电气辅导帮

微电网两阶段鲁棒优化问题（Matlab代码实现）

‍个人主页：电气辅导帮

欢迎来到本博客❤️❤️

博主优势：博客内容尽量做到思维缜密，逻辑清晰，为了方便读者。

⛳️座右铭：行百里者，半于九十。

本文目录如下：

目录

1 概述

2 运行结果

3 参考文献

4 Matlab代码及文章详细讲解

1 概述

参考文献：

站在巨人的肩膀上！！！！！

鲁棒优化（RO）是最近一种处理数据不确定性的优化方法。因为它是为了对冲输入数据中的任何扰动而导出的，所以（单阶段）RO模型的解决方案往往过于保守。为了解决这一问题，已经引入并研究了两阶段RO（以及更一般的多级RO），也称为鲁棒可调或自适应优化[3]，其中第二阶段问题是在第一阶段决策做出并揭示不确定性后对决策进行建模。由于改进的建模能力，两阶段RO已成为一种流行的决策工具。应用包括网络/运输问题、组合优化和电力系统调度问题。

近年来，我国风电发展迅速，风电已成为我国电能的主要来源之一。至2020年，我国的风电装机容量将占总装机容量的。风电大规模的集中式发展与接入对我国电网调度运行造成严重的影响。与传统能源不同，风电出力存在不确定性。2008年2月，美国德克萨斯州的风电出现大规模的爬坡事件，导致负荷削减事故[1];2008年6月，纽约上州因风暴导致250MW的风电场在8min内全部停机2。如果仍采用传统的日前调度方法，那么电力系统将会面临较大的风险。
考虑风电出力不确定性的机组组合问题本质上就是系统供电容量充裕性问题，目前该方面已有大量的研究成果，如基于场景的机组组合区间机组组合、机会约束机组组合、鲁棒机组组合等。基于机会约束的机组组合由于含有机会约束，因此其模型通常是非凸的，难以直接求解。基于场景的机组组合虽然有较好的经济性，但是该模型考虑大量风电出力场景集，使得整个模型规模较大，难以求解。为了解决这一问题，文献[10]提出考虑风电的区间机组组合。区间机组组合虽然求解速度较快，但是该模型并不能求解含离散随机变量的随机优化，如线路随机停运等4]。鲁棒机组组
合能有效解决上述问题，同时能保证系统运行的鲁棒性，并且该模型能通过 Benders分解、列生成算[法(column-and-constraint generation，C&CG)等方法求解，计算效率较高，因此得到广泛的应用。由于鲁棒调度结果往往过于保守，为了克服这缺点[12]，文献[12]引入弱鲁棒理论，牺牲调度结果的鲁棒性以提升鲁棒机组组合的经济性。文献[13]将场景机组组合与鲁棒机组组合结合以降低鲁棒机组组合的保守性。

2 运行结果

CPXPARAM_MIP_Display 1
Tried aggregator 1 time.
MIP Presolve eliminated 779 rows and 47 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 576 coefficients.
Reduced MIP has 1823 rows, 1110 columns, and 9311 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 192 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.00 sec. (5.00 ticks)
Probing fixed 0 vars, tightened 11 bounds.
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (1.69 ticks)
Tried aggregator 1 time.
Reduced MIP has 1823 rows, 1110 columns, and 9311 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 192 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.02 sec. (3.87 ticks)
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (1.59 ticks)
MIP emphasis: balance optimality and feasibility.
MIP search method: dynamic search.
Parallel mode: deterministic, using up to 16 threads.

Node log . . .
Best integer = 1.558508e+06 Node = 0 Best node = 2.128983e+04
Best integer = 5.306653e+04 Node = 0 Best node = 2.128983e+04
Best integer = 4.746628e+04 Node = 0 Best node = 4.745700e+04
Best integer = 4.746130e+04 Node = 0 Best node = 4.745700e+04
Implied bound cuts applied: 3
Mixed integer rounding cuts applied: 6
Gomory fractional cuts applied: 5
CPXPARAM_MIP_Display 1
Tried aggregator 3 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 3609 rows and 1057 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 3183 coefficients.
Aggregator did 61 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 3054 rows, 2726 columns, and 21043 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 1318 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.02 sec. (30.72 ticks)
Probing fixed 3 vars, tightened 122 bounds.
Probing time = 0.02 sec. (1.13 ticks)
Tried aggregator 3 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 129 rows and 103 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 618 coefficients.
Aggregator did 79 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 2846 rows, 2544 columns, and 20519 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 1201 binaries, 1 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.02 sec. (24.01 ticks)
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (1.04 ticks)
MIP emphasis: balance optimality and feasibility.
MIP search method: dynamic search.
Parallel mode: deterministic, using up to 16 threads.

Node log . . .
Best integer = -1.749242e+04 Node = 0 Best node = -2.422582e+04
Best integer = -1.769821e+04 Node = 0 Best node = -2.422582e+04
Best integer = -2.418924e+04 Node = 0 Best node = -2.422582e+04
Clique cuts applied: 12
Cover cuts applied: 6
Implied bound cuts applied: 52
Mixed integer rounding cuts applied: 151
Gomory fractional cuts applied: 52
CPXPARAM_MIP_Display 1
Tried aggregator 2 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 829 rows and 2 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 1008 coefficients.
Aggregator did 144 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 1053 rows, 723 columns, and 7241 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 192 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.00 sec. (7.29 ticks)
Probing fixed 0 vars, tightened 24 bounds.
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (0.53 ticks)
Tried aggregator 1 time.
MIP Presolve eliminated 144 rows and 72 columns.
Reduced MIP has 909 rows, 651 columns, and 6953 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 120 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.00 sec. (3.64 ticks)
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (0.26 ticks)
MIP emphasis: balance optimality and feasibility.
MIP search method: dynamic search.
Parallel mode: deterministic, using up to 16 threads.

Node log . . .
Best integer = 1.435047e+06 Node = 0 Best node = 4.559537e+04
Best integer = 1.601358e+05 Node = 0 Best node = 4.559537e+04
Best integer = 6.747812e+04 Node = 0 Best node = 6.747487e+04
CPXPARAM_MIP_Display 1
Tried aggregator 3 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 3639 rows and 1096 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 3189 coefficients.
Aggregator did 60 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 3025 rows, 2688 columns, and 20940 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 1306 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.02 sec. (30.45 ticks)
Probing fixed 2 vars, tightened 129 bounds.
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (1.35 ticks)
Tried aggregator 3 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 145 rows and 116 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 592 coefficients.
Aggregator did 73 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 2807 rows, 2499 columns, and 20394 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 1187 binaries, 1 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.02 sec. (23.83 ticks)
Probing fixed 0 vars, tightened 2 bounds.
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (1.22 ticks)
MIP emphasis: balance optimality and feasibility.
MIP search method: dynamic search.
Parallel mode: deterministic, using up to 16 threads.

