Spring3.2 AOP 分析

2019独角兽企业重金招聘Python工程师标准>>> hot3.png

Spring3.2 AOP个人分析:

AOP, 即Aspect-Oriented-Programming, 面向切面编程, 又一Spring的核心,被广泛应用,如在Spring-tx中都有用到,其好处是实现松耦合的外围处理程序,先说些理论吧。

  • 切面(Aspect): 一种模块化机制,用来描述分散在对象,类或函数中的横切关注点,它主要用于处理一些特定功能,而并不是业务逻辑,比如,日志处理,事务处理等,既然不是业务逻辑,就应该和业务逻辑代码分开,因此比较好的解决办法就是使用切面来编程,对业务代码破坏小,而且易于单独维护。
  • 通知(Advice): 定义在目标点干什么,比如在方法调用前,方法调用后等,Spring对AOP Alliance定义的Advice接口作了自己的扩展,如图:

       Spring3.2 AOP 分析_第1张图片

         例如其中BeforeAdvice的扩展接口MethodBeforeAdvice, 及该通知会在目标对象的目标方法调用之前被调用:

public interface MethodBeforeAdvice extends BeforeAdvice {
	void before(Method method, Object[] args, Object target) throws Throwable;
}
        Spring为MethodBeforeAdvice提供了一个简单用于计数方法调用次数的实现CountingBeforeAdvice, 具体的计数实现由MethodCounter实现了:
public class CountingBeforeAdvice extends MethodCounter implements MethodBeforeAdvice {

	@Override
	public void before(Method m, Object[] args, Object target) throws Throwable {
		count(m);
	}
public class MethodCounter implements Serializable {
	private HashMap map = new HashMap();
	private int allCount;

	protected void count(Method m) {
		count(m.getName());
	}

	protected void count(String methodName) {
		Integer i = map.get(methodName);
		i = (i != null) ? new Integer(i.intValue() + 1) : new Integer(1);
		map.put(methodName, i);
		++allCount;
	}
       ...
}
  • 切入点(Pointcut): 定义通知应该作用于哪些目标方法,可以进行一些方法匹配配置,看看spring中PointCut体系:

Spring3.2 AOP 分析_第2张图片

看其中的AbstractRegexpMethodPointcut,它有一个模版方法matchesPatterns, 就是先匹配包括的方法,再匹配不包括的方法,都由子类来实现,如JdkRegexpMethodPointcut的实现。

protected boolean matchesPattern(String signatureString) {
	for (int i = 0; i < this.patterns.length; i++) {
		boolean matched = matches(signatureString, i);
		if (matched) {
			for (int j = 0; j < this.excludedPatterns.length; j++) {
				boolean excluded = matchesExclusion(signatureString, j);
				if (excluded) {
					return false;
				}
			}
			return true;
		}
	}
	return false;
}

对应JdkRegexpMethodPointcut的实现:

protected boolean matches(String pattern, int patternIndex) {
	Matcher matcher = this.compiledPatterns[patternIndex].matcher(pattern);
	return matcher.matches();
}
protected boolean matchesExclusion(String candidate, int patternIndex) {
	Matcher matcher = this.compiledExclusionPatterns[patternIndex].matcher(candidate);
	return matcher.matches();
}
  • Advisor(通知器):Advice(处理程序)和Pointcut(处理程序进入点)完成后,我们还要一个管理者来管理它们,这就是Advisor:

Spring3.2 AOP 分析_第3张图片

到此将了aop中的几个重要组件概念,接下来是如何实现aop。

这就要涉及到核心的ProxyFactoryBean了:

Spring3.2 AOP 分析_第4张图片

那么ProxyFactoryBean是怎么来产生代理对象的呢,如下:

public Object getObject() throws BeansException {
	initializeAdvisorChain(); //初始化通知链, 为Proxy代理对象配置Advisor链
	if (isSingleton()) {
		return getSingletonInstance();
	}
	else {
		if (this.targetName == null) {
			logger.warn("Using non-singleton proxies with singleton targets is often undesirable. " +
					"Enable prototype proxies by setting the 'targetName' property.");
		}
		return newPrototypeInstance();
	}
}

