Android-vold源码分析之挂载SD卡(8)
这里续上一篇文章，讲解挂载磁盘的操作：
lookupVolume函数寻找与label匹配的对象：
如果找到，直接返回磁盘对象Volume*，挂载操作在mountVol函数里面，该函数内容有点多，贴源码:
这个挂载函数看起来，会发现很繁琐，好几个目录的挂载关系，有以下挂载目录：
/dev/block/vold/8:1 挂载在-> /mnt/secure/staging
/mnt/secure/staging/.android_secure 挂载在-> /mnt/secure/asec
tmpfs 挂载在-> /mnt/secure/staging/.android_secure
/mnt/secure/staging 挂载在-> /mnt/sdcard
从程序的注释看，这样的目的是挂载一个只有root用户能查看的目录，具体还是没搞清楚谷歌为什么要这样挂载，
还是有疑问，希望有清楚的高手指点一下。
sd卡的挂载比较清楚，中间多了一个中介，将设备节点8:1挂载在/mnt/secure/staging,最后又将该目录挂载在/mnt/sdcard，
这目录就是最终用户能够看到文件的目录。
函数里面涉及到几个函数：
getDeviceNodes函数获取挂载设备的设备号与分区数量，是Volume类的一个纯虚函数，在子类DirectVolume中实现，源码：
下面贴一些mountVol里面挂载的源码：
篇幅有点长了，挂载点也挂载了好几个，mountVol处理的事情最多的，也最繁琐，但都是简单的，主要是有点摸不着头脑，
谷歌为啥要这样挂载，也许自己太菜了。。
下一篇文章继续。。
3.挂载磁盘。这里都有一个const char *类型的参数，这参数保存着每个磁盘的标签信息，比如sd卡的label是sdcard。
int VolumeManager::mountVolume(const char *label) {
Volume *v = lookupVolume(label);
if (!v) {
errno = ENOENT;
return -1;
}
return v->mountVol();
}
lookupVolume函数寻找与label匹配的对象：
Volume *VolumeManager::lookupVolume(const char *label) {
VolumeCollection::iterator i;
for (i = mVolumes->begin(); i != mVolumes->end(); ++i) {
if (label[0] == '/') {
if (!strcmp(label, (*i)->getMountpoint()))
return (*i);
} else {
if (!strcmp(label, (*i)->getLabel()))
return (*i);
}
}
return NULL;
}
如果找到，直接返回磁盘对象Volume*，挂载操作在mountVol函数里面，该函数内容有点多，贴源码:
int Volume::mountVol() {
dev_t deviceNodes[4];
int n, i, rc = 0;
char errmsg[255];
if (getState() == Volume::State_NoMedia) {
snprintf(errmsg, sizeof(errmsg),
"Volume %s %s mount failed - no media",
getLabel(), getMountpoint());
mVm->getBroadcaster()->sendBroadcast(
ResponseCode::VolumeMountFailedNoMedia,
errmsg, false);
errno = ENODEV;
return -1;
} else if (getState() != Volume::State_Idle) {
errno = EBUSY;
return -1;
}
/*判断该挂载点是否已经挂载，若已经挂载，则直接返回。*/
if (isMountpointMounted(getMountpoint())) {
SLOGW("Volume is idle but appears to be mounted - fixing");
/*这里的setState函数用得很频繁，这函数就是将状态通知给framework*/
setState(Volume::State_Mounted);
// mCurrentlyMountedKdev = XXX
return 0;
}
/*获取磁盘的设备号与分区数量,在下面说明*/
n = getDeviceNodes((dev_t *) &deviceNodes, 4);
if (!n) {
SLOGE("Failed to get device nodes (%s)\n", strerror(errno));
return -1;
}
/*将循环挂载n个分区，但从代码上看，只适用于挂载一个分区*/
for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
char devicePath[255];
/*这里看到了吧，用这种方式来使用磁盘的设备节点很方便，直接用主次设备号来命令*/
sprintf(devicePath, "/dev/block/vold/%d:%d", MAJOR(deviceNodes[i]),
MINOR(deviceNodes[i]));
SLOGI("%s being considered for volume %s\n", devicePath, getLabel());
errno = 0;
setState(Volume::State_Checking);
/*挂载之前先检测一下该分区是否是fat分区，如果不是fat格式，返回-1*/
if (Fat::check(devicePath)) {
if (errno == ENODATA) {
SLOGW("%s does not contain a FAT filesystem\n", devicePath);
continue;
}
errno = EIO;
/* Badness - abort the mount */
SLOGE("%s failed FS checks (%s)", devicePath, strerror(errno));
setState(Volume::State_Idle);
return -1;
}
/*
* Mount the device on our internal staging mountpoint so we can
* muck with it before exposing it to non priviledged users.
