一直对nio和epoll没有系统的认识,最近看了下openjdk,简单的做个记录。
个人对于Nio不算太熟,所以用参考《netty权威指南》,写了一个TimeServer,从这个代码入手分析nio的实现原理。
public class NioTimeServer {
public static void main(String[] args) {
int port = 8080;
MultiplexerTimeServer timeServer = new MultiplexerTimeServer(port);
new Thread(timeServer).start();
}
static final class MultiplexerTimeServer implements Runnable {
private Selector selector;
private ServerSocketChannel servChannel;
private volatile boolean stop;
public MultiplexerTimeServer(int port) {
try {
selector = Selector.open();
servChannel = ServerSocketChannel.open();
servChannel.configureBlocking(false);
servChannel.socket().bind(new InetSocketAddress(port), 1024);
servChannel.register(selector, SelectionKey.OP_ACCEPT);
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
System.exit(1);
}
}
public void stop() {
this.stop = true;
}
@Override
public void run() {
while (!stop) {
try {
selector.select(1000);
Set
Iterator
SelectionKey key = null;
while (it.hasNext()) {
key = it.next();
it.remove();
try {
handleInput(key);
} catch (Exception e) {
if (key != null) {
key.cancel();
if (key.channel() != null)
key.channel().close();
}
}
}
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
private void handleInput(SelectionKey key) throws IOException {
if (key.isValid()) {
if (key.isAcceptable()) {
ServerSocketChannel ssc = (ServerSocketChannel) key.channel();
SocketChannel sc = ssc.accept();
sc.configureBlocking(false);
sc.register(selector, SelectionKey.OP_READ);
}
if (key.isReadable()) {
SocketChannel sc = (SocketChannel) key.channel();
ByteBuffer readBuf = ByteBuffer.allocate(1024);
int readBytes = sc.read(readBuf);
if (readBytes > 0) {
readBuf.flip();
byte[] bytes = new byte[readBuf.remaining()];
readBuf.get(bytes);
String body = new String(bytes, "UTF-8");
System.out.println("The time server receive order :" + body);
String currentTime = "QUERY TIME ORDER".equalsIgnoreCase(body)
? new Date(System.currentTimeMillis()).toString() : "BAD ORDER";
doWrite(sc, currentTime);
} else if (readBytes < 0) {
key.cancel();
sc.close();
}
}
}
}
/**
* @param sc
* @param currentTime
* @throws IOException
*/
private void doWrite(SocketChannel sc, String response) throws IOException {
if (response != null && response.trim().length() > 0) {
byte[] bytes = response.getBytes();
ByteBuffer writeBuf = ByteBuffer.allocate(bytes.length);
writeBuf.put(bytes);
writeBuf.flip();
sc.write(writeBuf);
}
}
}
大概的过程如下:
1.创建一个ServerSocketChannel,设置为非阻塞模式,同时绑定监听端口,并注册channel到选择器上(注册感兴趣的key),
2.用一个线程去轮询选择器,调用选择器的select方法,获取所有就绪的key,key和channel是相关的,通过key的状态来决定进一步的处理。
我们重点看的只有一个地方,那就是selector.select(1000);先看如何获取selector:
public static Selector open() throws IOException {
return SelectorProvider.provider().openSelector();
}
这是使用了SelectorProvider去创建一个Selector,看下SelectorProvider的默认实例:
public static SelectorProvider provider() {
synchronized (lock) {
if (provider != null)
return provider;
return AccessController.doPrivileged(
new PrivilegedAction
public SelectorProvider run() {
if (loadProviderFromProperty())
return provider;
if (loadProviderAsService())
return provider;
provider = sun.nio.ch.DefaultSelectorProvider.create();
return provider;
}
});
}
}
重点只看其中这一行:
provider = sun.nio.ch.DefaultSelectorProvider.create();
这里用到了DefaultSelectorProvider,看下create()方法:
public static SelectorProvider create() {
String osname = AccessController.doPrivileged(
new GetPropertyAction("os.name"));
if ("SunOS".equals(osname)) {
return new sun.nio.ch.DevPollSelectorProvider();
}
// use EPollSelectorProvider for Linux kernels >= 2.6
if ("Linux".equals(osname)) {
String osversion = AccessController.doPrivileged(
new GetPropertyAction("os.version"));
String[] vers = osversion.split("\\.", 0);
if (vers.length >= 2) {
try {
int major = Integer.parseInt(vers[0]);
int minor = Integer.parseInt(vers[1]);
if (major > 2 || (major == 2 && minor >= 6)) {
return new sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorProvider();
}
