Storage模块整体架构
Storage模块主要分为两层:
- 通信层:storage模块采用的是master-slave结构来实现通信层,master和slave之间传输控制信息、状态信息,这些都是通过通信层来实现的。
- 存储层:storage模块需要把数据存储到disk或是memory上面,有可能还需replicate到远端,这都是由存储层来实现和提供相应接口。
而其他模块若要和storage模块进行交互,storage模块提供了统一的操作类BlockManager
,外部类与storage模块打交道都需要通过调用BlockManager
相应接口来实现。
Storage模块通信层
首先来看一下通信层的UML类图:
其次我们来看看各个类在master和slave上所扮演的不同角色:
对于master和slave,BlockManager
的创建有所不同:
-
Master (client driver)
BlockManagerMaster
拥有BlockManagerMasterActor
的actor和所有BlockManagerSlaveActor
的ref。 -
Slave (executor)
对于slave,
BlockManagerMaster
则拥有BlockManagerMasterActor
的ref和自身BlockManagerSlaveActor
的actor。
BlockManagerMasterActor
在ref和actor之间进行通信;BlockManagerSlaveActor
在ref和actor之间通信。
actor和ref:
actor和ref是Akka中的两个不同的actor reference,分别由
actorOf
和actorFor
所创建。actor类似于网络服务中的server端,它保存所有的状态信息,接收client端的请求执行并返回给客户端;ref类似于网络服务中的client端,通过向server端发起请求获取结果。
BlockManager
wrap了BlockManagerMaster
,通过BlockManagerMaster
进行通信。Spark会在client driver和executor端创建各自的BlockManager
,通过BlockManager
对storage模块进行操作。
BlockManager
对象在SparkEnv
中被创建,创建的过程如下所示:
def registerOrLookup(name:String, newActor:=>Actor):ActorRef={
if(isDriver){
logInfo("Registering "+ name)
actorSystem.actorOf(Props(newActor), name = name)
}else{
val driverHost:String=System.getProperty("spark.driver.host","localhost")
val driverPort:Int=System.getProperty("spark.driver.port","7077").toInt
Utils.checkHost(driverHost,"Expected hostname")
val url ="akka://spark@%s:%s/user/%s".format(driverHost, driverPort, name)
logInfo("Connecting to "+ name +": "+ url)
actorSystem.actorFor(url)
}
}
val blockManagerMaster =newBlockManagerMaster(registerOrLookup(
"BlockManagerMaster",
newBlockManagerMasterActor(isLocal)))
val blockManager =newBlockManager(executorId, actorSystem, blockManagerMaster, serializer)
可以看到对于client driver和executor,Spark分别创建了BlockManagerMasterActor
actor和ref,并被wrap到BlockManager
中。
通信层传递的消息
-
BlockManagerMasterActor
-
executor to client driver
RegisterBlockManager (executor创建BlockManager以后向client driver发送请求注册自身) HeartBeat UpdateBlockInfo (更新block信息) GetPeers (请求获得其他BlockManager的id) GetLocations (获取block所在的BlockManager的id) GetLocationsMultipleBlockIds (获取一组block所在的BlockManager id)
-
client driver to client driver
GetLocations (获取block所在的BlockManager的id) GetLocationsMultipleBlockIds (获取一组block所在的BlockManager id) RemoveExecutor (删除所保存的已经死亡的executor上的BlockManager) StopBlockManagerMaster (停止client driver上的BlockManagerMasterActor)
-
有些消息例如
GetLocations
在executor端和client driver端都会向actor请求,而其他的消息比如RegisterBlockManager
只会由executor端的ref向client driver端的actor发送,于此同时例如RemoveExecutor
则只会由client driver端的ref向client driver端的actor发送。具体消息是从哪里发送,哪里接收和处理请看代码细节,在这里就不再赘述了。
-
BlockManagerSlaveActor
- client driver to executor
RemoveBlock (删除block) RemoveRdd (删除RDD)
- client driver to executor
通信层中涉及许多控制消息和状态消息的传递以及处理,这些细节可以直接查看源码,这里就不在一一罗列。下面就只简单介绍一下exeuctor端的BlockManager
是如何启动以及向client driver发送注册请求完成注册。
Register BlockManager
前面已经介绍了BlockManager
对象是如何被创建出来的,当BlockManager
被创建出来以后需要向client driver注册自己,下面我们来看一下这个流程:
首先BlockManager
会调用initialize()
初始化自己
privatedef initialize(){
master.registerBlockManager(blockManagerId, maxMemory, slaveActor)
...
