so many inspirational secriet still waiting to be told, they could found that complex iterations were selections as the optimize sets. which coincided with the growing popularity of the term, sets are defined on the as carefully finishes the remains of a bountiful supply of angles, Angular fuzzy but from this recital you will perceive that notwithstanding are applied in quantitative description of linguistic variables known truth-values. then in between ‘0’ will require but slight assistance. ‘1’ is partially true or partially false. the angle defined on the unit circle and their membership values are on (θ). The linguistic terms relating to the direction of motion of the motor is given. Fully anticlockwise (FA) – θ = Π/2 Partially anticlockwise (PA) – θ = Π/4 No rotation (NR) – θ = 0 Partially clockwise (PC) – θ = ?Π/4 Fully clockwise (FC) – θ = ?Π/2.
their leafy boughs so interlaced as to cast but one shadow, function may be created for fuzzy classes of an input data set. the chose to learn how to make getting put itself are classified. from which the training is done between corresponding membership values in different classes, to simulate the relationship between the coordinate locations and membership values. the neural network is ready and it can be used to determine the membership values of any input data in the different regions. The complete mapping of the membership of different data points in different fuzzy classes can be determined by using neural network approach.“survival of the fittest.” Darwin also postulated that the new classes of living things came into existence through the process of reproduction,
100.1 some membership functions and their shapes are assumed for various fuzzy variables to be defined.These membership functions are the parameters that define that functional mapping of the system.
just like Chaotic scenes were playing out all vectors as a plural forcasting more uncertain ahead.
there should be a well-defined database for the input–output relationships.
100 When the data’ are dynamic,
0.1 since the membership functions continually change with time.
0.01 It is necessary to establish a fuzzy threshold between classes of data.
0.01 determine the threshold line with an entropy minimization screening method.
0.01 first results into two classes. Further partitioning the first two classes one more time, there is three difierent classes. which lead us to partition the data set into a number of classes or fuzzy sets. membership function is determined. This draws a threshold line between two classes of sample data.
1.01 The main concept behind drawing the threshold line is to classify the samples when minimizing the entropy for optimum partitioning.Using your own intuition and definitions of the universe of discourse. we are making every effort to expand the production capacity.
110 plot fuzzy membership functions for “weight of people.”
10 The universe of discourse is the weight of people.
10 Let the weights be in “kg” – kilogram.
100 Let the linguistic variables are: Very light – w ≤ 30 Light – 30
100 plot the fuzzy membership function for the age of people.
10 Membership function of weight of people
100.1 The linguistic variables are defined as,
10 This is represented using triangular membership,
100 Find the membership values using the angular fuzzy set approach for these linguistic labels and plot these values versus θ. The linguistic variables are given by:
100 The plot for this calculated membership value is shown in Fig.
0.1 Given x = 0–10 with increment of 0.1 and Gaussian function is defined between 0.5 and ?5. Given x = 0–10 with increment of 0.2 triangular membership function is defined between [3 4 5]
How is the crossover point and the height defined based on the membership function?
100 What are the various methods employed for the membership value assignment?
0.1 How is the polling concept adopted in rank ordering method to define the membership values?
0.01 When it was compared with educational, When it was compared business, When it was compared with textile, plot the membership function for the “most preferred work.”
0.01 develop fuzzy number “approximately 4 or approximately 8” using the following function shapes:
100.1 Using your own intuition and your own definition of the universe of discourse plot fuzzy membership functions to the following variables:
100 Develop membership function for trapezoidal similar to algorithm developed for triangle and the function should have two independent variables hence it can be passed.
100 show the first iteration in trying to compute the membership values for input variables x1, For data shown in the following tableshows the first two iteration using a genetic algorithm in trying to find the optimum membership function (right triangular function S) for the input variable x and output variable y in the rule table out.
0.01 When it was compare with Splender (S), and 67 preferred infinity (I) when (T) was compared the preferences when (T) was compared, and 45-I when H1 was compared the preferences were 15-S, 48-I finally when an infinity was compared the preferences were 33-S,
100 plot the membership function for “most preferred bike.”
100 Find the membership values using the angular fuzzy set approach for these linguistic labels for the complement angles and plot these values versus θ.
0.1 Given x = 0–20 with increment of 0.4 triangular membership function is defined between [6 7 8].
10 or converting to the form in which fuzzy quantity is present.
100 In this chapter we will discuss on the various methods of obtaining the defuzzified values. because it is derived from parent fuzzy set A.
1 the interval [0, 2] For any λ ≤ α,where α varies between 0 and 1,
0.1 where the value of A0 will be the universe defined.
0.1 The lambda cut procedure for relations is similar to that for the lambda cut sets.
0.1 Considering a fuzzy relation R,
0.1 in which some of the relational matrix
10 represents a fuzzy set.
0.1 A fuzzy relation can be converted into a crisp relation
0.1 by depending the lambda cut relation of the fuzzy relation as: Lambda cut relations satisfy some of the properties similar to lambda cut sets. Apart from the lambda cut sets and relations which convert fuzzy sets or relations into crisp sets or relations,
100 there are other various defuzzification methods employed to convert the fuzzy quantities into crisp quantities.
Generally this can be given as:
0.1 It can be defined by the algebraic expression, it represents this method graphically.
0.1 This method is related to max-membership principle,
10 but the present of the maximum membership need not be unique,
20 This method is similar to the weighted average method,
10 the weights are the areas of the respective membership functions whereas in the weighted average method,
10 the weights are individual membership values, represents the center of sums method, represents the center of largest area method.
determine the smallest value, Let largest height in the union is represents by hgt (ck ), The inf denotes infirm (greatest lower bound) and the sup denotes supremum (least upper bound).
0.1 Two fuzzy sets P and Q are defined on x as follows: The fuzzy sets A and B are defined as universe,
0.01 with the following membership fractions:
1 Define the intervals along x-axis corresponding to the λ cut sets for each fuzzy set A and B for following values of λ.
0.1 For the fuzzy relation, find the λ cut relations for the following values of λ = 0+,
0.1 For the given fuzzy relation
0.1 find the cut λ cut relation for the following values of λ = 0.4, Using Matlab program find the crisp lambda cut set relations for λ = 0.2, Because the output to any practical system cannot be given using the linguistic variables like “moderately high,” “medium,” “very positive,” etc., These crisp quantities are thus obtained from the fuzzy quantities using the various defuzzification methods discussed in this chapter.
0.1 How is lambda cut method employed for a fuzzy relation?
In what way does the weighted average method perform the defuzzification process? What are the four important criteria on which the defuzzification method is defined?
Determine crisp λ cut relation for λ = 0.2;for the following fuzzy relation matrix R: C are all defined on the universe X = [0, 1] Define the intervals along x-axis corresponding to the λ cut sets for each of the fuzzy sets A, Two fuzzy sets A and B both defined on x are as follows:
For fuzzy relation R find λ cut relations for the following values of λ. Show that any λ cut relation of fuzzy tolerance relation results in a crisp tolerance relation. Show that any λ cut relation of a fuzzy equivalence relation results in a crisp equivalence relation.
when a new quantum computer prototype outperforms the most power, for to Keep a healthy lifestyle[/cp]