Node log . . .
Best integer = -2.149270e+04 Node = 0 Best node = -2.676388e+04
Best integer = -2.181844e+04 Node = 0 Best node = -2.676289e+04
Clique cuts applied: 16
Cover cuts applied: 23
Implied bound cuts applied: 100
Flow cuts applied: 7
Mixed integer rounding cuts applied: 143
Gomory fractional cuts applied: 60
CPXPARAM_MIP_Display 1
Tried aggregator 2 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 829 rows and 2 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 1008 coefficients.
Aggregator did 144 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 1053 rows, 723 columns, and 7241 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 192 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.00 sec. (7.29 ticks)
Probing fixed 0 vars, tightened 24 bounds.
Probing time = 0.02 sec. (0.50 ticks)
Tried aggregator 1 time.
MIP Presolve eliminated 144 rows and 72 columns.
Reduced MIP has 909 rows, 651 columns, and 6953 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 120 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.00 sec. (3.64 ticks)
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (0.22 ticks)
MIP emphasis: balance optimality and feasibility.
MIP search method: dynamic search.
Parallel mode: deterministic, using up to 16 threads.

Node log . . .
Best integer = 1.434795e+06 Node = 0 Best node = 4.387395e+04
Best integer = 1.597238e+05 Node = 0 Best node = 4.387395e+04
Best integer = 6.835990e+04 Node = 0 Best node = 6.835665e+04
CPXPARAM_MIP_Display 1
Tried aggregator 3 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 3833 rows and 1275 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 3181 coefficients.
Aggregator did 67 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 2824 rows, 2502 columns, and 20363 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 1221 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.02 sec. (30.34 ticks)
Probing fixed 0 vars, tightened 97 bounds.
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (1.31 ticks)
Tried aggregator 3 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 137 rows and 108 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 552 coefficients.
Aggregator did 61 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 2626 rows, 2333 columns, and 19897 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 1122 binaries, 3 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.02 sec. (19.99 ticks)
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (1.14 ticks)
MIP emphasis: balance optimality and feasibility.
MIP search method: dynamic search.
Parallel mode: deterministic, using up to 16 threads.

Node log . . .
Best integer = -2.439674e+04 Node = 0 Best node = -2.890634e+04
Best integer = -2.886494e+04 Node = 524 Best node = -2.890295e+04
Clique cuts applied: 16
Cover cuts applied: 16
Implied bound cuts applied: 31
Flow cuts applied: 7
Mixed integer rounding cuts applied: 100
Gomory fractional cuts applied: 56
CPXPARAM_MIP_Display 1
Tried aggregator 2 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 829 rows and 2 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 1008 coefficients.
Aggregator did 144 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 1053 rows, 723 columns, and 7241 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 192 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.00 sec. (7.29 ticks)
Probing fixed 0 vars, tightened 24 bounds.
Probing time = 0.02 sec. (0.49 ticks)
Tried aggregator 1 time.
MIP Presolve eliminated 144 rows and 72 columns.
Reduced MIP has 909 rows, 651 columns, and 6953 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 120 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.00 sec. (3.64 ticks)
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (0.22 ticks)
MIP emphasis: balance optimality and feasibility.
MIP search method: dynamic search.
Parallel mode: deterministic, using up to 16 threads.

Node log . . .
Best integer = 1.435291e+06 Node = 0 Best node = 4.228469e+04
Best integer = 1.616469e+05 Node = 0 Best node = 4.228469e+04
Best integer = 6.925787e+04 Node = 0 Best node = 6.925463e+04
CPXPARAM_MIP_Display 1
Tried aggregator 3 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 3924 rows and 1372 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 3186 coefficients.
Aggregator did 72 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 2728 rows, 2400 columns, and 20066 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 1180 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.00 sec. (30.04 ticks)
Probing fixed 0 vars, tightened 82 bounds.
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (1.30 ticks)
Tried aggregator 1 time.
MIP Presolve eliminated 150 rows and 120 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 451 coefficients.
Reduced MIP has 2578 rows, 2280 columns, and 19692 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 1130 binaries, 6 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.02 sec. (8.66 ticks)
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (1.16 ticks)
MIP emphasis: balance optimality and feasibility.
MIP search method: dynamic search.
Parallel mode: deterministic, using up to 16 threads.

Node log . . .
Best integer = -3.044507e+04 Node = 0 Best node = -3.202296e+04
Best integer = -3.044582e+04 Node = 0 Best node = -3.093878e+04
Best integer = -3.044609e+04 Node = 0 Best node = -3.089980e+04
Best integer = -3.050281e+04 Node = 0 Best node = -3.089980e+04
Clique cuts applied: 12
Cover cuts applied: 44
Implied bound cuts applied: 19
Flow cuts applied: 7
Mixed integer rounding cuts applied: 53
Gomory fractional cuts applied: 28
CPXPARAM_MIP_Display 1
Tried aggregator 2 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 829 rows and 2 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 1008 coefficients.
Aggregator did 144 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 1053 rows, 723 columns, and 7241 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 192 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.00 sec. (7.29 ticks)
Probing fixed 0 vars, tightened 24 bounds.
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (0.48 ticks)
Tried aggregator 1 time.
MIP Presolve eliminated 144 rows and 72 columns.
Reduced MIP has 909 rows, 651 columns, and 6953 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 120 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.02 sec. (3.64 ticks)
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (0.21 ticks)
MIP emphasis: balance optimality and feasibility.
MIP search method: dynamic search.
Parallel mode: deterministic, using up to 16 threads.

Node log . . .
Best integer = 1.435399e+06 Node = 0 Best node = 4.081637e+04
Best integer = 1.629365e+05 Node = 0 Best node = 4.081637e+04
Best integer = 6.995436e+04 Node = 0 Best node = 6.995241e+04
CPXPARAM_MIP_Display 1
Tried aggregator 3 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 3888 rows and 1329 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 3183 coefficients.
Aggregator did 72 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 2764 rows, 2443 columns, and 20191 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 1195 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.00 sec. (30.24 ticks)
Probing fixed 1 vars, tightened 95 bounds.
Probing time = 0.02 sec. (1.36 ticks)
Tried aggregator 3 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 143 rows and 113 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 522 coefficients.
Aggregator did 51 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 2570 rows, 2279 columns, and 19730 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 1102 binaries, 6 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.03 sec. (19.77 ticks)
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (1.23 ticks)
MIP emphasis: balance optimality and feasibility.
MIP search method: dynamic search.
Parallel mode: deterministic, using up to 16 threads.

Node log . . .
Best integer = -3.229320e+04 Node = 0 Best node = -3.386904e+04
Best integer = -3.229448e+04 Node = 0 Best node = -3.274230e+04
Best integer = -3.231160e+04 Node = 36 Best node = -3.273753e+04
Best integer = -3.267385e+04 Node = 527 Best node = -3.273693e+04
Clique cuts applied: 10
Cover cuts applied: 31
Implied bound cuts applied: 27
Flow cuts applied: 2
Mixed integer rounding cuts applied: 50
Gomory fractional cuts applied: 31
CPXPARAM_MIP_Display 1
Tried aggregator 2 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 829 rows and 2 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 1008 coefficients.
Aggregator did 144 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 1053 rows, 723 columns, and 7241 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 192 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.00 sec. (7.29 ticks)
Probing fixed 0 vars, tightened 24 bounds.
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (0.46 ticks)
Tried aggregator 1 time.
MIP Presolve eliminated 144 rows and 72 columns.
Reduced MIP has 909 rows, 651 columns, and 6953 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 120 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.00 sec. (3.64 ticks)
Probing time = 0.02 sec. (0.19 ticks)
MIP emphasis: balance optimality and feasibility.
MIP search method: dynamic search.
Parallel mode: deterministic, using up to 16 threads.

