atom:link element with a rel attribute value of "alternate" that has the same combination of type and hreflang attribute values. o atom:feed elements MAY contain additional atom:link elements beyond those described above. o atom:feed elements MUST NOT contain more than one atom:rights element. o atom:feed elements MUST NOT contain more than one atom:subtitle element. o atom:feed elements MUST contain exactly one atom:title element. o atom:feed elements MUST contain exactly one atom:updated element. If multiple atom:entry elements with the same atom:id value appear in an Atom Feed Document, they represent the same entry. Their atom:updated timestamps SHOULD be different. If an Atom Feed Document contains multiple entries with the same atom:id, Atom Processors MAY choose to display all of them or some subset of them. One typical behavior would be to display only the entry with the latest atom:updated timestamp. 4.1.1.1. Providing Textual Content Experience teaches that feeds that contain textual content are in general more useful than those that do not. Some applications (one example is full-text indexers) require a minimum amount of text or (X)HTML to function reliably and predictably. Feed producers should be aware of these issues. It is advisable that each atom:entry element contain a non-empty atom:title element, a non-empty Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 12] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 atom:content element when that element is present, and a non-empty atom:summary element when the entry contains no atom:content element. However, the absence of atom:summary is not an error, and Atom Processors MUST NOT fail to function correctly as a consequence of such an absence. 4.1.2. The "atom:entry" Element The "atom:entry" element represents an individual entry, acting as a container for metadata and data associated with the entry. This element can appear as a child of the atom:feed element, or it can appear as the document (i.e., top-level) element of a stand-alone Atom Entry Document. atomEntry = element atom:entry { atomCommonAttributes, (atomAuthor* & atomCategory* & atomContent? & atomContributor* & atomId & atomLink* & atomPublished? & atomRights? & atomSource? & atomSummary? & atomTitle & atomUpdated & extensionElement*) } This specification assigns no significance to the order of appearance of the child elements of atom:entry. The following child elements are defined by this specification (note that it requires the presence of some of these elements): o atom:entry elements MUST contain one or more atom:author elements, unless the atom:entry contains an atom:source element that contains an atom:author element or, in an Atom Feed Document, the atom:feed element contains an atom:author element itself. o atom:entry elements MAY contain any number of atom:category elements. o atom:entry elements MUST NOT contain more than one atom:content element. o atom:entry elements MAY contain any number of atom:contributor elements. Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 13] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 o atom:entry elements MUST contain exactly one atom:id element. o atom:entry elements that contain no child atom:content element MUST contain at least one atom:link element with a rel attribute value of "alternate". o atom:entry elements MUST NOT contain more than one atom:link element with a rel attribute value of "alternate" that has the same combination of type and hreflang attribute values. o atom:entry elements MAY contain additional atom:link elements beyond those described above. o atom:entry elements MUST NOT contain more than one atom:published element. o atom:entry elements MUST NOT contain more than one atom:rights element. o atom:entry elements MUST NOT contain more than one atom:source element. o atom:entry elements MUST contain an atom:summary element in either of the following cases: * the atom:entry contains an atom:content that has a "src" attribute (and is thus empty). * the atom:entry contains content that is encoded in Base64; i.e., the "type" attribute of atom:content is a MIME media type [MIMEREG], but is not an XML media type [RFC3023], does not begin with "text/", and does not end with "/xml" or "+xml". o atom:entry elements MUST NOT contain more than one atom:summary element. o atom:entry elements MUST contain exactly one atom:title element. o atom:entry elements MUST contain exactly one atom:updated element. 4.1.3. The "atom:content" Element The "atom:content" element either contains or links to the content of the entry. The content of atom:content is Language-Sensitive. atomInlineTextContent = element atom:content { atomCommonAttributes, attribute type { "text" | "html" }?, (text)* } atomInlineXHTMLContent = element atom:content { atomCommonAttributes, attribute type { "xhtml" }, xhtmlDiv } Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 14] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 atomInlineOtherContent = element atom:content { atomCommonAttributes, attribute type { atomMediaType }?, (text|anyElement)* } atomOutOfLineContent = element atom:content { atomCommonAttributes, attribute type { atomMediaType }?, attribute src { atomUri }, empty } atomContent = atomInlineTextContent | atomInlineXHTMLContent | atomInlineOtherContent | atomOutOfLineContent 4.1.3.1. The "type" Attribute On the atom:content element, the value of the "type" attribute MAY be one of "text", "html", or "xhtml". Failing that, it MUST conform to the syntax of a MIME media type, but MUST NOT be a composite type (see Section 4.2.6 of [MIMEREG]). If neither the type attribute nor the src attribute is provided, Atom Processors MUST behave as though the type attribute were present with a value of "text". 