使用Spring提供的Open Session In View而引起Write operations are not allowed in read-only mode (FlushMode.NEVER) 错误解决:
在没有使用Spring提供的Open Session In View情况下,因需要在service(or Dao)层里把session关闭,所以lazy loading 为true的话,要在应用层内把关系集合都初始化,如 company.getEmployees(),否则Hibernate抛session already closed Exception; Open Session In View提供了一种简便的方法,较好地解决了lazy loading问题.
它有两种配置方式OpenSessionInViewInterceptor和OpenSessionInViewFilter(具体参看SpringSide),功能相同,只是一个在web.xml配置,另一个在application.xml配置而已。
Open Session In View在request把session绑定到当前thread期间一直保持hibernate session在open状态,使session在request的整个期间都可以使用,如在View层里PO也可以lazy loading数据,如 ${ company.employees }。当View 层逻辑完成后,才会通过Filter的doFilter方法或Interceptor的postHandle方法自动关闭session。
OpenSessionInViewInterceptor配置
<beans> <bean name="openSessionInViewInterceptor" class="org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.support.OpenSessionInViewInterceptor"> <property name="sessionFactory"> <ref bean="sessionFactory"/> </property> </bean> <bean id="urlMapping" class="org.springframework.web.servlet.handler.SimpleUrlHandlerMapping"> <property name="interceptors"> <list> <ref bean="openSessionInViewInterceptor"/> </list> </property> <property name="mappings"> ... </property> </bean> ... </beans>
OpenSessionInViewFilter配置
<web-app> ... <filter> <filter-name>hibernateFilter</filter-name> <filter-class> org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.support.OpenSessionInViewFilter </filter-class> <!-- singleSession默认为true,若设为false则等于没用OpenSessionInView --> <init-param> <param-name>singleSession</param-name> <param-value>true</param-value> </init-param> </filter> ... <filter-mapping> <filter-name>hibernateFilter</filter-name> <url-pattern>*.do</url-pattern> </filter-mapping> ... </web-app>
很多人在使用OpenSessionInView过程中提及一个错误:
org.springframework.dao.InvalidDataAccessApiUsageException: Write operations
are not allowed in read-only mode (FlushMode.NEVER) - turn your Session into
FlushMode.AUTO or remove 'readOnly' marker from transaction definition
看看OpenSessionInViewFilter里的几个方法
protected void doFilterInternal(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response,FilterChain filterChain) throws ServletException, IOException { SessionFactory sessionFactory = lookupSessionFactory(); logger.debug("Opening Hibernate Session in OpenSessionInViewFilter"); Session session = getSession(sessionFactory); TransactionSynchronizationManager.bindResource( sessionFactory, new SessionHolder(session)); try { filterChain.doFilter(request, response); } finally { TransactionSynchronizationManager.unbindResource(sessionFactory); logger.debug("Closing Hibernate Session in OpenSessionInViewFilter"); closeSession(session, sessionFactory); } } protected Session getSession(SessionFactory sessionFactory) throws DataAccessResourceFailureException { Session session = SessionFactoryUtils.getSession(sessionFactory, true); session.setFlushMode(FlushMode.NEVER); return session; } protected void closeSession(Session session, SessionFactory sessionFactory) throws CleanupFailureDataAccessException { SessionFactoryUtils.closeSessionIfNecessary(session, sessionFactory); }
可以看到OpenSessionInViewFilter在getSession的时候,会把获取回来的session的flush mode 设为FlushMode.NEVER。然后把该sessionFactory绑定到 TransactionSynchronizationManager,使request的整个过程都使用同一个session,在请求过后再接除该 sessionFactory的绑定,最后closeSessionIfNecessary根据该 session是否已和transaction绑定来决定是否关闭session。在这个过程中,若HibernateTemplate 发现自当前session有不是readOnly的transaction,就会获取到FlushMode.AUTO Session,使方法拥有写权限。
public static void closeSessionIfNecessary(Session session, SessionFactory sessionFactory) throws CleanupFailureDataAccessException { if (session == null || TransactionSynchronizationManager.hasResource(sessionFactory)) { return; } logger.debug("Closing Hibernate session"); try { session.close(); } catch (JDBCException ex) { // SQLException underneath throw new CleanupFailureDataAccessException("Could not close Hibernate session", ex.getSQLException()); } catch (HibernateException ex) { throw new CleanupFailureDataAccessException("Could not close Hibernate session", ex); } }
也即是,如果有不是readOnly的transaction就可以由Flush.NEVER转为Flush.AUTO,拥有 insert,update,delete操作权限,如果没有transaction,并且没有另外人为地设flush model的话,则doFilter的整个过程都是Flush.NEVER。所以受transaction保护的方法有写权限,没受保护的则没有。
采用spring的事务声明,使方法受transaction控制
<bean id="baseTransaction" class="org.springframework.transaction.interceptor.TransactionProxyFactoryBean" abstract="true"> <property name="transactionManager" ref="transactionManager"/> <property name="proxyTargetClass" value="true"/> <property name="transactionAttributes"> <props> <prop key="get*">PROPAGATION_REQUIRED,readOnly</prop> <prop key="find*">PROPAGATION_REQUIRED,readOnly</prop> <prop key="load*">PROPAGATION_REQUIRED,readOnly</prop> <prop key="save*">PROPAGATION_REQUIRED</prop> <prop key="add*">PROPAGATION_REQUIRED</prop> <prop key="update*">PROPAGATION_REQUIRED</prop> <prop key="remove*">PROPAGATION_REQUIRED</prop> </props> </property> </bean> <bean id="userService" parent="baseTransaction"> <property name="target"> <bean class="com.phopesoft.security.service.impl.UserServiceImpl"/> </property> </bean>
对于上例,则以save,add,update,remove开头的方法拥有可写的事务,如果当前有某个方法,如命名为importExcel(),则因没有transaction而没有写权限,这时若方法内有insert,update,delete操作的话,则需要手动设置flush model为Flush.AUTO,如
session.setFlushMode(FlushMode.AUTO);
session.save(user);
session.flush();
尽 管Open Session In View看起来还不错,其实副作用不少。看回上面OpenSessionInViewFilter的doFilterInternal方法代码,这个方法实际上是被父类的doFilter调用的,因此,我们可以大约了解的OpenSessionInViewFilter调用流程: request(请求)->open session并开始transaction->controller->View(Jsp)->结束transaction并 close session.
一切看起来很正确,尤其是在本地开发测试的时候没出现问题,但试想下如果流程中的某一步被阻塞的话,那在这期间connection就一直被占用而不释放。最有可能被阻塞的就是在写Jsp这步,一方面可能是页面内容大,response.write的时间长,另一方面可能是网速慢,服务器与用户间传输时间久。当大量这样的情况出现时,就有连接池连接不足,造成页面假死现象。
Open Session In View是个双刃剑,放在公网上内容多流量大的网站请慎用。