点击上方“芋道源码”,选择“置顶公众号”
技术文章第一时间送达!
源码精品专栏
精尽 Dubbo 原理与源码专栏( 已经完成 69+ 篇,预计总共 75+ 篇 )
中文详细注释的开源项目
Java 并发源码合集
RocketMQ 源码合集
Sharding-JDBC 源码解析合集
Spring MVC 和 Security 源码合集
MyCAT 源码解析合集
摘要: 原创出处 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/_ghOnuwbLHOkqGKgzWdLVw 「渣渣王子」欢迎转载,保留摘要,谢谢!
1. 概念
2. 源码分析
2.1.1 HikariConfig
2.1.2 HouseKeeper
2.1.3 小结
2.2.1 getConnection
2.2.2 leakTaskFactory、ProxyLeakTaskFactory、ProxyLeakTask
2.2.3 close
3. 测试模拟
4. Spark/Scala连接池泄漏问题排查
5. 参考资料
6. 系列文章
此属性控制在记录消息之前连接可能离开池的时间量,单位毫秒,默认为0,表明可能存在连接泄漏。
如果大于0且不是单元测试,则进一步判断:(leakDetectionThreshold < SECONDS.toMillis(2) or (leakDetectionThreshold > maxLifetime && maxLifetime > 0),会被重置为0。即如果要生效则必须>0,而且不能小于2秒,而且当maxLifetime > 0时不能大于maxLifetime(默认值1800000毫秒=30分钟)。
leakDetectionThreshold
This property controls the amount of time that a connection can be out of the pool before a message is logged indicating a possible connection leak. A value of 0 means leak detection is disabled. Lowest acceptable value for enabling leak detection is 2000 (2 seconds). Default: 0
更多配置大纲详见文章 【追光者系列】HikariCP默认配置
我们首先来看一下leakDetectionThreshold用在了哪里的纲要图:
还记得上一篇文章【追光者系列】HikariCP源码分析之从validationTimeout来讲讲Hikari 2.7.5版本的那些故事提到:我们可以看到在两处看到validationTimeout的写入,一处是PoolBase构造函数,另一处是HouseKeeper线程。
leakDetectionThreshold的用法可以说是异曲同工,除了构造函数之外,也用了HouseKeeper线程去处理。
在com.zaxxer.hikari.HikariConfig中进行了leakDetectionThreshold初始化工作,
@Override
public void setLeakDetectionThreshold(long leakDetectionThresholdMs)
{
this.leakDetectionThreshold = leakDetectionThresholdMs;
}
validateNumerics方法中则是解释了上文及官方文档中该值validate的策略
if (leakDetectionThreshold > 0 && !unitTest) {
if (leakDetectionThreshold < SECONDS.toMillis(2) || (leakDetectionThreshold > maxLifetime && maxLifetime > 0)) {
LOGGER.warn("{} - leakDetectionThreshold is less than 2000ms or more than maxLifetime, disabling it.", poolName);
leakDetectionThreshold = 0;
}
}
该方法会被HikariConfig#validate所调用,而HikariConfig#validate会在HikariDataSource的specified configuration的构造函数使用到
/**
* Construct a HikariDataSource with the specified configuration. The
* {@link HikariConfig} is copied and the pool is started by invoking this
* constructor.
*
* The {@link HikariConfig} can be modified without affecting the HikariDataSource
* and used to initialize another HikariDataSource instance.