4.1.3.2. The "src" Attribute atom:content MAY have a "src" attribute, whose value MUST be an IRI reference [RFC3987]. If the "src" attribute is present, atom:content MUST be empty. Atom Processors MAY use the IRI to retrieve the content and MAY choose to ignore remote content or to present it in a different manner than local content. If the "src" attribute is present, the "type" attribute SHOULD be provided and MUST be a MIME media type [MIMEREG], rather than "text", "html", or "xhtml". The value is advisory; that is to say, when the corresponding URI (mapped from an IRI, if necessary) is dereferenced, if the server providing that content also provides a media type, the server-provided media type is authoritative. Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 15] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 4.1.3.3. Processing Model Atom Documents MUST conform to the following rules. Atom Processors MUST interpret atom:content according to the first applicable rule. 1. If the value of "type" is "text", the content of atom:content MUST NOT contain child elements. Such text is intended to be presented to humans in a readable fashion. Thus, Atom Processors MAY collapse white space (including line breaks), and display the text using typographic techniques such as justification and proportional fonts. 2. If the value of "type" is "html", the content of atom:content MUST NOT contain child elements and SHOULD be suitable for handling as HTML [HTML]. The HTML markup MUST be escaped; for example, " that it could validly appear directly within an HTML element. Atom Processors that display the content MAY use the markup to aid in displaying it. 3. If the value of "type" is "xhtml", the content of atom:content MUST be a single XHTML div element [XHTML] and SHOULD be suitable for handling as XHTML. The XHTML div element itself MUST NOT be considered part of the content. Atom Processors that display the content MAY use the markup to aid in displaying it. The escaped versions of characters such as "&" and ">" represent those characters, not markup. 4. If the value of "type" is an XML media type [RFC3023] or ends with "+xml" or "/xml" (case insensitive), the content of atom:content MAY include child elements and SHOULD be suitable for handling as the indicated media type. If the "src" attribute is not provided, this would normally mean that the "atom:content" element would contain a single child element that would serve as the root element of the XML document of the indicated type. 5. If the value of "type" begins with "text/" (case insensitive), the content of atom:content MUST NOT contain child elements. 6. For all other values of "type", the content of atom:content MUST be a valid Base64 encoding, as described in [RFC3548], section 3. When decoded, it SHOULD be suitable for handling as the indicated media type. In this case, the characters in the Base64 encoding MAY be preceded and followed in the atom:content element by white space, and lines are separated by a single newline (U+000A) character. Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 16] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 4.1.3.4. Examples XHTML inline: ... This is XHTML content. ... This is ... The following example assumes that the XHTML namespace has been bound to the "xh" prefix earlier in the document: ... This is ... 4.2. Metadata Elements 4.2.1. The "atom:author" Element The "atom:author" element is a Person construct that indicates the author of the entry or feed. atomAuthor = element atom:author { atomPersonConstruct } If an atom:entry element does not contain atom:author elements, then the atom:author elements of the contained atom:source element are considered to apply. In an Atom Feed Document, the atom:author elements of the containing atom:feed element are considered to apply to the entry if there are no atom:author elements in the locations described above. Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 17] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 4.2.2. The "atom:category" Element The "atom:category" element conveys information about a category associated with an entry or feed. This specification assigns no meaning to the content (if any) of this element. atomCategory = element atom:category { atomCommonAttributes, attribute term { text }, attribute scheme { atomUri }?, attribute label { text }?, undefinedContent } 4.2.2.1. The "term" Attribute The "term" attribute is a string that identifies the category to which the entry or feed belongs. Category elements MUST have a "term" attribute. 4.2.2.2. The "scheme" Attribute The "scheme" attribute is an IRI that identifies a categorization scheme. Category elements MAY have a "scheme" attribute. 4.2.2.3. The "label" Attribute The "label" attribute provides a human-readable label for display in end-user applications. The content of the "label" attribute is Language-Sensitive. Entities such as "&" and "<" represent their corresponding characters ("&" and "<", respectively), not markup. Category elements MAY have a "label" attribute. 4.2.3. The "atom:contributor" Element The "atom:contributor" element is a Person construct that indicates a person or other entity who contributed to the entry or feed. atomContributor = element atom:contributor { atomPersonConstruct } 4.2.4. The "atom:generator" Element The "atom:generator" element's content identifies the agent used to generate a feed, for debugging and other purposes. Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 18] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 atomGenerator = element atom:generator { atomCommonAttributes, attribute uri { atomUri }?, attribute version { text }?, text } The content of this element, when present, MUST be a string that is a human-readable name for the generating agent. Entities such as "&" and "<" represent their corresponding characters ("&" and "<" respectively), not markup. The atom:generator element MAY have a "uri" attribute whose value MUST be an IRI reference [RFC3987]. When dereferenced, the resulting URI (mapped from an IRI, if necessary) SHOULD produce a representation that is relevant to that agent. The atom:generator element MAY have a "version" attribute that indicates the version of the generating agent. 