Node log . . .
Best integer = 1.435498e+06 Node = 0 Best node = 3.945881e+04
Best integer = 1.641265e+05 Node = 0 Best node = 3.945881e+04
Best integer = 7.050950e+04 Node = 0 Best node = 7.050625e+04
CPXPARAM_MIP_Display 1
Tried aggregator 3 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 3969 rows and 1400 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 3173 coefficients.
Aggregator did 73 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 2682 rows, 2371 columns, and 19965 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 1161 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.00 sec. (30.19 ticks)
Probing fixed 1 vars, tightened 86 bounds.
Probing time = 0.02 sec. (1.35 ticks)
Tried aggregator 3 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 143 rows and 113 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 482 coefficients.
Aggregator did 41 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 2498 rows, 2217 columns, and 19535 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 1078 binaries, 10 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.02 sec. (19.45 ticks)
Probing time = 0.02 sec. (1.27 ticks)
MIP emphasis: balance optimality and feasibility.
MIP search method: dynamic search.
Parallel mode: deterministic, using up to 16 threads.

Node log . . .
Best integer = -3.433272e+04 Node = 0 Best node = -3.434461e+04
Clique cuts applied: 23
Cover cuts applied: 19
Implied bound cuts applied: 64
Flow cuts applied: 19
Mixed integer rounding cuts applied: 91
Gomory fractional cuts applied: 51
CPXPARAM_MIP_Display 1
Tried aggregator 2 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 829 rows and 2 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 1008 coefficients.
Aggregator did 144 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 1053 rows, 723 columns, and 7241 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 192 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.02 sec. (7.29 ticks)
Probing fixed 0 vars, tightened 24 bounds.
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (0.46 ticks)
Tried aggregator 1 time.
MIP Presolve eliminated 144 rows and 72 columns.
Reduced MIP has 909 rows, 651 columns, and 6953 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 120 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.00 sec. (3.64 ticks)
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (0.19 ticks)
MIP emphasis: balance optimality and feasibility.
MIP search method: dynamic search.
Parallel mode: deterministic, using up to 16 threads.

Node log . . .
Best integer = 1.435587e+06 Node = 0 Best node = 3.820272e+04
Best integer = 1.652181e+05 Node = 0 Best node = 3.820272e+04
Best integer = 7.091213e+04 Node = 0 Best node = 7.090888e+04
CPXPARAM_MIP_Display 1
Tried aggregator 3 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 4084 rows and 1509 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 3167 coefficients.
Aggregator did 80 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 2560 rows, 2255 columns, and 19615 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 1109 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.02 sec. (30.05 ticks)
Probing fixed 1 vars, tightened 69 bounds.
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (1.38 ticks)
Tried aggregator 3 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 149 rows and 117 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 435 coefficients.
Aggregator did 31 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 2380 rows, 2107 columns, and 19204 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 1037 binaries, 14 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.02 sec. (21.84 ticks)
Probing time = 0.02 sec. (1.32 ticks)
MIP emphasis: balance optimality and feasibility.
MIP search method: dynamic search.
Parallel mode: deterministic, using up to 16 threads.

Node log . . .
Best integer = -3.531202e+04 Node = 0 Best node = -3.670811e+04
Clique cuts applied: 15
Cover cuts applied: 47
Implied bound cuts applied: 57
Flow cuts applied: 14
Mixed integer rounding cuts applied: 102
Gomory fractional cuts applied: 72
CPXPARAM_MIP_Display 1
Tried aggregator 2 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 829 rows and 2 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 1008 coefficients.
Aggregator did 144 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 1053 rows, 723 columns, and 7241 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 192 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.02 sec. (7.29 ticks)
Probing fixed 0 vars, tightened 24 bounds.
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (0.45 ticks)
Tried aggregator 1 time.
MIP Presolve eliminated 144 rows and 72 columns.
Reduced MIP has 909 rows, 651 columns, and 6953 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 120 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.00 sec. (3.65 ticks)
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (0.18 ticks)
MIP emphasis: balance optimality and feasibility.
MIP search method: dynamic search.
Parallel mode: deterministic, using up to 16 threads.

Node log . . .
Best integer = 1.435666e+06 Node = 0 Best node = 3.703968e+04
Best integer = 7.123725e+04 Node = 0 Best node = 3.703968e+04
Best integer = 7.117944e+04 Node = 0 Best node = 7.117749e+04
CPXPARAM_MIP_Display 1
Tried aggregator 3 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 4124 rows and 1544 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 3156 coefficients.
Aggregator did 78 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 2522 rows, 2222 columns, and 19509 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 1094 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.02 sec. (30.03 ticks)
Probing fixed 2 vars, tightened 69 bounds.
Probing time = 0.02 sec. (1.55 ticks)
Tried aggregator 3 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 158 rows and 124 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 429 coefficients.
Aggregator did 31 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 2333 rows, 2067 columns, and 19089 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 1023 binaries, 17 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.02 sec. (21.70 ticks)
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (1.32 ticks)
MIP emphasis: balance optimality and feasibility.
MIP search method: dynamic search.
Parallel mode: deterministic, using up to 16 threads.

Node log . . .
Best integer = -3.655283e+04 Node = 0 Best node = -3.786446e+04
Best integer = -3.692724e+04 Node = 0 Best node = -3.693466e+04
Clique cuts applied: 16
Cover cuts applied: 10
Implied bound cuts applied: 50
Flow cuts applied: 13
Mixed integer rounding cuts applied: 96
Zero-half cuts applied: 1
Lift and project cuts applied: 1
Gomory fractional cuts applied: 36
CPXPARAM_MIP_Display 1
Tried aggregator 2 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 829 rows and 2 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 1008 coefficients.
Aggregator did 144 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 1053 rows, 723 columns, and 7241 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 192 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.02 sec. (7.29 ticks)
Probing fixed 0 vars, tightened 24 bounds.
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (0.45 ticks)
Tried aggregator 1 time.
MIP Presolve eliminated 144 rows and 72 columns.
Reduced MIP has 909 rows, 651 columns, and 6953 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 120 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.00 sec. (3.65 ticks)
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (0.18 ticks)
MIP emphasis: balance optimality and feasibility.
MIP search method: dynamic search.
Parallel mode: deterministic, using up to 16 threads.

