我们依旧拿ConfigExample作为入口
public class ConfigExample {
public static void main(String[] args) throws NacosException, InterruptedException {
String serverAddr = "localhost";
String dataId = "test";
String group = "DEFAULT_GROUP";
Properties properties = new Properties();
properties.put("serverAddr", serverAddr);
ConfigService configService = NacosFactory.createConfigService(properties);
String content = configService.getConfig(dataId, group, 5000);
System.out.println(content);
configService.addListener(dataId, group, new Listener() {
@Override
public void receiveConfigInfo(String configInfo) {
System.out.println("receive:" + configInfo);
}
@Override
public Executor getExecutor() {
return null;
}
});
Thread.sleep(300000);
boolean isPublishOk = configService.publishConfig(dataId, group, "content");
System.out.println(isPublishOk);
Thread.sleep(3000);
content = configService.getConfig(dataId, group, 5000);
System.out.println(content);
// boolean isRemoveOk = configService.removeConfig(dataId, group);
// System.out.println(isRemoveOk);
// Thread.sleep(3000);
//
// content = configService.getConfig(dataId, group, 5000);
// System.out.println(content);
Thread.sleep(300000);
}
}
套路和之前差不多, 加速过
会走到NacosConfigService的构造方法里面
private String getConfigInner(String tenant, String dataId, String group, long timeoutMs) throws NacosException {
group = blank2defaultGroup(group);
// todo 检查参数
ParamUtils.checkKeyParam(dataId, group);
ConfigResponse cr = new ConfigResponse();
// todo // 设置配置信息
cr.setDataId(dataId);
cr.setTenant(tenant);
cr.setGroup(group);
// use local config first
// todo 这里有个失败转移的配置。如果能读到失败转移的配置信息,则直接返回了。原因的话英文注释写的很清楚了
// 优先使用失败转移,设计的目的是当server挂后,又需要修改配置,就可以读本地目录
String content = LocalConfigInfoProcessor.getFailover(worker.getAgentName(), dataId, group, tenant);
if (content != null) {
LOGGER.warn("[{}] [get-config] get failover ok, dataId={}, group={}, tenant={}, config={}",
worker.getAgentName(), dataId, group, tenant, ContentUtils.truncateContent(content));
cr.setContent(content);
String encryptedDataKey = LocalEncryptedDataKeyProcessor
.getEncryptDataKeyFailover(agent.getName(), dataId, group, tenant);
cr.setEncryptedDataKey(encryptedDataKey);
configFilterChainManager.doFilter(null, cr);
content = cr.getContent();
return content;
}
try {
// todo 通过客户端远程拉取配置信息
ConfigResponse response = worker.getServerConfig(dataId, group, tenant, timeoutMs, false);
cr.setContent(response.getContent());
cr.setEncryptedDataKey(response.getEncryptedDataKey());
configFilterChainManager.doFilter(null, cr);
content = cr.getContent();
return content;
} catch (NacosException ioe) {
if (NacosException.NO_RIGHT == ioe.getErrCode()) {
throw ioe;
}
LOGGER.warn("[{}] [get-config] get from server error, dataId={}, group={}, tenant={}, msg={}",
worker.getAgentName(), dataId, group, tenant, ioe.toString());
}
LOGGER.warn("[{}] [get-config] get snapshot ok, dataId={}, group={}, tenant={}, config={}",
worker.getAgentName(), dataId, group, tenant, ContentUtils.truncateContent(content));
// todo // 非鉴权失败的异常的,可以从本地快照中获取配置,如果有的话
content = LocalConfigInfoProcessor.getSnapshot(worker.getAgentName(), dataId, group, tenant);
cr.setContent(content);
String encryptedDataKey = LocalEncryptedDataKeyProcessor
.getEncryptDataKeyFailover(agent.getName(), dataId, group, tenant);
cr.setEncryptedDataKey(encryptedDataKey);
configFilterChainManager.doFilter(null, cr);
content = cr.getContent();
return content;
}
总结一下做了几件事:
这里的agent会被ClientWorker里面内部类的ConfigRpcTransportClient�继承,并且重写,也就是说最终会调用到ConfigRpcTransportClient.queryConfig方法
通过GrpcSdkClient往server发送请求,获取配置
这个比较简单,和上面逻辑类似
最终也是调用ClientWorker.publishConfig -> agent.pushConfig(实际为ClientWorker的内部类ConfigRpcTransportClient)
它会往这个阻塞队列里面放一个Object,为什么要放呢?那肯定有地方要取,ClientWorker在启动的时候,会有一个定时任务不断从这个阻塞队列中取,如果取到就执行