if(!BlockManager.getDisableHeartBeatsForTesting){
heartBeatTask = actorSystem.scheduler.schedule(0.seconds, heartBeatFrequency.milliseconds){
heartBeat()
}
}
}
在initialized()
函数中首先调用BlockManagerMaster
向client driver注册自己,同时设置heartbeat定时器,定时发送heartbeat报文。可以看到在注册自身的时候向client driver传递了自身的slaveActor
,client driver收到slaveActor
以后会将其与之对应的BlockManagerInfo
存储到hash map中,以便后续通过slaveActor
向executor发送命令。
BlockManagerMaster
会将注册请求包装成RegisterBlockManager
报文发送给client driver的BlockManagerMasterActor
,BlockManagerMasterActor
调用register()
函数注册BlockManager
:
privatedefregister(id:BlockManagerId, maxMemSize:Long, slaveActor:ActorRef){
if(id.executorId =="<driver>"&&!isLocal){
// Got a register message from the master node; don't register it
}elseif(!blockManagerInfo.contains(id)){
blockManagerIdByExecutor.get(id.executorId) match {
caseSome(manager)=>
// A block manager of the same executor already exists.
// This should never happen. Let's just quit.
logError("Got two different block manager registrations on "+ id.executorId)
System.exit(1)
caseNone=>
blockManagerIdByExecutor(id.executorId)= id
}
blockManagerInfo(id)=newBlockManagerMasterActor.BlockManagerInfo(
id,System.currentTimeMillis(), maxMemSize, slaveActor)
}
}
需要注意的是在client driver端也会执行上述过程,只是在最后注册的时候如果判断是"<driver>"
就不进行任何操作。可以看到对应的BlockManagerInfo
对象被创建并保存在hash map中。
Storage模块存储层
在RDD层面上我们了解到RDD是由不同的partition组成的,我们所进行的transformation和action是在partition上面进行的;而在storage模块内部,RDD又被视为由不同的block组成,对于RDD的存取是以block为单位进行的,本质上partition和block是等价的,只是看待的角度不同。在Spark storage模块中中存取数据的最小单位是block,所有的操作都是以block为单位进行的。
首先我们来看一下存储层的UML类图:
BlockManager
对象被创建的时候会创建出MemoryStore
和DiskStore
对象用以存取block,同时在initialize()
函数中创建BlockManagerWorker
对象用以监听远程的block存取请求来进行相应处理。
private[storage] val memoryStore:BlockStore=newMemoryStore(this, maxMemory)
private[storage] val diskStore:DiskStore=
newDiskStore(this,System.getProperty("spark.local.dir",System.getProperty("java.io.tmpdir")))
privatedef initialize(){
...
BlockManagerWorker.startBlockManagerWorker(this)
...