Node log . . .
Best integer = 1.435737e+06 Node = 0 Best node = 3.596200e+04
Best integer = 7.145608e+04 Node = 0 Best node = 3.596200e+04
Best integer = 7.139956e+04 Node = 0 Best node = 7.139632e+04
CPXPARAM_MIP_Display 1
Tried aggregator 3 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 4159 rows and 1563 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 3122 coefficients.
Aggregator did 61 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 2504 rows, 2220 columns, and 19481 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 1091 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.02 sec. (30.08 ticks)
Probing fixed 1 vars, tightened 66 bounds.
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (1.43 ticks)
Tried aggregator 3 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 143 rows and 113 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 416 coefficients.
Aggregator did 28 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 2333 rows, 2079 columns, and 19119 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 1028 binaries, 21 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.03 sec. (18.87 ticks)
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (1.35 ticks)
MIP emphasis: balance optimality and feasibility.
MIP search method: dynamic search.
Parallel mode: deterministic, using up to 16 threads.

Node log . . .
Best integer = -3.761882e+04 Node = 0 Best node = -3.873746e+04
Clique cuts applied: 14
Cover cuts applied: 24
Implied bound cuts applied: 39
Flow cuts applied: 7
Mixed integer rounding cuts applied: 69
Gomory fractional cuts applied: 49
CPXPARAM_MIP_Display 1
Tried aggregator 2 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 829 rows and 2 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 1008 coefficients.
Aggregator did 144 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 1053 rows, 723 columns, and 7241 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 192 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.00 sec. (7.29 ticks)
Probing fixed 0 vars, tightened 24 bounds.
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (0.45 ticks)
Tried aggregator 1 time.
MIP Presolve eliminated 144 rows and 72 columns.
Reduced MIP has 909 rows, 651 columns, and 6953 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 120 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.00 sec. (3.66 ticks)
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (0.18 ticks)
MIP emphasis: balance optimality and feasibility.
MIP search method: dynamic search.
Parallel mode: deterministic, using up to 16 threads.

Node log . . .
Best integer = 1.435804e+06 Node = 0 Best node = 3.496271e+04
Best integer = 7.166073e+04 Node = 0 Best node = 3.496271e+04
Best integer = 7.160422e+04 Node = 0 Best node = 7.160097e+04
CPXPARAM_MIP_Display 1
Tried aggregator 3 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 4184 rows and 1592 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 3120 coefficients.
Aggregator did 59 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 2481 rows, 2193 columns, and 19405 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 1082 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.02 sec. (29.99 ticks)
Probing fixed 0 vars, tightened 54 bounds.
Probing time = 0.02 sec. (1.41 ticks)
Tried aggregator 3 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 140 rows and 113 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 378 coefficients.
Aggregator did 14 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 2327 rows, 2066 columns, and 19068 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 1023 binaries, 23 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.02 sec. (18.77 ticks)
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (1.25 ticks)
MIP emphasis: balance optimality and feasibility.
MIP search method: dynamic search.
Parallel mode: deterministic, using up to 16 threads.

Node log . . .
Best integer = -3.841269e+04 Node = 0 Best node = -3.942486e+04
Best integer = -3.869170e+04 Node = 0 Best node = -3.868681e+04
Clique cuts applied: 13
Cover cuts applied: 3
Implied bound cuts applied: 23
Flow cuts applied: 6
Mixed integer rounding cuts applied: 94
Gomory fractional cuts applied: 31
CPXPARAM_MIP_Display 1
Tried aggregator 2 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 829 rows and 2 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 1008 coefficients.
Aggregator did 144 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 1053 rows, 723 columns, and 7241 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 192 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.00 sec. (7.29 ticks)
Probing fixed 0 vars, tightened 24 bounds.
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (0.45 ticks)
Tried aggregator 1 time.
MIP Presolve eliminated 144 rows and 72 columns.
Reduced MIP has 909 rows, 651 columns, and 6953 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 120 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.02 sec. (3.67 ticks)
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (0.18 ticks)
MIP emphasis: balance optimality and feasibility.
MIP search method: dynamic search.
Parallel mode: deterministic, using up to 16 threads.

Node log . . .
Best integer = 1.436049e+06 Node = 0 Best node = 3.422789e+04
Best integer = 7.175970e+04 Node = 0 Best node = 3.422789e+04
Best integer = 7.170318e+04 Node = 0 Best node = 7.169994e+04
CPXPARAM_MIP_Display 1
Tried aggregator 3 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 4181 rows and 1592 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 3115 coefficients.
Aggregator did 55 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 2488 rows, 2197 columns, and 19425 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 1086 binaries, 0 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.03 sec. (29.92 ticks)
Probing fixed 1 vars, tightened 57 bounds.
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (1.40 ticks)
Tried aggregator 3 times.
MIP Presolve eliminated 138 rows and 112 columns.
MIP Presolve modified 381 coefficients.
Aggregator did 14 substitutions.
Reduced MIP has 2336 rows, 2071 columns, and 19091 nonzeros.
Reduced MIP has 1027 binaries, 26 generals, 0 SOSs, and 0 indicators.
Presolve time = 0.02 sec. (18.81 ticks)
Probing time = 0.00 sec. (1.43 ticks)
MIP emphasis: balance optimality and feasibility.
MIP search method: dynamic search.
Parallel mode: deterministic, using up to 16 threads.

Node log . . .
Best integer = -3.896327e+04 Node = 0 Best node = -3.993966e+04
Best integer = -3.897429e+04 Node = 0 Best node = -3.923728e+04
Best integer = -3.914657e+04 Node = 17 Best node = -3.923781e+04
Clique cuts applied: 10
Cover cuts applied: 19
Implied bound cuts applied: 30
Flow cuts applied: 11
Mixed integer rounding cuts applied: 60
Gomory fractional cuts applied: 43
时间已过 39.528332 秒。
>>

3 参考文献

部分理论来源于网络，如有侵权请联系删除。

[1]晏鸣宇,艾小猛,张艺镨,舒康安,甘伟,文劲宇.考虑机组禁止运行区间的含风电鲁棒机组组合[J].中国电机工程学报,2018,38(11):3195-3203.DOI:10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.171138.

4 Matlab代码及文章详细讲解

博客主页：电气辅导帮

你可能感兴趣的:(微电网调度,matlab,开发语言,算法,能源)

