一般HIDL服务的调用者(client)和其是不在同一个进程中(process)中的,HIDL service一般提供的是硬件功能,而调用者(client)则是基于此硬件功能来实现特色功能的。此处假设HIDL-light service只提供控制具体led的开和关的硬件功能,client 则是实现led每1秒进行闪烁的特色功能。从上面的假设可知client需要连续调用HIDL-light service所提供的led控制接口,并且其间隔为1秒。如果HIDL-light service意外退出了,那么client也就无法实现该特色功能了,因此在client中是需要知道HIDL-light service的运行状态的。在HIDL框架中,像client这种常驻的调用者会注册死亡接收器(Death recipients),来解释该状态的。此处使用serviceModelClient作为该场景的实例。
flagstaff@flagstaff-pc:~/aosp_r.lns/test/flagstaffTest$ cat hardware/interfaces/custom_hardware/1.0/serviceModelClient/Android.bp
cc_binary {
name: "serviceModelClient",
vendor: true,
srcs: [
"*.cpp",
"src/*.cpp",
],
shared_libs: [
...
"[email protected]",
],
cppflags:[
"-DLOG_TAG=\"serviceModelClient\"",
],
}
属于c语言可执行程序,所以使用cc_binary进行编译,和HIDL-service的实现一致。
在CPP端的类则是 hidl_death_recipient,其内部仅仅包含一个接口 serviceDied,client在实现并且注册到HIDL-service后,在HIDL-service死亡后该实现则会被回调,其定义如下
namespace hardware {
...
//file:system\libhidl\base\include\hidl\HidlSupport.h
// hidl_death_recipient is a callback interfaced that can be used with
// linkToDeath() / unlinkToDeath()
struct hidl_death_recipient : public virtual RefBase {
virtual void serviceDied(uint64_t cookie,
const ::android::wp<::android::hidl::base::V1_0::IBase>& who) = 0;
};
..
}
下面则是在 serviceModelClient中对该接口的实现
//file:test\flagstaffTest\hardware\interfaces\custom_hardware\1.0\serviceModelClient\serviceModelClient.cpp
static sp<hidl_death_recipient> mChd = nullptr;
static android::sp<ICustomHardware> mService = nullptr;
class CustomHardwareDeath : public hidl_death_recipient {
private:
int mDeathCount = 1;
public:
void serviceDied(uint64_t cookie, const wp<IBase>& who) override {
mService = ICustomHardware::getService();
Return<bool> ret = mService->linkToDeath(mChd, mDeathCount++);
}
};
serviceModelClient 在接收到HIDL-service的死亡通知后,做如下3件事情
a)重新获取 ICustomHardware服务。
b)重新注册 ICustomHardware服务的死亡接收器。
c)serviceModelClient内部的标志置位,由于该为测试程序所以没有标志需要重置。
//file:test\flagstaffTest\hardware\interfaces\custom_hardware\1.0\serviceModelClient\serviceModelClient.cpp
static sp<hidl_death_recipient> mChd = nullptr;
static android::sp<ICustomHardware> mService = nullptr;
...
int main(int /* argc */, char** /* argv */) {
...
android::sp<ICustomHardware> mService = ICustomHardware::getService();
if (mService == nullptr) {
LOG(ERROR)<<"Failed to get ICustomHardware instance of default";
return -1;
}
mChd = new CustomHardwareDeath();
Return<bool> ret = mService->linkToDeath(mChd, 0);
joinRpcThreadpool();
/* The following code is an example for unlinkToDeath only. Reaching here in abnormal.*/
mService->unlinkToDeath(mChd);
return 1;
}
实现步骤如下
a)获取ICustomHardware服务。
b)实例化 CustomHardwareDeath。
c)调用HIDL 接口linkToDeath注册CustomHardwareDeath。一个死亡接收器是支持处理多个HIDL-service的,其中cookie则是用来区分HIDL-service的,此处则用来计数死亡次数。
d)在client退出后,则要主动调用接口unlinkToDeath来释放之前注册的死亡回调。
generic_x86_64:/ # killall flagstaff.hardware.custom_hardware@1.0-service
02-05 18:08:57.245 2112 2112 E serviceModelClient: CustomHardwareDeath:[cookie]0
generic_x86_64:/ # killall flagstaff.hardware.custom_hardware@1.0-service
02-05 18:08:59.371 2112 2112 E serviceModelClient: CustomHardwareDeath:[cookie]1
generic_x86_64:/ # killall flagstaff.hardware.custom_hardware@1.0-service
02-05 18:09:02.917 2112 2112 E serviceModelClient: CustomHardwareDeath:[cookie]2
从上面实验结果可见在每一次HIDL-service死亡后,client中会收到相应的通知,并且试图恢复。
serviceModelClient source code
https://gitee.com/solo-king/android-rhidl-about/tree/master/hardware/interfaces/custom_hardware/1.0/serviceModelClient
另外如果有问题,欢迎留言或者email([email protected])我,技术升级在于交流~~