记一次传递文件句柄引发的血案 （续）

继 记一次传递文件句柄引发的血案 之后，这个 demo 又引发了一次血案，现录如下。

这次我是在 linux 上测试文件句柄的传递，linux 上并没有 STREAMS 系统，

因此是采用 unix domain socket 的 sendmsg/recvmsg 中控制消息部分来传递句柄的。

代码的主要修改部分集中于发送 fd 与接收 fd 处，一开始代码是这样的，运行良好。

spipe_fd.c

  1 #define MAXLINE 128
  2 #define RIGHTSLEN CMSG_LEN(sizeof(int))
  3 #define CREDSLEN CMSG_LEN(sizeof(struct CREDSTRUCT))
  4 #define CONTROLLEN (RIGHTSLEN+CREDSLEN)
  5 
  6 int send_fd (int fd, int fd_to_send)
  7 {
  8     struct iovec iov[1]; 
  9     struct msghdr msg; 
 10     struct cmsghdr *cmptr = NULL; 
 11     char buf[2]; 
 12 
 13     iov[0].iov_base = buf; 
 14     iov[0].iov_len = 2; 
 15 
 16     msg.msg_iov = iov; 
 17     msg.msg_iovlen = 1; 
 18     msg.msg_name = NULL; 
 19     msg.msg_namelen = 0; 
 20     msg.msg_flags = 0; 
 21 
 22     if (fd_to_send < 0) {
 23         msg.msg_control = NULL; 
 24         msg.msg_controllen = 0; 
 25         buf[1] = -fd_to_send; 
 26         if (buf[1] == 0)
 27             buf[1] = 1; 
 28     } else {
 29         if ((cmptr = malloc(CONTROLLEN)) == NULL) {
 30             fprintf (stderr, "malloc memory failed\n"); 
 31             return -1; 
 32         }
 33 
 34         msg.msg_control = cmptr; 
 35         msg.msg_controllen = CONTROLLEN; 
 36 
 37         cmptr->cmsg_level = SOL_SOCKET; 
 38         cmptr->cmsg_type = SCM_RIGHTS; 
 39         cmptr->cmsg_len = CONTROLLEN; 
 40 
 41         *(int *) CMSG_DATA(cmptr) = fd_to_send; 
 42         buf[1] = 0; 
 43     }
 44 
 45     buf[0] = 0; 
 46     if (sendmsg(fd, &msg, 0) != 2) {
 47         free (cmptr); 
 48         return -1; 
 49     }
 50 
 51     free (cmptr); 
 52     return 0; 
 53 }

 