机器学习与深度学习间关系与区别 ℒℴѵℯ心·动ꦿ໊ོ꫞ 人工智能学习深度学习 python
一、机器学习概述定义机器学习（MachineLearning,ML）是一种通过数据驱动的方法，利用统计学和计算算法来训练模型，使计算机能够从数据中学习并自动进行预测或决策。机器学习通过分析大量数据样本，识别其中的模式和规律，从而对新的数据进行判断。其核心在于通过训练过程，让模型不断优化和提升其预测准确性。主要类型1.监督学习（SupervisedLearning）监督学习是指在训练数据集中包含输入
Goolge earth studio 进阶4——路径修改与平滑陟彼高冈yu Google earth studio 进阶教程旅游
如果我们希望在大约中途时获得更多的城市鸟瞰视角。可以将相机拖动到这里并创建一个新的关键帧。camera_target_clip_7EarthStudio会自动平滑我们的路径，所以当我们通过这个关键帧时，不是一个生硬的角度，而是一个平滑的曲线。camera_target_clip_8路径上有贝塞尔控制手柄，允许我们调整路径的形状。右键单击，我们可以选择“平滑路径”，这是默认的自动平滑算法，或者我们可
基于社交网络算法优化的二维最大熵图像分割智能算法研学社（Jack旭）智能优化算法应用图像分割算法 php 开发语言
智能优化算法应用：基于社交网络优化的二维最大熵图像阈值分割-附代码文章目录智能优化算法应用：基于社交网络优化的二维最大熵图像阈值分割-附代码1.前言2.二维最大熵阈值分割原理3.基于社交网络优化的多阈值分割4.算法结果：5.参考文献：6.Matlab代码摘要：本文介绍基于最大熵的图像分割，并且应用社交网络算法进行阈值寻优。1.前言阅读此文章前，请阅读《图像分割：直方图区域划分及信息统计介绍》htt
121. 买卖股票的最佳时机薄荷糖的味道_fb40
给定一个数组，它的第i个元素是一支给定股票第i天的价格。如果你最多只允许完成一笔交易（即买入和卖出一支股票），设计一个算法来计算你所能获取的最大利润。注意你不能在买入股票前卖出股票。示例1:输入:[7,1,5,3,6,4]输出:5解释:在第2天（股票价格=1）的时候买入，在第5天（股票价格=6）的时候卖出，最大利润=6-1=5。注意利润不能是7-1=6,因为卖出价格需要大于买入价格。示例2:输入:
每日算法&面试题，大厂特训二十八天——第二十天（树）肥学 ⚡算法题⚡面试题每日精进 java 算法数据结构
目录标题导读算法特训二十八天面试题点击直接资料领取导读肥友们为了更好的去帮助新同学适应算法和面试题，最近我们开始进行专项突击一步一步来。上一期我们完成了动态规划二十一天现在我们进行下一项对各类算法进行二十八天的一个小总结。还在等什么快来一起肥学进行二十八天挑战吧！！特别介绍小白练手专栏，适合刚入手的新人欢迎订阅编程小白进阶python有趣练手项目里面包括了像《机器人尬聊》《恶搞程序》这样的有趣文章
回溯算法-重新安排行程 chirou_ 算法数据结构图论 c++图搜索
leetcode332.重新安排行程这题我还没自己ac过，只能现在凭着刚学完的热乎劲把我对题解的理解记下来。本题我认为对数据结构的考察比较多，用什么数据结构去存数据，去读取数据，都是很重要的。classSolution{private:unordered_map>targets;boolbacktracking(intticketNum,vector&result){//1.确定参数和返回值//2
Faiss：高效相似性搜索与聚类的利器网络·魚大数据 faiss
Faiss是一个针对大规模向量集合的相似性搜索库，由FacebookAIResearch开发。它提供了一系列高效的算法和数据结构，用于加速向量之间的相似性搜索，特别是在大规模数据集上。本文将介绍Faiss的原理、核心功能以及如何在实际项目中使用它。Faiss原理：近似最近邻搜索：Faiss的核心功能之一是近似最近邻搜索，它能够高效地在大规模数据集中找到与给定查询向量最相似的向量。这种搜索是近似的，
insert into select 主键自增_mybatis拦截器实现主键自动生成 weixin_39521651 insert into select 主键自增 mybatis delete返回值 mybatis insert返回主键 mybatis insert返回对象 mybatis plus insert返回主键 mybatis plus 插入生成id
前言前阵子和朋友聊天，他说他们项目有个需求，要实现主键自动生成，不想每次新增的时候，都手动设置主键。于是我就问他，那你们数据库表设置主键自动递增不就得了。他的回答是他们项目目前的id都是采用雪花算法来生成，因此为了项目稳定性，不会切换id的生成方式。朋友问我有没有什么实现思路，他们公司的orm框架是mybatis，我就建议他说，不然让你老大把mybatis切换成mybatis-plus。mybat
k均值聚类算法考试例题_k均值算法(k均值聚类算法计算题) 寻找你83497 k均值聚类算法考试例题
?算法：第一步：选K个初始聚类中心，z1(1),z2(1)，…，zK(1)，其中括号内的序号为寻找聚类中心的迭代运算的次序号。聚类中心的向量值可任意设定，例如可选开始的K个.k均值聚类：---------一种硬聚类算法，隶属度只有两个取值0或1，提出的基本根据是“类内误差平方和最小化”准则；模糊的c均值聚类算法：--------一种模糊聚类算法，是.K均值聚类算法是先随机选取K个对象作为初始的聚类
TDengine 签约前晨汽车，解锁智能出行的无限潜力涛思数据（TDengine） tdengine 汽车大数据
在全球汽车产业转型升级的背景下，智能网联和新能源技术正迅速成为商用车行业的重要发展方向。随着市场对环保和智能化需求的日益增强，企业必须在技术创新和数据管理上不断突破，以满足客户对高效、安全和智能出行的期待。在这一背景下，前晨汽车凭借其在新能源智能商用车领域的前瞻性布局和技术实力，成为行业中的佼佼者。前晨汽车采用整车数据采集和全车数据打通策略，能够实时将数据推送至APP端客户。然而，这导致整体写入和
“这才好”麻辣香锅能够增加人身体的免疫能力小补文知
我就来介绍一种香锅，那就是“这才好”麻辣香锅，它产出于著名的蜀地文化，具有悠久的历史土家风味，麻辣鲜香，健康安全。采用传统秘制麻辣香锅油辣子，还有贴心加料“孜然包”满足人们的不同口味需求，香锅底料辣椒，微辣且香，含有丰富微量元素和维生素，具有辣而不躁，味道纯正，醇厚温和。花椒采用历史悠久，被列为宫廷供品的“贡椒”的汉源花椒。我们还挑选了“川菜之魂”郫县豆瓣的鼻祖品牌豆瓣，保留最原始的郫县豆瓣味道，
Python实现简单的机器学习算法 master_chenchengg python python 办公效率 python开发 IT
Python实现简单的机器学习算法开篇：初探机器学习的奇妙之旅搭建环境：一切从安装开始必备工具箱第一步：安装Anaconda和JupyterNotebook小贴士：如何配置Python环境变量算法初体验：从零开始的Python机器学习线性回归：让数据说话数据准备：从哪里找数据编码实战：Python实现线性回归模型评估：如何判断模型好坏逻辑回归：从分类开始理论入门：什么是逻辑回归代码实现：使用skl
《度五行》生活报报甲午62：不通痛苦，太通也痛苦，要健康快乐，需要通体舒畅。 YangduSam2021
220809壬寅戊申甲午，《度.生活五行》:天干土克水，水生木，木克土。地支寅申冲，寅午合。20220809，周二，兴大上海六班2512天，西交大2013上海班3212天，后TA15332天，度生活619天，今天拜访了一家有趣且当红产业的新创公司AK。AK一开始从事深海新能源储存与供电设备的研发生产制造，2年前开始做移动与家庭储能设备的研发生产制造。觉得有趣是因为这是笔者认知里用科技做降维打击的公
推荐算法_隐语义-梯度下降 _feivirus_ 算法机器学习和数学推荐算法机器学习隐语义
importnumpyasnp1.模型实现"""inputrate_matrix:M行N列的评分矩阵，值为P*Q.P:初始化用户特征矩阵M*K.Q:初始化物品特征矩阵K*N.latent_feature_cnt:隐特征的向量个数max_iteration:最大迭代次数alpha:步长lamda:正则化系数output分解之后的P和Q"""defLFM_grad_desc(rate_matrix,l