}
下面就具体介绍一下对于DiskStore
和MemoryStore
,block的存取操作是怎样进行的。
DiskStore如何存取block
DiskStore
可以配置多个folder,Spark会在不同的folder下面创建Spark文件夹,文件夹的命名方式为(spark-local-yyyyMMddHHmmss-xxxx, xxxx是一个随机数),所有的block都会存储在所创建的folder里面。DiskStore
会在对象被创建时调用createLocalDirs()
来创建文件夹:
privatedef createLocalDirs():Array[File]={
logDebug("Creating local directories at root dirs '"+ rootDirs +"'")
val dateFormat =newSimpleDateFormat("yyyyMMddHHmmss")
rootDirs.split(",").map { rootDir =>
var foundLocalDir =false
var localDir:File=null
var localDirId:String=null
var tries =0
val rand =newRandom()
while(!foundLocalDir && tries < MAX_DIR_CREATION_ATTEMPTS){
tries +=1
try{
localDirId ="%s-%04x".format(dateFormat.format(newDate), rand.nextInt(65536))
localDir =newFile(rootDir,"spark-local-"+ localDirId)
if(!localDir.exists){
foundLocalDir = localDir.mkdirs()
}
}catch{
case e:Exception=>
logWarning("Attempt "+ tries +" to create local dir "+ localDir +" failed", e)
}
}
if(!foundLocalDir){
logError("Failed "+ MAX_DIR_CREATION_ATTEMPTS +
" attempts to create local dir in "+ rootDir)
System.exit(ExecutorExitCode.DISK_STORE_FAILED_TO_CREATE_DIR)
}
logInfo("Created local directory at "+ localDir)
localDir
}
}
在DiskStore
里面,每一个block都被存储为一个file,通过计算block id的hash值将block映射到文件中,block id与文件路径的映射关系如下所示:
privatedef getFile(blockId:String):File={
logDebug("Getting file for block "+ blockId)
// Figure out which local directory it hashes to, and which subdirectory in that
val hash =Utils.nonNegativeHash(blockId)
val dirId = hash % localDirs.length
val subDirId =(hash / localDirs.length)% subDirsPerLocalDir
// Create the subdirectory if it doesn't already exist
var subDir = subDirs(dirId)(subDirId)
if(subDir ==null){
subDir = subDirs(dirId).synchronized{
val old = subDirs(dirId)(subDirId)
if(old !=null){
old
}else{
val newDir =newFile(localDirs(dirId),"%02x".format(subDirId))
newDir.mkdir()
subDirs(dirId)(subDirId)= newDir
newDir
}
}
}
newFile(subDir, blockId)
}
根据block id计算出hash值,将hash取模获得dirId
和subDirId
,在subDirs
中找出相应的subDir
,若没有则新建一个subDir
,最后以subDir
为路径、block id为文件名创建file handler,DiskStore
使用此file handler将block写入文件内,代码如下所示:
overridedef putBytes(blockId:String, _bytes:ByteBuffer, level:StorageLevel){
// So that we do not modify the input offsets !
// duplicate does not copy buffer, so inexpensive
val bytes = _bytes.duplicate()
logDebug("Attempting to put block "+ blockId)
val startTime =System.currentTimeMillis
val file = createFile(blockId)
val channel =newRandomAccessFile(file,"rw").getChannel()
while(bytes.remaining >0){
channel.write(bytes)
}
channel.close()
val finishTime =System.currentTimeMillis
logDebug("Block %s stored as %s file on disk in %d ms".format(
blockId,Utils.bytesToString(bytes.limit),(finishTime - startTime)))
}
而获取block则非常简单,找到相应的文件并读取出来即可:
overridedef getBytes(blockId:String):Option[ByteBuffer]={
val file = getFile(blockId)
val bytes = getFileBytes(file)
Some(bytes)
}
因此在DiskStore
中存取block首先是要将block id映射成相应的文件路径,接着存取文件就可以了。
MemoryStore如何存取block
相对于DiskStore
需要根据block id hash计算出文件路径并将block存放到对应的文件里面,MemoryStore
管理block就显得非常简单:MemoryStore
内部维护了一个hash map来管理所有的block,以block id为key将block存放到hash map中。
caseclassEntry(value:Any, size:Long, deserialized:Boolean)
private val entries =newLinkedHashMap[String,Entry](32,0.75f,true)
在MemoryStore
中存放block必须确保内存足够容纳下该block,若内存不足则会将block写到文件中,具体的代码如下所示:
overridedef putBytes(blockId:String, _bytes:ByteBuffer, level:StorageLevel){
// Work on a duplicate - since the original input might be used elsewhere.
