本文由@EOSNewYork和@EOSnation共同编写，基于Block.One在5/4/18发布的最新Dawn 4.0公告。本文的内容可能会随着EOS.IO的软件的升级和开发而发生变化。
聊天记录：
Mr.Hobbes.转自RickSchlesinger-EOS New York
如果由超过100%的EOS总量去交易了RAM，产生了手续费，出块节点的成本反而有可能会变成“负值”。这样你还反而会看到系统中的节点运营成本不会产生通胀，实际上反而会产生紧缩。
Wow，对用户免费，而且还有可能成就不会造成通胀的出块节点。这该不会完全颠覆整个网络的价值观吧？其他的区块链可要注意了！
转自BM：
很惊讶居然很少有人知道这一点
MrHobbes：很精确的表述，很高兴有人确认了这一点。
边际成本
在经济学中，边际成本是生产一个单位附加的产品或服务的成本。在最新的EOS.IO版本Dawn 4.0中，Block.One已经引入了能够抵消区块生产成本的机制，且有望使得网络安全，和验证的边际成本也为零。这个重要且具说服力的解决方案不该应该让人们了解。让我们解释一下......
Marginal Costs
In
economics, marginal
costis the cost of producing one additional unit of a product orservice. In the latest EOS.IO release, Dawn 4.0, Block.One has introducedmechanisms to offset the cost of block production and trend the marginal costof securing and validating the network toward zero. This important and eloquentsolution cannot be understated. Let us explain…
今天，人们可以通过互联网发送图片，并将其传播到数百万甚至数十亿的用户。除了购买手机和流量的成本之外，发送图片大概花费了用户一美分的成本。用户可以免费的且高效地执行发送图片之类的操作。可以说这几乎就是“免费的”。
Today, one cansend a picture across the internet and have it propagate to millions, evenbillions, of users. Besides the cost of a phone and data plan purchase, the actof sending the picture costs the user fractions of one cent. The user caneffectively perform the action itself for near zero marginal cost, and we couldeven reasonably say it was “free”.
而区块链网络上的信息传输成本则不一样。因为其经济模式和驱动设计，这种成本可能会有点贵。成本通常会用增发或者是手续费的形式被补偿。这些花费，直接被转移到了用户的头上，用户没有其他选择，不得不接受。但接受他们。一些区块链的应用场景，像物联网，因为有了这些手续费而被拒之门外。
The costs oftransmitting information on blockchain networks can vary. Depending on theeconomic model and incentive structure, these costs can be relatively high.These costs, usually in the form of inflation and transaction fees, aretransferred directly onto the users who have no choice but to accept them.Blockchain use cases, like an Internet-of-Things, are rendered unobtainable bythese fees.
RAM分配模型
最近宣布的EOS.IO
Dawn 4.0描述了一种新的RAM分配模式，它引入了RAM本身成为投机工具的可能性。为了避免这种情况，Block.One要求在购买RAM的时候要征收1％的费用。请注意，这仅仅是交易RAM时产生的费用，并不等于交易手续费。 EOS上的所有交易仍然没有收费。
RAM Allocation Model
The recentannouncement of EOS.IO Dawn 4.0 describes a new RAM allocation model whichintroduces the possibility for RAM itself to be a speculative vehicle. In orderto avoid this, Block.One is imposing a 1% fee on all purchases of RAM. Pleasenote that this is a fee for trading RAM only and is not the same as a“transaction fee”. All transactions on EOS are still fee-less.
现在有了RAM市场，投机者可能会利用RAM的价格波动获取利润。 EOS.IO系统合约会让RAM不可转让，并收取1％的交易费用。这笔费用的最终结果退出市场，从而抵消增发带来的通胀。
这些令牌从市场流通中移除，并被销毁
Now that thereis a RAM market, speculators may want to trade RAM price-volatility for profit.The EOS.IO system contract makes RAM non-transferrable and charges a 1% fee ontrades. The result of this fee is to offset the natural inflation of tokens bytaking them out of the market.
These tokens are
removed from circulation and are effectively destroyed.