看看initializeAdvisorChain方法:

private synchronized void initializeAdvisorChain() throws AopConfigException, BeansException {
	if (this.advisorChainInitialized) { //如果已经初始化了,就返回
		return;
	}
	if (!ObjectUtils.isEmpty(this.interceptorNames)) { 
		...
		// Materialize interceptor chain from bean names.
		for (String name : this.interceptorNames) { //这个interceptorNames是我们xml中配置的通知器(拦截器)bean的name
			if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) {
				logger.trace("Configuring advisor or advice '" + name + "'");
			}
			if (name.endsWith(GLOBAL_SUFFIX)) {
				...
			else {
				// If we get here, we need to add a named interceptor.
				// We must check if it's a singleton or prototype.
				Object advice;
				if (this.singleton || this.beanFactory.isSingleton(name)) {
					// Add the real Advisor/Advice to the chain.
					advice = this.beanFactory.getBean(name);
				}
				else {
					// It's a prototype Advice or Advisor: replace with a prototype.
					// Avoid unnecessary creation of prototype bean just for advisor chain initialization.
					advice = new PrototypePlaceholderAdvisor(name);
				}
				addAdvisorOnChainCreation(advice, name);
			}
		}
	}
	this.advisorChainInitialized = true;
}
再看看ProxyFactoryBean怎么生成单例代理对象的:
private synchronized Object getSingletonInstance() {
	if (this.singletonInstance == null) {
		this.targetSource = freshTargetSource();
		if (this.autodetectInterfaces && getProxiedInterfaces().length == 0 && !isProxyTargetClass()) {
			// Rely on AOP infrastructure to tell us what interfaces to proxy.
			Class targetClass = getTargetClass();
			if (targetClass == null) {
				throw new FactoryBeanNotInitializedException("Cannot determine target class for proxy");
			}
			setInterfaces(ClassUtils.getAllInterfacesForClass(targetClass, this.proxyClassLoader));
		}
		// Initialize the shared singleton instance.
		super.setFrozen(this.freezeProxy);
		this.singletonInstance = getProxy(createAopProxy()); //这里就通过createAopProxy来创建我们的代理对象了
	}
	return this.singletonInstance;
}
接着看看createAopProxy(), 其默认实现是DefaultAopProxyFactory.java, 两种代理对象的实现JdkDynamicAopProxy和CglibProxy:
public AopProxy createAopProxy(AdvisedSupport config) throws AopConfigException {
	if (config.isOptimize() || config.isProxyTargetClass() || hasNoUserSuppliedProxyInterfaces(config)) {
		Class targetClass = config.getTargetClass(); // 这里获取xml中配置的目标对象
		if (targetClass == null) {
			throw new AopConfigException("TargetSource cannot determine target class: " +
					"Either an interface or a target is required for proxy creation.");
		}
		if (targetClass.isInterface()) {
			return new JdkDynamicAopProxy(config);
		}
		return CglibProxyFactory.createCglibProxy(config);
	}
	else {
		return new JdkDynamicAopProxy(config);
	}
}

JdkDynamicAopProxy是内部怎么创建代理对象的呢?

public Object getProxy(ClassLoader classLoader) {
	if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
		logger.debug("Creating JDK dynamic proxy: target source is " + this.advised.getTargetSource());
	}
	Class[] proxiedInterfaces = AopProxyUtils.completeProxiedInterfaces(this.advised);
	findDefinedEqualsAndHashCodeMethods(proxiedInterfaces);
	return Proxy.newProxyInstance(classLoader, proxiedInterfaces, this);
}

JdkDynamicAopProxy实现了JDK动态代理的标准接口InvocationHandler,当我们调用目标代理对象时会直接调用invoke方法:

public Object invoke(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args) throws Throwable {
        ...
        List chain = this.advised.getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice(method, targetClass);//获取拦截器链

	// Check whether we have any advice. If we don't, we can fallback on direct
	// reflective invocation of the target, and avoid creating a MethodInvocation.
	if (chain.isEmpty()) {
		// We can skip creating a MethodInvocation: just invoke the target directly
		// Note that the final invoker must be an InvokerInterceptor so we know it does
		// nothing but a reflective operation on the target, and no hot swapping or fancy proxying.
		retVal = AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(target, method, args); //没有拦截器就直接调用目标对象的目标方法
	} else {
		// We need to create a method invocation... //有拦截器则先处理拦截器
		invocation = new ReflectiveMethodInvocation(proxy, target, method, args, targetClass, chain);
		// Proceed to the joinpoint through the interceptor chain.
		retVal = invocation.proceed();
	}
        ...
} 真正拦截器处理就时invocation.proceed()方法了: 
   