*/
errno = 0;
/*将设备节点挂载在/mnt/secure/staging目录*/
if (Fat::doMount(devicePath, "/mnt/secure/staging", false, false, 1000, 1015, 0702, true)) {
SLOGE("%s failed to mount via VFAT (%s)\n", devicePath, strerror(errno));
continue;
}
SLOGI("Device %s, target %s mounted @ /mnt/secure/staging", devicePath, getMountpoint());
protectFromAutorunStupidity();
/*挂载一个只有root用户能够访问的目录，这函数挂载了两次
将/mnt/secure/staging/.android_secure 挂载在 /mnt/secure/asec，
将tmpfs 挂载在 /mnt/secure/staging/.android_secure*/
if (createBindMounts()) {
SLOGE("Failed to create bindmounts (%s)", strerror(errno));
umount("/mnt/secure/staging");
setState(Volume::State_Idle);
return -1;
}
/*
* Now that the bindmount trickery is done, atomically move the
* whole subtree to expose it to non priviledged users.
*/
/*将挂载点挂载的目录再挂载到最终的目录/mnt/sdcard*/
if (doMoveMount("/mnt/secure/staging", getMountpoint(), false)) {
SLOGE("Failed to move mount (%s)", strerror(errno));
umount("/mnt/secure/staging");
setState(Volume::State_Idle);
return -1;
}
setState(Volume::State_Mounted);
mLastMountedKdev = mCurrentlyMountedKdev = deviceNodes[i];
return 0;
}
SLOGE("Volume %s found no suitable devices for mounting :(\n", getLabel());
setState(Volume::State_Idle);
return -1;
}
这个挂载函数看起来，会发现很繁琐，好几个目录的挂载关系，有以下挂载目录：
/dev/block/vold/8:1 挂载在-> /mnt/secure/staging
/mnt/secure/staging/.android_secure 挂载在-> /mnt/secure/asec
tmpfs 挂载在-> /mnt/secure/staging/.android_secure
/mnt/secure/staging 挂载在-> /mnt/sdcard
从程序的注释看，这样的目的是挂载一个只有root用户能查看的目录，具体还是没搞清楚谷歌为什么要这样挂载，
还是有疑问，希望有清楚的高手指点一下。
sd卡的挂载比较清楚，中间多了一个中介，将设备节点8:1挂载在/mnt/secure/staging,最后又将该目录挂载在/mnt/sdcard，
这目录就是最终用户能够看到文件的目录。
函数里面涉及到几个函数：
getDeviceNodes函数获取挂载设备的设备号与分区数量，是Volume类的一个纯虚函数，在子类DirectVolume中实现，源码：
int DirectVolume::getDeviceNodes(dev_t *devs, int max) {
if (mPartIdx == -1) {
// If the disk has no partitions, try the disk itself
if (!mDiskNumParts) {
devs[0] = MKDEV(mDiskMajor, mDiskMinor);
return 1;
}
int i;
for (i = 0; i < mDiskNumParts; i++) {
if (i == max)
break;
devs[i] = MKDEV(mDiskMajor, mPartMinors[i]);
}
return mDiskNumParts;
}
devs[0] = MKDEV(mDiskMajor, mPartMinors[mPartIdx -1]);
return 1;
}
下面贴一些mountVol里面挂载的源码：
int Fat::doMount(const char *fsPath, const char *mountPoint,
bool ro, bool remount, int ownerUid, int ownerGid,
int permMask, bool createLost) {
int rc;
unsigned long flags;
char mountData[255];
flags = MS_NODEV | MS_NOEXEC | MS_NOSUID | MS_DIRSYNC;
flags |= (ro ? MS_RDONLY : 0);
flags |= (remount ? MS_REMOUNT : 0);
/*
* Note: This is a temporary hack. If the sampling profiler is enabled,
* we make the SD card world-writable so any process can write snapshots.
*
* TODO: Remove this code once we have a drop box in system_server.