K近邻算法_分类鸢尾花数据集 _feivirus_ 算法机器学习和数学分类机器学习 K近邻
importnumpyasnpimportpandasaspdfromsklearn.datasetsimportload_irisfromsklearn.model_selectionimporttrain_test_splitfromsklearn.metricsimportaccuracy_score1.数据预处理iris=load_iris()df=pd.DataFrame(data=ir
数据结构 | 栈和队列 TT-Kun 数据结构与算法数据结构栈队列 C语言
文章目录栈和队列1.栈：后进先出（LIFO）的数据结构1.1概念与结构1.2栈的实现2.队列：先进先出（FIFO）的数据结构2.1概念与结构2.2队列的实现3.栈和队列算法题3.1有效的括号3.2用队列实现栈3.3用栈实现队列3.4设计循环队列结论栈和队列在计算机科学中，栈和队列是两种基本且重要的数据结构，它们在处理数据存储和访问顺序方面有着独特的规则和应用。本文将详细介绍栈和队列的概念、结构、实
[Python] 数据结构详解及代码 AIAdvocate 算法 python 数据结构链表
今日内容大纲介绍数据结构介绍列表链表1.数据结构和算法简介程序大白话翻译,程序=数据结构+算法数据结构指的是存储,组织数据的方式.算法指的是为了解决实际业务问题而思考思路和方法,就叫:算法.2.算法的5大特性介绍算法具有独立性算法是解决问题的思路和方式,最重要的是思维,而不是语言,其(算法)可以通过多种语言进行演绎.5大特性有输入,需要传入1或者多个参数有输出,需要返回1个或者多个结果有穷性,执行
matlab mle 优化,MLE+: Matlab Toolbox for Integrated Modeling, Control and Optimization for Buildings... Simon Zhong matlab mle 优化
摘要：FollowingunilateralopticnervesectioninadultPVGhoodedrat,theaxonguidancecueephrin-A2isup-regulatedincaudalbutnotrostralsuperiorcolliculus(SC)andtheEphA5receptorisdown-regulatedinaxotomisedretinalgan
如何用matlab灵活控制feko的求解 NingrLi matlab 开发语言
https://bbs.rfeda.cn/read.php?tid=3778Feko中的模型和求解设置等都可以通过editfeko进行设置，其文件存储为.pre文件，该文件可以用文本打开，因此，我们可以通过VB、VC、matlab等工具对.pre文件进行读写操作，以达到更灵活的使用feko。同样，对于.out文件，我们也可以进行读操作。熟练使用对.pre文件和.out文件的操作后，我们可以方便的计
Python算法L5：贪心算法小熊同学哦 Python算法算法 python 贪心算法
Python贪心算法简介目录Python贪心算法简介贪心算法的基本步骤贪心算法的适用场景经典贪心算法问题1.**零钱兑换问题**2.**区间调度问题**3.**背包问题**贪心算法的优缺点优点：缺点：结语贪心算法（GreedyAlgorithm）是一种在每一步选择中都采取当前最优或最优解的算法。它的核心思想是，在保证每一步局部最优的情况下，希望通过贪心选择达到全局最优解。虽然贪心算法并不总能得到全
科幻游戏《外卖员模拟器》主要地理环境设定 (1) 穷人小水滴游戏科幻设计
游戏名称:《外卖员模拟器》(英文名称:waimai_se)作者:穷人小水滴本故事纯属虚构,如有雷同实属巧合.故事发生在一个(架空)平行宇宙的地球,21世纪(超低空科幻流派).相关文章:https://blog.csdn.net/secext2022/article/details/141790630目录1星球整体地理设定2巨蛇国主要设定3海蛇市主要设定3.1主要地标建筑3.2交通3.3能源(电力)
冬练太极虽好，也需做好防护！武当功夫传人郑师和
俗话说，夏练三伏，冬练三九，练功绝非一日之功，必须持之以恒。太极拳是一项集文化、养生、锻炼于一体的活动。现在已经进入冬季，许多喜爱太极拳的朋友们仍然会到户外进行锻炼。这种精神固然可嘉，但是也一定要注意一些相关事项，以避免影响养生的效果。冬季练拳要“养汗”太极拳一日不练十日空,入冬天冷以后要“守汗”，春生夏长秋收冬藏，冬天练功，万物冬藏，要养阳气，需要藏精，顺天时天利，盘拳时，身体微热要见汗，还没出
matlab delsat = setdiff(1:69,unique(Eph(30,:)))；语句含义黄卷青灯77 matlab 开发语言 setdiff
这行MATLAB代码用于计算在范围1:69中不包含在Eph矩阵第30行的唯一值集合中的所有元素。具体解释如下：delsat=setdiff(1:69,unique(Eph(30,:)));解释Eph(30,:)Eph(30,:)提取矩阵Eph的第30行的所有列元素。这是一个行向量，包含了第30行的所有值。unique(Eph(30,:))unique函数返回Eph(30,:)中的唯一元素。这意味着
【RabbitMQ 项目】服务端：数据管理模块之绑定管理月夜星辉雪 rabbitmq 分布式
文章目录一.编写思路二.代码实践一.编写思路定义绑定信息类交换机名称队列名称绑定关键字：交换机的路由交换算法中会用到没有是否持久化的标志，因为绑定是否持久化取决于交换机和队列是否持久化，只有它们都持久化时绑定才需要持久化。绑定就好像一根绳子，两端连接着交换机和队列，当一方不存在，它就没有存在的必要了定义绑定持久化类构造函数：如果数据库文件不存在则创建，打开数据库，创建binding_table插入
非对称加密算法原理与应用2——RSA私钥加密文件私语茶馆云部署与开发架构及产品灵感记录 RSA2048 私钥加密
作者：私语茶馆1.相关章节（1）非对称加密算法原理与应用1——秘钥的生成-CSDN博客第一章节讲述的是创建秘钥对，并将公钥和私钥导出为文件格式存储。本章节继续讲如何利用私钥加密内容，包括从密钥库或文件中读取私钥，并用RSA算法加密文件和String。2.私钥加密的概述本文主要基于第一章节的RSA2048bit的非对称加密算法讲述如何利用私钥加密文件。这种加密后的文件，只能由该私钥对应的公钥来解密。
粒子群优化 (PSO) 在三维正弦波函数中的应用 subject625Ruben 机器学习人工智能 matlab 算法
在这篇博客中，我们将展示如何使用粒子群优化（PSO）算法求解三维正弦波函数，并通过增加正弦波扰动，使优化过程更加复杂和有趣。本文将介绍目标函数的定义、PSO参数设置以及算法执行的详细过程，并展示搜索空间中的动态过程和收敛曲线。1.目标函数定义我们使用的目标函数是一个三维正弦波函数，定义如下：objectiveFunc=@(x)sin(sqrt(x(1).^2+x(2).^2))+0.5*sin(5
经纬恒润二面&三七互娱一面&元象二面 Redstone Monstrosity 面试前端
1.请尽可能详细地说明，进程和线程的区别，分别有哪些应用场景？进程间如何通信？线程间如何通信？你的回答中不要写出示例代码。进程和线程是操作系统中的两个基本概念，它们在计算机系统中扮演着不同的角色，并且在不同的应用场景中发挥作用。进程和线程的区别定义：进程：进程是操作系统进行资源分配和调度的基本单位。每个进程都有独立的内存空间和系统资源。线程：线程是进程内的一个执行单元，是操作系统进行调度的最小单位
非对称加密算法————RSA理论及详情 hu19930613
转自：https://www.kancloud.cn/kancloud/rsa_algorithm/48484一、一点历史1976年以前，所有的加密方法都是同一种模式：（1）甲方选择某一种加密规则，对信息进行加密；（2）乙方使用同一种规则，对信息进行解密。由于加密和解密使用同样规则（简称"密钥"），这被称为"对称加密算法"（Symmetric-keyalgorithm）。这种加密模式有一个最大弱点
ai绘画工具midjourney怎么下载？附作品管理教程设计师早上好