以上是发送句柄部分，重点位于 37-39 行，设置了控制消息的类型与句柄的值。

sendmsg 中的数据消息部分，用来兼容出错的场景（出错时可以提供一个-1~-255的错误码，及一段描述信息），关键信息位于控制部分。

下面来看消息的接收：

 1 int recv_fd (int fd, uid_t *uidptr, ssize_t (*userfunc) (int, const void*, size_t))
 2 {
 3     struct cmsghdr *cmptr = NULL; 
 4     int newfd, nr, status; 
 5     char *ptr; 
 6     char buf[MAXLINE]; 
 7     struct iovec iov[1]; 
 8     struct msghdr msg; 
 9 
10     status = -1; 
11     newfd = -1; 
12 
13     for (;;) {
14         iov[0].iov_base = buf; 
15         iov[0].iov_len = sizeof (buf); 
16 
17         msg.msg_iov = iov; 
18         msg.msg_iovlen = 1; 
19         msg.msg_name = NULL; 
20         msg.msg_namelen = 0; 
21 
22         if ((cmptr = malloc (CONTROLLEN)) == NULL) {
23             fprintf (stderr, "malloc error\n"); 
24             return -1; 
25         }
26 
27         msg.msg_control = cmptr; 
28         msg.msg_controllen = CONTROLLEN; 
29 
30         if ((nr = recvmsg (fd, &msg, 0)) < 0) { 
31             fprintf (stderr, "recvmsg error\n"); 
32             free (cmptr); 
33             return -1; 
34         } else if (nr == 0) {
35             fprintf (stderr, "connection closed by server\n"); 
36             free (cmptr); 
37             return -1; 
38         }
39 
40         for (ptr = buf; ptr < &buf[nr]; ) {
41             if (*ptr ++ == 0) {
42                 if (ptr != &buf[nr-1]) {
43                     fprintf (stderr, "message format error"); 
44                     free (cmptr); 
45                     return -1; 
46                 }
47 
48                 status = *ptr & 0xff; 
49                 if (status == 0) {
50                     if (msg.msg_controllen != CONTROLLEN) { 
51                         fprintf (stderr, "status = 0 but no fd\n"); 
52                         free (cmptr); 
53                         return -1; 
54                     }
55 
56                     newfd = *(int *) CMSG_DATA(cmptr); 
57                 } else { 
58                     newfd = -status; 
59                 }
60 
61                 nr -= 2; 
62             }
63         }
64 
65         free(cmptr); 
66         if (nr > 0 && (*userfunc)(STDERR_FILENO, buf, nr) != nr)
67             return -1; 
68 
69         if (status >= 0)
70             return newfd; 
71     }
72 
73     return -1; 
74 }

 

接收部分的重点位于 56 行，这里取得了对方传递过来的文件句柄（注意不是简单的值传递！参考上篇文章）

其它一些代码则用来处理出错信息，当出现错误时，调用 userfunc 打印错误信息 (用户一般传递 write) 。

另外接口中 uidptr 参数并没有用，这个是为将来扩展预留的。

 

使用之前的 demo （spipe_server.c / spipe_client.c）编译、运行，输出结果如下：

./spipe_server ./spipe_client
create pipe 3.4
3 7
create temp file /tmp/outliqA3i with fd 4
seek to head
send fd 4 to peer
recv fd 3, position 0
create temp file /tmp/inaLr30i with fd 4
source: 3 7

seek to head
send fd 4
recv fd 5 from peer, position 0
10

 

可以看到通过新的方式传递的文件句柄值也发生了变化（从 4 变为 3），且也需要对文件偏移进行重置，否则还会掉到之前文章说的那个坑里。

 

