所有博文均在个人独立博客http://blog.mozhu.org首发,欢迎访问!
前面几篇博文中,都是使用OkHttpSender来上报Trace信息给Zipkin,这在生产环境中,当业务量比较大的时候,可能会成为一个性能瓶颈,这一篇博文我们来使用KafkaSender将Trace信息先写入到Kafka中,然后Zipkin使用KafkaCollector从Kafka中收集Span信息。
在Brave配置中需要将Sender设置为KafkaSender,而zipkin的collector组件配置为KafkaCollector
相关代码在Chapter8/zipkin-kafka中
pom.xml中添加依赖
<dependency>
<groupId>io.zipkin.reporter2groupId>
<artifactId>zipkin-sender-kafka11artifactId>
<version>${zipkin-reporter2.version}version>
dependency>
TracingConfiguration中,我们修改Sender为KafkaSender,指定Kafka的地址,以及topic
@Bean
Sender sender() {
return KafkaSender.newBuilder().bootstrapServers("localhost:9091,localhost:9092,localhost:9093").topic("zipkin").encoding(Encoding.JSON).build();
}
我们先启动zookeeper(默认端口号为2181),再依次启动一个本地的3个broker的kafka集群(端口号分别为9091、9092、9093),最后启动一个KafkaManager(默认端口号9000),KafkaManager是Kafka的UI管理工具
关于如何搭建本地Kafka伪集群,请自行上网搜索教程,本文使用的Kafka版本为0.10.0.0。
kafka启动完毕后,我们创建名为zipkin的topic,因为我们有3个broker,我这里设置replication-factor=3
bin/windows/kafka-topics.bat --create --zookeeper localhost:2181 --replication-factor 3 --partitions 1 --topic zipkin
打开KafkaManager界面
http://localhost:9000/clusters/localhost/topics/zipkin
可以看到topic zipkin中暂时没有消息。
我们使用如下命令启动zipkin,带上Kafka的Zookeeper地址参数,这样zipkin就会从kafka中消费我们上报的trace信息。
java -jar zipkin-server-2.2.1-exec.jar --KAFKA_ZOOKEEPER=localhost:2181
然后分别运行,主意我们这里将backend的端口改为9001,目的是为了避免和KafkaManager端口号冲突。
mvn spring-boot:run -Drun.jvmArguments="-Dserver.port=9001 -Dzipkin.service=backend"
mvn spring-boot:run -Drun.jvmArguments="-Dserver.port=8081 -Dzipkin.service=frontend"
浏览器访问 http://localhost:8081/ 会显示当前时间
我们再次刷新KafkaManager界面
http://localhost:9000/clusters/localhost/topics/zipkin
可以看到topic zipkin中有两条消息。
为了看到这两条消息的具体内容,我们可以在kafka安装目录使用如下命令
bin/windows/kafka-console-consumer.bat --zookeeper localhost:2181 --topic zipkin --from-beginning
在控制台会打印出最近的两条消息
[{"traceId":"802bd09f480b5faa","parentId":"802bd09f480b5faa","id":"bb3c70909ea3ee3c","kind":"SERVER","name":"get","timestamp":1510891296426607,"duration":10681,"localEndpoint":{"serviceName":"backend","ipv4":"10.200.170.137"},"remoteEndpoint":{"ipv4":"127.0.0.1","port":64421},"tags":{"http.path":"/api"},"shared":true}]
[{"traceId":"802bd09f480b5faa","parentId":"802bd09f480b5faa","id":"bb3c70909ea3ee3c","kind":"CLIENT","name":"get","timestamp":1510891296399882,"duration":27542,"localEndpoint":{"serviceName":"frontend","ipv4":"10.200.170.137"},"tags":{"http.path":"/api"}},{"traceId":"802bd09f480b5faa","id":"802bd09f480b5faa","kind":"SERVER","name":"get","timestamp":1510891296393252,"duration":39514,"localEndpoint":{"serviceName":"frontend","ipv4":"10.200.170.137"},"remoteEndpoint":{"ipv6":"::1","port":64420},"tags":{"http.path":"/"}}]
这说明我们的应用frontend和backend已经将trace信息写入kafka成功了!
