之前在程序中有打了很多的log,当初打log的方式也没有统一,删掉肯定不行,统一修改也挺麻烦的。今天在stackoverflow上面看到有对这个的讨论
主要有以下三种方式关闭log信息http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2446248/deactivate-any-calls-to-log-before-publishing-are-there-tools-to-do-this
方法一:
if(condition) Log.d(LOG_TAG, "Something");缺点:每打log都要做判断
方法二:
I find a far easier solution is to forget all the if
checks all over the place and just use ProGuard to strip out any Log.d()
or Log.v()
method calls when we call our Ant release
target.
That way, we always have the debug info being output for regular builds and don't have to make any code changes for release builds. ProGuard can also do multiple passes over the bytecode to remove other undesired statements, empty blocks and can automatically inline short methods where appropriate.
For example, here's a very basic ProGuard config for Android:
-dontskipnonpubliclibraryclasses -dontobfuscate -forceprocessing -optimizationpasses 5 -keep class * extends android.app.Activity -assumenosideeffects class android.util.Log { public static *** d(...); public static *** v(...); }
So you would save that to a file, then call ProGuard from Ant, passing in your just-compiled JAR and the Android platform JAR you're using.
See also the examples in the ProGuard manual.
缺点:需要借助第三方的工具方法三:
All good answers, but when I was finished with my development I didn´t want to either use if statements around all the Log calls, nor did I want to use external tools.
So the solution I`m using is to replace the android.util.Log class with my own Log class:
public class Log { static final boolean LOG = false; public static void i(String tag, String string) { if (LOG) android.util.Log.i(tag, string); } public static void e(String tag, String string) { if (LOG) android.util.Log.e(tag, string); } public static void d(String tag, String string) { if (LOG) android.util.Log.d(tag, string); } public static void v(String tag, String string) { if (LOG) android.util.Log.v(tag, string); } public static void w(String tag, String string) { if (LOG) android.util.Log.w(tag, string); } }
The only thing I had to do in all the source files was to replace the import of android.util.Log with my own class.
缺点: The only problem with this approach is that, if you do Log.d("tag", "Processed: " + new ItemCounter(blabla) + " items "), even if this log message does not appear in your released version, a StringBuilder is used to create the message, which could be expensive to create.import android.util.Log; public class MyLog { public static void d(String tag, String msg) { if (Log.isLoggable(tag, Log.DEBUG)) { Log.d(tag, msg); } } public static void i(String tag, String msg) { if (Log.isLoggable(tag, Log.INFO)) { Log.i(tag, msg); } } public static void e(String tag, String msg) { if (Log.isLoggable(tag, Log.ERROR)) { Log.e(tag, msg); } } public static void v(String tag, String msg) { if (Log.isLoggable(tag, Log.VERBOSE)) { Log.v(tag, msg); } } public static void w(String tag, String msg) { if (Log.isLoggable(tag, Log.WARN)) { Log.w(tag, msg); } } }
To summarize the preceding code, the MyLog class is simply wrapping the calls to the android Log class. The rest of your application can simply reference MyLog.d(“MyApp”, “Sample debug message”); and if the device/emulator running the app has the log level set to debug the message will appear. The benefit here is you won’t have to worry about removing print lines or maintaining variables for levels that you might forget to change before building your release apk.
Changing the log level on device is actually very simple. Simply run adb shell setprop log.tag.<YOUR_LOG_TAG> <LEVEL>
There you have it, this is only a small sample of what you can do meant to get you started. This code is compatible with Android since API Level 1. I recommend reading through the Log javadoc here for more details about the Logging capabilities on Android.
备注:对于我们的程序来说,代码量庞大,第二中方式是比较好的选择