*
* @param configuration a HikariConfig instance
*/
public HikariDataSource(HikariConfig configuration)
{
configuration.validate();
configuration.copyStateTo(this);
LOGGER.info("{} - Starting...", configuration.getPoolName());
pool = fastPathPool = new HikariPool(this);
LOGGER.info("{} - Start completed.", configuration.getPoolName());
this.seal();
}
也在每次getConnection的时候用到了,
// ***********************************************************************
// DataSource methods
// ***********************************************************************
/** {@inheritDoc} */
@Override
public Connection getConnection() throws SQLException
{
if (isClosed()) {
throw new SQLException("HikariDataSource " + this + " has been closed.");
}
if (fastPathPool != null) {
return fastPathPool.getConnection();
}
// See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-checked_locking#Usage_in_Java
HikariPool result = pool;
if (result == null) {
synchronized (this) {
result = pool;
if (result == null) {
validate();
LOGGER.info("{} - Starting...", getPoolName());
try {
pool = result = new HikariPool(this);
this.seal();
}
catch (PoolInitializationException pie) {
if (pie.getCause() instanceof SQLException) {
throw (SQLException) pie.getCause();
}
else {
throw pie;
}
}
LOGGER.info("{} - Start completed.", getPoolName());
}
}
}
return result.getConnection();
}
这里要特别提一下一个很牛逼的Double-checked_locking的实现,大家可以看一下这篇文章 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-checked_locking#Usage_in_Java
// Works with acquire/release semantics for volatile in Java 1.5 and later
// Broken under Java 1.4 and earlier semantics for volatile
class Foo {
private volatile Helper helper;
public Helper getHelper() {
Helper localRef = helper;
if (localRef == null) {
synchronized(this) {
localRef = helper;
if (localRef == null) {
helper = localRef = new Helper();
}
}
}
return localRef;
}
// other functions and members...
}
我们再来看一下com.zaxxer.hikari.pool.HikariPool这个代码,该线程尝试在池中维护的最小空闲连接数,并不断刷新的通过MBean调整的connectionTimeout和validationTimeout等值,leakDetectionThreshold这个值也是通过这个HouseKeeper的leakTask.updateLeakDetectionThreshold(config.getLeakDetectionThreshold())去管理的。
/**
* The house keeping task to retire and maintain minimum idle connections.
*/
private final class HouseKeeper implements Runnable
{
private volatile long previous = plusMillis(currentTime(), -HOUSEKEEPING_PERIOD_MS);
@Override
public void run()
{
try {
// refresh timeouts in case they changed via MBean
connectionTimeout = config.getConnectionTimeout();
validationTimeout = config.getValidationTimeout();
leakTask.updateLeakDetectionThreshold(config.getLeakDetectionThreshold());
final long idleTimeout = config.getIdleTimeout();
final long now = currentTime();
// Detect retrograde time, allowing +128ms as per NTP spec.
if (plusMillis(now, 128) < plusMillis(previous, HOUSEKEEPING_PERIOD_MS)) {
LOGGER.warn("{} - Retrograde clock change detected (housekeeper delta={}), soft-evicting connections from pool.",
poolName, elapsedDisplayString(previous, now));
previous = now;
softEvictConnections();
fillPool();
return;
}
else if (now > plusMillis(previous, (3 * HOUSEKEEPING_PERIOD_MS) / 2)) {
// No point evicting for forward clock motion, this merely accelerates connection retirement anyway
LOGGER.warn("{} - Thread starvation or clock leap detected (housekeeper delta={}).", poolName, elapsedDisplayString(previous, now));
}
previous = now;
String afterPrefix = "Pool ";
if (idleTimeout > 0L && config.getMinimumIdle() < config.getMaximumPoolSize()) {
logPoolState("Before cleanup ");
afterPrefix = "After cleanup ";
final List notInUse = connectionBag.values(STATE_NOT_IN_USE);
int removed = 0;
for (PoolEntry entry : notInUse) {
if (elapsedMillis(entry.lastAccessed, now) > idleTimeout && connectionBag.reserve(entry)) {
closeConnection(entry, "(connection has passed idleTimeout)");
if (++removed > config.getMinimumIdle()) {
break;
}
}
}
}
logPoolState(afterPrefix);
fillPool(); // Try to maintain minimum connections
}
catch (Exception e) {
LOGGER.error("Unexpected exception in housekeeping task", e);
}
}
}
这里补充说一下这个HouseKeeper,它是在com.zaxxer.hikari.pool.HikariPool的构造函数中初始化的:this.houseKeepingExecutorService = initializeHouseKeepingExecutorService();
/**
* Create/initialize the Housekeeping service {@link ScheduledExecutorService}. If the user specified an Executor
* to be used in the {@link HikariConfig}, then we use that. If no Executor was specified (typical), then create
* an Executor and configure it.