NacosConfigService在创建的同时会创建ClientWorker, ClientWorker其实就是它的打手
这个agent又是ClientWorker的打手,当调用到agent.start的时候,最终会调用到ClientWorker的内部类的startInternal方法,
这个方法不断在从ListenExecutebell获取,如果说一直获取不到,就超时,就进入executeConfigListen, 结合前面的notifyListenConfig其实就是给这里一个信号,触发executeConfigListen执行
public void executeConfigListen() {
// todo 存放含有listen的cacheData
Map<String, List<CacheData>> listenCachesMap = new HashMap<String, List<CacheData>>(16);
// todo 存放不含邮listen的cacheData
Map<String, List<CacheData>> removeListenCachesMap = new HashMap<String, List<CacheData>>(16);
long now = System.currentTimeMillis();
// todo // 当前时间减去上次全量同步时间是否大于5分钟
boolean needAllSync = now - lastAllSyncTime >= ALL_SYNC_INTERNAL;
for (CacheData cache : cacheMap.get().values()) {
synchronized (cache) {
// todo !!!!!!!这里,一般不会走这里,不要被误导了,我也是debug多次才发现
//check local listeners consistent.
if (cache.isSyncWithServer()) {
// todo // 一致则检查md5值,若md5值和上一个不一样,则说明变动了,需要通知监听器
cache.checkListenerMd5();
// todo // 是否到全量同步时间了,未到则直接跳过
if (!needAllSync) {
continue;
}
}
if (!CollectionUtils.isEmpty(cache.getListeners())) {
// todo 如果有监听器并且缓存数据并非使用本地的,则把这些缓存数据加入到需要监听的列表listenCachesMap中
//get listen config
if (!cache.isUseLocalConfigInfo()) {
List<CacheData> cacheDatas = listenCachesMap.get(String.valueOf(cache.getTaskId()));
if (cacheDatas == null) {
cacheDatas = new LinkedList<CacheData>();
listenCachesMap.put(String.valueOf(cache.getTaskId()), cacheDatas);
}
cacheDatas.add(cache);
}
} else if (CollectionUtils.isEmpty(cache.getListeners())) {
// todo 即删除, 放入removeListenCachesMap
if (!cache.isUseLocalConfigInfo()) {
List<CacheData> cacheDatas = removeListenCachesMap.get(String.valueOf(cache.getTaskId()));
if (cacheDatas == null) {
cacheDatas = new LinkedList<CacheData>();
removeListenCachesMap.put(String.valueOf(cache.getTaskId()), cacheDatas);
}
cacheDatas.add(cache);
}
}
}
}
// todo 此时,如果需要和服务端数据同步,则listenCachesMap和removeListenCachesMap存放了本地数据,需要和服务端对比
boolean hasChangedKeys = false;
if (!listenCachesMap.isEmpty()) {
for (Map.Entry<String, List<CacheData>> entry : listenCachesMap.entrySet()) {
String taskId = entry.getKey();
Map<String, Long> timestampMap = new HashMap<>(listenCachesMap.size() * 2);
List<CacheData> listenCaches = entry.getValue();
for (CacheData cacheData : listenCaches) {
timestampMap.put(GroupKey.getKeyTenant(cacheData.dataId, cacheData.group, cacheData.tenant),
cacheData.getLastModifiedTs().longValue());
}
// todo 构建新增数据的请求参数,此请求用于远程和本地对比,发现变动了会进行通知
ConfigBatchListenRequest configChangeListenRequest = buildConfigRequest(listenCaches);
// todo // 配置需要新增或更新监听数据
configChangeListenRequest.setListen(true);
try {
// todo // 获取一个rpc的客户端
RpcClient rpcClient = ensureRpcClient(taskId);
ConfigChangeBatchListenResponse configChangeBatchListenResponse = (ConfigChangeBatchListenResponse) requestProxy(
rpcClient, configChangeListenRequest);
if (configChangeBatchListenResponse != null && configChangeBatchListenResponse.isSuccess()) {
Set<String> changeKeys = new HashSet<String>();
//handle changed keys,notify listener
if (!CollectionUtils.isEmpty(configChangeBatchListenResponse.getChangedConfigs())) {
hasChangedKeys = true;
for (ConfigChangeBatchListenResponse.ConfigContext changeConfig : configChangeBatchListenResponse
.getChangedConfigs()) {
String changeKey = GroupKey
.getKeyTenant(changeConfig.getDataId(), changeConfig.getGroup(),
changeConfig.getTenant());
changeKeys.add(changeKey);
boolean isInitializing = cacheMap.get().get(changeKey).isInitializing();
// todo 刷新配置并通知变动
refreshContentAndCheck(changeKey, !isInitializing);
}
}
//handler content configs
for (CacheData cacheData : listenCaches) {
String groupKey = GroupKey
.getKeyTenant(cacheData.dataId, cacheData.group, cacheData.getTenant());
if (!changeKeys.contains(groupKey)) {
//sync:cache data md5 = server md5 && cache data md5 = all listeners md5.