问题出现在增加一些代码来传递发送进程凭证（如uid）时，此时发送方需要传递两个控制子消息（分别表示句柄与凭证），接收方也需要处理两个子消息。

新的发送代码如下：

 1 #define MAXLINE 128
 2 #if defined(SCM_CREDS) // on BSD
 3 #define CREDSTRUCT cmsgcred
 4 #define CR_UID cmcred_uid
 5 #define CREDOPT LOCAL_PEERCRED
 6 #define SCM_CREDTYPE SCM_CREDS
 7 #elif defined(SCM_CREDENTIALS)  // on linux
 8 #define CREDSTRUCT ucred
 9 #define CR_UID uid
10 #define CREDOPT SO_PASSCRED
11 #define SCM_CREDTYPE SCM_CREDENTIALS
12 #else
13 #error passing credentials is unsupported!
14 #endif
15 
16 #define RIGHTSLEN CMSG_LEN(sizeof(int))
17 #define CREDSLEN CMSG_LEN(sizeof(struct CREDSTRUCT))
18 #define CONTROLLEN (RIGHTSLEN+CREDSLEN)
19 
20 
21 int send_fd (int fd, int fd_to_send)
22 {
23     struct iovec iov[1]; 
24     struct msghdr msg; 
25     struct cmsghdr *cmptr = NULL; 
26     char buf[2]; 
27     struct CREDSTRUCT *credp; 
28     struct cmsghdr *cmp; 
29 
30     iov[0].iov_base = buf; 
31     iov[0].iov_len = 2; 
32 
33     msg.msg_iov = iov; 
34     msg.msg_iovlen = 1; 
35     msg.msg_name = NULL; 
36     msg.msg_namelen = 0; 
37     msg.msg_flags = 0; 
38 
39     if (fd_to_send < 0) {
40         msg.msg_control = NULL; 
41         msg.msg_controllen = 0; 
42         buf[1] = -fd_to_send; 
43         if (buf[1] == 0)
44             buf[1] = 1; 
45     } else {
46         if ((cmptr = malloc(CONTROLLEN)) == NULL) {
47             fprintf (stderr, "malloc memory failed\n"); 
48             return -1; 
49         }
50 
51         msg.msg_control = cmptr; 
52         msg.msg_controllen = CONTROLLEN; 
53 
54         cmp = cmptr; 
55         cmp->cmsg_level = SOL_SOCKET; 
56         cmp->cmsg_type = SCM_RIGHTS; 
57         cmp->cmsg_len = RIGHTSLEN; 
58         *(int *) CMSG_DATA(cmp) = fd_to_send; 
59 
60         cmp = CMSG_NXTHDR(&msg, cmp); 
61         cmp->cmsg_level = SOL_SOCKET; 
62         cmp->cmsg_type = SCM_CREDTYPE; 
63         cmp->cmsg_len = CREDSLEN; 
64         credp = (struct CREDSTRUCT *) CMSG_DATA(cmp); 
65 
66 #  if defined(SCM_CREDENTIALS)
67         // only linux need to set members of this struct !
68         credp->uid = getuid (); 
69         credp->gid = getegid (); 
70         credp->pid = getpid (); 
71 #  endif
72         buf[1] = 0; 
73     }
74 
75     buf[0] = 0; 
76     if (sendmsg(fd, &msg, 0) != 2) {
77         free (cmptr); 
78         return -1; 
79     }
80 
81     free (cmptr); 
82     return 0; 
83 }

 