Midjourney是一款功能强大的AI绘画工具，它使用机器学习技术和深度神经网络等算法，可以生成各种艺术风格的绘画作品。在创意设计、广告宣传等方面有着广泛的应用前景。那么，ai绘画工具midjourney怎么下载？本文将为您介绍Midjourney的下载以及作品的相关管理。一、Midjourney下载Midjourney的下载非常简单，只需打开Midjourney官网（点击“GetMidjour
【加密算法基础——对称加密和非对称加密】 XWWW668899 网络安全服务器笔记
对称加密与非对称加密对称加密和非对称加密是两种基本的加密方法，各自有不同的特点和用途。以下是详细比较：1.对称加密特点密钥:使用相同的密钥进行加密和解密。发送方和接收方必须共享这个密钥。速度:通常速度较快，适合处理大量数据。实现:算法相对简单，计算效率高。常见算法AES(高级加密标准)DES(数据加密标准)3DES(三重数据加密标准)RC4(流密码)应用场景文件加密磁盘加密传输大量数据时的加密2.
web报表工具FineReport常见的数据集报错错误代码和解释老A不折腾 web报表 finereport 代码可视化工具
在使用finereport制作报表，若预览发生错误，很多朋友便手忙脚乱不知所措了，其实没什么，只要看懂报错代码和含义，可以很快的排除错误，这里我就分享一下finereport的数据集报错错误代码和解释，如果有说的不准确的地方，也请各位小伙伴纠正一下。 NS-war-remote=错误代码\:1117 压缩部署不支持远程设计 NS_LayerReport_MultiDs=错误代码
Java的WeakReference与WeakHashMap bylijinnan java 弱引用
首先看看 WeakReference wiki 上 Weak reference 的一个例子： public class ReferenceTest { public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException { WeakReference r = new Wea
Linux——（hostname）主机名与ip的映射 eksliang linux hostname
一、什么是主机名无论在局域网还是INTERNET上，每台主机都有一个IP地址，是为了区分此台主机和彼台主机，也就是说IP地址就是主机的门牌号。但IP地址不方便记忆，所以又有了域名。域名只是在公网（INtERNET)中存在，每个域名都对应一个IP地址，但一个IP地址可有对应多个域名。域名类型 linuxsir.org 这样的；主机名是用于什么的呢？答：在一个局域网中，每台机器都有一个主
oracle 常用技巧 18289753290
oracle常用技巧 ①复制表结构和数据 create table temp_clientloginUser as select distinct userid from tbusrtloginlog ②仅复制数据如果表结构一样 insert into mytable select * &nb
使用c3p0数据库连接池时出现com.mchange.v2.resourcepool.TimeoutException 酷的飞上天空 exception
有一个线上环境使用的是c3p0数据库，为外部提供接口服务。最近访问压力增大后台tomcat的日志里面频繁出现 com.mchange.v2.resourcepool.TimeoutException: A client timed out while waiting to acquire a resource from com.mchange.v2.resourcepool.BasicResou
IT系统分析师如何学习大数据蓝儿唯美大数据
我是一名从事大数据项目的IT系统分析师。在深入这个项目前需要了解些什么呢？学习大数据的最佳方法就是先从了解信息系统是如何工作着手，尤其是数据库和基础设施。同样在开始前还需要了解大数据工具，如Cloudera、Hadoop、Spark、Hive、Pig、Flume、Sqoop与Mesos。系统分析师需要明白如何组织、管理和保护数据。在市面上有几十款数据管理产品可以用于管理数据。你的大数据数据库可能
spring学习——简介 a-john spring
Spring是一个开源框架，是为了解决企业应用开发的复杂性而创建的。Spring使用基本的JavaBean来完成以前只能由EJB完成的事情。然而Spring的用途不仅限于服务器端的开发，从简单性，可测试性和松耦合的角度而言，任何Java应用都可以从Spring中受益。其主要特征是依赖注入、AOP、持久化、事务、SpringMVC以及Acegi Security 为了降低Java开发的复杂性，
自定义颜色的xml文件 aijuans xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <resources> <color name="white">#FFFFFF</color> <color name="black">#000000</color> &
运营到底是做什么的？ aoyouzi 运营到底是做什么的？
文章来源：夏叔叔（微信号：woshixiashushu），欢迎大家关注！很久没有动笔写点东西，近些日子，由于爱狗团产品上线，不断面试，经常会被问道一个问题。问：爱狗团的运营主要做什么？答：带着用户一起嗨。为什么是带着用户玩起来呢？究竟什么是运营？运营到底是做什么的？那么，我们先来回答一个更简单的问题——互联网公司对运营考核什么？以爱狗团为例，绝大部分的移动互联网公司，对运营部门的考核分为三块——用
js面向对象类和对象百合不是茶 js 面向对象函数创建类和对象
接触js已经有几个月了,但是对js的面向对象的一些概念根本就是模糊的,js是一种面向对象的语言但又不像java一样有class,js不是严格的面向对象语言 ,js在java web开发的地位和java不相上下 ,其中web的数据的反馈现在主流的使用json,json的语法和js的类和属性的创建相似下面介绍一些js的类和对象的创建的技术一:类和对
web.xml之资源管理对象配置 resource-env-ref bijian1013 java web.xml servlet
resource-env-ref元素来指定对管理对象的servlet引用的声明，该对象与servlet环境中的资源相关联 <resource-env-ref> <resource-env-ref-name>资源名</resource-env-ref-name> <resource-env-ref-type>查找资源时返回的资源类
Create a composite component with a custom namespace sunjing
https://weblogs.java.net/blog/mriem/archive/2013/11/22/jsf-tip-45-create-composite-component-custom-namespace When you developed a composite component the namespace you would be seeing would
【MongoDB学习笔记十二】Mongo副本集服务器角色之Arbiter bit1129 mongodb
一、复本集为什么要加入Arbiter这个角色回答这个问题，要从复本集的存活条件和Aribter服务器的特性两方面来说。什么是Artiber？ An arbiter does not have a copy of data set and cannot become a primary. Replica sets may have arbiters to add a
Javascript开发笔记白糖_ JavaScript
获取iframe内的元素通常我们使用window.frames["frameId"].document.getElementById("divId").innerHTML这样的形式来获取iframe内的元素，这种写法在IE、safari、chrome下都是通过的，唯独在fireforx下不通过。其实jquery的contents方法提供了对if
Web浏览器Chrome打开一段时间后，运行alert无效 bozch Web chorme alert 无效