synchronized (cacheData) {
if (!cacheData.getListeners().isEmpty()) {
Long previousTimesStamp = timestampMap.get(groupKey);
if (previousTimesStamp != null) {
if (!cacheData.getLastModifiedTs().compareAndSet(previousTimesStamp,
System.currentTimeMillis())) {
continue;
}
}
// todo 缓存数据没有变动,设置为和服务器同步
cacheData.setSyncWithServer(true);
}
}
}
cacheData.setInitializing(false);
}
}
} catch (Exception e) {
LOGGER.error("Async listen config change error ", e);
try {
Thread.sleep(50L);
} catch (InterruptedException interruptedException) {
//ignore
}
}
}
}
// todo // 需要删除的数据不为空
if (!removeListenCachesMap.isEmpty()) {
for (Map.Entry<String, List<CacheData>> entry : removeListenCachesMap.entrySet()) {
String taskId = entry.getKey();
List<CacheData> removeListenCaches = entry.getValue();
ConfigBatchListenRequest configChangeListenRequest = buildConfigRequest(removeListenCaches);
// todo // 配置需要删除
configChangeListenRequest.setListen(false);
try {
// 获取rpc客户端
RpcClient rpcClient = ensureRpcClient(taskId);
// todo 通知服务端移除数据
boolean removeSuccess = unListenConfigChange(rpcClient, configChangeListenRequest);
if (removeSuccess) {
for (CacheData cacheData : removeListenCaches) {
synchronized (cacheData) {
// todo // 移除缓存
if (cacheData.getListeners().isEmpty()) {
ClientWorker.this
.removeCache(cacheData.dataId, cacheData.group, cacheData.tenant);
}
}
}
}
} catch (Exception e) {
LOGGER.error("async remove listen config change error ", e);
}
try {
Thread.sleep(50L);
} catch (InterruptedException interruptedException) {
//ignore
}
}
}
if (needAllSync) {
//todo 更新同步时间
lastAllSyncTime = now;
}
//If has changed keys,notify re sync md5.
if (hasChangedKeys) {
// todo // 服务端告知了有数据变动,则需要再同步一次
notifyListenConfig();
}
}
这段代码极其的长,现在我们来总结一一下具体做了哪些事:
设置两个监听器cacheMap,一个是带监听器的,一个是不带的
开始遍历cacheMap集合,忽略什么cache.isSyncWithServer,debug的时候走不到这里,看源码抓住核心流程,将有监听器的放到listenCachesMap(注意,这里有一个分组操作,拿到cache的taskId, 将cache的taskId和 相同taskId的cache组成一个Map:
如果listenCachesMap不为空,然后遍历listenCachesMap,
refreshContentAndCheck�:通过cacheData拿到的dataId、group、tenant 通过getServerConfig调用服务端拿到这个dataId对应的配置
将请求回来的content、configType、encryptedDataKey都设置到cacheData中,接下来调用cacheData.checkListenerMD5()
另外注意一下cacheData.setContent:会同时设置上md5
listeners(ManagerListernerWrap)就是我们刚开始创建CacheData设置上的listener上面包装了一层,在创建listener的时候,会把CacheData的content、md5、还有我们创建listener都放到里面,所以这里才会判断当前CacheData里面的md5和listener里面md5是不是一样的,如果不是,就需要通知到listener
private void safeNotifyListener(final String dataId, final String group, final String content, final String type,
final String md5, final String encryptedDataKey, final ManagerListenerWrap listenerWrap) {
final Listener listener = listenerWrap.listener;
if (listenerWrap.inNotifying) {
LOGGER.warn(
"[{}] [notify-currentSkip] dataId={}, group={}, md5={}, listener={}, listener is not finish yet,will try next time.",
name, dataId, group, md5, listener);
return;
}
// todo 定义一个通知任务
Runnable job = new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
ClassLoader myClassLoader = Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader();
ClassLoader appClassLoader = listener.getClass().getClassLoader();
try {
// todo 拓展点,像spring cloud alibaba就用到了,创建了NacosContextRefresher
if (listener instanceof AbstractSharedListener) {
AbstractSharedListener adapter = (AbstractSharedListener) listener;
adapter.fillContext(dataId, group);
LOGGER.info("[{}] [notify-context] dataId={}, group={}, md5={}", name, dataId, group, md5);
}
// Before executing the callback, set the thread classloader to the classloader of
// the specific webapp to avoid exceptions or misuses when calling the spi interface in
// the callback method (this problem occurs only in multi-application deployment).