最开始的一些宏定义，是用来区分 linux 与 bsd 上一些细节，重点在 55-64 行，这两段代码分别设置了句柄与凭证。

然后控制消息的大小 CONTROLLEN 由两部分消息的长度（RIGHTSLEN 与 CREDSLEN）累加得到，分配的内存也是这么大。

再来看接收部分：

  1 int recv_fd (int fd, uid_t *uidptr, ssize_t (*userfunc) (int, const void*, size_t))
  2 {
  3     struct cmsghdr *cmptr = NULL; 
  4 
  5     int newfd, nr, status; 
  6     char *ptr; 
  7     char buf[MAXLINE]; 
  8     struct iovec iov[1]; 
  9     struct msghdr msg; 
 10 
 11     status = -1; 
 12     newfd = -1; 
 13 
 14     const int on = -1; 
 15     struct cmsghdr *cmp; 
 16     struct CREDSTRUCT *credp; 
 17     if (setsockopt (fd, SOL_SOCKET, CREDOPT, &on, sizeof(int)) < 0) {
 18         fprintf (stderr, "setsockopt for %d failed\n", CREDOPT); 
 19         return -1; 
 20     }
 21 
 22     for (;;) {
 23         iov[0].iov_base = buf; 
 24         iov[0].iov_len = sizeof (buf); 
 25 
 26         msg.msg_iov = iov; 
 27         msg.msg_iovlen = 1; 
 28         msg.msg_name = NULL; 
 29         msg.msg_namelen = 0; 
 30 
 31         if ((cmptr = malloc (CONTROLLEN)) == NULL) {
 32             fprintf (stderr, "malloc error\n"); 
 33             return -1; 
 34         }
 35 
 36         msg.msg_control = cmptr; 
 37         msg.msg_controllen = CONTROLLEN; 
 38 
 39         if ((nr = recvmsg (fd, &msg, 0)) < 0) { 
 40             fprintf (stderr, "recvmsg error\n"); 
 41             free (cmptr); 
 42             return -1; 
 43         } else if (nr == 0) {
 44             fprintf (stderr, "connection closed by server\n"); 
 45             free (cmptr); 
 46             return -1; 
 47         }
 48 
 49         for (ptr = buf; ptr < &buf[nr]; ) {
 50             if (*ptr ++ == 0) {
 51                 if (ptr != &buf[nr-1]) {
 52                     fprintf (stderr, "message format error"); 
 53                     free (cmptr); 
 54                     return -1; 
 55                 }
 56 
 57                 status = *ptr & 0xff; 
 58                 if (status == 0) {
 59                     if (msg.msg_controllen != CONTROLLEN) { 
 60                         fprintf (stderr, "status = 0 but no fd\n"); 
 61                         free (cmptr); 
 62                         return -1; 
 63                     }
 64 
 65                     for (cmp = CMSG_FIRSTHDR(&msg); cmp != NULL; cmp = CMSG_NXTHDR(&msg, cmp)) { 
 66                         if (cmp->cmsg_level != SOL_SOCKET) {
 67                             fprintf (stderr, "ignore unknown socket level %d\n", cmp->cmsg_level); 
 68                             continue; 
 69                         }
 70 
 71                         switch (cmp->cmsg_type) {
 72                             case SCM_RIGHTS:
 73                                 newfd = *(int *) CMSG_DATA(cmp); 
 74                                 break; 
 75                             case SCM_CREDTYPE:
 76                                 credp = (struct CREDSTRUCT *) CMSG_DATA(cmp); 
 77                                 *uidptr = credp->CR_UID; 
 78                                 break; 
 79                             default:
 80                                 fprintf (stderr, "ignore unknown msg type %d\n", cmp->cmsg_type); 
 81                                 break; 
 82                         }
 83                     }
 84                 } else { 
 85                     newfd = -status; 
 86                 }
 87 
 88                 nr -= 2; 
 89             }
 90         }
 91 
 92         free(cmptr); 
 93         if (nr > 0 && (*userfunc)(STDERR_FILENO, buf, nr) != nr)
 94             return -1; 
 95 
 96         if (status >= 0)
 97             return newfd; 
 98     }
 99 
100     return -1; 
101 }

 

重点分为两个部分：

14-20 行，设置 unix domain socket 可以接收凭证信息；

65-83 行，分别读取控制消息中的句柄与凭证信息，这里我们取了发送进程的 uid 信息作为凭证返回给上层调用者；

与发送消息类似，这里使用系统提供的 CMSG_FIRSTHDR、CMSG_NXTHDR 在控制消息中遍历各个子部分。

 

重新编译、运行 demo，却发现出错了：

./spipe_server ./spipe_client
create pipe 3.4
3 7
create temp file /tmp/outgQY1Y4 with fd 4
seek to head
send fd 4 to peer
recv fd 3, uid 500, position 0
create temp file /tmp/invVgKW4 with fd 4
source: 3 7

seek to head
connection closed by server
recv fd from peer failed, error -1

 

从输出日志看，第一次从 server 发往 client 的句柄及凭证是可以的（line 7），再之后 client 处理完消息回传时，就出错了。

首先定位出错代码位置，在 client 回传这里 (send_fd)，加入一些日志：

 

 1         if ((cmptr = malloc(CONTROLLEN)) == NULL) {
 2             fprintf (stderr, "malloc memory failed\n"); 
 3             return -1; 
 4         }
 5 
 6         msg.msg_control = cmptr; 
 7         msg.msg_controllen = CONTROLLEN; 
 8 
 9         cmp = cmptr; 
10         cmp->cmsg_level = SOL_SOCKET; 
11         cmp->cmsg_type = SCM_RIGHTS; 
12         cmp->cmsg_len = RIGHTSLEN; 
13         *(int *) CMSG_DATA(cmp) = fd_to_send; 
14         fprintf (stderr, "add fd with len %d\n", RIGHTSLEN); 
15 
16         cmp = CMSG_NXTHDR(&msg, cmp); 
17         cmp->cmsg_level = SOL_SOCKET; 
18         cmp->cmsg_type = SCM_CREDTYPE; 
19         cmp->cmsg_len = CREDSLEN; 
20         credp = (struct CREDSTRUCT *) CMSG_DATA(cmp); 
21         fprintf (stderr, "add credential with len %d\n", CREDSLEN); 
22 
23 #  if defined(SCM_CREDENTIALS)
24         // only linux need to set members of this struct !
25         credp->uid = getuid (); 
26         credp->gid = getegid (); 
27         credp->pid = getpid (); 
28         fprintf (stderr, "set uid %d, gid %d, pid %d\n", credp->uid, credp->gid, credp->pid);
29 #  endif
30         buf[1] = 0; 