val bytes = _bytes.duplicate()
bytes.rewind()
if(level.deserialized){
val values = blockManager.dataDeserialize(blockId, bytes)
val elements =newArrayBuffer[Any]
elements ++= values
val sizeEstimate =SizeEstimator.estimate(elements.asInstanceOf[AnyRef])
tryToPut(blockId, elements, sizeEstimate,true)
}else{
tryToPut(blockId, bytes, bytes.limit,false)
}
}
在tryToPut()
中,首先调用ensureFreeSpace()
确保空闲内存是否足以容纳block,若可以则将该block放入hash map中进行管理;若不足以容纳则通过调用dropFromMemory()
将block写入文件。
privatedef tryToPut(blockId:String, value:Any, size:Long, deserialized:Boolean):Boolean={
// TODO: Its possible to optimize the locking by locking entries only when selecting blocks
// to be dropped. Once the to-be-dropped blocks have been selected, and lock on entries has been
// released, it must be ensured that those to-be-dropped blocks are not double counted for
// freeing up more space for another block that needs to be put. Only then the actually dropping
// of blocks (and writing to disk if necessary) can proceed in parallel.
putLock.synchronized{
if(ensureFreeSpace(blockId, size)){
val entry =newEntry(value, size, deserialized)
entries.synchronized{
entries.put(blockId, entry)
currentMemory += size
}
if(deserialized){
logInfo("Block %s stored as values to memory (estimated size %s, free %s)".format(
blockId,Utils.bytesToString(size),Utils.bytesToString(freeMemory)))
}else{
logInfo("Block %s stored as bytes to memory (size %s, free %s)".format(
blockId,Utils.bytesToString(size),Utils.bytesToString(freeMemory)))
}
true
}else{
// Tell the block manager that we couldn't put it in memory so that it can drop it to
// disk if the block allows disk storage.
val data =if(deserialized){
Left(value.asInstanceOf[ArrayBuffer[Any]])
}else{
Right(value.asInstanceOf[ByteBuffer].duplicate())
}
blockManager.dropFromMemory(blockId, data)
false
}
}
}
而从MemoryStore
中取得block则非常简单,只需从hash map中取出block id对应的value即可。
overridedef getValues(blockId:String):Option[Iterator[Any]]={
val entry = entries.synchronized{
entries.get(blockId)
}
if(entry ==null){
None
}elseif(entry.deserialized){
Some(entry.value.asInstanceOf[ArrayBuffer[Any]].iterator)
}else{
val buffer = entry.value.asInstanceOf[ByteBuffer].duplicate()// Doesn't actually copy data
Some(blockManager.dataDeserialize(blockId, buffer))
}
}
Put or Get block through BlockManager
上面介绍了DiskStore
和MemoryStore
对于block的存取操作,那么我们是要直接与它们交互存取数据吗,还是封装了更抽象的接口使我们无需关心底层?
BlockManager
为我们提供了put()
和get()
函数,用户可以使用这两个函数对block进行存取而无需关心底层实现。
首先我们来看一下put()
函数的实现:
def put(blockId:String, values:ArrayBuffer[Any], level:StorageLevel,
tellMaster:Boolean=true):Long={
...
