Why would Secondary sources be useful and not useful - a PEE study 为什么二级资源有用且无用 - 一项PEE研究

Why would Schindler’s List be a useful source for studying about the Holocaust?

The film ‘Schindler’s List’ would be a useful source because it would show how the person interpreted the source and their own opinion on the event.

Many secondary sources are considered to be not clear and sometimes are made up for convenience sake. But most times those parts are representations of the directors opinion and how they interpreted the information. Persona opinions and different outlooks on things are very valuable to academic writing as we can critique the information and understand the piece better.

Having different opinions on a certain event or subject will widen your field of thinking and cause you to realise new and different things. This is why a secondary source like, ‘Schindler’s List’ would be a useful source for studying about the Holocaust.

Why wouldn’t Schindler’s List be a useful source for studying about the Holocaust?

‘Schindler’s List’, a film about a German businessman during WW2 isn’t a useful source for academic information because the movie is a secondary source and because of that the primary information could be obscured for public movie entertainment or scenery violences.

Many movie producing companies restrict extremely violent material and WW2 was no exception. Most countries, including New Zealand, have set Offensive Regulation Acts for movie contents.

WW2 was an excruciating time for the Jewish religion and having modern movie directors reenact the experience would be offensive to current Jewish population and could bring back some sad memories. Some scenes of the actual event also could be tedious and consume precious time on the movie screen for the more key points of the film. Another point is that the basic moral of a movie is to entertain or inform viewers about certain events or a story.

If movie directors don’t focus on the areas rich with information or add a bit of their own flavour to it, then they have broken the basic purpose of a movie, to entertain or inform the viewers.

The film ‘Schindler’s List’ wouldn’t be a useful source for studying the Holocaust because it’s a secondary source that can be unreliable due to present day film regulations and basic movie entertainment morals.

为什么辛德勒的名单会成为研究大屠杀的有用资料来源？

电影'辛德勒的名单'将是一个有用的来源，因为它将显示该人如何解释来源和他们自己对该事件的意见。

许多二级资源被认为不清楚，有时为方便起见而编制。 但大部分时间这些部分都是董事意见的表示以及他们如何解释信息。 对于学术写作来说，角色的观点和对事物的不同看法是非常有价值的，因为我们可以批评信息并更好地理解这些信息。

对某个事件或主题有不同的意见会扩大你的思维领域，使你认识到新的和不同的事物。 这就是为什么像“辛德勒的名单”这样的二手资源将成为研究大屠杀的有用资源。

为什么辛德勒的名单不能成为研究大屠杀的有用资料来源？

“辛德勒的名单”是一部关于二战期间德国商人的电影，不是学术信息的有用来源，因为这部电影是次要来源，因此主要信息可能会因公共电影娱乐或风景暴力而模糊不清。

许多电影制作公司限制极其暴力的材料，WW2也不例外。 包括新西兰在内的大多数国家都制定了针对电影内容的进攻性规制法案。

第二次世界大战对犹太人的宗教来说是一个令人难以忍受的时刻，让现代电影导演重新演绎这种经历会使当前的犹太人口感到冒犯，并可能带回一些悲伤的回忆。 实际事件的一些场景也可能是乏味的，并且在电影屏幕上消耗宝贵的时间以获得电影的更多关键点。 另一点是，电影的基本道德是娱乐或告知观众某些事件或故事。

如果电影导演不专注于信息丰富的领域或者添加一些自己的风味，那么他们就打破了电影的基本目的，娱乐或告知观众。

电影“辛德勒的名单”不会成为研究大屠杀的有用资源，因为它是次要资源，由于现在的电影规则和基本的电影娱乐道德而不可靠。