 

标黄的是新加入的输出日志，再次编译运行：

./spipe_server ./spipe_client
create pipe 3.4
3 7
create temp file /tmp/outivt2Og with fd 4
seek to head
add fd with len 16
add credential with len 24
set uid 500, gid 500, pid 12071
send fd 4 to peer
recv fd 3, uid 500, position 0
create temp file /tmp/inHqRwMg with fd 4
source: 3 7

seek to head
add fd with len 16
connection closed by server
recv fd from peer failed, error -1

 

可以看到，第一次传递时，这三条日志全都正确输出了，而回传时，只输出了第一条日志。

所以明显是在第一条日志与第二条日志之间的代码出了问题。左看右看，看不出这块有什么问题，难道系统提供的 CMSG_NXTHDR 会出错?

这边再加两条日志：

 1         if ((cmptr = malloc(CONTROLLEN)) == NULL) {
 2             fprintf (stderr, "malloc memory failed\n"); 
 3             return -1; 
 4         }
 5 
 6         msg.msg_control = cmptr; 
 7         msg.msg_controllen = CONTROLLEN; 
 8 
 9         cmp = cmptr; 
10         cmp->cmsg_level = SOL_SOCKET; 
11         cmp->cmsg_type = SCM_RIGHTS; 
12         cmp->cmsg_len = RIGHTSLEN; 
13         *(int *) CMSG_DATA(cmp) = fd_to_send; 
14         fprintf (stderr, "add fd with len %d\n", RIGHTSLEN); 
15         fprintf (stderr, "cmsghdr = %d, cmsglen = %d, after align = %d, control len = %d\n", sizeof(struct cmsghdr), CREDSLEN, CMSG_ALIGN(CREDSLEN), CONTROLLEN); 
16 
17         cmp = CMSG_NXTHDR(&msg, cmp); 
18         fprintf (stderr, "cmp = %p\n", cmp); 
19         cmp->cmsg_level = SOL_SOCKET; 
20         cmp->cmsg_type = SCM_CREDTYPE; 
21         cmp->cmsg_len = CREDSLEN; 
22         credp = (struct CREDSTRUCT *) CMSG_DATA(cmp); 
23         fprintf (stderr, "add credential with len %d\n", CREDSLEN); 
24 
25 #  if defined(SCM_CREDENTIALS)
26         // only linux need to set members of this struct !
27         credp->uid = getuid (); 
28         credp->gid = getegid (); 
29         credp->pid = getpid (); 
30         fprintf (stderr, "set uid %d, gid %d, pid %d\n", credp->uid, credp->gid, credp->pid);
31 #  endif
32         buf[1] = 0; 

 

第二条日志是主要怀疑的地方，看指针是否为空；第一条日志则是怀疑块大小计算有误，导致分配的内存不够大，指针递增时出现了范围错误，所以这里打印各种长度做验证。

再次运行后，又多了一些输出：

./spipe_server ./spipe_client
create pipe 3.4
3 7
create temp file /tmp/out7UgSYZ with fd 4
seek to head
add fd with len 16
cmsghdr = 12, cmsglen = 24, after align = 24, control len = 40
cmp = 0x9ded018
add credential with len 24
set uid 500, gid 500, pid 12100
send fd 4 to peer
recv fd 3, uid 500, position 0
create temp file /tmp/inC3nyWZ with fd 4
source: 3 7

seek to head
add fd with len 16
cmsghdr = 12, cmsglen = 24, after align = 24, control len = 40
cmp = (nil)
connection closed by server
recv fd from peer failed, error -1