// Remember the block's storage level so that we can correctly drop it to disk if it needs
// to be dropped right after it got put into memory. Note, however, that other threads will
// not be able to get() this block until we call markReady on its BlockInfo.
val myInfo ={
val tinfo =newBlockInfo(level, tellMaster)
// Do atomically !
val oldBlockOpt = blockInfo.putIfAbsent(blockId, tinfo)
if(oldBlockOpt.isDefined){
if(oldBlockOpt.get.waitForReady()){
logWarning("Block "+ blockId +" already exists on this machine; not re-adding it")
return oldBlockOpt.get.size
}
// TODO: So the block info exists - but previous attempt to load it (?) failed. What do we do now ? Retry on it ?
oldBlockOpt.get
}else{
tinfo
}
}
val startTimeMs =System.currentTimeMillis
// If we need to replicate the data, we'll want access to the values, but because our
// put will read the whole iterator, there will be no values left. For the case where
// the put serializes data, we'll remember the bytes, above; but for the case where it
// doesn't, such as deserialized storage, let's rely on the put returning an Iterator.
var valuesAfterPut:Iterator[Any]=null
// Ditto for the bytes after the put
var bytesAfterPut:ByteBuffer=null
// Size of the block in bytes (to return to caller)
var size =0L
myInfo.synchronized{
logTrace("Put for block "+ blockId +" took "+Utils.getUsedTimeMs(startTimeMs)
+" to get into synchronized block")
var marked =false
try{
if(level.useMemory){
// Save it just to memory first, even if it also has useDisk set to true; we will later
// drop it to disk if the memory store can't hold it.
val res = memoryStore.putValues(blockId, values, level,true)
size = res.size
res.data match {
caseRight(newBytes)=> bytesAfterPut = newBytes
caseLeft(newIterator)=> valuesAfterPut = newIterator
}
}else{
// Save directly to disk.
// Don't get back the bytes unless we replicate them.
val askForBytes = level.replication >1
val res = diskStore.putValues(blockId, values, level, askForBytes)
size = res.size
res.data match {
caseRight(newBytes)=> bytesAfterPut = newBytes
case _ =>
}
}
// Now that the block is in either the memory or disk store, let other threads read it,
// and tell the master about it.
marked =true
myInfo.markReady(size)
if(tellMaster){
reportBlockStatus(blockId, myInfo)
}
}finally{
// If we failed at putting the block to memory/disk, notify other possible readers
// that it has failed, and then remove it from the block info map.
if(! marked){
// Note that the remove must happen before markFailure otherwise another thread
// could've inserted a new BlockInfo before we remove it.
blockInfo.remove(blockId)
myInfo.markFailure()
logWarning("Putting block "+ blockId +" failed")
}
}
}
logDebug("Put block "+ blockId +" locally took "+Utils.getUsedTimeMs(startTimeMs))
// Replicate block if required
if(level.replication >1){
val remoteStartTime =System.currentTimeMillis
// Serialize the block if not already done
if(bytesAfterPut ==null){
if(valuesAfterPut ==null){
thrownewSparkException(
"Underlying put returned neither an Iterator nor bytes! This shouldn't happen.")
}
bytesAfterPut = dataSerialize(blockId, valuesAfterPut)
}
replicate(blockId, bytesAfterPut, level)
logDebug("Put block "+ blockId +" remotely took "+Utils.getUsedTimeMs(remoteStartTime))
}
BlockManager.dispose(bytesAfterPut)
return size
}
对于put()
操作,主要分为以下3个步骤:
- 为block创建
BlockInfo
结构体存储block相关信息,同时将其加锁使其不能被访问。 - 根据block的storage level将block存储到memory或是disk上,同时解锁标识该block已经ready,可被访问。
- 根据block的replication数决定是否将该block replicate到远端。
接着我们来看一下get()
函数的实现:
defget(blockId:String):Option[Iterator[Any]]={
val local= getLocal(blockId)
if(local.isDefined){
logInfo("Found block %s locally".format(blockId))
returnlocal
}
val remote = getRemote(blockId)
if(remote.isDefined){
logInfo("Found block %s remotely".format(blockId))
return remote
}
None
}
get()
首先会从local的BlockManager
中查找block,如果找到则返回相应的block,若local没有找到该block,则发起请求从其他的executor上的BlockManager
中查找block。在通常情况下Spark任务的分配是根据block的分布决定的,任务往往会被分配到拥有block的节点上,因此getLocal()
就能找到所需的block;但是在资源有限的情况下,Spark会将任务调度到与block不同的节点上,这样就必须通过getRemote()
来获得block。
我们先来看一下getLocal()
:
def getLocal(blockId:String):Option[Iterator[Any]]={
logDebug("Getting local block "+ blockId)
val info = blockInfo.get(blockId).orNull
if(info !=null){
info.synchronized{
// In the another thread is writing the block, wait for it to become ready.