*
* @return either the user specified {@link ScheduledExecutorService}, or the one we created
*/
private ScheduledExecutorService initializeHouseKeepingExecutorService()
{
if (config.getScheduledExecutor() == null) {
final ThreadFactory threadFactory = Optional.ofNullable(config.getThreadFactory()).orElse(new DefaultThreadFactory(poolName + " housekeeper", true));
final ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor executor = new ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor(1, threadFactory, new ThreadPoolExecutor.DiscardPolicy());
executor.setExecuteExistingDelayedTasksAfterShutdownPolicy(false);
executor.setRemoveOnCancelPolicy(true);
return executor;
}
else {
return config.getScheduledExecutor();
}
}
这里简要说明一下,ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor是ThreadPoolExecutor类的子类,因为继承了ThreadPoolExecutor类所有的特性。但是,Java推荐仅在开发定时任务程序时采用ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor类。
在调用shutdown()方法而仍有待处理的任务需要执行时,可以配置ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor的行为。默认的行为是不论执行器是否结束,待处理的任务仍将被执行。但是,通过调用ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor类的setExecuteExistingDelayedTasksAfterShutdownPolicy()方法则可以改变这个行为。传递false参数给这个方法,执行shutdown()方法之后,待处理的任务将不会被执行。
取消任务后,判断是否需要从阻塞队列中移除任务。其中removeOnCancel参数通过setRemoveOnCancelPolicy()设置。之所以要在取消任务后移除阻塞队列中任务,是为了防止队列中积压大量已被取消的任务。
从这两个参数配置大家可以了解到作者的对于HouseKeeper的配置初衷。
Hikari通过构造函数和HouseKeeper对于一些配置参数进行初始化及动态赋值,动态赋值依赖于HikariConfigMXbean以及使用任务调度线程池ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor来不断刷新配置的。
我们仅仅以com.zaxxer.hikari.HikariConfig来做下小结,允许在运行时进行动态修改的主要有:
// Properties changeable at runtime through the HikariConfigMXBean
//
private volatile long connectionTimeout;
private volatile long validationTimeout;
private volatile long idleTimeout;
private volatile long leakDetectionThreshold;
private volatile long maxLifetime;
private volatile int maxPoolSize;
private volatile int minIdle;
private volatile String username;
private volatile String password;
不允许在运行时进行改变的主要有
// Properties NOT changeable at runtime
//
private long initializationFailTimeout;
private String catalog;
private String connectionInitSql;
private String connectionTestQuery;
private String dataSourceClassName;
private String dataSourceJndiName;
private String driverClassName;
private String jdbcUrl;
private String poolName;
private String schema;
private String transactionIsolationName;
private boolean isAutoCommit;
private boolean isReadOnly;
private boolean isIsolateInternalQueries;
private boolean isRegisterMbeans;
private boolean isAllowPoolSuspension;
private DataSource dataSource;
private Properties dataSourceProperties;
private ThreadFactory threadFactory;
private ScheduledExecutorService scheduledExecutor;
private MetricsTrackerFactory metricsTrackerFactory;
private Object metricRegistry;
private Object healthCheckRegistry;
private Properties healthCheckProperties;
在com.zaxxer.hikari.pool.HikariPool的核心方法getConnection返回的时候调用了poolEntry.createProxyConnection(leakTaskFactory.schedule(poolEntry), now)
注意,创建代理连接的时候关联了ProxyLeakTask。
连接泄漏检测的原理就是:连接有借有还,hikari是每借用一个connection则会创建一个延时的定时任务,在归还或者出异常的或者用户手动调用evictConnection的时候cancel掉这个task
/**
* Get a connection from the pool, or timeout after the specified number of milliseconds.