 

神奇的地方出现了，同样的代码，相同的尺寸，第一次指针正常；第二次就为空了！

崩溃点找到了，但是还是一头雾水，看起来数据块都对齐了，计算也没毛病，难道是这个系统提供的宏 (CMSG_NXTHDR) 出问题了吗？

翻看头文件，找到这一段的定义 (我所在的系统，位于 /usr/include/bits/socket.h (L311))：

 1 __EXTERN_INLINE struct cmsghdr *
 2 __NTH (__cmsg_nxthdr (struct msghdr *__mhdr, struct cmsghdr *__cmsg))
 3 {
 4   if ((size_t) __cmsg->cmsg_len < sizeof (struct cmsghdr))
 5     /* The kernel header does this so there may be a reason.  */
 6     return 0;
 7 
 8   __cmsg = (struct cmsghdr *) ((unsigned char *) __cmsg
 9                    + CMSG_ALIGN (__cmsg->cmsg_len));
10   if ((unsigned char *) (__cmsg + 1) > ((unsigned char *) __mhdr->msg_control
11                     + __mhdr->msg_controllen)
12       || ((unsigned char *) __cmsg + CMSG_ALIGN (__cmsg->cmsg_len)
13       > ((unsigned char *) __mhdr->msg_control + __mhdr->msg_controllen)))
14     /* No more entries.  */
15     return 0;
16   return __cmsg;
17 }

 

这段 INLINE 函数主要包含三个判断，

1）子消息长度小于消息头长度，返回 null；

2）下一个子消息的消息头超出消息尾部，返回null；

3）下一个子消息的消息体超出消息尾部，返回null；

直接修改系统代码不方便，将这个函数拷贝到本地并重全名为 my_cmsg_nxthdr，在各个判断下面添加日志输出：

 1 struct cmsghdr *my_cmsg_nxthdr (struct msghdr *__mhdr, struct cmsghdr *__cmsg)
 2 {
 3   if ((size_t) __cmsg->cmsg_len < sizeof (struct cmsghdr)) {
 4     /* The kernel header does this so there may be a reason.  */
 5     fprintf (stderr, "in step1\n"); 
 6     return 0;
 7   }
 8 
 9   fprintf (stderr, "%p: cmsg_len %u, cmsg_level %d, cmsg_type %d\n", __cmsg, __cmsg->cmsg_len, __cmsg->cmsg_level, __cmsg->cmsg_type); 
10   __cmsg = (struct cmsghdr *) ((unsigned char *) __cmsg + CMSG_ALIGN (__cmsg->cmsg_len));
11   if ((unsigned char *) (__cmsg + 1) > ((unsigned char *) __mhdr->msg_control + __mhdr->msg_controllen)) {
12       fprintf (stderr, "in step2\n"); 
13       return 0; 
14   }
15 
16   fprintf (stderr, "%p: cmsg_len %u, cmsg_level %d, cmsg_type %d\n", __cmsg, __cmsg->cmsg_len, __cmsg->cmsg_level, __cmsg->cmsg_type); 
17   if (((unsigned char *) __cmsg + CMSG_ALIGN (__cmsg->cmsg_len) > ((unsigned char *) __mhdr->msg_control + __mhdr->msg_controllen))) {
18     /* No more entries.  */
19       fprintf (stderr, "in step3\n"); 
20       fprintf (stderr, "msg len %d, after align %d, msg control %d\n", __cmsg->cmsg_len, CMSG_ALIGN(__cmsg->cmsg_len), __mhdr->msg_controllen); 
21     return 0;
22   }
23 
24   fprintf (stderr, "in final step\n"); 
25   return __cmsg;
26 }

 

