1,先看api
引用
Method#proc
meth.to_proc => prc
Returns a Proc object corresponding to this method.
prc.to_proc → prc
Part of the protocol for converting objects to Proc objects. Instances of class Proc simply return themselves.
2,to_proc经常和&一起使用.
可以把block传递给带block的方法.block的to_proc返回的就是本身.
如果对象自带to_proc方法的话,就可以把它当作带"&"的参数传给带block方法(默认状态下,Proc、Method对象都有to_proc方法)。方法调用时会执行to_proc,它将返回Proc对象.
pobj = lambda {|v| p v }
[1,2,3].each(&pobj)
=> 1
2
3
class Foo
def to_proc
lambda {|v| p v}
end
end
[1,2,3].each(&Foo.new)
=> 1
2
3
class Symbol
def to_proc
proc { |obj, *args| obj.send(self, *args) }
end
end
projects.collect(&:name)
[1, 2, 3].map(&:to_s.to_proc) #=> ["1", "2", "3"]
class Person < ActiveRecord::Base; end;
[{:name => 'Dan'}, {:name => 'Josh'}].map(&Person.method(:new))
class Class
def to_proc
proc(&method(:new))
end
end
[{:name => 'Dan'}, {:name => 'Josh'}].map(&Person)
3,to_proc和method_missing
module Kernel
protected
def it() It.new end
alias its it
end
class It
undef_method(*(instance_methods - %w*__id__ __send__*))
def initialize
@methods = []
end
def method_missing(*args, &block)
@methods << [args, block] unless args == [:respond_to?, :to_proc]
self
end
def to_proc
lambda do |obj|
@methods.inject(obj) do |current,(args,block)|
current.send(*args, &block)
end
end
end
end
File.read("/etc/passwd").split.sort_by &it.split(":")[2]
User.find(:all).map &its.contacts.map(&its.last_name.capitalize)
4,Going crazy
可以让&使用多个参数,更性感。
What I always regretted though was not being to pass any arguments, so I hacked and monkeypatched a bit, and got:
class Symbol
def with(*args, &block)
@proc_arguments = { :args => args, :block => block }
self
end
def to_proc
@proc_arguments ||= {}
args = @proc_arguments[:args] || []
block = @proc_arguments[:block]
@proc_arguments = nil
Proc.new { |obj, *other| obj.send(self, *(other + args), &block) }
end
end
#So you can now write:
some_dates.map(&:strftime.with("%d-%M-%Y"))
Not that this is any shorter than just creating the darn block in the first place. But hey, it’s a good exercise in metaprogramming and show of more of Ruby’s awesome flexibility.
After this I remembered something similar that annoyed me before. It’s that Rails helper methods are just a bag of methods available to, because they are mixed in your template. So if you have an array of numbers that you want to format as currency, you’d have to do:
<%= @prices.map { |price| number_to_currency(price) }.to_sentence %>
What if I could apply some to_proc-love to that too? All these helper methods cannot be added to strings, fixnums, and the likes; that would clutter way to much. Rather, it might by a nice idea to use procs that understands helper methods. Here is what I created:
module ProcProxyHelper
def it(position = 1)
ProcProxy.new(self, position)
end
class ProcProxy
instance_methods.each { |m| undef_method(m) unless m.to_s =~ /^__|respond_to\?|method_missing/ }
def initialize(object, position = 1)
@object, @position = object, position
end
def to_proc
raise "Please specify a method to be called on the object" unless @delegation
Proc.new { |*values| @object.__send__(*@delegation[:args].dup.insert(@position, *values), &@delegation[:block]) }
end
def method_missing(*args, &block)
@delegation = { :args => args, :block => block }
self
end
end
end
I used a clean blank class (in Ruby 1.9, you’d want to inherit it from BasicObject), in which I will provide the proper proc-object. I play around with the argument list a bit, handling multiple arguments and blocks too. You can now use this syntax:
<%= @prices.map(&it.number_to_currency).to_sentence %>
That is a lot sexier if you as me. And you can use it in any object, not just inside views. And lets add some extra arguments and some Enumerator-love too:
class SomeClass
include ProcProxyHelper
def initialize(name, list)
@name, @list = name, list
end
def apply(value, index, seperator)
"#{@name}, #{index} #{separator} #{value}"
end
def applied_list
@list.map.with_index(&it.apply(":"))
end
end
In case you are wondering, the position you can specify is to tell where the arguments need to go. Position 0 is the method name, so you shouldn’t use that, but any other value is okay. An example might be that you cant to wrap an array of texts into span-tags:
<%= some_texts.map(&it(2).content_tag(:span, :class => "foo")).to_sentence %>
So there you have it. I’m probably solving a problem that doesn’t exist. It is however a nice example of the awesome power of Ruby. I hope you’ve enjoyed this little demonstration of the possible uses of to_proc.
最后的一部分来自于http://iain.nl/2010/02/going-crazy-with-to_proc/