*/
char value[PROPERTY_VALUE_MAX];
property_get("persist.sampling_profiler", value, "");
if (value[0] == '1') {
SLOGW("The SD card is world-writable because the"
" 'persist.sampling_profiler' system property is set to '1'.");
permMask = 0;
}
sprintf(mountData,
"utf8,uid=%d,gid=%d,fmask=%o,dmask=%o,shortname=mixed",
ownerUid, ownerGid, permMask, permMask);
rc = mount(fsPath, mountPoint, "vfat", flags, mountData);
if (rc && errno == EROFS) {
SLOGE("%s appears to be a read only filesystem - retrying mount RO", fsPath);
flags |= MS_RDONLY;
rc = mount(fsPath, mountPoint, "vfat", flags, mountData);
}
if (rc == 0 && createLost) {
char *lost_path;
asprintf(&lost_path, "%s/LOST.DIR", mountPoint);
if (access(lost_path, F_OK)) {
/*
* Create a LOST.DIR in the root so we have somewhere to put
* lost cluster chains (fsck_msdos doesn't currently do this)
*/
if (mkdir(lost_path, 0755)) {
SLOGE("Unable to create LOST.DIR (%s)", strerror(errno));
}
}
free(lost_path);
}
return rc;
}
int Volume::createBindMounts() {
unsigned long flags;
/*
* Rename old /android_secure -> /.android_secure
*/
if (!access("/mnt/secure/staging/android_secure", R_OK | X_OK) &&
access(SEC_STG_SECIMGDIR, R_OK | X_OK)) {
if (rename("/mnt/secure/staging/android_secure", SEC_STG_SECIMGDIR)) {
SLOGE("Failed to rename legacy asec dir (%s)", strerror(errno));
}
}
/*
* Ensure that /android_secure exists and is a directory
*/
if (access(SEC_STG_SECIMGDIR, R_OK | X_OK)) {
if (errno == ENOENT) {
if (mkdir(SEC_STG_SECIMGDIR, 0777)) {
SLOGE("Failed to create %s (%s)", SEC_STG_SECIMGDIR, strerror(errno));
return -1;
}
} else {
SLOGE("Failed to access %s (%s)", SEC_STG_SECIMGDIR, strerror(errno));
return -1;
}
} else {
struct stat sbuf;
if (stat(SEC_STG_SECIMGDIR, &sbuf)) {
SLOGE("Failed to stat %s (%s)", SEC_STG_SECIMGDIR, strerror(errno));
return -1;
}
if (!S_ISDIR(sbuf.st_mode)) {
SLOGE("%s is not a directory", SEC_STG_SECIMGDIR);
errno = ENOTDIR;
return -1;
}
}
/*
* Bind mount /mnt/secure/staging/android_secure -> /mnt/secure/asec so we'll
* have a root only accessable mountpoint for it.
*/
if (mount(SEC_STG_SECIMGDIR, SEC_ASECDIR, "", MS_BIND, NULL)) {
SLOGE("Failed to bind mount points %s -> %s (%s)",
SEC_STG_SECIMGDIR, SEC_ASECDIR, strerror(errno));
return -1;
}
/*
* Mount a read-only, zero-sized tmpfs on <mountpoint>/android_secure to
* obscure the underlying directory from everybody - sneaky eh? ;)
*/
if (mount("tmpfs", SEC_STG_SECIMGDIR, "tmpfs", MS_RDONLY, "size=0,mode=000,uid=0,gid=0")) {
SLOGE("Failed to obscure %s (%s)", SEC_STG_SECIMGDIR, strerror(errno));
umount("/mnt/asec_secure");
return -1;
}
return 0;
}
int Volume::doMoveMount(const char *src, const char *dst, bool force) {
unsigned int flags = MS_MOVE;
int retries = 5;
while(retries--) {
if (!mount(src, dst, "", flags, NULL)) {
if (mDebug) {
SLOGD("Moved mount %s -> %s sucessfully", src, dst);
}
return 0;
} else if (errno != EBUSY) {
SLOGE("Failed to move mount %s -> %s (%s)", src, dst, strerror(errno));
return -1;
}
int action = 0;
if (force) {
if (retries == 1) {
action = 2; // SIGKILL
} else if (retries == 2) {
action = 1; // SIGHUP
}
}
SLOGW("Failed to move %s -> %s (%s, retries %d, action %d)",
src, dst, strerror(errno), retries, action);
Process::killProcessesWithOpenFiles(src, action);
usleep(1000*250);
}
errno = EBUSY;
SLOGE("Giving up on move %s -> %s (%s)", src, dst, strerror(errno));
return -1;
}
篇幅有点长了，挂载点也挂载了好几个，mountVol处理的事情最多的，也最繁琐，但都是简单的，主要是有点摸不着头脑，
谷歌为啥要这样挂载，也许自己太菜了。。
下一篇文章继续。。