*
* @param hardTimeout the maximum time to wait for a connection from the pool
* @return a java.sql.Connection instance
* @throws SQLException thrown if a timeout occurs trying to obtain a connection
*/
public Connection getConnection(final long hardTimeout) throws SQLException
{
suspendResumeLock.acquire();
final long startTime = currentTime();
try {
long timeout = hardTimeout;
do {
PoolEntry poolEntry = connectionBag.borrow(timeout, MILLISECONDS);
if (poolEntry == null) {
break; // We timed out... break and throw exception
}
final long now = currentTime();
if (poolEntry.isMarkedEvicted() || (elapsedMillis(poolEntry.lastAccessed, now) > ALIVE_BYPASS_WINDOW_MS && !isConnectionAlive(poolEntry.connection))) {
closeConnection(poolEntry, poolEntry.isMarkedEvicted() ? EVICTED_CONNECTION_MESSAGE : DEAD_CONNECTION_MESSAGE);
timeout = hardTimeout - elapsedMillis(startTime);
}
else {
metricsTracker.recordBorrowStats(poolEntry, startTime);
return poolEntry.createProxyConnection(leakTaskFactory.schedule(poolEntry), now);
}
} while (timeout > 0L);
metricsTracker.recordBorrowTimeoutStats(startTime);
throw createTimeoutException(startTime);
}
catch (InterruptedException e) {
Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
throw new SQLException(poolName + " - Interrupted during connection acquisition", e);
}
finally {
suspendResumeLock.release();
}
}
在HikariPool构造函数里,初始化了leakTaskFactory,以及houseKeepingExecutorService。
this.houseKeepingExecutorService = initializeHouseKeepingExecutorService();
this.leakTaskFactory = new ProxyLeakTaskFactory(config.getLeakDetectionThreshold(), houseKeepingExecutorService);
this.houseKeeperTask = houseKeepingExecutorService.scheduleWithFixedDelay(new HouseKeeper(), 100L, HOUSEKEEPING_PERIOD_MS, MILLISECONDS);
com.zaxxer.hikari.pool.ProxyLeakTaskFactory是作者惯用的设计,我们看一下源码:
/**
* A factory for {@link ProxyLeakTask} Runnables that are scheduled in the future to report leaks.
*
* @author Brett Wooldridge
* @author Andreas Brenk
*/
class ProxyLeakTaskFactory
{
private ScheduledExecutorService executorService;
private long leakDetectionThreshold;
ProxyLeakTaskFactory(final long leakDetectionThreshold, final ScheduledExecutorService executorService)
{
this.executorService = executorService;
this.leakDetectionThreshold = leakDetectionThreshold;
}
ProxyLeakTask schedule(final PoolEntry poolEntry)
{
return (leakDetectionThreshold == 0) ? ProxyLeakTask.NO_LEAK : scheduleNewTask(poolEntry);
}
void updateLeakDetectionThreshold(final long leakDetectionThreshold)
{
this.leakDetectionThreshold = leakDetectionThreshold;
}
private ProxyLeakTask scheduleNewTask(PoolEntry poolEntry) {
ProxyLeakTask task = new ProxyLeakTask(poolEntry);
task.schedule(executorService, leakDetectionThreshold);
return task;
}
}
如果leakDetectionThreshold=0,即禁用连接泄露检测,schedule返回的是ProxyLeakTask.NO_LEAK,否则则新建一个ProxyLeakTask,在leakDetectionThreshold时间后触发
再看一下com.zaxxer.hikari.pool.ProxyLeakTask的源码
/**
* A Runnable that is scheduled in the future to report leaks. The ScheduledFuture is
* cancelled if the connection is closed before the leak time expires.
*
* @author Brett Wooldridge
*/
class ProxyLeakTask implements Runnable
{
private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(ProxyLeakTask.class);
static final ProxyLeakTask NO_LEAK;
private ScheduledFuture> scheduledFuture;
private String connectionName;
private Exception exception;
private String threadName;
private boolean isLeaked;
static
{
NO_LEAK = new ProxyLeakTask() {
@Override
void schedule(ScheduledExecutorService executorService, long leakDetectionThreshold) {}
@Override
public void run() {}
@Override
public void cancel() {}
};
}
ProxyLeakTask(final PoolEntry poolEntry)
{
this.exception = new Exception("Apparent connection leak detected");
this.threadName = Thread.currentThread().getName();
this.connectionName = poolEntry.connection.toString();
}
private ProxyLeakTask()
{
}
void schedule(ScheduledExecutorService executorService, long leakDetectionThreshold)
{
scheduledFuture = executorService.schedule(this, leakDetectionThreshold, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
}
/** {@inheritDoc} */
@Override
public void run()
{
isLeaked = true;
final StackTraceElement[] stackTrace = exception.getStackTrace();
final StackTraceElement[] trace = new StackTraceElement[stackTrace.length - 5];
System.arraycopy(stackTrace, 5, trace, 0, trace.length);
exception.setStackTrace(trace);
LOGGER.warn("Connection leak detection triggered for {} on thread {}, stack trace follows", connectionName, threadName, exception);
}
void cancel()
{
scheduledFuture.cancel(false);
if (isLeaked) {
LOGGER.info("Previously reported leaked connection {} on thread {} was returned to the pool (unleaked)", connectionName, threadName);
}
}
}
NO_LEAK类里头的方法都是空操作
一旦该task被触发,则抛出Exception("Apparent connection leak detected")
我们想起了什么,是不是想起了【追光者系列】HikariCP源码分析之allowPoolSuspension那篇文章里有着一摸一样的设计?