Thread.currentThread().setContextClassLoader(appClassLoader);
ConfigResponse cr = new ConfigResponse();
cr.setDataId(dataId);
cr.setGroup(group);
cr.setContent(content);
cr.setEncryptedDataKey(encryptedDataKey);
configFilterChainManager.doFilter(null, cr);
String contentTmp = cr.getContent();
listenerWrap.inNotifying = true;
// todo !!!!最终回调通知,就是这里
listener.receiveConfigInfo(contentTmp);
// compare lastContent and content
// todo 扩展点,告知配置内容的变动
if (listener instanceof AbstractConfigChangeListener) {
Map data = ConfigChangeHandler.getInstance()
.parseChangeData(listenerWrap.lastContent, content, type);
ConfigChangeEvent event = new ConfigChangeEvent(data);
((AbstractConfigChangeListener) listener).receiveConfigChange(event);
listenerWrap.lastContent = content;
}
// 赋予最新的md5
listenerWrap.lastCallMd5 = md5;
LOGGER.info("[{}] [notify-ok] dataId={}, group={}, md5={}, listener={} ,cost={} millis.", name,
dataId, group, md5, listener, (System.currentTimeMillis() - start));
} catch (NacosException ex) {
LOGGER.error("[{}] [notify-error] dataId={}, group={}, md5={}, listener={} errCode={} errMsg={}",
name, dataId, group, md5, listener, ex.getErrCode(), ex.getErrMsg());
} catch (Throwable t) {
LOGGER.error("[{}] [notify-error] dataId={}, group={}, md5={}, listener={} tx={}", name, dataId,
group, md5, listener, t.getCause());
} finally {
listenerWrap.inNotifying = false;
Thread.currentThread().setContextClassLoader(myClassLoader);
}
}
};
final long startNotify = System.currentTimeMillis();
try {
// todo // 监听器配置了异步执行器,就用配置的执行
if (null != listener.getExecutor()) {
listener.getExecutor().execute(job);
} else {
try {
//todo 内部线程池执行
INTERNAL_NOTIFIER.submit(job);
} catch (RejectedExecutionException rejectedExecutionException) {
LOGGER.warn(
"[{}] [notify-blocked] dataId={}, group={}, md5={}, listener={}, no available internal notifier,will sync notifier ",
name, dataId, group, md5, listener);
job.run();
} catch (Throwable throwable) {
LOGGER.error(
"[{}] [notify-blocked] dataId={}, group={}, md5={}, listener={}, submit internal async task fail,throwable= ",
name, dataId, group, md5, listener, throwable);
job.run();
}
}
} catch (Throwable t) {
LOGGER.error("[{}] [notify-error] dataId={}, group={}, md5={}, listener={} throwable={}", name, dataId,
group, md5, listener, t.getCause());
}
final long finishNotify = System.currentTimeMillis();
LOGGER.info("[{}] [notify-listener] time cost={}ms in ClientWorker, dataId={}, group={}, md5={}, listener={} ",
name, (finishNotify - startNotify), dataId, group, md5, listener);
}
�这块代码也很长,但是比较简单:
�到上面为止,其实客户端的主流程已经比较请求,但是在executeConfigListen方法中有一个小方法ensureRpcClient我们就简单的一笔带过,实际上在后续的与服务端请求交互比较有用,我们还是再看一下
简单总结一下: