转载请注明出处
http://blog.csdn.net/pony_maggie/article/details/44120045
作者:小马
看一段代码:
public class ArrayTest { //都是引用传递,输出的结果是"goodbbb" public void arrayPassTest(String s, String[] ss) { s = "bad"; ss[0] = "bbb"; }
public static void main(String[] args) { String s1 = new String("good"); String[] ss1 = {"aaa"}; //string数组,只有一个元素 ArrayTest test = new ArrayTest(); test.arrayPassTest(s1, ss1); System.out.println(s1+ss1[0]);
goodbbb
如果你认为arrayPassTest 函数中,s是作为值传递,而ss是作为引用传递,所以有这样的输出结果,也不算错误,但是决对没有真正理解里面的原因。在这里,String 类型的传递是引用传递,也即是地址传递。这个是毋庸置疑的。因为在java里,String是对象类型,作为参数肯定是引用传递。之所以有值传递的效果,是因为Stirng内部实现时,是用char[] 来存储字符串的,所以String相当于char[]的包装类,那java中,包装类的一个特质就是值操作时体现对应的基本类型的特质。
这个确实有点难理解,尤其是从C/C++转出过的程序员。需要再慢慢揣摩。
ss参数完全符合引用传递的特点,很好理解,不多说。附上String的构造函数实现,
public String(String original) { int size = original.count; char[] originalValue = original.value; char[] v; if (originalValue.length > size) { // The array representing the String is bigger than the new // String itself. Perhaps this constructor is being called // in order to trim the baggage, so make a copy of the array. v = new char[size]; System.arraycopy(originalValue, original.offset, v, 0, size); } else { // The array representing the String is the same // size as the String, so no point in making a copy. v = originalValue; } this.offset = 0; this.count = size; this.value = v; }
public void setArray(String[] newArray) { this.m_myArray = newArray; }
public void setArrayNew(String[] newArray) { if(newArray == null) { this.m_myArray = new String[0]; } else { this.m_myArray = new String[newArray.length]; System.arraycopy(newArray, 0, this.m_myArray, 0, newArray.length); } }