使用Spring提供的Open Session In View而引起Write operations are not allowed in read-only mode (FlushMode.NEVER) 错误解决:
在没有使用Spring提供的Open Session In View情况下,因需要在service(or Dao)层里把session关闭,所以lazy loading 为true的话,要在应用层内把关系集合都初始化,如 company.getEmployees(),否则Hibernate抛session already closed Exception; Open Session In View提供了一种简便的方法,较好地解决了lazy loading问题.
它有两种配置方式OpenSessionInViewInterceptor和OpenSessionInViewFilter(具体参看SpringSide),功能相同,只是一个在web.xml配置,另一个在application.xml配置而已。
Open Session In View在request把session绑定到当前thread期间一直保持hibernate session在open状态,使session在request的整个期间都可以使用,如在View层里PO也可以lazy loading数据,如 ${ company.employees }。当View 层逻辑完成后,才会通过Filter的doFilter方法或Interceptor的postHandle方法自动关闭session。
OpenSessionInViewInterceptor配置
<beans>
<bean name="openSessionInViewInterceptor"
class="org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.support.OpenSessionInViewInterceptor">
<property name="sessionFactory">
<ref bean="sessionFactory"/>
</property>
</bean>
<bean id="urlMapping"
class="org.springframework.web.servlet.handler.SimpleUrlHandlerMapping">
<property name="interceptors">
<list>
<ref bean="openSessionInViewInterceptor"/>
</list>
</property>
<property name="mappings">
...
</property>
</bean>
...
</beans>
OpenSessionInViewFilter配置
<web-app>
...
<filter>
<filter-name>hibernateFilter</filter-name>
<filter-class>
org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.support.OpenSessionInViewFilter
</filter-class>
<!-- singleSession默认为true,若设为false则等于没用OpenSessionInView -->
<init-param>
<param-name>singleSession</param-name>
<param-value>true</param-value>
</init-param>
</filter>
...
<filter-mapping>
<filter-name>hibernateFilter</filter-name>
<url-pattern>*.do</url-pattern>
</filter-mapping>
...
</web-app>
很多人在使用OpenSessionInView过程中提及一个错误:
org.springframework.dao.InvalidDataAccessApiUsageException: Write operations
are not allowed in read-only mode (FlushMode.NEVER) - turn your Session into
FlushMode.AUTO or remove 'readOnly' marker from transaction definition
看看OpenSessionInViewFilter里的几个方法
protected void doFilterInternal(HttpServletRequest request,
HttpServletResponse response,FilterChain filterChain)
throws ServletException, IOException {
SessionFactory sessionFactory = lookupSessionFactory();
logger.debug("Opening Hibernate Session in OpenSessionInViewFilter");
Session session = getSession(sessionFactory);
TransactionSynchronizationManager.bindResource(
sessionFactory, new SessionHolder(session));
try {
filterChain.doFilter(request, response);
}
finally {
TransactionSynchronizationManager.unbindResource(sessionFactory);
logger.debug("Closing Hibernate Session in OpenSessionInViewFilter");
closeSession(session, sessionFactory);
}
}
protected Session getSession(SessionFactory sessionFactory)
throws DataAccessResourceFailureException {
Session session = SessionFactoryUtils.getSession(sessionFactory, true);
session.setFlushMode(FlushMode.NEVER);
return session;
}
protected void closeSession(Session session, SessionFactory sessionFactory)
throws CleanupFailureDataAccessException {
SessionFactoryUtils.closeSessionIfNecessary(session, sessionFactory);
}
可以看到OpenSessionInViewFilter在getSession的时候,会把获取回来的session的flush mode 设为FlushMode.NEVER。然后把该sessionFactory绑定到 TransactionSynchronizationManager,使request的整个过程都使用同一个session,在请求过后再接除该 sessionFactory的绑定,最后closeSessionIfNecessary根据该 session是否已和transaction绑定来决定是否关闭session。在这个过程中,若HibernateTemplate 发现自当前session有不是readOnly的transaction,就会获取到FlushMode.AUTO Session,使方法拥有写权限。
public static void closeSessionIfNecessary(Session session, SessionFactory sessionFactory)
throws CleanupFailureDataAccessException {
if (session == null ||
TransactionSynchronizationManager.hasResource(sessionFactory)) {
return;
}
logger.debug("Closing Hibernate session");
try {
session.close();
}
catch (JDBCException ex) {
// SQLException underneath
throw new CleanupFailureDataAccessException("Could not close Hibernate session", ex.getSQLException());
}
catch (HibernateException ex) {
throw new CleanupFailureDataAccessException("Could not close Hibernate session", ex);
}
}
也即是,如果有不是readOnly的transaction就可以由Flush.NEVER转为Flush.AUTO,拥有 insert,update,delete操作权限,如果没有transaction,并且没有另外人为地设flush model的话,则doFilter的整个过程都是Flush.NEVER。所以受transaction保护的方法有写权限,没受保护的则没有。
采用spring的事务声明,使方法受transaction控制
<bean id="baseTransaction"
class="org.springframework.transaction.interceptor.TransactionProxyFactoryBean"
abstract="true">
<property name="transactionManager" ref="transactionManager"/>
<property name="proxyTargetClass" value="true"/>
<property name="transactionAttributes">
<props>
<prop key="get*">PROPAGATION_REQUIRED,readOnly</prop>
<prop key="find*">PROPAGATION_REQUIRED,readOnly</prop>
<prop key="load*">PROPAGATION_REQUIRED,readOnly</prop>
<prop key="save*">PROPAGATION_REQUIRED</prop>
<prop key="add*">PROPAGATION_REQUIRED</prop>
<prop key="update*">PROPAGATION_REQUIRED</prop>
<prop key="remove*">PROPAGATION_REQUIRED</prop>
</props>
</property>
</bean>
<property name="target">
<bean class="com.phopesoft.security.service.impl.UserServiceImpl"/>
</property>
</bean>
对于上例,则以save,add,update,remove开头的方法拥有可写的事务,如果当前有某个方法,如命名为importExcel(),则因没有transaction而没有写权限,这时若方法内有insert,update,delete操作的话,则需要手动设置flush model为Flush.AUTO,如
session.setFlushMode(FlushMode.AUTO);
session.save(user);
session.flush();
尽 管Open Session In View看起来还不错,其实副作用不少。看回上面OpenSessionInViewFilter的doFilterInternal方法代码,这个方法实际上是被父类的doFilter调用的,因此,我们可以大约了解的OpenSessionInViewFilter调用流程: request(请求)->open session并开始transaction->controller->View(Jsp)->结束transaction并 close session.
一切看起来很正确,尤其是在本地开发测试的时候没出现问题,但试想下如果流程中的某一步被阻塞的话,那在这期间connection就一直被占用而不释放。最有可能被阻塞的就是在写Jsp这步,一方面可能是页面内容大,response.write的时间长,另一方面可能是网速慢,服务器与用户间传输时间久。当大量这样的情况出现时,就有连接池连接不足,造成页面假死现象。
Open Session In View是个双刃剑,放在公网上内容多流量大的网站请慎用。