为了便于根据不同的判断条件输出日志，这里对判断条件进行了拆分。

再次运行 demo，输出如下：

./spipe_server ./spipe_client
create pipe 3.4
3 7
create temp file /tmp/outh7NhIs with fd 4
seek to head
add fd with len 16
cmsghdr = 12, cmsglen = 24, after align = 24, control len = 40
0x9336008: cmsg_len 16, cmsg_level 1, cmsg_type 1
0x9336018: cmsg_len 0, cmsg_level 0, cmsg_type 0
in final step
cmp = 0x9336018
add credential with len 24
set uid 500, gid 500, pid 12171
send fd 4 to peer
recv fd 3, uid 500, position 0
create temp file /tmp/inoJMmKs with fd 4
source: 3 7

seek to head
add fd with len 16
cmsghdr = 12, cmsglen = 24, after align = 24, control len = 40
0x904d008: cmsg_len 16, cmsg_level 1, cmsg_type 1
0x904d018: cmsg_len 500, cmsg_level 500, cmsg_type 16
in step3
msg len 500, after align 500, msg control 40
cmp = (nil)
connection closed by server
recv fd from peer failed, error -1

 

原来是第三个判断出现了问题(Line 24)！

消息总长度是 16 + 24 = 40，而这里的第二个子消息单个的长度达到 500，明显越界了。

但是第二个子消息的长度明明是 24 呀，哪里跑出来的 500 呢？

而且它的其它字段也明显不对，例如消息 level 也是 500，消息类型是 16 ！

 

初步可以确定是这块内存被弄乱了，而从前面打印的消息指针(0x904d008 与 0x904d018)看，分配的大小是没问题的，因此内存越界问题先排除掉；

其次是我们设置好的内容……等等……我们好像还没有设置第二个子消息的内容！！

……

垃圾数据！！

……

malloc 之后没有清空的垃圾数据！！

……

这也是第一次调用没问题而第二次掉坑里的原因，随着系统内存的分配回收而存在一定的随机性！

 

找到原因之后，修改就简单了，可以将 malloc 替换为 calloc，或者简单的加一句 memset 来清空内存：

 1         if ((cmptr = malloc(CONTROLLEN)) == NULL) {
 2             fprintf (stderr, "malloc memory failed\n"); 
 3             return -1; 
 4         }
 5 
 6         // important on linux, garbage data may mess cmsg_len fields, 
 7         // and cause CMSG_NXTHDR return null on protection.
 8         memset (cmptr, 0, CONTROLLEN); 
 9         msg.msg_control = cmptr; 
10         msg.msg_controllen = CONTROLLEN; 

 

再次运行 demo，一切正常：

./spipe_server ./spipe_client
create pipe 3.4
3 7
create temp file /tmp/outqsTYkp with fd 4
seek to head
add fd with len 16
cmsghdr = 12, cmsglen = 24, after align = 24, control len = 40
0x814c008: cmsg_len 16, cmsg_level 1, cmsg_type 1
0x814c018: cmsg_len 0, cmsg_level 0, cmsg_type 0
in final step
cmp = 0x814c018
add credential with len 24
set uid 500, gid 500, pid 12207
send fd 4 to peer
recv fd 3, uid 500, position 0
create temp file /tmp/in3ntkip with fd 4
source: 3 7

seek to head
add fd with len 16
cmsghdr = 12, cmsglen = 24, after align = 24, control len = 40
0x8389008: cmsg_len 16, cmsg_level 1, cmsg_type 1
0x8389018: cmsg_len 0, cmsg_level 0, cmsg_type 0
in final step
cmp = 0x8389018
add credential with len 24
set uid 500, gid 500, pid 12208
send fd 4
recv fd 5, uid 500 from peer, position 0
10

 

通过这次 debug，找到了经典的 APUE 例子中的一个瑕疵 (随机性比较大，大师刚好没有遇到而已，可能你的机器也不复现)。

不过回过头来看这个场景，也不能全算在 coder 身上，我感觉系统提供的这个 CMSG_NXTHDR 宏也颇成问题：

如果我调用这个之前还没有设置下一个子消息，难道还不准我使用了么? 过多的检查反而弄巧成拙，总之一句话：差评！ 哈哈~