Google test代码的编译很简单,那么,我们应该如何使用googletest来写单元测试呢?例如,要测一个函数,有哪些步骤?
The following text is extracted from ../samples/sample1_unittest.cc
// This sample shows how to write a simple unit test for a function,
// using Google C++ testing framework.
//
// Writing a unit test using Google C++ testing framework is easy as 1-2-3:
// Step 1. Include necessary header files such that the stuff your
// test logic needs is declared.
//
// Don't forget gtest.h, which declares the testing framework.
#include
#include "sample1.h"
#include
// Step 2. Use the TEST macro to define your tests.
//
// TEST has two parameters: the test case name and the test name.
// After using the macro, you should define your test logic between a
// pair of braces. You can use a bunch of macros to indicate the
// success or failure of a test. EXPECT_TRUE and EXPECT_EQ are
// examples of such macros. For a complete list, see gtest.h.
//
//
//
// In Google Test, tests are grouped into test cases. This is how we
// keep test code organized. You should put logically related tests
// into the same test case.
//
// The test case name and the test name should both be valid C++
// identifiers. And you should not use underscore (_) in the names.
//
// Google Test guarantees that each test you define is run exactly
// once, but it makes no guarantee on the order the tests are
// executed. Therefore, you should write your tests in such a way
// that their results don't depend on their order.
//
//
Summary : 3 个步骤// Step 3. Call RUN_ALL_TESTS() in main().
//
// We do this by linking in src/gtest_main.cc file, which consists of
// a main() function which calls RUN_ALL_TESTS() for us.
//
// This runs all the tests you've defined, prints the result, and
// returns 0 if successful, or 1 otherwise.
//
// Did you notice that we didn't register the tests? The
// RUN_ALL_TESTS() macro magically knows about all the tests we
// defined. Isn't this convenient?
Reference
http://code.google.com/p/googletest
http://www.cppprog.com/2009/0105/38.html
http://www.cnblogs.com/coderzh/archive/2009/04/06/1426755.html