其实就是另一种形式的打分。
个人点评这种方法：
这篇文章发表在nature上，有点奇怪，个人感觉创新性和重要性还不够格，工具很多，但是本文基本都是自己开发的算法（毕竟satji就是搞统计出身的）。
但是仔细看了代码之后，发现这些方法确实是有点artificial！
而且算法原创性不高，多半是基于现有的一些工具的二次开发。
Identifying a maturation trajectory.
To assign each cell a maturation score that is proportional to the developmental progress, we first performed dimensionality reduction as described above using all genes that were detected in at least 2% of the cells (8,014 genes). This resulted in four significant dimensions. We then fit a principal curve (R package princurve, smoother= ‘lowess’, f= 1/3) through the data. The maturation score of a cell is then the arc-length from the beginning of the curve to the point at which the cell projects onto the curve.
The resulting curve is directionless, so we assign the ‘beginning’ of the curve so that the expression of Nes is negatively correlated with maturation. Nes is a known ventricular zone marker and therefore should only be highly expressed early in the trajectory. Maturation scores are normalized to the interval [0, 1]. In an independent analysis, we also used Monocle2 to order cells along a pseudo-time. We used Monocle version 2.3.6 with expression response variable set to negative binomial. We estimated size factors and dispersion using the default functions.
For ordering cells, we reduced the set of genes based on results of the monocle dispersion Table function, and only considered 718 genes with mean expression≥0.01 and an empirical dispersion at least twice as large as the fitted dispersion. Dimensionality reduction was carried out using the default method (DDRTree)
为了打分，先是降维， 然后拟合了一个principal curve，根据长度来将分数normalize到0~1，其中只利用了一个key gene（Nes），这相当的人为了。
Defining mitotic and post mitotic populations.
We observed a sharp transition point along the maturation trajectory at which cells uniformly transitioned into a postmitotic state, corresponding to the loss of proliferation potential and exit from the cell cycle (Fig. 1f, Extended Data Fig. 1).
We therefore subdivided the maturation trajectory into a mitotic and postmitotic phase to facilitate downstream analyses. We defined cells with a high phase-specific enrichment score (score >2, see section ‘Removal of cell cycle effect’) as being in the S or the G2/M phase.
We then fitted a smooth curve (loess, span=0.33, degree=2) to number of cells in S, G2/M phases as a function of maturation score. The point where this curve falls below half the global average marks the dividing threshold (Fig. 1f).
我对这种方法有着深深的怀疑！
# for maturation trajectory
# fit maturation trajectory
maturation.trajectory <- function(cm, md, expr, pricu.f=1/3) {
cat('Fitting maturation trajectory\n')
genes <- apply(cm[rownames(expr), ] > 0, 1, mean) >= 0.02 & apply(cm[rownames(expr), ] > 0, 1, sum) >= 3
rd <- dim.red(expr[genes, ], max.dim=50, ev.red.th=0.04)
# for a consisten look use Nes expression to orient each axis
for (i in 1:ncol(rd)) {
if (cor(expr['Nes', ], rd[, i]) > 0) {
rd[, i] <- -rd[, i]
}
}
md <- md[, !grepl('^DMC', colnames(md))]
md <- cbind(md, rd)
pricu <- principal.curve(rd, smoother='lowess', trace=TRUE, f=pricu.f, stretch=333)
# two DMCs
pc.line <- as.data.frame(pricu$s[order(pricu$lambda), ])
# lambda, for each point, its arc-length from the beginning of the curve. The curve is parametrized approximately by arc-length, and hence is unit-speed.
md$maturation.score <- pricu$lambda/max(pricu$lambda)
# orient maturation score using Nes expression
if (cor(md$maturation.score, expr['Nes', ]) > 0) {
md$maturation.score <- -(md$maturation.score - max(md$maturation.score))
}
# use 1% of neighbor cells to smooth maturation score
md$maturation.score.smooth <- nn.smooth(md$maturation.score, rd[, 1:2], round(ncol(expr)*0.01, 0))
# pick maturation score cutoff to separate mitotic from post-mitotic cells
md$in.cc.phase <- md$cc.phase != 0
fit <- loess(as.numeric(md$in.cc.phase) ~ md$maturation.score.smooth, span=0.5, degree=2)
md$cc.phase.fit <- fit$fitted
# pick MT threshold based on drop in cc.phase cells
# ignore edges of MT because of potential outliers
mt.th <- max(subset(md, cc.phase.fit > mean(md$in.cc.phase)/2 & maturation.score.smooth >= 0.2 & maturation.score.smooth <= 0.8)$maturation.score.smooth)
md$postmitotic <- md$maturation.score.smooth > mt.th
return(list(md=md, pricu=pricu, pc.line=pc.line, mt.th=mt.th))
}
# for smoothing maturation score
nn.smooth <- function(y, coords, k) {
knn.out <- FNN::get.knn(coords, k)
w <- 1 / (knn.out$nn.dist+.Machine$double.eps)
w <- w / apply(w, 1, sum)
v <- apply(knn.out$nn.index, 2, function(i) y[i])
return(apply(v*w, 1, sum))
}