手撕Jetpack组件之ViewModel

为什么要使用ViewModel?

  1. 在日常开发中,横竖屏切换是非常常见的功能,由于横竖屏切换会使得Activity重建,导致界面相关数据都会丢失。为了避免这种情况,一般会有两种做法:第一种是在AndroidManifest.xml文件中,将Activity的一个属性设置为android:configChanges="orientation|keyboardHidden|screenSize";第二种方案是使用onSaveInstanceState方法保存数据,但此方法仅适合可以序列化和反序列化的少量数据,而不适合数量可能较大的数据,如用户列表或位图。

  2. 在使用MVP架构时,当View层使用Presenter层去异步加载一个耗时任务,若在任务结果返回回来之前,界面已经被销毁,我们都需要手动判断View层的状态;若Presenter层还有持有了View层的Context,若不清理掉的话可能会造成内存泄露。

ViewModel的出现能够很优雅地解决上述两个问题。

简单用法

// 1. 创建一个继承ViewModel的类
public class MyVideoModel extends ViewModel {}
// 2. 创建一个ViewModelProvider实例
ViewModelProvider provider = new ViewModelProvider(this);
// 3. 通过provider获取MyVideoModel实例
MyVideoModel videoModel = provider.get(MyVideoModel.class);

源码分析

先来看看第2步创建ViewModelProvider时做了些什么事

public ViewModelProvider(@NonNull ViewModelStoreOwner owner) {
    this(owner.getViewModelStore(), owner instanceof HasDefaultViewModelProviderFactory
         ? ((HasDefaultViewModelProviderFactory) owner).getDefaultViewModelProviderFactory()
         : NewInstanceFactory.getInstance());
}

第一个参数调用了owner.getViewModelStore(),这个ViewModelStoreOwner是一个接口,我们继承的父类Activity--ComponentActivity实现了这个接口。

@NonNull
@Override
public ViewModelStore getViewModelStore() {
    if (getApplication() == null) {
        throw new IllegalStateException("Your activity is not yet attached to the "
                                        + "Application instance. You can't request ViewModel before onCreate call.");
    }
    if (mViewModelStore == null) {
        NonConfigurationInstances nc =
            (NonConfigurationInstances) getLastNonConfigurationInstance();
        if (nc != null) {
            // Restore the ViewModelStore from NonConfigurationInstances
            mViewModelStore = nc.viewModelStore;
        }
        if (mViewModelStore == null) {
            mViewModelStore = new ViewModelStore();
        }
    }
    return mViewModelStore;
}

当我们在自己的Activity#onCreate方法内new ViewModelProvider(this);时,这个
mViewModelStore就已经不为空了,所以直接返回。ViewModelStore就是用来保存我们自己创建的
ViewModel对象。那么它是什么时候被创建赋值的呢?在FragmentActivity#onCreate方法内调用了
mFragments.attachHost(null /*parent*/);

// FragmentActivity.java
@Override
protected void onCreate(@Nullable Bundle savedInstanceState) {
    mFragments.attachHost(null /*parent*/);
    ...
    super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
    ...
}
// FragmentController.java
public void attachHost(@Nullable Fragment parent) {
    mHost.mFragmentManager.attachController(
        mHost, mHost /*container*/, parent);
}
// FragmentManagerImpl.java
public void attachController(@NonNull FragmentHostCallback host,
                             @NonNull FragmentContainer container, @Nullable final Fragment parent) {
    ...
    // Get the FragmentManagerViewModel
    if (parent != null) {
        mNonConfig = parent.mFragmentManager.getChildNonConfig(parent);
    } else if (host instanceof ViewModelStoreOwner) {
        ViewModelStore viewModelStore = ((ViewModelStoreOwner) host).getViewModelStore();
        mNonConfig = FragmentManagerViewModel.getInstance(viewModelStore);
    } else {
        mNonConfig = new FragmentManagerViewModel(false);
    }
}

attachController方法中的parent为空,所以不会走第一个if条件;第一个参数host,它的实现类是
HostCallbacks

class HostCallbacks extends FragmentHostCallback implements
    ViewModelStoreOwner,
OnBackPressedDispatcherOwner {
    ...
    @NonNull
    @Override
    public ViewModelStore getViewModelStore() {
        return FragmentActivity.this.getViewModelStore();
    }
    ...
}