public Object proceed() throws Throwable {
	//We start with an index of -1 and increment early.
	if (this.currentInterceptorIndex == this.interceptorsAndDynamicMethodMatchers.size() - 1) {
		return invokeJoinpoint(); //真正调用我们的目标对象的对应方法了
	}
	Object interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice =
			this.interceptorsAndDynamicMethodMatchers.get(++this.currentInterceptorIndex);
	if (interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice instanceof InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatcher) {
		// Evaluate dynamic method matcher here: static part will already have
		// been evaluated and found to match.
		InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatcher dm =
				(InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatcher) interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice;
		if (dm.methodMatcher.matches(this.method, this.targetClass, this.arguments)) {
				return dm.interceptor.invoke(this); //调用拦截器处理方法
		} else {
			// Dynamic matching failed.
			// Skip this interceptor and invoke the next in the chain.
			return proceed(); //继续处理下一个拦截器
		}
	} else {
		// It's an interceptor, so we just invoke it: The pointcut will have
		// been evaluated statically before this object was constructed.
		return ((MethodInterceptor) interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice).invoke(this);
	}
}

这就是JdkDynamicAopProxy生成目标代理对象的实现过程,那么cglib怎么实现的呢,看DynamicAdvisedIntercept的intercept方法:

public Object intercept(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args, MethodProxy methodProxy) throws Throwable {
	...
	target = getTarget();
	if (target != null) {
		targetClass = target.getClass();
	}
	List chain = this.advised.getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice(method, targetClass);
	Object retVal;
	if (chain.isEmpty() && Modifier.isPublic(method.getModifiers())) {
	    retVal = methodProxy.invoke(target, args); //没有配置拦截器
	} else {
	    // We need to create a method invocation...
	    retVal = new CglibMethodInvocation(proxy, target, method, args, targetClass, chain, methodProxy).proceed(); //拦截器链处理
	}
	retVal = processReturnType(proxy, target, method, retVal);
	return retVal;
} 
   

至此,简单讲解了Spring Aop代理对象的实现过程。

说了这么多,还是要得有个demo才行, 这里我们会对目标对象建立一条具有2个拦截器的拦截链:

  • 一个后置通知:
package org.spring.framework.learn.aop;

import java.lang.reflect.Method;
import org.springframework.aop.AfterReturningAdvice;

/**
 * 定制的后置通知,用于注入Advisor
 */
public class MyAdvice implements AfterReturningAdvice{

	@Override
	public void afterReturning(Object returnValue, Method method,
			Object[] args, Object target) throws Throwable {
		System.out.println("I am MyAdvice, invoked after target method return.");
	}
}
  • 一个普通的方法拦截器:
package org.spring.framework.learn.aop;

import org.aopalliance.intercept.MethodInterceptor;
import org.aopalliance.intercept.MethodInvocation;

/**
 * Advisor Test Class
 */
public class MyInterceptor implements MethodInterceptor {

	@Override
	public Object invoke(MethodInvocation invocation) throws Throwable {
		System.out.println("I am MyInterceptor, invoked before target method execute.");
		return invocation.proceed();
	}
}
  • 一个jdk正则表达式匹配的切入点:
package org.spring.framework.learn.aop;

import org.springframework.aop.support.JdkRegexpMethodPointcut;

/**
 * 定制的PointCut, 用于注入Advisor
 *
 */
public class MyPointCut extends JdkRegexpMethodPointcut {
	private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
}
  • 一个管理切入点和通知(拦截器)的通知器:
package org.spring.framework.learn.aop;

import org.springframework.aop.support.DefaultPointcutAdvisor;


/**
 * 定制的通知器
 */
public class MyAdvisor extends DefaultPointcutAdvisor {
	private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
	
}
  • 需要代理的目标接口及其实现:
package org.spring.framework.learn.aop;

public interface MyService {
	public void helloAop();
}
package org.spring.framework.learn.aop;

public class MyServiceImpl implements MyService{
	
	public void helloAop(){
		System.out.println("This is a target for aop handle.");
	}
}
  • 当然还有spring的配置文件aop-test.xml:




	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
		
			
		
		
		
			
		
	
	
	
	
	
		
			org.spring.framework.learn.aop.MyService
		
		
			
		
		 
		
			
				myInterceptor
				myAdvisor
			
		
	
  • 测试用例:
public class ProxyFactoryBeanTests {
	private static ClassPathXmlApplicationContext context = 
			new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("configs/aop-test.xml");
	@Test
	public void testProxyFactoryBean1(){
		MyService in = (MyService)context.getBean("myAopProxy");
		in.helloAop();
	}
}
  • 运行结果:

Spring3.2 AOP 分析_第5张图片

收工,不懂留话。

转载于:https://my.oschina.net/indestiny/blog/193690

你可能感兴趣的:(Spring3.2 AOP 分析)