this.suspendResumeLock = config.isAllowPoolSuspension() ? new SuspendResumeLock() : SuspendResumeLock.FAUX_LOCK;
isAllowPoolSuspension默认值是false的,构造函数直接会创建SuspendResumeLock.FAUX_LOCK;只有isAllowPoolSuspension为true时,才会真正创建SuspendResumeLock。
com.zaxxer.hikari.util.SuspendResumeLock内部实现了一虚一实两个java.util.concurrent.Semaphore
/**
* This class implements a lock that can be used to suspend and resume the pool. It
* also provides a faux implementation that is used when the feature is disabled that
* hopefully gets fully "optimized away" by the JIT.
*
* @author Brett Wooldridge
*/
public class SuspendResumeLock
{
public static final SuspendResumeLock FAUX_LOCK = new SuspendResumeLock(false) {
@Override
public void acquire() {}
@Override
public void release() {}
@Override
public void suspend() {}
@Override
public void resume() {}
};
private static final int MAX_PERMITS = 10000;
private final Semaphore acquisitionSemaphore;
/**
* Default constructor
*/
public SuspendResumeLock()
{
this(true);
}
private SuspendResumeLock(final boolean createSemaphore)
{
acquisitionSemaphore = (createSemaphore ? new Semaphore(MAX_PERMITS, true) : null);
}
public void acquire()
{
acquisitionSemaphore.acquireUninterruptibly();
}
public void release()
{
acquisitionSemaphore.release();
}
public void suspend()
{
acquisitionSemaphore.acquireUninterruptibly(MAX_PERMITS);
}
public void resume()
{
acquisitionSemaphore.release(MAX_PERMITS);
}
}
由于Hikari的isAllowPoolSuspension默认值是false的,FAUX_LOCK只是一个空方法,acquisitionSemaphore对象也是空的;如果isAllowPoolSuspension值调整为true,当收到MBean的suspend调用时将会一次性acquisitionSemaphore.acquireUninterruptibly从此信号量获取给定数目MAX_PERMITS 10000的许可,在提供这些许可前一直将线程阻塞。之后HikariPool的getConnection方法获取不到连接,阻塞在suspendResumeLock.acquire(),除非resume方法释放给定数目MAX_PERMITS 10000的许可,将其返回到信号量
连接有借有还,连接检测的task也是会关闭的。
我们看一下com.zaxxer.hikari.pool.ProxyConnection源码,
// **********************************************************************
// "Overridden" java.sql.Connection Methods
// **********************************************************************
/** {@inheritDoc} */
@Override
public final void close() throws SQLException
{
// Closing statements can cause connection eviction, so this must run before the conditional below
closeStatements();
if (delegate != ClosedConnection.CLOSED_CONNECTION) {
leakTask.cancel();
try {
if (isCommitStateDirty && !isAutoCommit) {
delegate.rollback();
lastAccess = currentTime();
LOGGER.debug("{} - Executed rollback on connection {} due to dirty commit state on close().", poolEntry.getPoolName(), delegate);
}
if (dirtyBits != 0) {
poolEntry.resetConnectionState(this, dirtyBits);
lastAccess = currentTime();
}
delegate.clearWarnings();
}
catch (SQLException e) {
// when connections are aborted, exceptions are often thrown that should not reach the application
if (!poolEntry.isMarkedEvicted()) {
throw checkException(e);
}
}
finally {
delegate = ClosedConnection.CLOSED_CONNECTION;
poolEntry.recycle(lastAccess);
}
}
}
在connection的close的时候,delegate != ClosedConnection.CLOSED_CONNECTION时会调用leakTask.cancel();取消检测连接泄露的task。
在closeStatements中也会关闭:
@SuppressWarnings("EmptyTryBlock")
private synchronized void closeStatements()
{
final int size = openStatements.size();
if (size > 0) {
for (int i = 0; i < size && delegate != ClosedConnection.CLOSED_CONNECTION; i++) {
try (Statement ignored = openStatements.get(i)) {
// automatic resource cleanup
}
catch (SQLException e) {
LOGGER.warn("{} - Connection {} marked as broken because of an exception closing open statements during Connection.close()",
poolEntry.getPoolName(), delegate);
leakTask.cancel();
poolEntry.evict("(exception closing Statements during Connection.close())");
delegate = ClosedConnection.CLOSED_CONNECTION;
}
}
openStatements.clear();
}
}
在checkException中也会关闭
final SQLException checkException(SQLException sqle)
{
SQLException nse = sqle;
for (int depth = 0; delegate != ClosedConnection.CLOSED_CONNECTION && nse != null && depth < 10; depth++) {
final String sqlState = nse.getSQLState();
if (sqlState != null && sqlState.startsWith("08") || ERROR_STATES.contains(sqlState) || ERROR_CODES.contains(nse.getErrorCode())) {
// broken connection
LOGGER.warn("{} - Connection {} marked as broken because of SQLSTATE({}), ErrorCode({})",
poolEntry.getPoolName(), delegate, sqlState, nse.getErrorCode(), nse);
leakTask.cancel();
poolEntry.evict("(connection is broken)");
delegate = ClosedConnection.CLOSED_CONNECTION;
}
else {
nse = nse.getNextException();
}
}
return sqle;
}
在com.zaxxer.hikari.pool.HikariPool的evictConnection中,也会关闭任务
/**
* Evict a Connection from the pool.
*
* @param connection the Connection to evict (actually a {@link ProxyConnection})
*/
public void evictConnection(Connection connection)
{
ProxyConnection proxyConnection = (ProxyConnection) connection;
proxyConnection.cancelLeakTask();
try {
softEvictConnection(proxyConnection.getPoolEntry(), "(connection evicted by user)", !connection.isClosed() /* owner */);
}
catch (SQLException e) {
// unreachable in HikariCP, but we're still forced to catch it
}
}
小结关闭任务如下图所示:
我们可以根据本文对于leakDetectionThreshold的分析用测试包里的com.zaxxer.hikari.pool.MiscTest代码进行适当参数调整模拟连接泄漏情况,测试代码如下:
/**
* @author Brett Wooldridge
*/
public class MiscTest
{
@Test
public void testLogWriter() throws SQLException
{
HikariConfig config = newHikariConfig();
config.setMinimumIdle(0);
config.setMaximumPoolSize(4);
config.setDataSourceClassName("com.zaxxer.hikari.mocks.StubDataSource");
setConfigUnitTest(true);
try (HikariDataSource ds = new HikariDataSource(config)) {
PrintWriter writer = new PrintWriter(System.out);
ds.setLogWriter(writer);
assertSame(writer, ds.getLogWriter());
assertEquals("testLogWriter", config.getPoolName());
}
finally
{
setConfigUnitTest(false);
}
}
@Test
public void testInvalidIsolation()
{
try {
getTransactionIsolation("INVALID");
fail();
}
catch (Exception e) {
assertTrue(e instanceof IllegalArgumentException);
}
}
@Test
public void testCreateInstance()
{
try {
createInstance("invalid", null);
fail();
}
catch (RuntimeException e) {
assertTrue(e.getCause() instanceof ClassNotFoundException);
}
}
@Test
public void testLeakDetection() throws Exception
{