今天在开发的时候，突然间发现alert在chrome浏览器就没法弹出了，很是怪异。试了试其他浏览器，发现都是没有问题的。开始想以为是chorme浏览器有啥机制导致的，就开始尝试各种代码让alert出来。尝试结果是仍然没有显示出来。这样开发的结果，如果客户在使用的时候没有提示，那会带来致命的体验。哎，没啥办法了就关闭浏览器重启。结果就好了，这也太怪异了。难道是cho
编程之美-高效地安排会议图着色问题贪心算法 bylijinnan 编程之美
import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.Collections; import java.util.List; import java.util.Random; public class GraphColoringProblem { /**编程之美高效地安排会议图着色问题贪心算法 * 假设要用很多个教室对一组
机器学习相关概念和开发工具 chenbowen00 算法 matlab 机器学习
基本概念：机器学习(Machine Learning, ML)是一门多领域交叉学科，涉及概率论、统计学、逼近论、凸分析、算法复杂度理论等多门学科。专门研究计算机怎样模拟或实现人类的学习行为，以获取新的知识或技能，重新组织已有的知识结构使之不断改善自身的性能。它是人工智能的核心，是使计算机具有智能的根本途径，其应用遍及人工智能的各个领域，它主要使用归纳、综合而不是演绎。开发工具 M
[宇宙经济学]关于在太空建立永久定居点的可能性 comsci 经济
大家都知道,地球上的房地产都比较昂贵,而且土地证经常会因为新的政府的意志而变幻文本格式........ 所以,在地球议会尚不具有在太空行使法律和权力的力量之前,我们外太阳系统的友好联盟可以考虑在地月系的某些引力平衡点上面,修建规模较大的定居点
oracle 11g database control 证书错误 daizj oracle 证书错误 oracle 11G 安装
oracle 11g database control 证书错误 win7 安装完oracle11后打开 Database control 后，会打开em管理页面，提示证书错误，点“继续浏览此网站”，还是会继续停留在证书错误页面解决办法：是 KB2661254 这个更新补丁引起的，它限制了 RSA 密钥位长度少于 1024 位的证书的使用。具体可以看微软官方公告：
Java I/O之用FilenameFilter实现根据文件扩展名删除文件游其是你 FilenameFilter
在Java中，你可以通过实现FilenameFilter类并重写accept(File dir, String name) 方法实现文件过滤功能。在这个例子中，我们向你展示在“c:\\folder”路径下列出所有“.txt”格式的文件并删除。 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
C语言数组的简单以及一维数组的简单排序算法示例，二维数组简单示例 dcj3sjt126com c array
# include <stdio.h> int main(void) { int a[5] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; //a 是数组的名字 5是表示数组元素的个数，并且这五个元素分别用a[0], a[1]...a[4] int i; for (i=0; i<5; ++i) printf("%d\n",
PRIMARY, INDEX, UNIQUE 这3种是一类 PRIMARY 主键。就是唯一且不能为空。 INDEX 索引，普通的 UNIQUE 唯一索引 dcj3sjt126com primary
PRIMARY, INDEX, UNIQUE 这3种是一类PRIMARY 主键。就是唯一且不能为空。INDEX 索引，普通的UNIQUE 唯一索引。不允许有重复。FULLTEXT 是全文索引，用于在一篇文章中，检索文本信息的。举个例子来说，比如你在为某商场做一个会员卡的系统。这个系统有一个会员表有下列字段：会员编号 INT会员姓名
java集合辅助类 Collections、Arrays shuizhaosi888 Collections Arrays HashCode
Arrays、Collections 1 ）数组集合之间转换 public static <T> List<T> asList(T... a) { return new ArrayList<>(a); } a）Arrays.asL
Spring Security（10）——退出登录logout 234390216 logout Spring Security 退出登录 logout-url LogoutFilter
要实现退出登录的功能我们需要在http元素下定义logout元素，这样Spring Security将自动为我们添加用于处理退出登录的过滤器LogoutFilter到FilterChain。当我们指定了http元素的auto-config属性为true时logout定义是会自动配置的，此时我们默认退出登录的URL为“/j_spring_secu
透过源码学前端之 Backbone 三 Model 逐行分析JS源代码 backbone 源码分析 js学习
Backbone 分析第三部分 Model 概述： Model 提供了数据存储，将数据以JSON的形式保存在 Model的 attributes里，但重点功能在于其提供了一套功能强大，使用简单的存、取、删、改数据方法，并在不同的操作里加了相应的监听事件，如每次修改添加里都会触发 change，这在据模型变动来修改视图时很常用，并且与collection建立了关联。
SpringMVC源码总结（七）mvc:annotation-driven中的HttpMessageConverter 乒乓狂魔 springMVC
这一篇文章主要介绍下HttpMessageConverter整个注册过程包含自定义的HttpMessageConverter，然后对一些HttpMessageConverter进行具体介绍。 HttpMessageConverter接口介绍： public interface HttpMessageConverter<T> { /** * Indicate
分布式基础知识和算法理论 bluky999 算法 zookeeper 分布式一致性哈希 paxos
分布式基础知识和算法理论 BY [email protected] 本文永久链接：http://nodex.iteye.com/blog/2103218 在大数据的背景下，不管是做存储，做搜索，做数据分析，或者做产品或服务本身，面向互联网和移动互联网用户，已经不可避免地要面对分布式环境。笔者在此收录一些分布式相关的基础知识和算法理论介绍，在完善自我知识体系的同
Android Studio的.gitignore以及gitignore无效的解决 bell0901 android gitignore
　　github上.gitignore模板合集，里面有各种.gitignore ： https://github.com/github/gitignore 　　自己用的Android Studio下项目的.gitignore文件，对github上的android.gitignore添加了　　　　　　# OSX files　　　　　　//mac os下　　　　　　.DS_Store
成为高级程序员的10个步骤 tomcat_oracle 编程
What 软件工程师的职业生涯要历经以下几个阶段：初级、中级，最后才是高级。这篇文章主要是讲如何通过 10 个步骤助你成为一名高级软件工程师。 Why 得到更多的报酬！因为你的薪水会随着你水平的提高而增加提升你的职业生涯。成为了高级软件工程师之后，就可以朝着架构师、团队负责人、CTO 等职位前进历经更大的挑战。随着你的成长，各种影响力也会提高。
mongdb在linux下的安装 xtuhcy mongodb linux
一、查询linux版本号： lsb_release -a LSB Version: :base-4.0-amd64:base-4.0-noarch:core-4.0-amd64:core-4.0-noarch:graphics-4.0-amd64:graphics-4.0-noarch:printing-4.0-amd64:printing-4.0-noa