在Zipkin的Web界面中,也能查询到这次跟踪信息
在zipkin的控制台,我们也看到跟Kafka相关的类ConsumerFetcherThread启动,我们在后续专门分析zipkin的源代码再来看看这个类。
2017-11-17 11:25:00.477 INFO 9292 --- [49-8e18eab0-0-1] kafka.consumer.ConsumerFetcherThread : [ConsumerFetcherThread-zipkin_LT290-1510889099649-8e18eab0-0-1], Starting
2017-11-17 11:25:00.482 INFO 9292 --- [r-finder-thread] kafka.consumer.ConsumerFetcherManager : [ConsumerFetcherManager-1510889099800] Added fetcher for partitions ArrayBuffer([[zipkin,0], initOffset 0 to broker id:1,host:10.200.170.137,port:9091] )
public abstract class KafkaSender extends Sender {
public static Builder newBuilder() {
// Settings below correspond to "Producer Configs"
// http://kafka.apache.org/0102/documentation.html#producerconfigs
Properties properties = new Properties();
properties.put(ProducerConfig.KEY_SERIALIZER_CLASS_CONFIG, ByteArraySerializer.class.getName());
properties.put(ProducerConfig.VALUE_SERIALIZER_CLASS_CONFIG,
ByteArraySerializer.class.getName());
properties.put(ProducerConfig.ACKS_CONFIG, "0");
return new zipkin2.reporter.kafka11.AutoValue_KafkaSender.Builder()
.encoding(Encoding.JSON)
.properties(properties)
.topic("zipkin")
.overrides(Collections.EMPTY_MAP)
.messageMaxBytes(1000000);
}
@Override public zipkin2.Call sendSpans(List<byte[]> encodedSpans) {
if (closeCalled) throw new IllegalStateException("closed");
byte[] message = encoder().encode(encodedSpans);
return new KafkaCall(message);
}
}
KafkaSender中通过KafkaProducer客户端来发送消息给Kafka,在newBuilder方法中,设置了一些默认值,比如topic默认为zipkin,编码默认用JSON,消息最大字节数1000000,还可以通过overrides来覆盖默认的配置来定制KafkaProducer。
在sendSpans方法中返回KafkaCall,这个对象的execute方法,在AsyncReporter中的flush方法中会被调用:
void flush(BufferNextMessage bundler) {
// ...
sender.sendSpans(nextMessage).execute();
// ...
}
KafkaCall的父类BaseCall方法execute会调用doExecute,而在doExecute方法中使用了一个AwaitableCallback将KafkaProducer的异步发送消息的方法,强制转为了同步发送,这里也确实处理的比较优雅。
class KafkaCall extends BaseCall { // KafkaFuture is not cancelable
private final byte[] message;
KafkaCall(byte[] message) {
this.message = message;
}
@Override protected Void doExecute() throws IOException {
final AwaitableCallback callback = new AwaitableCallback();
get().send(new ProducerRecord<>(topic(), message), (metadata, exception) -> {
if (exception == null) {
callback.onSuccess(null);
} else {
callback.onError(exception);
}
});
callback.await();
return null;
}
@Override protected void doEnqueue(Callback callback) {
get().send(new ProducerRecord<>(topic(), message), (metadata, exception) -> {
if (exception == null) {
callback.onSuccess(null);
} else {
callback.onError(exception);
}
});
}
@Override public Call clone() {
return new KafkaCall(message);
}
}
这里还有一个知识点,get方法每次都会返回一个新的KafkaProducer,我在第一眼看到这段代码时也曾怀疑,难道这里没有性能问题?
原来这里用到了google的插件autovalue里的标签@Memoized,结合@AutoValue标签,它会在自动生成的类里,给我们添加一些代码,可以看到get方法里作了一层缓存,所以我们的担心是没有必要的
@Memoized KafkaProducer<byte[], byte[]> get() {
KafkaProducer<byte[], byte[]> result = new KafkaProducer<>(properties());
provisioned = true;
return result;
}
AutoValue_KafkaSender
final class AutoValue_KafkaSender extends $AutoValue_KafkaSender {
private volatile KafkaProducer<byte[], byte[]> get;
AutoValue_KafkaSender(Encoding encoding$, int messageMaxBytes$, BytesMessageEncoder encoder$,
String topic$, Properties properties$) {
super(encoding$, messageMaxBytes$, encoder$, topic$, properties$);
}
@Override
KafkaProducer<byte[], byte[]> get() {
if (get == null) {
synchronized (this) {
if (get == null) {
get = super.get();
if (get == null) {
throw new NullPointerException("get() cannot return null");
}
}
}
}
return get;
}
}
我们再来看下Zipkin中的KafkaCollector,我们打开zipkin-server的源代码,在目录resources/zipkin-server-shared.yml文件中,发现关于kafka的配置片段
而我们在本文前面使用–KAFKA_ZOOKEEPER启动了zipkin,将kafka的zookeeper参数传递给了KafkaServer的main方法,也就是说,我们制定了zipkin.collector.kafka.zookeeper的值为localhost:2181
java -jar zipkin-server-2.2.1-exec.jar --KAFKA_ZOOKEEPER=localhost:2181
zipkin-server-shared.yml
zipkin:
collector:
kafka:
# ZooKeeper host string, comma-separated host:port value.
zookeeper: ${KAFKA_ZOOKEEPER:}
# Name of topic to poll for spans
topic: ${KAFKA_TOPIC:zipkin}
# Consumer group this process is consuming on behalf of.
group-id: ${KAFKA_GROUP_ID:zipkin}
# Count of consumer threads consuming the topic
streams: ${KAFKA_STREAMS:1}
# Maximum size of a message containing spans in bytes
max-message-size: ${KAFKA_MAX_MESSAGE_SIZE:1048576}
在pom.xml中,有如下依赖
<dependency>
<groupId>${project.groupId}groupId>
<artifactId>zipkin-autoconfigure-collector-kafkaartifactId>
<optional>trueoptional>
dependency>
我们找到zipkin-autoconfigure/collector-kafka的ZipkinKafkaCollectorAutoConfiguration类,使用了@Conditional注解,当KafkaZooKeeperSetCondition条件满足时,ZipkinKafkaCollectorAutoConfiguration类会被SpringBoot加载。当加载时,会配置KafkaCollector到spring容器中。
@Configuration
@EnableConfigurationProperties(ZipkinKafkaCollectorProperties.class)
@Conditional(KafkaZooKeeperSetCondition.class)
public class ZipkinKafkaCollectorAutoConfiguration {
/**
* This launches a thread to run start. This prevents a several second hang, or worse crash if
* zookeeper isn't running, yet.
*/
@Bean KafkaCollector kafka(ZipkinKafkaCollectorProperties kafka, CollectorSampler sampler,
CollectorMetrics metrics, StorageComponent storage) {
final KafkaCollector result =
kafka.toBuilder().sampler(sampler).metrics(metrics).storage(storage).build();
// don't use @Bean(initMethod = "start") as it can crash the process if zookeeper is down
Thread start = new Thread("start " + result.getClass().getSimpleName()) {
@Override public void run() {
result.start();
}
};
start.setDaemon(true);
start.start();
return result;
}
}
KafkaZooKeeperSetCondition继承了SpringBootCondition,实现了getMatchOutcome方法,当上下文的环境变量中有配置zipkin.collector.kafka.zookeeper的时候,则条件满足,即ZipkinKafkaCollectorAutoConfiguration会被加载
final class KafkaZooKeeperSetCondition extends SpringBootCondition {
static final String PROPERTY_NAME = "zipkin.collector.kafka.zookeeper";
@Override
public ConditionOutcome getMatchOutcome(ConditionContext context, AnnotatedTypeMetadata a) {
String kafkaZookeeper = context.getEnvironment().getProperty(PROPERTY_NAME);
return kafkaZookeeper == null || kafkaZookeeper.isEmpty() ?
ConditionOutcome.noMatch(PROPERTY_NAME + " isn't set") :
ConditionOutcome.match();
}
}
在ZipkinKafkaCollectorAutoConfiguration中,启动了一个守护线程来运行KafkaCollector的start方法,避免zookeeper连不上,阻塞zipkin的启动过程。
public final class KafkaCollector implements CollectorComponent {
final LazyConnector connector;
final LazyStreams streams;
KafkaCollector(Builder builder) {
connector = new LazyConnector(builder);
streams = new LazyStreams(builder, connector);
}
@Override public KafkaCollector start() {
connector.get();
streams.get();
return this;
}
}
KafkaCollector中初始化了两个对象,LazyConnector,和LazyStreams,在start方法中调用了2个对象的get方法
LazyConnector继承了Lazy,当get方法被调用的时候,compute方法会被调用
static final class LazyConnector extends LazyCloseable {
final ConsumerConfig config;
LazyConnector(Builder builder) {
this.config = new ConsumerConfig(builder.properties);
}
@Override protected ZookeeperConsumerConnector compute() {
return (ZookeeperConsumerConnector) createJavaConsumerConnector(config);
}
@Override
public void close() {
ZookeeperConsumerConnector maybeNull = maybeNull();
if (maybeNull != null) maybeNull.shutdown();
}
}
Lazy的get方法中,使用了典型的懒汉式单例模式,并使用了double-check,方式多线程构造多个实例,而真正构造对象是委派给compute方法
public abstract class Lazy<T> {
volatile T instance = null;
/** Remembers the result, if the operation completed unexceptionally. */
protected abstract T compute();
/** Returns the same value, computing as necessary */
public final T get() {
T result = instance;
if (result == null) {
synchronized (this) {
result = instance;
if (result == null) {
instance = result = tryCompute();
}
}
}
return result;
}
/**
* This is called in a synchronized block when the value to memorize hasn't yet been computed.