再回到ComponentActivity#getViewModelStore方法

@NonNull
@Override
public ViewModelStore getViewModelStore() {
    ...
    if (mViewModelStore == null) {
        NonConfigurationInstances nc =
            (NonConfigurationInstances) getLastNonConfigurationInstance();
        // Activity第一次启动时,得到nc为null。但是在横竖屏切换时,这个nc不为空了
        if (nc != null) {
            // Restore the ViewModelStore from NonConfigurationInstances
            // 所以这里就拿到了之前保存的ViewModelStore,也就意味着拿到之前我们的ViewModel实例。
            // 后面会继续分析到
            mViewModelStore = nc.viewModelStore;
        }
        // 执行这里
        if (mViewModelStore == null) {
            mViewModelStore = new ViewModelStore();
        }
    }
    return mViewModelStore;
}

此时再回到上面创建ViewModelProvider时的第二个参数,因为ComponentActivity并没有实现
HasDefaultViewModelProviderFactory,所以第二个参数的类型是NewInstanceFactory。第2步源码分析完成。

接下来看第3步源码实现。

@NonNull
@MainThread
public  T get(@NonNull Class modelClass) {
    String canonicalName = modelClass.getCanonicalName();
    if (canonicalName == null) {
        throw new IllegalArgumentException("Local and anonymous classes can not be ViewModels");
    }
    return get(DEFAULT_KEY + ":" + canonicalName, modelClass);
}

继续追踪get的重载函数

@NonNull
@MainThread
public  T get(@NonNull String key, @NonNull Class modelClass) {
    // 注释1
    ViewModel viewModel = mViewModelStore.get(key);

    if (modelClass.isInstance(viewModel)) {
        if (mFactory instanceof OnRequeryFactory) {
            ((OnRequeryFactory) mFactory).onRequery(viewModel);
        }
        return (T) viewModel;
    } else {
        //noinspection StatementWithEmptyBody
        if (viewModel != null) {
            // TODO: log a warning.
        }
    }
    // 注释2
    if (mFactory instanceof KeyedFactory) {
        viewModel = ((KeyedFactory) mFactory).create(key, modelClass);
    } else {
    
        // 注释3
        viewModel = mFactory.create(modelClass);
    }
    mViewModelStore.put(key, viewModel);
    return (T) viewModel;
}

方法中的key为androidx.lifecycle.ViewModelProvider.DefaultKey:xxx.xxx.MyViewModel
modelClass就是我们自己传的MyViewModel.class。注释1处代码第一次执行时肯定为空,从第2步源码分析可知mFactory的类型为NewInstanceFactory,所以会执行到第注释3。通过反射获取到我们自己的
ViewModel对象,然后将其保存到ViewModelStore中。

当因配置更新导致界面重建时如何做到保存数据的?

当界面发生横竖屏切换时,Activity会被销毁再重建,在调用onDestroy方法之前系统会调用一个方法

// Activity.java
/**
  * Called by the system, as part of destroying an
  * activity due to a configuration change, when it is known that a new
  * instance will immediately be created for the new configuration.  You
  * can return any object you like here, including the activity instance
  * itself, which can later be retrieved by calling
  * {@link #getLastNonConfigurationInstance()} in the new activity
  * instance.
  */
public Object onRetainNonConfigurationInstance() {
    return null;
}

来看看ComponentActivity中是如何将其重写的

@Override
@Nullable
public final Object onRetainNonConfigurationInstance() {
    // 这里直接返回的是null
    Object custom = onRetainCustomNonConfigurationInstance();