4.2.5. The "atom:icon" Element The "atom:icon" element's content is an IRI reference [RFC3987] that identifies an image that provides iconic visual identification for a feed. atomIcon = element atom:icon { atomCommonAttributes, (atomUri) } The image SHOULD have an aspect ratio of one (horizontal) to one (vertical) and SHOULD be suitable for presentation at a small size. 4.2.6. The "atom:id" Element The "atom:id" element conveys a permanent, universally unique identifier for an entry or feed. atomId = element atom:id { atomCommonAttributes, (atomUri) } Its content MUST be an IRI, as defined by [RFC3987]. Note that the definition of "IRI" excludes relative references. Though the IRI might use a dereferencable scheme, Atom Processors MUST NOT assume it can be dereferenced. Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 19] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 When an Atom Document is relocated, migrated, syndicated, republished, exported, or imported, the content of its atom:id element MUST NOT change. Put another way, an atom:id element pertains to all instantiations of a particular Atom entry or feed; revisions retain the same content in their atom:id elements. It is suggested that the atom:id element be stored along with the associated resource. The content of an atom:id element MUST be created in a way that assures uniqueness. Because of the risk of confusion between IRIs that would be equivalent if they were mapped to URIs and dereferenced, the following normalization strategy SHOULD be applied when generating atom:id elements: o Provide the scheme in lowercase characters. o Provide the host, if any, in lowercase characters. o Only perform percent-encoding where it is essential. o Use uppercase A through F characters when percent-encoding. o Prevent dot-segments from appearing in paths. o For schemes that define a default authority, use an empty authority if the default is desired. o For schemes that define an empty path to be equivalent to a path of "/", use "/". o For schemes that define a port, use an empty port if the default is desired. o Preserve empty fragment identifiers and queries. o Ensure that all components of the IRI are appropriately character normalized, e.g., by using NFC or NFKC. 4.2.6.1. Comparing atom:id Instances of atom:id elements can be compared to determine whether an entry or feed is the same as one seen before. Processors MUST compare atom:id elements on a character-by-character basis (in a case-sensitive fashion). Comparison operations MUST be based solely on the IRI character strings and MUST NOT rely on dereferencing the IRIs or URIs mapped from them. As a result, two IRIs that resolve to the same resource but are not character-for-character identical will be considered different for the purposes of identifier comparison. For example, these are four distinct identifiers, despite the fact that they differ only in case: Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 20] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 http://www.example.org/thing http://www.example.org/Thing http://www.EXAMPLE.org/thing HTTP://www.example.org/thing Likewise, these are three distinct identifiers, because IRI %-escaping is significant for the purposes of comparison: http://www.example.com/~bob http://www.example.com/%7ebob http://www.example.com/%7Ebob 4.2.7. The "atom:link" Element The "atom:link" element defines a reference from an entry or feed to a Web resource. This specification assigns no meaning to the content (if any) of this element. atomLink = element atom:link { atomCommonAttributes, attribute href { atomUri }, attribute rel { atomNCName | atomUri }?, attribute type { atomMediaType }?, attribute hreflang { atomLanguageTag }?, attribute title { text }?, attribute length { text }?, undefinedContent } 4.2.7.1. The "href" Attribute The "href" attribute contains the link's IRI. atom:link elements MUST have an href attribute, whose value MUST be a IRI reference [RFC3987]. 4.2.7.2. The "rel" Attribute atom:link elements MAY have a "rel" attribute that indicates the link relation type. If the "rel" attribute is not present, the link element MUST be interpreted as if the link relation type is "alternate". The value of "rel" MUST be a string that is non-empty and matches either the "isegment-nz-nc" or the "IRI" production in [RFC3987]. Note that use of a relative reference other than a simple name is not allowed. If a name is given, implementations MUST consider the link relation type equivalent to the same name registered within the IANA Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 21] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 Registry of Link Relations (Section 7), and thus to the IRI that would be obtained by appending the value of the rel attribute to the string "http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/". The value of "rel" describes the meaning of the link, but does not impose any behavioral requirements on Atom Processors. This document defines five initial values for the Registry of Link Relations: 1. The value "alternate" signifies that the IRI in the value of the href attribute identifies an alternate version of the resource described by the containing element. 2. The value "related" signifies that the IRI in the value of the href attribute identifies a resource related to the resource described by the containing element. For example, the feed for a site that discusses the performance of the search engine at "http://search.example.com" might contain, as a child of atom:feed: An identical link might appear as a child of any atom:entry whose content contains a discussion of that same search engine. 3. The value "self" signifies that the IRI in the value of the href attribute identifies a resource equivalent to the containing element. 4. The value "enclosure" signifies that the IRI in the value of the href attribute identifies a related resource that is potentially large in size and might require special handling. For atom:link elements with rel="enclosure", the length attribute SHOULD be provided. 5. The value "via" signifies that the IRI in the value of the href attribute identifies a resource that is the source of the information provided in the containing element. 