*
* Extracted only for LazyCloseable, hence package protection.
*/
T tryCompute() {
return compute();
}
}
在LazyConnector的compute方法中根据ConsumerConfig构造出了ZookeeperConsumerConnector,这个是kafka 0.8版本一种重要的对象,基于zookeeper的ConsumerConnector。
在LazyStreams的compute中,新建了一个线程池,线程池大小可以由参数streams(即zipkin.collector.kafka.streams)来指定,默认为一个线程的线程池。
然后通过topicCountMap设置zipkin的kafka消费使用的线程数,再使用ZookeeperConsumerConnector的createMessageStreams方法来创建KafkaStream,然后使用线程池执行KafkaStreamProcessor。
static final class LazyStreams extends LazyCloseable {
final int streams;
final String topic;
final Collector collector;
final CollectorMetrics metrics;
final LazyCloseable connector;
final AtomicReference failure = new AtomicReference<>();
LazyStreams(Builder builder, LazyCloseable connector) {
this.streams = builder.streams;
this.topic = builder.topic;
this.collector = builder.delegate.build();
this.metrics = builder.metrics;
this.connector = connector;
}
@Override protected ExecutorService compute() {
ExecutorService pool = streams == 1
? Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor()
: Executors.newFixedThreadPool(streams);
Map topicCountMap = new LinkedHashMap<>(1);
topicCountMap.put(topic, streams);
for (KafkaStream<byte[], byte[]> stream : connector.get().createMessageStreams(topicCountMap)
.get(topic)) {
pool.execute(guardFailures(new KafkaStreamProcessor(stream, collector, metrics)));
}
return pool;
}
Runnable guardFailures(final Runnable delegate) {
return () -> {
try {
delegate.run();
} catch (RuntimeException e) {
failure.set(CheckResult.failed(e));
}
};
}
@Override
public void close() {
ExecutorService maybeNull = maybeNull();
if (maybeNull != null) maybeNull.shutdown();
}
}
在KafkaStreamProcessor的run方法中,迭代stream对象,取出获得的流数据,然后调用Collector的acceptSpans方法,即使用storage组件来接收并存储span数据。
final class KafkaStreamProcessor implements Runnable {
final KafkaStream<byte[], byte[]> stream;
final Collector collector;
final CollectorMetrics metrics;
KafkaStreamProcessor(
KafkaStream<byte[], byte[]> stream, Collector collector, CollectorMetrics metrics) {
this.stream = stream;
this.collector = collector;
this.metrics = metrics;
}
@Override
public void run() {
ConsumerIterator<byte[], byte[]> messages = stream.iterator();
while (messages.hasNext()) {
byte[] bytes = messages.next().message();
metrics.incrementMessages();
if (bytes.length == 0) {
metrics.incrementMessagesDropped();
continue;
}
// If we received legacy single-span encoding, decode it into a singleton list
if (bytes[0] <= 16 && bytes[0] != 12 /* thrift, but not a list */) {
try {
metrics.incrementBytes(bytes.length);
Span span = SpanDecoder.THRIFT_DECODER.readSpan(bytes);
collector.accept(Collections.singletonList(span), NOOP);
} catch (RuntimeException e) {
metrics.incrementMessagesDropped();
}
} else {
collector.acceptSpans(bytes, DETECTING_DECODER, NOOP);
}
}
}
}
这里的kafka消费方式还是kafka0.8版本的,如果你想用kafka0.10+的版本,可以更改zipkin-server的pom,将collector-kafka10加入到依赖中,其原理跟kafka0.8的差不多,此处不再展开分析了。
<dependency>
<groupId>io.zipkin.javagroupId>
<artifactId>zipkin-autoconfigure-collector-kafka10artifactId>
<optional>trueoptional>
dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>io.zipkin.javagroupId>
<artifactId>zipkin-collector-kafka10artifactId>
dependency>
在生产环境中,我们可以将zipkin的日志收集器改为kafka来提高系统的吞吐量,而且也可以让客户端和zipkin服务端解耦,客户端将不依赖zipkin服务端,只依赖kafka集群。
当然我们也可以将zipkin的collector替换为RabbitMQ来提高日志收集的效率,zipkin对scribe也作了支持,这里就不展开篇幅细说了。