    ViewModelStore viewModelStore = mViewModelStore;
    // 正常情况下,此时的mViewModelStore不可能为空
    if (viewModelStore == null) {
        // No one called getViewModelStore(), so see if there was an existing
        // ViewModelStore from our last NonConfigurationInstance
        NonConfigurationInstances nc =
            (NonConfigurationInstances) getLastNonConfigurationInstance();
        if (nc != null) {
            viewModelStore = nc.viewModelStore;
        }
    }

    if (viewModelStore == null && custom == null) {
        return null;
    }

    NonConfigurationInstances nci = new NonConfigurationInstances();
    nci.custom = custom;
    nci.viewModelStore = viewModelStore;
    return nci;
}

根据代码中的注释,最终ViewModelStore对象被保存在ComponentActivity的内部类
NonConfigurationInstances对象中。这个方法是在Activity中被调用的。

// Activity.java
NonConfigurationInstances retainNonConfigurationInstances() {
    Object activity = onRetainNonConfigurationInstance();
    ...
    NonConfigurationInstances nci = new NonConfigurationInstances();
    nci.activity = activity;
    ...
    return nci;
}

ComponentActivity#NonConfigurationInstances对象赋值给了
Activity#NonConfigurationInstances对象的activity属性。而retainNonConfigurationInstances方法是在Activity执行onDestroy生命周期方法之前执行的。

// ActivityThread.java
/** Core implementation of activity destroy call. */
ActivityClientRecord performDestroyActivity(IBinder token, boolean finishing,
                                            int configChanges, boolean getNonConfigInstance, String reason) {
    ActivityClientRecord r = mActivities.get(token);
        ... 
        if (getNonConfigInstance) {
            try {
                // 将其返回给了ActivityClientRecord属性
                r.lastNonConfigurationInstances
                    = r.activity.retainNonConfigurationInstances();
            } catch (Exception e) {
                ...
            }
        }
        try {
            r.activity.mCalled = false;
            // 执行onDestroy方法
            mInstrumentation.callActivityOnDestroy(r.activity);
            ...
        } catch (Exception e) {
            ...
        }
    return r;
}

最终mViewModelStore对象被保存在ActivityClientRecord对象的
lastNonConfigurationInstances属性上。很显然,mActivities属性的生命周期与ActivityThread保持一致,那么lastNonConfigurationInstances也一样,因此不会受Activity的销毁再重建的影响。

Activity重建时,又会执行onCreate方法,此时,我们再回到getViewModelStore方法

@NonNull
@Override
public ViewModelStore getViewModelStore() {
    ...
        if (mViewModelStore == null) {
            // 会执行到这里
            NonConfigurationInstances nc =
                (NonConfigurationInstances) getLastNonConfigurationInstance();
            if (nc != null) {
                // Restore the ViewModelStore from NonConfigurationInstances
                mViewModelStore = nc.viewModelStore;
            }
            if (mViewModelStore == null) {
                mViewModelStore = new ViewModelStore();
            }
        }
    return mViewModelStore;
}


@Nullable
public Object getLastNonConfigurationInstance() {
    return mLastNonConfigurationInstances != null
        ? mLastNonConfigurationInstances.activity : null;
}

mLastNonConfigurationInstances不为空,所以直接返回它的属性activity的值。还记得这个属性保存的是什么值吗?上文已经提到过了,它就是ComponentActivityNonConfigurationInstances对象,而它的viewModelStore就保存着横竖屏销毁前的那个ViewModelStore对象,那也就意味着拿到了之前的ViewModel对象。

mLastNonConfigurationInstances这个属性是在哪里被赋值的呢?它是Activity对象在ActivityThread中被创建后,调用其attach方法时进行赋值的。上文也提到过,我们的ViewModel被保存在ViewModelStore,而ViewModelStore又被保存在CompponentActivity#NonConfigurationInstances对象的viewModelStore属性上,而这个对象又被保存到了Activity#NonConfigurationInstances对象的activity属性上,它又被保存到了ActivityThread#ActivityClientRecord对象的lastNonConfigurationInstances属性上。

你可能感兴趣的:(手撕Jetpack组件之ViewModel)