一、前言
- Springboot源码解析是一件大工程,逐行逐句的去研究代码,会很枯燥,也不容易坚持下去。
- 我们不追求大而全,而是试着每次去研究一个小知识点,最终聚沙成塔,这就是我们的springboot源码管中窥豹系列。
二、排序
- 前几节我们讲源码的时候,会遇到一些排序的问题,我们都避而不谈
比如获取initializer时的排序:
private Collection getSpringFactoriesInstances(Class type, Class>[] parameterTypes, Object... args) {
ClassLoader classLoader = getClassLoader();
Set names = new LinkedHashSet<>(SpringFactoriesLoader.loadFactoryNames(type, classLoader));
List instances = createSpringFactoriesInstances(type, parameterTypes, classLoader, args, names);
// 排序
AnnotationAwareOrderComparator.sort(instances);
return instances;
}
比如对runner排序:
private void callRunners(ApplicationContext context, ApplicationArguments args) {
List
我们来分析一下这个排序AnnotationAwareOrderComparator.sort(list)的源码。
三、源码解析
public static final AnnotationAwareOrderComparator INSTANCE = new AnnotationAwareOrderComparator();
public static void sort(List> list) {
if (list.size() > 1) {
list.sort(INSTANCE);
}
}
- 已new的AnnotationAwareOrderComparator对象作为参数,排序
- list.sort(comparator)是jdk自带的排序, 通用的
default void sort(Comparator super E> c) {
Object[] a = this.toArray();
Arrays.sort(a, (Comparator) c);
ListIterator i = this.listIterator();
for (Object e : a) {
i.next();
i.set((E) e);
}
}
- 我们知道排序要么实现Comparable接口,要么new Comparator, spring用的第二种
- 我们重点看下这个comparator : AnnotationAwareOrderComparator
public class AnnotationAwareOrderComparator extends OrderComparator {
...
}
public class OrderComparator implements Comparator
compare方法在OrderComparator里面:
@Override
public int compare(@Nullable Object o1, @Nullable Object o2) {
return doCompare(o1, o2, null);
}
private int doCompare(@Nullable Object o1, @Nullable Object o2, @Nullable OrderSourceProvider sourceProvider) {
boolean p1 = (o1 instanceof PriorityOrdered);
boolean p2 = (o2 instanceof PriorityOrdered);
if (p1 && !p2) {
return -1;
}
else if (p2 && !p1) {
return 1;
}
int i1 = getOrder(o1, sourceProvider);
int i2 = getOrder(o2, sourceProvider);
return Integer.compare(i1, i2);
}
- 先判断有没有实现PriorityOrdered接口,实现了的比没实现的有高优先级
- 再用getOrder()判断
private int getOrder(@Nullable Object obj, @Nullable OrderSourceProvider sourceProvider) {
Integer order = null;
if (obj != null && sourceProvider != null) {
Object orderSource = sourceProvider.getOrderSource(obj);
if (orderSource != null) {
if (orderSource.getClass().isArray()) {
Object[] sources = ObjectUtils.toObjectArray(orderSource);
for (Object source : sources) {
order = findOrder(source);
if (order != null) {
break;
}
}
}
else {
order = findOrder(orderSource);
}
}
}
return (order != null ? order : getOrder(obj));
}
sourceProvider为空,我们可以直接看最后一行。
int LOWEST_PRECEDENCE = Integer.MAX_VALUE;
protected int getOrder(@Nullable Object obj) {
if (obj != null) {
Integer order = findOrder(obj);
if (order != null) {
return order;
}
}
return Ordered.LOWEST_PRECEDENCE;
}
protected Integer findOrder(Object obj) {
return (obj instanceof Ordered ? ((Ordered) obj).getOrder() : null);
}
- 判断有没有实现Ordered接口,如果有就取出来它的order值
- 如果没有,就取Integer.MAX_VALUE
- 注意,order值越小,优先级越高
- 注意,上面findOrder方法是protected, 我们最开始说的AnnotationAwareOrderComparator对它进行了重写
@Override
@Nullable
protected Integer findOrder(Object obj) {
Integer order = super.findOrder(obj);
if (order != null) {
return order;
}
return findOrderFromAnnotation(obj);
}
@Nullable
private Integer findOrderFromAnnotation(Object obj) {
AnnotatedElement element = (obj instanceof AnnotatedElement ? (AnnotatedElement) obj : obj.getClass());
MergedAnnotations annotations = MergedAnnotations.from(element, SearchStrategy.TYPE_HIERARCHY);
Integer order = OrderUtils.getOrderFromAnnotations(element, annotations);
if (order == null && obj instanceof DecoratingProxy) {
return findOrderFromAnnotation(((DecoratingProxy) obj).getDecoratedClass());
}
return order;
}
- 先调用父类的findOrder方法
- 没找到,再调用findOrderFromAnnotation方法
- 最重要的是这一行:OrderUtils.getOrderFromAnnotations(element, annotations),我们进去看看
@Nullable
static Integer getOrderFromAnnotations(AnnotatedElement element, MergedAnnotations annotations) {
if (!(element instanceof Class)) {
return findOrder(annotations);
}
Object cached = orderCache.get(element);
if (cached != null) {
return (cached instanceof Integer ? (Integer) cached : null);
}
Integer result = findOrder(annotations);
orderCache.put(element, result != null ? result : NOT_ANNOTATED);
return result;
}
@Nullable
private static Integer findOrder(MergedAnnotations annotations) {
MergedAnnotation orderAnnotation = annotations.get(Order.class);
if (orderAnnotation.isPresent()) {
return orderAnnotation.getInt(MergedAnnotation.VALUE);
}
MergedAnnotation> priorityAnnotation = annotations.get(JAVAX_PRIORITY_ANNOTATION);
if (priorityAnnotation.isPresent()) {
return priorityAnnotation.getInt(MergedAnnotation.VALUE);
}
return null;
}
private static final String JAVAX_PRIORITY_ANNOTATION = "javax.annotation.Priority";
- 两个方法,第一个是简单的缓存,不用看,重点看第二个方法
- 先判断有没有org.springframework.core.annotation.Order注解
- 再判断有没有javax.annotation.Priority注解
- 有注解就去上面的值,没有返回null
回到最开始的方法,进行int值的排序
Integer.compare(i1, i2);
public static int compare(int x, int y) {
return (x < y) ? -1 : ((x == y) ? 0 : 1);
}
至此,我们的排序源码就分析完了,我们总结一下:
- (1)先判断有没有实现PriorityOrdered,实现PriorityOrdered比没实现的有高优先级
- (2)第一步如果比较不出来,判断有没有实现Ordered,如果实现了,取实现方法的int值比较
- (3)如果没有实现Ordered,判断有没有org.springframework.core.annotation.Order注解, 有注解,取注解上的order值,进行比较
- (4)如果没有Order注解,判断有没有javax.annotation.Priority注解,取注解上的值比较
- (5)如果上面都没有,返回Integer.MAX_VALUE,值越大优先级越低
欢迎关注微信公众号:丰极,更多技术学习分享。