if(!info.waitForReady()){
// If we get here, the block write failed.
logWarning("Block "+ blockId +" was marked as failure.")
returnNone
}
val level = info.level
logDebug("Level for block "+ blockId +" is "+ level)
// Look for the block in memory
if(level.useMemory){
logDebug("Getting block "+ blockId +" from memory")
memoryStore.getValues(blockId) match {
caseSome(iterator)=>
returnSome(iterator)
caseNone=>
logDebug("Block "+ blockId +" not found in memory")
}
}
// Look for block on disk, potentially loading it back into memory if required
if(level.useDisk){
logDebug("Getting block "+ blockId +" from disk")
if(level.useMemory && level.deserialized){
diskStore.getValues(blockId) match {
caseSome(iterator)=>
// Put the block back in memory before returning it
// TODO: Consider creating a putValues that also takes in a iterator ?
val elements =newArrayBuffer[Any]
elements ++= iterator
memoryStore.putValues(blockId, elements, level,true).data match {
caseLeft(iterator2)=>
returnSome(iterator2)
case _ =>
thrownewException("Memory store did not return back an iterator")
}
caseNone=>
thrownewException("Block "+ blockId +" not found on disk, though it should be")
}
}elseif(level.useMemory &&!level.deserialized){
// Read it as a byte buffer into memory first, then return it
diskStore.getBytes(blockId) match {
caseSome(bytes)=>
// Put a copy of the block back in memory before returning it. Note that we can't
// put the ByteBuffer returned by the disk store as that's a memory-mapped file.
// The use of rewind assumes this.
assert(0== bytes.position())
val copyForMemory =ByteBuffer.allocate(bytes.limit)
copyForMemory.put(bytes)
memoryStore.putBytes(blockId, copyForMemory, level)
bytes.rewind()
returnSome(dataDeserialize(blockId, bytes))
caseNone=>
thrownewException("Block "+ blockId +" not found on disk, though it should be")
}
}else{
diskStore.getValues(blockId) match {
caseSome(iterator)=>
returnSome(iterator)
caseNone=>
thrownewException("Block "+ blockId +" not found on disk, though it should be")
}
}
}
}
}else{
logDebug("Block "+ blockId +" not registered locally")
}
returnNone
}
getLocal()
首先会根据block id获得相应的BlockInfo
并从中取出该block的storage level,根据storage level的不同getLocal()
又进入以下不同分支:
- level.useMemory == true:从memory中取出block并返回,若没有取到则进入分支2。
- level.useDisk == true:
- level.useMemory == true: 将block从disk中读出并写入内存以便下次使用时直接从内存中获得,同时返回该block。
- level.useMemory == false: 将block从disk中读出并返回
- level.useDisk == false: 没有在本地找到block,返回None。
接下来我们来看一下getRemote()
:
def getRemote(blockId:String):Option[Iterator[Any]]={
if(blockId ==null){
thrownewIllegalArgumentException("Block Id is null")
}
logDebug("Getting remote block "+ blockId)
// Get locations of block
val locations = master.getLocations(blockId)
// Get block from remote locations
for(loc <- locations){
logDebug("Getting remote block "+ blockId +" from "+ loc)
val data =BlockManagerWorker.syncGetBlock(
GetBlock(blockId),ConnectionManagerId(loc.host, loc.port))
if(data !=null){
returnSome(dataDeserialize(blockId, data))
}
logDebug("The value of block "+ blockId +" is null")
}
logDebug("Block "+ blockId +" not found")
returnNone
}
getRemote()
首先取得该block的所有location信息,然后根据location向远端发送请求获取block,只要有一个远端返回block该函数就返回而不继续发送请求。
至此我们简单介绍了BlockManager
类中的get()
和put()
函数,使用这两个函数外部类可以轻易地存取block数据。
Partition如何转化为Block
在storage模块里面所有的操作都是和block相关的,但是在RDD里面所有的运算都是基于partition的,那么partition是如何与block对应上的呢?