ByteArrayOutputStream baos = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
try (PrintStream ps = new PrintStream(baos, true)) {
setSlf4jTargetStream(Class.forName("com.zaxxer.hikari.pool.ProxyLeakTask"), ps);
setConfigUnitTest(true);
HikariConfig config = newHikariConfig();
config.setMinimumIdle(0);
config.setMaximumPoolSize(4);
config.setThreadFactory(Executors.defaultThreadFactory());
config.setMetricRegistry(null);
config.setLeakDetectionThreshold(TimeUnit.SECONDS.toMillis(4));
config.setDataSourceClassName("com.zaxxer.hikari.mocks.StubDataSource");
try (HikariDataSource ds = new HikariDataSource(config)) {
setSlf4jLogLevel(HikariPool.class, Level.DEBUG);
getPool(ds).logPoolState();
try (Connection connection = ds.getConnection()) {
quietlySleep(SECONDS.toMillis(4));
connection.close();
quietlySleep(SECONDS.toMillis(1));
ps.close();
String s = new String(baos.toByteArray());
assertNotNull("Exception string was null", s);
assertTrue("Expected exception to contain 'Connection leak detection' but contains *" + s + "*", s.contains("Connection leak detection"));
}
}
finally
{
setConfigUnitTest(false);
setSlf4jLogLevel(HikariPool.class, Level.INFO);
}
}
}
}
当代码执行到了quietlySleep(SECONDS.toMillis(4));时直接按照预期抛异常Apparent connection leak detected。
紧接着在close的过程中执行到了delegate != ClosedConnection.CLOSED_CONNECTION来进行leakTask.cancel()
完整的测试输出模拟过程如下所示:
金融中心大数据决策数据组的同学找到反馈了一个问题:
我们在同一个jvm 需要连接多个数据库时,发现总体上 从连接池borrow 的 connection 多于 归还的,一段时间后 连接池就会报出
Caused by: java.sql.SQLTransientConnectionException: HikariPool-0 - Connection is not available, request timed out after 30000ms的异常。
用户使用的spark的场景有点特殊,单机上开的链接很小,但是有很多机器都会去连。用户在一个jvm中就只会并发1个链接。
maximumPoolSize: 5
minimumIdle: 2
程序也会出现block的情况,发现是执行mysql时出现的,
mysql show processlist;发现大多停留在query end的情况,程序 thread dump 进程 持有monitor的线程。
DBA介入之后发现存在slow sql。
当然,这个问题出了是写频繁导致的,一次写入的量有点大,每一个sql都巨大走的batch,写入的 records 数在每秒 30-50条,一个record 有70多个字段。一个解决方式是把 binlog 移到 ssd 盘;还有一个方式是innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit把这个参数改成0了,估计可能会提高20%~30%。
修复了如上一些问题之后,又发现用户反馈的问题,加了leakDetectionThreshold,得出的结论是存在连接泄漏(从池中借用后连接没有关闭)。
针对这个问题,我们怀疑的连接池泄漏的点要么在hikari中,要么在spark/scala中。采用排除法使用了druid,依然存在这个问题;于是我们就去翻spark这块的代码,仔细分析之后定位到了问题:
因为scala map懒加载,一开始mapPartitions都落在一个stage中,我们调整代码toList之后result.iterator就分在独立的stage中,连接池泄漏问题就不再存在。
根本原因可以参见《Spark : How to use mapPartition and create/close connection per partition
》:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36545579/spark-how-to-use-mappartition-and-create-close-connection-per-partition/36545821#36545821
一开始以为这是一个连接池问题,或者是spark问题,但是实际上通过leakDetectionThreshold的定位,我们得知实际上这是一个scala问题 :)
https://segmentfault.com/a/1190000013092894
如果你对 Dubbo 感兴趣,欢迎加入我的知识星球一起交流。
目前在知识星球(https://t.zsxq.com/2VbiaEu)更新了如下 Dubbo 源码解析如下:
01. 调试环境搭建
02. 项目结构一览
03. 配置 Configuration
04. 核心流程一览
05. 拓展机制 SPI
06. 线程池
07. 服务暴露 Export
08. 服务引用 Refer
09. 注册中心 Registry
10. 动态编译 Compile
11. 动态代理 Proxy
12. 服务调用 Invoke
13. 调用特性
14. 过滤器 Filter
15. NIO 服务器
16. P2P 服务器
17. HTTP 服务器
18. 序列化 Serialization
19. 集群容错 Cluster
20. 优雅停机
21. 日志适配
22. 状态检查
23. 监控中心 Monitor
24. 管理中心 Admin
25. 运维命令 QOS
26. 链路追踪 Tracing
...
一共 60 篇++