抵消区块生产成本
另一方面，我提供1％的代币以奖励的形式向区块生产者发放。用于公链安全的出块奖励，或任何形式的激励是必要的。如果不给网络上的验证人某种形式的激励，那么网络本身也将不复存在。尽管给用户验证区块的成本很低，但仍然是有成本。但是如果我们能够抵消这些成本呢？ RAM的1％交易费就可以去试着解决这个问题。
如过每年度交易RAM的EOS代币量累计起来相当于EOS的总量，所有超级节点的奖励将会１００％地被RAM市场的手续费所补偿。
Offsetting the Cost of Block Production
On the otherhand, we have 1% of total token supply going to block producers in the form ofrewards. The block reward, or any incentive to secure a public blockchain, is anecessity. If there isn’t some form of incentive for network validators thenthere is no network. While the cost of validating blocks to the user isminimal, they are still costs.But what if we couldoffset those costs? The 1% fee for RAM attempts to do just that.
If [the] annual trading volume of RAM equalsthe token supply then 100% of all block producer rewards will be covered by theRAM market fees.
BM在此基本上所说的是，随着RAM内存交易数量的增加，所发生的费用不仅可以等于1％的区块生产者奖励，而且可能超过它。这降低了整体通货膨胀率，随着网络的增长，区块生产的边际成本趋于零。
What Dan is
essentially saying here is that as the number of RAM trades increases, the fees
incurred could not only equal the 1% block producer reward but possibly exceed
it.This
reduces overall inflation and as the network grows, the marginal cost of block
production trends toward zero.
未知经济领土
我们从这里可以瞥见零边际成本的网络的雏形。这个伟大的EOS实验不仅仅可以为用户提供免费交易，而且还有助于推动我们对零边际成本经济学的理解。
Uncharted Economic Territory
We arewitnessing the first glimpses of what a zero marginal cost network may looklike. This great EOS experiment isn’t going to just deliver free transactionsfor its users, but it will also help propel our understanding of zero marginalcost economics.
完全披露：我们无法预测未来。我们正不断接近主网上线之日，事情正在迅速发展。我们认为这是一个优雅的经济解决方案，但实际上它可能会有很大的不同。但我们希望这种解释能够激发人们关于边际成本的讨论以及EOS如何影响人们开展商业活动的方式。
Full disclosure:
we cannot predict the future. Things are moving quickly as we approach Launch
Day. We think this is an elegant economic solution, but in practice it may
function very differently. But we hope that this explanation will help spark
conversations on the topic of marginal costs and how EOS can impact the way we
conduct commerce.
这篇文章由@EOSNation和@EOSNewYork共同撰写，并受到Telegram EOS42和@EOSVibes对话的启发，旨在了解EOS.IO Dawn 4.0新的基于市场的RAM分配模型。加入我们讨论，分享您对新经济模式的看法。
This post was
co-authored by @EOSNation and @EOSNewYork and
inspired by conversations that were held in Telegram with @EOS42 and @EOSVibesin aneffort to understand the new Market-Based RAM Allocation Model of EOS.IO Dawn4.0. Please join the discussion and let us know your thoughts on the neweconomic model.
EOSNation CEO
Yves:
我多读好几遍，对我而言最有意思的部分是，“如过每年度交易RAM的EOS代币量累计起来相当于EOS的总量，所有超级节点的奖励将会１００％被RAM市场的手续费所覆盖。”
Kyle-EOSVibes
Rick Schlesinger-EOS New York
不好意思这个问题之前有人问过了，还没看到回复
我认为1%RAM手续费抵消了1%的出块节点拿到的增发。所以如果RAM的年交易量等于EOS的总量的话，出块节点的奖励将１００％地由RAM的交易费所补偿。
交易费的基本功能就是去补偿通胀，如果我哪错了请指出来
Rick Schlesinger
DavidP-EOS42
哈哈，目前为止你是对的。
如果由超过100%的EOS总量去交易了RAM，产生了手续费，出块节点的成本反而有可能会变成“负值”。这样你还反而会看到系统中的节点运营成本不会产生通胀，实际上反而会产生紧缩。
Wow，对用户免费，而且还有可能成就不会造成通胀的出块节点。这该不会完全颠覆整个网络的价值观吧？其他的区块链可要注意了！
官方网站：eosnation.io
Official Account 微信公众号：EOSNation123
Telegram电报群：https://t.me/EOSNation
Weibo微博：https://weibo.com/Eosnation
Youku
Chanel 优酷频道：i.youku.com/eosnation
YoutubeChanel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXgAY9DyooykrubRXw3xK1g/videos
Steemit：Steemit.com/@eosnation
Github：github.com/EOS-Nation
Twitter:twitter.com/EOS_NATION