4.2.7.3. The "type" Attribute On the link element, the "type" attribute's value is an advisory media type: it is a hint about the type of the representation that is expected to be returned when the value of the href attribute is dereferenced. Note that the type attribute does not override the actual media type returned with the representation. Link elements MAY have a type attribute, whose value MUST conform to the syntax of a MIME media type [MIMEREG]. Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 22] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 4.2.7.4. The "hreflang" Attribute The "hreflang" attribute's content describes the language of the resource pointed to by the href attribute. When used together with the rel="alternate", it implies a translated version of the entry. Link elements MAY have an hreflang attribute, whose value MUST be a language tag [RFC3066]. 4.2.7.5. The "title" Attribute The "title" attribute conveys human-readable information about the link. The content of the "title" attribute is Language-Sensitive. Entities such as "&" and "<" represent their corresponding characters ("&" and "<", respectively), not markup. Link elements MAY have a title attribute. 4.2.7.6. The "length" Attribute The "length" attribute indicates an advisory length of the linked content in octets; it is a hint about the content length of the representation returned when the IRI in the href attribute is mapped to a URI and dereferenced. Note that the length attribute does not override the actual content length of the representation as reported by the underlying protocol. Link elements MAY have a length attribute. 4.2.8. The "atom:logo" Element The "atom:logo" element's content is an IRI reference [RFC3987] that identifies an image that provides visual identification for a feed. atomLogo = element atom:logo { atomCommonAttributes, (atomUri) } The image SHOULD have an aspect ratio of 2 (horizontal) to 1 (vertical). 4.2.9. The "atom:published" Element The "atom:published" element is a Date construct indicating an instant in time associated with an event early in the life cycle of the entry. atomPublished = element atom:published { atomDateConstruct } Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 23] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 Typically, atom:published will be associated with the initial creation or first availability of the resource. 4.2.10. The "atom:rights" Element The "atom:rights" element is a Text construct that conveys information about rights held in and over an entry or feed. atomRights = element atom:rights { atomTextConstruct } The atom:rights element SHOULD NOT be used to convey machine-readable licensing information. If an atom:entry element does not contain an atom:rights element, then the atom:rights element of the containing atom:feed element, if present, is considered to apply to the entry. 4.2.11. The "atom:source" Element If an atom:entry is copied from one feed into another feed, then the source atom:feed's metadata (all child elements of atom:feed other than the atom:entry elements) MAY be preserved within the copied entry by adding an atom:source child element, if it is not already present in the entry, and including some or all of the source feed's Metadata elements as the atom:source element's children. Such metadata SHOULD be preserved if the source atom:feed contains any of the child elements atom:author, atom:contributor, atom:rights, or atom:category and those child elements are not present in the source atom:entry. atomSource = element atom:source { atomCommonAttributes, (atomAuthor* & atomCategory* & atomContributor* & atomGenerator? & atomIcon? & atomId? & atomLink* & atomLogo? & atomRights? & atomSubtitle? & atomTitle? & atomUpdated? & extensionElement*) } Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 24] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 The atom:source element is designed to allow the aggregation of entries from different feeds while retaining information about an entry's source feed. For this reason, Atom Processors that are performing such aggregation SHOULD include at least the required feed-level Metadata elements (atom:id, atom:title, and atom:updated) in the atom:source element. 4.2.12. The "atom:subtitle" Element The "atom:subtitle" element is a Text construct that conveys a human- readable description or subtitle for a feed. atomSubtitle = element atom:subtitle { atomTextConstruct } 4.2.13. The "atom:summary" Element The "atom:summary" element is a Text construct that conveys a short summary, abstract, or excerpt of an entry. atomSummary = element atom:summary { atomTextConstruct } It is not advisable for the atom:summary element to duplicate atom:title or atom:content because Atom Processors might assume there is a useful summary when there is none. 4.2.14. The "atom:title" Element The "atom:title" element is a Text construct that conveys a human- readable title for an entry or feed. atomTitle = element atom:title { atomTextConstruct } 4.2.15. The "atom:updated" Element The "atom:updated" element is a Date construct indicating the most recent instant in time when an entry or feed was modified in a way the publisher considers significant. Therefore, not all modifications necessarily result in a changed atom:updated value. atomUpdated = element atom:updated { atomDateConstruct } Publishers MAY change the value of this element over time. Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 25] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 5. Securing Atom Documents Because Atom is an XML-based format, existing XML security mechanisms can be used to secure its content. Producers of feeds and/or entries, and intermediaries who aggregate feeds and/or entries, may have sound reasons for signing and/or encrypting otherwise-unprotected content. For example, a merchant might digitally sign a message that contains a discount coupon for its products. A bank that uses Atom to deliver customer statements is very likely to want to sign and encrypt those messages to protect their customers' financial information and to assure the customer of their authenticity. Intermediaries may want to encrypt aggregated feeds so that a passive observer cannot tell what topics the recipient is interested in. Of course, many other examples exist as well. The algorithm requirements in this section pertain to the Atom Processor. They require that a recipient, at a minimum, be able to handle messages that use the specified cryptographic algorithms. These requirements do not limit the algorithms that the sender can choose. 