RDD计算的核心函数是iterator()
函数:
finaldef iterator(split:Partition, context:TaskContext):Iterator[T]={
if(storageLevel !=StorageLevel.NONE){
SparkEnv.get.cacheManager.getOrCompute(this, split, context, storageLevel)
}else{
computeOrReadCheckpoint(split, context)
}
}
如果当前RDD的storage level不是NONE的话,表示该RDD在BlockManager
中有存储,那么调用CacheManager
中的getOrCompute()
函数计算RDD,在这个函数中partition和block发生了关系:
首先根据RDD id和partition index构造出block id (rdd_xx_xx),接着从BlockManager
中取出相应的block。
- 如果该block存在,表示此RDD在之前已经被计算过和存储在
BlockManager
中,因此取出即可,无需再重新计算。 - 如果该block不存在则需要调用RDD的
computeOrReadCheckpoint()
函数计算出新的block,并将其存储到BlockManager
中。
需要注意的是block的计算和存储是阻塞的,若另一线程也需要用到此block则需等到该线程block的loading结束。
def getOrCompute[T](rdd: RDD[T], split:Partition, context:TaskContext, storageLevel:StorageLevel)
:Iterator[T]={
val key ="rdd_%d_%d".format(rdd.id, split.index)
logDebug("Looking for partition "+ key)
blockManager.get(key) match {
caseSome(values)=>
// Partition is already materialized, so just return its values
return values.asInstanceOf[Iterator[T]]
caseNone=>
// Mark the split as loading (unless someone else marks it first)
loading.synchronized{
if(loading.contains(key)){
logInfo("Another thread is loading %s, waiting for it to finish...".format (key))
while(loading.contains(key)){
try{loading.wait()}catch{case _ :Throwable=>}
}
logInfo("Finished waiting for %s".format(key))
// See whether someone else has successfully loaded it. The main way this would fail
// is for the RDD-level cache eviction policy if someone else has loaded the same RDD
// partition but we didn't want to make space for it. However, that case is unlikely
// because it's unlikely that two threads would work on the same RDD partition. One
// downside of the current code is that threads wait serially if this does happen.
blockManager.get(key) match {
caseSome(values)=>
return values.asInstanceOf[Iterator[T]]
caseNone=>
logInfo("Whoever was loading %s failed; we'll try it ourselves".format (key))
loading.add(key)
}
}else{
loading.add(key)
}
}
try{
// If we got here, we have to load the split
logInfo("Partition %s not found, computing it".format(key))
val computedValues = rdd.computeOrReadCheckpoint(split, context)
// Persist the result, so long as the task is not running locally
if(context.runningLocally){return computedValues }
val elements =newArrayBuffer[Any]
elements ++= computedValues
blockManager.put(key, elements, storageLevel,true)
return elements.iterator.asInstanceOf[Iterator[T]]
}finally{
loading.synchronized{
loading.remove(key)
loading.notifyAll()
}
}
}
}
这样RDD的transformation、action就和block数据建立了联系,虽然抽象上我们的操作是在partition层面上进行的,但是partition最终还是被映射成为block,因此实际上我们的所有操作都是对block的处理和存取。
http://jerryshao.me/architecture/2013/10/08/spark-storage-module-analysis/