} catch (NumberFormatException x) {
// format not recognized
}
}
}
return new sun.nio.ch.PollSelectorProvider();
}
重点到了,我们看到create方法中是通过区分操作系统来返回不同的Provider的。其中SunOs就是Solaris返回的是DevPollSelectorProvider,对于Linux,返回的Provder是EPollSelectorProvider,其余操作系统,返回的是PollSelectorProvider(比如Windows,是不支持epoll的,见注释)
继续看下EPollSelectorProvider
public class EPollSelectorProvider
extends SelectorProviderImpl
{
public AbstractSelector openSelector() throws IOException {
return new EPollSelectorImpl(this);
}
public Channel inheritedChannel() throws IOException {
return InheritedChannel.getChannel();
}
}
这里用到的是EPollSelectorImpl,由此可知,epoll在nio的实现就在这里了。
EPollSelectorImpl 中select的实现如下:
protected int doSelect(long timeout)
throws IOException
{
if (closed)
throw new ClosedSelectorException();
processDeregisterQueue();
try {
begin();
pollWrapper.poll(timeout);
} finally {
end();
}
processDeregisterQueue();
int numKeysUpdated = updateSelectedKeys();
if (pollWrapper.interrupted()) {
// Clear the wakeup pipe
pollWrapper.putEventOps(pollWrapper.interruptedIndex(), 0);
synchronized (interruptLock) {
pollWrapper.clearInterrupted();
IOUtil.drain(fd0);
interruptTriggered = false;
}
}
return numKeysUpdated;
}
只看这一句
pollWrapper.poll(timeout);
其中,pollWrapper:
// The poll object
EPollArrayWrapper pollWrapper;
关于EPollArrayWrapper:
/**
* Manipulates a native array of epoll_event structs on Linux:
*
* typedef union epoll_data {
* void *ptr;
* int fd;
* __uint32_t u32;
* __uint64_t u64;
* } epoll_data_t;
*
* struct epoll_event {
* __uint32_t events;
* epoll_data_t data;
* };
*
* The system call to wait for I/O events is epoll_wait(2). It populates an
* array of epoll_event structures that are passed to the call. The data
* member of the epoll_event structure contains the same data as was set
* when the file descriptor was registered to epoll via epoll_ctl(2). In
* this implementation we set data.fd to be the file descriptor that we
* register. That way, we have the file descriptor available when we
* process the events.
*
* All file descriptors registered with epoll have the POLLHUP and POLLERR
* events enabled even when registered with an event set of 0. To ensure
* that epoll_wait doesn't poll an idle file descriptor when the underlying
* connection is closed or reset then its registration is deleted from
* epoll (it will be re-added again if the event set is changed)
*/
这是类注释,说明了epoll的数据结构等
此类是epoll在openjdk中的实现类,肯定有epoll相关的jni:
private native int epollCreate();
private native void epollCtl(int epfd, int opcode, int fd, int events);
private native int epollWait(long pollAddress, int numfds, long timeout,
int epfd) throws IOException;
private static native int sizeofEPollEvent();
private static native int offsetofData();
private static native int fdLimit();
private static native void interrupt(int fd);
private static native void init();
重点在poll方法:
int poll(long timeout) throws IOException {
updateRegistrations();
updated = epollWait(pollArrayAddress, NUM_EPOLLEVENTS, timeout, epfd);
for (int i=0; i
if (getDescriptor(i) == incomingInterruptFD) {
interruptedIndex = i;
interrupted = true;
break;
}
}
return updated;
}
首先调用epollCtl系统调用,更新fd到epoll实例,然后调用epollWait系统调用,线程在此处阻塞,超时或有fd就绪时会被唤醒,返回值是一个fd的集合,0表示无就绪时间,-1表示report error and abort,否则遍历并处理fd。
关于epoll可以参考此文 http://www.ulduzsoft.com/2014/01/select-poll-epoll-practical-difference-for-system-architects/ 。
脚注
The syscall select is available in Windows but select processing is O(n) in the number of file descriptors unlike the modern constant-time multiplexers like epoll which makes select unacceptable for high-concurrency servers. This document will describe how high-concurrency programs are designed in Windows.Instead of epoll or kqueue, Windows has its own I/O multiplexer called I/O completion ports (IOCPs). IOCPs are the objects used to poll overlapped I/O for completion. IOCP polling is constant time (REF?).Windows支持select系统调用,(时间复杂度O(N)),但是不支持Epoll,Windows自身的 multiplexer是IOCPs