5.1. Digital Signatures The root of an Atom Document (i.e., atom:feed in an Atom Feed Document, atom:entry in an Atom Entry Document) or any atom:entry element MAY have an Enveloped Signature, as described by XML- Signature and Syntax Processing [W3C.REC-xmldsig-core-20020212]. Atom Processors MUST NOT reject an Atom Document containing such a signature because they are not capable of verifying it; they MUST continue processing and MAY inform the user of their failure to validate the signature. In other words, the presence of an element with the namespace URI "http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#" and a local name of "Signature" as a child of the document element MUST NOT cause an Atom Processor to fail merely because of its presence. Other elements in an Atom Document MUST NOT be signed unless their definitions explicitly specify such a capability. Section 6.5.1 of [W3C.REC-xmldsig-core-20020212] requires support for Canonical XML [W3C.REC-xml-c14n-20010315]. However, many implementers do not use it because signed XML documents enclosed in other XML documents have their signatures broken. Thus, Atom Processors that verify signed Atom Documents MUST be able to Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 26] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 canonicalize with the exclusive XML canonicalization method identified by the URI "http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#", as specified in Exclusive XML Canonicalization [W3C.REC-xml-exc-c14n-20020718]. Intermediaries such as aggregators may need to add an atom:source element to an entry that does not contain its own atom:source element. If such an entry is signed, the addition will break the signature. Thus, a publisher of individually-signed entries should strongly consider adding an atom:source element to those entries before signing them. Implementers should also be aware of the issues concerning the use of markup in the "xml:" namespace as it interacts with canonicalization. Section 4.4.2 of [W3C.REC-xmldsig-core-20020212] requires support for DSA signatures and recommends support for RSA signatures. However, because of the much greater popularity in the market of RSA versus DSA, Atom Processors that verify signed Atom Documents MUST be able to verify RSA signatures, but do not need be able to verify DSA signatures. Due to security issues that can arise if the keying material for message authentication code (MAC) authentication is not handled properly, Atom Documents SHOULD NOT use MACs for signatures. 5.2. Encryption The root of an Atom Document (i.e., atom:feed in an Atom Feed Document, atom:entry in an Atom Entry Document) MAY be encrypted, using the mechanisms described by XML Encryption Syntax and Processing [W3C.REC-xmlenc-core-20021210]. Section 5.1 of [W3C.REC-xmlenc-core-20021210] requires support of TripleDES, AES-128, and AES-256. Atom Processors that decrypt Atom Documents MUST be able to decrypt with AES-128 in Cipher Block Chaining (CBC) mode. Encryption based on [W3C.REC-xmlenc-core-20021210] does not ensure integrity of the original document. There are known cryptographic attacks where someone who cannot decrypt a message can still change bits in a way where part or all the decrypted message makes sense but has a different meaning. Thus, Atom Processors that decrypt Atom Documents SHOULD check the integrity of the decrypted document by verifying the hash in the signature (if any) in the document, or by verifying a hash of the document within the document (if any). Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 27] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 5.3. Signing and Encrypting When an Atom Document is to be both signed and encrypted, it is generally a good idea to first sign the document, then encrypt the signed document. This provides integrity to the base document while encrypting all the information, including the identity of the entity that signed the document. Note that, if MACs are used for authentication, the order MUST be that the document is signed and then encrypted, and not the other way around. 6. Extending Atom 6.1. Extensions from Non-Atom Vocabularies This specification describes Atom's XML markup vocabulary. Markup from other vocabularies ("foreign markup") can be used in an Atom Document. Note that the atom:content element is designed to support the inclusion of arbitrary foreign markup. 6.2. Extensions to the Atom Vocabulary The Atom namespace is reserved for future forward-compatible revisions of Atom. Future versions of this specification could add new elements and attributes to the Atom markup vocabulary. Software written to conform to this version of the specification will not be able to process such markup correctly and, in fact, will not be able to distinguish it from markup error. For the purposes of this discussion, unrecognized markup from the Atom vocabulary will be considered "foreign markup". 6.3. Processing Foreign Markup Atom Processors that encounter foreign markup in a location that is legal according to this specification MUST NOT stop processing or signal an error. It might be the case that the Atom Processor is able to process the foreign markup correctly and does so. Otherwise, such markup is termed "unknown foreign markup". When unknown foreign markup is encountered as a child of atom:entry, atom:feed, or a Person construct, Atom Processors MAY bypass the markup and any textual content and MUST NOT change their behavior as a result of the markup's presence. When unknown foreign markup is encountered in a Text Construct or atom:content element, software SHOULD ignore the markup and process any text content of foreign elements as though the surrounding markup were not present. Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 28] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 6.4. Extension Elements Atom allows foreign markup anywhere in an Atom document, except where it is explicitly forbidden. Child elements of atom:entry, atom:feed, atom:source, and Person constructs are considered Metadata elements and are described below. Child elements of Person constructs are considered to apply to the construct. The role of other foreign markup is undefined by this specification. 6.4.1. Simple Extension Elements A Simple Extension element MUST NOT have any attributes or child elements. The element MAY contain character data or be empty. Simple Extension elements are not Language-Sensitive. simpleExtensionElement = element * - atom:* { text } The element can be interpreted as a simple property (or name/value pair) of the parent element that encloses it. The pair consisting of the namespace-URI of the element and the local name of the element can be interpreted as the name of the property. The character data content of the element can be interpreted as the value of the property. If the element is empty, then the property value can be interpreted as an empty string. 6.4.2. Structured Extension Elements The root element of a Structured Extension element MUST have at least one attribute or child element. It MAY have attributes, it MAY contain well-formed XML content (including character data), or it MAY be empty. Structured Extension elements are Language-Sensitive. structuredExtensionElement = element * - atom:* { (attribute * { text }+, (text|anyElement)*) | (attribute * { text }*, (text?, anyElement+, (text|anyElement)*)) } The structure of a Structured Extension element, including the order of its child elements, could be significant. Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 29] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 This specification does not provide an interpretation of a Structured Extension element. The syntax of the XML contained in the element (and an interpretation of how the element relates to its containing element) is defined by the specification of the Atom extension. 7. IANA Considerations An Atom Document, when serialized as XML 1.0, can be identified with the following media type: MIME media type name: application MIME subtype name: atom+xml Mandatory parameters: None. Optional parameters: "charset": This parameter has semantics identical to the charset parameter of the "application/xml" media type as specified in [RFC3023]. Encoding considerations: Identical to those of "application/xml" as described in [RFC3023], Section 3.2. Security considerations: As defined in this specification. In addition, as this media type uses the "+xml" convention, it shares the same security considerations as described in [RFC3023], Section 10. Interoperability considerations: There are no known interoperability issues. Published specification: This specification. Applications that use this media type: No known applications currently use this media type. Additional information: Magic number(s): As specified for "application/xml" in [RFC3023], Section 3.2. File extension: .atom Fragment identifiers: As specified for "application/xml" in [RFC3023], Section 5. Base URI: As specified in [RFC3023], Section 6. Macintosh File Type code: TEXT Person and email address to contact for further information: Mark Nottingham Intended usage: COMMON Author/Change controller: IESG Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 30] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 7.1. Registry of Link Relations This registry is maintained by IANA and initially contains five values: "alternate", "related", "self", "enclosure", and "via". New assignments are subject to IESG Approval, as outlined in [RFC2434]. Requests should be made by email to IANA, which will then forward the request to the IESG, requesting approval. The request should use the following template: o Attribute Value: (A value for the "rel" attribute that conforms to the syntax rule given in Section 4.2.7.2) o Description: o Expected display characteristics: o Security considerations: 8. Security Considerations 8.1. HTML and XHTML Content Text constructs and atom:content allow the delivery of HTML and XHTML. Many elements in these languages are considered 'unsafe' in that they open clients to one or more types of attack. Implementers of software that processes Atom should carefully consider their handling of every type of element when processing incoming (X)HTML in Atom Documents. See the security sections of [RFC2854] and [HTML] for guidance. Atom Processors should pay particular attention to the security of the IMG, SCRIPT, EMBED, OBJECT, FRAME, FRAMESET, IFRAME, META, and LINK elements, but other elements might also have negative security properties. (X)HTML can either directly contain or indirectly reference executable content. 8.2. URIs Atom Processors handle URIs. See Section 7 of [RFC3986]. 8.3. IRIs Atom Processors handle IRIs. See Section 8 of [RFC3987]. 8.4. Spoofing Atom Processors should be aware of the potential for spoofing attacks where the attacker publishes an atom:entry with the atom:id value of an entry from another feed, perhaps with a falsified atom:source Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 31] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 element duplicating the atom:id of the other feed. For example, an Atom Processor could suppress display of duplicate entries by displaying only one entry from a set of entries with identical atom:id values. In that situation, the Atom Processor might also take steps to determine whether the entries originated from the same publisher before considering them duplicates. 8.5. Encryption and Signing Atom Documents can be encrypted and signed using [W3C.REC-xmlenc-core-20021210] and [W3C.REC-xmldsig-core-20020212], respectively, and are subject to the security considerations implied by their use. Digital signatures provide authentication, message integrity, and non-repudiation with proof of origin. Encryption provides data confidentiality. 