大家都知道,在hibernate里为了性能考虑,引进了lazy的概念,这里我们以Parent和Child为模型来说明,
在我们查询Parent对象的时候,默认只有Parent的内容,并不包含childs的信息,如果在Parent.hbm.xml里设置lazy="false"的话才同时取出关联的所有childs内容.
问题是我既想要hibernate默认的性能又想要临时的灵活性该怎么办? 这就是fetch的功能。我们可以把fetch与lazy="true"的关系类比为事务当中的编程式事务与声明式事务,不太准确,但是大概是这个意思。
总值,fetch就是在代码这一层给你一个主动抓取得机会.
你可以在lazy="true"的情况下把fetch去掉,就会报异常. 当然,如果lazy="false"就不需要fetch了
有一个问题,使用Fetch会有重复记录的现象发生,我们可以理解为Fetch实际上不是为Parent服务的,而是为Child服务的.所以直接取Parent会有不匹配的问题.
参考一下下面的这篇文章
Hibernate集合初始化
======================================================================
update:以上有些结论错误,实际上在hibernate3.2.1版本下测试,可以不出现重复记录,
打印结果如下:
另外,如果用open session in view模式的话一般不用fetch,但首先推荐fetch,如果非用的话因为有N+1的现象,所以可以结合batch模式来改善下性能.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hibernate最让人头大的就是对集合的加载形式。
书看了N次了,还是没有真正理解Hibernate。所以下午专门做了下测试,对配置文件的意思加深了认识。
假设有两个表,Photos(一) --- picture(多)Photo包含picture集合
结论1: HQL代码 > fetch(配置) > lazy (配置)
结论2: 默认 lazy="true"
结论3: fetch 和 lazy 主要是用来级联查询的, 而 cascade 和 inverse 主要是用来级联插入和修改的
结论4: 如果你是用spring来帮你管理你的session, 并且是自动提交,延迟加载就等于没加载~_~(当然
除非你手动重新打开session然后手动Hibernate.initialize(set);然后关闭session.
结论5:cascade主要是简化了在代码中的级联更新和删除。
j结论6:老爸可以有多个孩子,一个孩子不能有多个老爸,而且老爸说的算, 孩子围着老爸转。
所以Photos老爸要有权力所以 cascade这个关键子都是送给老爸的,也就是级联更新,
老爸改姓了,儿子也得跟着改,呵呵。“不然,就没有零花钱咯”。
而Picture儿子整体挨骂,但是还是要维护父子之间良好的关系,对老爸百依百顺,所
以老爸就说,儿子,“关系,由你来维护(inverse="true"),不然就不给零花钱。呵。”。
<set name="pictures" inverse="true" cascade="all">
<key>
<column name="photosid" not-null="true" />
</key>
<one-to-many class="girl.domain.Picture" />
</set>
测试代码:
Photos p = ps.getById(1);
Set<Picture> set = p.getPictures();
for(Picture pic : set){
System.out.println(pic.getId());
}
配置文件的一部分:
<set name="pictures" inverse="true" cascade="all" >
<key>
<column name="photosid" not-null="true" />
</key>
<one-to-many class="girl.domain.Picture" />
</set>
测试过程会对配置文件不断修改:并且从来不曾手动重新打开session
测试结构:
当配置条件为 lazy=true 一句查询 测试代码中没有调用getPicture() 正常
Hibernate: select photos0_.id as id0_0_, photos0_.userid as userid0_0_, photos0_.typeid as typeid0_0_, photos0_.name as name0_0_, photos0_.createtime as createtime0_0_, photos0_.description as descript6_0_0_, photos0_.faceid as faceid0_0_, photos0_.uri as uri0_0_ from super.photos photos0_ where photos0_.id=?
lazy=true 一句查询 有getPicture()
Hibernate: select photos0_.id as id0_0_, photos0_.userid as userid0_0_, photos0_.typeid as typeid0_0_, photos0_.name as name0_0_, photos0_.createtime as createtime0_0_, photos0_.description as descript6_0_0_, photos0_.faceid as faceid0_0_, photos0_.uri as uri0_0_ from super.photos photos0_ where photos0_.id=?
lazy=true 一句查询 有getPicture() 并且访问了里面的元数Picture 且有异常抛出
Hibernate: select photos0_.id as id0_0_, photos0_.userid as userid0_0_, photos0_.typeid as typeid0_0_, photos0_.name as name0_0_, photos0_.createtime as createtime0_0_, photos0_.description as descript6_0_0_, photos0_.faceid as faceid0_0_, photos0_.uri as uri0_0_ from super.photos photos0_ where photos0_.id=?
lazy="false" 两句查询 肯定没问题,因为全部数据都个查了出来 所以怎么调用都正常
Hibernate: select photos0_.id as id0_0_, photos0_.userid as userid0_0_, photos0_.typeid as typeid0_0_, photos0_.name as name0_0_, photos0_.createtime as createtime0_0_, photos0_.description as descript6_0_0_, photos0_.faceid as faceid0_0_, photos0_.uri as uri0_0_ from super.photos photos0_ where photos0_.id=?
Hibernate: select pictures0_.photosid as photosid1_, pictures0_.id as id1_, pictures0_.id as id2_0_, pictures0_.photosid as photosid2_0_, pictures0_.name as name2_0_, pictures0_.clicked as clicked2_0_, pictures0_.uploaddate as uploaddate2_0_, pictures0_.size as size2_0_, pictures0_.description as descript7_2_0_, pictures0_.uri as uri2_0_ from super.picture pictures0_ where pictures0_.photosid=?
fetch="join" 一句查询 效果 == lazy="false" 呵呵,哪个效率高,我就不知道了。。。。。。。。。。。
Hibernate: select photos0_.id as id0_1_, photos0_.userid as userid0_1_, photos0_.typeid as typeid0_1_, photos0_.name as name0_1_, photos0_.createtime as createtime0_1_, photos0_.description as descript6_0_1_, photos0_.faceid as faceid0_1_, photos0_.uri as uri0_1_, pictures1_.photosid as photosid3_, pictures1_.id as id3_, pictures1_.id as id2_0_, pictures1_.photosid as photosid2_0_, pictures1_.name as name2_0_, pictures1_.clicked as clicked2_0_, pictures1_.uploaddate as uploaddate2_0_, pictures1_.size as size2_0_, pictures1_.description as descript7_2_0_, pictures1_.uri as uri2_0_ from super.photos photos0_ left outer join super.picture pictures1_ on photos0_.id=pictures1_.photosid where photos0_.id=?
不加fetch="join" 一句查询 没有getPicture() 正常
Hibernate: select photos0_.id as id0_0_, photos0_.userid as userid0_0_, photos0_.typeid as typeid0_0_, photos0_.name as name0_0_, photos0_.createtime as createtime0_0_, photos0_.description as descript6_0_0_, photos0_.faceid as faceid0_0_, photos0_.uri as uri0_0_ from super.photos photos0_ where photos0_.id=?
不加fetch="join" 一句查询 有getPicture() 正常
Hibernate: select photos0_.id as id0_0_, photos0_.userid as userid0_0_, photos0_.typeid as typeid0_0_, photos0_.name as name0_0_, photos0_.createtime as createtime0_0_, photos0_.description as descript6_0_0_, photos0_.faceid as faceid0_0_, photos0_.uri as uri0_0_ from super.photos photos0_ where photos0_.id=?
不加fetch="join" 一句查询 有getPicture() 并且访问里面的元素Picture的ID 有异常抛出
Hibernate: select photos0_.id as id0_0_, photos0_.userid as userid0_0_, photos0_.typeid as typeid0_0_, photos0_.name as name0_0_, photos0_.createtime as createtime0_0_, photos0_.description as descript6_0_0_, photos0_.faceid as faceid0_0_, photos0_.uri as uri0_0_ from super.photos photos0_ where photos0_.id=?
来个两兵交战 fetch="join" lazy="true" 呵呵 结果,一句查询, 结构正常 所以就当lazy不存在好了。 看来fetch 是老大。、、、、、、、、、、、、、
Hibernate: select photos0_.id as id0_1_, photos0_.userid as userid0_1_, photos0_.typeid as typeid0_1_, photos0_.name as name0_1_, photos0_.createtime as createtime0_1_, photos0_.description as descript6_0_1_, photos0_.faceid as faceid0_1_, photos0_.uri as uri0_1_, pictures1_.photosid as photosid3_, pictures1_.id as id3_, pictures1_.id as id2_0_, pictures1_.photosid as photosid2_0_, pictures1_.name as name2_0_, pictures1_.clicked as clicked2_0_, pictures1_.uploaddate as uploaddate2_0_, pictures1_.size as size2_0_, pictures1_.description as descript7_2_0_, pictures1_.uri as uri2_0_ from super.photos photos0_ left outer join super.picture pictures1_ on photos0_.id=pictures1_.photosid where photos0_.id=?