9. References 9.1. Normative References [HTML] Raggett, D., Hors, A., and I. Jacobs, "HTML 4.01 Specification", W3C REC REC-html401-19991224, December 1999, [MIMEREG] Freed, N. and J. Klensin, "Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures", BCP 13, RFC 4288, December 2005. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC2822] Resnick, P., "Internet Message Format", RFC 2822, April 2001. [RFC2854] Connolly, D. and L. Masinter, "The 'text/html' Media Type", RFC 2854, June 2000. [RFC3023] Murata, M., St. Laurent, S., and D. Kohn, "XML Media Types", RFC 3023, January 2001. [RFC3066] Alvestrand, H., "Tags for the Identification of Languages", BCP 47, RFC 3066, January 2001. [RFC3339] Klyne, G. and C. Newman, "Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps", RFC 3339, July 2002. Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 32] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 [RFC3548] Josefsson, S., "The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings", RFC 3548, July 2003. [RFC3986] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66, RFC 3986, January 2005. [RFC3987] Duerst, M. and M. Suignard, "Internationalized Resource Identifiers (IRIs)", RFC 3987, January 2005. [W3C.REC-xml-20040204] Yergeau, F., Paoli, J., Sperberg-McQueen, C., Bray, T., and E. Maler, "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Third Edition)", W3C REC REC-xml-20040204, February 2004, [W3C.REC-xml-c14n-20010315] Boyer, J., "Canonical XML Version 1.0", W3C REC REC-xml- c14n-20010315, March 2001, [W3C.REC-xml-exc-c14n-20020718] Eastlake, D., Boyer, J., and J. Reagle, "Exclusive XML Canonicalization Version 1.0", W3C REC REC-xml-exc-c14n- 20020718, July 2002, [W3C.REC-xml-infoset-20040204] Cowan, J. and R. Tobin, "XML Information Set (Second Edition)", W3C REC REC-xml-infoset-20040204, February 2004, [W3C.REC-xml-names-19990114] Hollander, D., Bray, T., and A. Layman, "Namespaces in XML", W3C REC REC-xml-names-19990114, January 1999, [W3C.REC-xmlbase-20010627] Marsh, J., "XML Base", W3C REC REC-xmlbase-20010627, June 2001, [W3C.REC-xmldsig-core-20020212] Solo, D., Reagle, J., and D. Eastlake, "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing", W3C REC REC-xmldsig-core-20020212, February 2002, Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 33] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 [W3C.REC-xmlenc-core-20021210] Reagle, J. and D. Eastlake, "XML Encryption Syntax and Processing", W3C REC REC-xmlenc-core-20021210, December 2002, [XHTML] Altheim, M., Boumphrey, F., McCarron, S., Dooley, S., Schnitzenbaumer, S., and T. Wugofski, "Modularization of XHTML[TM]", W3C REC REC-xhtml-modularization-20010410, April 2001, REC-xhtml-modularization-20010410>. 9.2. Informative References [ISO.8601.1988] International Organization for Standardization, "Data elements and interchange formats - Information interchange - Representation of dates and times", ISO Standard 8601, June 1988. [RELAX-NG] Clark, J., "RELAX NG Compact Syntax", December 2001, compact-20021121.html>. [RFC2434] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 2434, October 1998. [W3C.NOTE-datetime-19980827] Wolf, M. and C. Wicksteed, "Date and Time Formats", W3C NOTE NOTE-datetime-19980827, August 1998, [W3C.REC-xmlschema-2-20041028] Malhotra, A. and P. Biron, "XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes Second Edition", W3C REC REC-xmlschema-2-20041028, October 2004, Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 34] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 Appendix A. Contributors The following people contributed to preliminary versions of this document: Tim Bray, Mark Pilgrim, and Sam Ruby. Norman Walsh provided the Relax NG schema. The content and concepts within are a product of the Atom community and the Atompub Working Group. The Atompub Working Group has dozens of very active contributors who proposed ideas and wording for this document, including: Danny Ayers, James Aylett, Roger Benningfield, Arve Bersvendsen, Tim Bray, Dan Brickley, Thomas Broyer, Robin Cover, Bill de hOra, Martin Duerst, Roy Fielding, Joe Gregorio, Bjoern Hoehrmann, Paul Hoffman, Anne van Kesteren, Brett Lindsley, Dare Obasanjo, David Orchard, Aristotle Pagaltzis, John Panzer, Graham Parks, Dave Pawson, Mark Pilgrim, David Powell, Julian Reschke, Phil Ringnalda, Antone Roundy, Sam Ruby, Eric Scheid, Brent Simmons, Henri Sivonen, Ray Slakinski, James Snell, Henry Story, Asbjorn Ulsberg, Walter Underwood, Norman Walsh, Dave Winer, and Bob Wyman. Appendix B. RELAX NG Compact Schema This appendix is informative. The Relax NG schema explicitly excludes elements in the Atom namespace that are not defined in this revision of the specification. Requirements for Atom Processors encountering such markup are given in Sections 6.2 and 6.3. # -*- rnc -*- # RELAX NG Compact Syntax Grammar for the # Atom Format Specification Version 11 namespace atom = "http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" namespace xhtml = "http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" namespace s = "http://www.ascc.net/xml/schematron" namespace local = "" start = atomFeed | atomEntry # Common attributes atomCommonAttributes = attribute xml:base { atomUri }?, attribute xml:lang { atomLanguageTag }?, undefinedAttribute* # Text Constructs Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 35] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 atomPlainTextConstruct = atomCommonAttributes, attribute type { "text" | "html" }?, text atomXHTMLTextConstruct = atomCommonAttributes, attribute type { "xhtml" }, xhtmlDiv atomTextConstruct = atomPlainTextConstruct | atomXHTMLTextConstruct # Person Construct atomPersonConstruct = atomCommonAttributes, (element atom:name { text } & element atom:uri { atomUri }? & element atom:email { atomEmailAddress }? & extensionElement*) # Date Construct atomDateConstruct = atomCommonAttributes, xsd:dateTime # atom:feed atomFeed = [ s:rule [ context = "atom:feed" s:assert [ test = "atom:author or not(atom:entry[not(atom:author)])" "An atom:feed must have an atom:author unless all " ~ "of its atom:entry children have an atom:author." ] ] ] element atom:feed { atomCommonAttributes, (atomAuthor* & atomCategory* & atomContributor* & atomGenerator? & atomIcon? & atomId Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 36] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 & atomLink* & atomLogo? & atomRights? & atomSubtitle? & atomTitle & atomUpdated & extensionElement*), atomEntry* } # atom:entry atomEntry = [ s:rule [ context = "atom:entry" s:assert [ test = "atom:link[@rel='alternate'] " ~ "or atom:link[not(@rel)] " ~ "or atom:content" "An atom:entry must have at least one atom:link element " ~ "with a rel attribute of 'alternate' " ~ "or an atom:content." ] ] s:rule [ context = "atom:entry" s:assert [ test = "atom:author or " ~ "../atom:author or atom:source/atom:author" "An atom:entry must have an atom:author " ~ "if its feed does not." ] ] ] element atom:entry { atomCommonAttributes, (atomAuthor* & atomCategory* & atomContent? & atomContributor* & atomId & atomLink* & atomPublished? & atomRights? & atomSource? & atomSummary? & atomTitle Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 37] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 & atomUpdated & extensionElement*) } # atom:content atomInlineTextContent = element atom:content { atomCommonAttributes, attribute type { "text" | "html" }?, (text)* } atomInlineXHTMLContent = element atom:content { atomCommonAttributes, attribute type { "xhtml" }, xhtmlDiv } atomInlineOtherContent = element atom:content { atomCommonAttributes, attribute type { atomMediaType }?, (text|anyElement)* } atomOutOfLineContent = element atom:content { atomCommonAttributes, attribute type { atomMediaType }?, attribute src { atomUri }, empty } atomContent = atomInlineTextContent | atomInlineXHTMLContent | atomInlineOtherContent | atomOutOfLineContent # atom:author atomAuthor = element atom:author { atomPersonConstruct } # atom:category atomCategory = element atom:category { Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 38] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 atomCommonAttributes, attribute term { text }, attribute scheme { atomUri }?, attribute label { text }?, undefinedContent } # atom:contributor atomContributor = element atom:contributor { atomPersonConstruct } # atom:generator atomGenerator = element atom:generator { atomCommonAttributes, attribute uri { atomUri }?, attribute version { text }?, text } # atom:icon atomIcon = element atom:icon { atomCommonAttributes, (atomUri) } # atom:id atomId = element atom:id { atomCommonAttributes, (atomUri) } # atom:logo atomLogo = element atom:logo { atomCommonAttributes, (atomUri) } # atom:link atomLink = element atom:link { atomCommonAttributes, attribute href { atomUri }, attribute rel { atomNCName | atomUri }?, Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 39] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 attribute type { atomMediaType }?, attribute hreflang { atomLanguageTag }?, attribute title { text }?, attribute length { text }?, undefinedContent } # atom:published atomPublished = element atom:published { atomDateConstruct } # atom:rights atomRights = element atom:rights { atomTextConstruct } # atom:source atomSource = element atom:source { atomCommonAttributes, (atomAuthor* & atomCategory* & atomContributor* & atomGenerator? & atomIcon? & atomId? & atomLink* & atomLogo? & atomRights? & atomSubtitle? & atomTitle? & atomUpdated? & extensionElement*) } # atom:subtitle atomSubtitle = element atom:subtitle { atomTextConstruct } # atom:summary atomSummary = element atom:summary { atomTextConstruct } # atom:title atomTitle = element atom:title { atomTextConstruct } # atom:updated Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 40] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 atomUpdated = element atom:updated { atomDateConstruct } # Low-level simple types atomNCName = xsd:string { minLength = "1" pattern = "[^:]*" } # Whatever a media type is, it contains at least one slash atomMediaType = xsd:string { pattern = ".+/.+" } # As defined in RFC 3066 atomLanguageTag = xsd:string { pattern = "[A-Za-z]{1,8}(-[A-Za-z0-9]{1,8})*" } # Unconstrained; it's not entirely clear how IRI fit into # xsd:anyURI so let's not try to constrain it here atomUri = text # Whatever an email address is, it contains at least one @ atomEmailAddress = xsd:string { pattern = ".+@.+" } # Simple Extension simpleExtensionElement = element * - atom:* { text } # Structured Extension structuredExtensionElement = element * - atom:* { (attribute * { text }+, (text|anyElement)*) | (attribute * { text }*, (text?, anyElement+, (text|anyElement)*)) } # Other Extensibility extensionElement = simpleExtensionElement | structuredExtensionElement undefinedAttribute = attribute * - (xml:base | xml:lang | local:*) { text } undefinedContent = (text|anyForeignElement)* Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 41] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 anyElement = element * { (attribute * { text } | text | anyElement)* } anyForeignElement = element * - atom:* { (attribute * { text } | text | anyElement)* } # XHTML anyXHTML = element xhtml:* { (attribute * { text } | text | anyXHTML)* } xhtmlDiv = element xhtml:div { (attribute * { text } | text | anyXHTML)* } # EOF Authors' Addresses Mark Nottingham (editor) EMail: [email protected] URI: http://www.mnot.net/ Robert Sayre (editor) EMail: [email protected] URI: http://boswijck.com Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 42] RFC 4287 Atom Format December 2005 Full Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005). This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights. This document and the information contained herein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Intellectual Property The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79. Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr. The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf- Acknowledgement Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the Internet Society. Nottingham & Sayre Standards Track [Page 43]
" as "<br>". The HTML markup SHOULD be such