<!-- @page { margin: 2cm } P { margin-bottom: 0.21cm } --> By convention, the approach of writing clone method is:
1. Implements Cloneable interface
This approach ensures your clone method can directly or indirectly call Object.clone(). Otherwise, calling Object.clone() will throws CloneNotSupportedException. Why we need to call Object.clone() in our clone method? Please see approach 2.2.
2. Override the clone method
2.1 Make the clone method to public method
Please be noted that the clone method type of Object class is: protected Object clone() throws CloneNotSupportedException In order to support other class can use our clone method, we should define it as public method.
2.2 Call super.clone() to produce the new object
By convention, the object returned by clone method should be obtained by calling super.clone (this means it’s better to produce the new object by super.clone() than directly use “new” operator). If a class and all of its superclasses (except Object) obey this convention, it will be the case that x.clone().getClass() == x.getClass().
Key point: why we should use super.clone() to produce the new object instead of directly use “new” operator?
First of all, if all classes obey this convention, our clone method will directly or indirectly call Object.clone method. This method is a native method, it will be more efficient than directly “new” an object.
Secondly, Object.clone method can recognize the class type which called the clone method using RTTI mechanism. And it will return the new object which has the correct class type.
For example:
<!--<br /> <br /> Code highlighting produced by Actipro CodeHighlighter (freeware)<br /> http://www.CodeHighlighter.com/<br /> <br /> -->
1
class
A
implements
Cloneable
2
class
B
extends
A
implements
Cloneable {
3
4
public
Object clone()
throws
CloneNotSupportedException {
5
B b
=
null
;
6
7
b
=
(B)
super
.clone();
//
It seems that super.clone() is
8
//
A.clone(), so it will return an
9
//
object of Class A. This is incorrect.
10
//
If the clone method of class A calls
11
//
super.clone method too, it will
12
//
return a new object belongs to
13
//
class B. Thus, we can cast it to
14
//
class B. This is the benefit of
15
//
Object.clone().
16
return
b;
17
}
18
}
Now, let’s consider another case, if we write clone method of class A like this:
<!--<br /> <br /> Code highlighting produced by Actipro CodeHighlighter (freeware)<br /> http://www.CodeHighlighter.com/<br /> <br /> -->
1
class
A {
2
public
Object clone() {
3
A a
=
null
;
4
a
=
new
A();
5
//
Then do some copy data operation.
6
return
a;
7
}
8
}
When B.clone() calls super.clone(),unfortunately we can only get the object whose class is A. And we can’t cast the new object to class B since B is a subclass of A.
That’s why it’s strongly recommended that clone method of all classes obey the convention that obtained the new object by calling super.clone().
2.3 Clone members
There are two cases: If the member supports clone, it’s better to call the clone method of the member to return a copy object of this member. If the member doesn’t support clone, you should create a new object which is the copy of the member. After this approach, it will be ensured that x.clone.equals(x) and x.clone() is independent with x.
Examples:
<!--<br /> <br /> Code highlighting produced by Actipro CodeHighlighter (freeware)<br /> http://www.CodeHighlighter.com/<br /> <br /> -->
1
/**
2
* class B support clone
3
*
4
*/
5
class
B
implements
Cloneable {
6
private
int
intMember;
7
8
public
B(
int
i) {
9
intMember
=
i;
10
}
11
12
public
void
setIntMember(
int
i) {
13
intMember
=
i;
14
}
15
16
public
Object clone()
throws
CloneNotSupportedException {
17
B clonedObject
=
null
;
18
19
//
Firstly, call super.clone to return new object
20
clonedObject
=
(B)
super
.clone();
21
22
//
Secondly, clone member here
23
clonedObject.setIntMember(intMember);
24
25
//
The end, return new object
26
return
clonedObject;
27
}
28
}
29
30
/**
31
* class C doesn't support clone
32
*
33
*/
34
class
C {
35
private
int
intMember;
36
37
public
C(
int
i) {
38
intMember
=
i;
39
}
40
41
public
void
setIntMember(
int
i) {
42
intMember
=
i;
43
}
44
45
public
int
getIntMember() {
46
return
intMember;
47
}
48
}
49
50
class
A
implements
Cloneable {
51
private
int
intMember
=
0
;
52
private
String stringMember
=
""
;
53
private
B supportCloneMember
=
null
;
54
private
C notSupportCloneMember
=
null
;
55
56
public
void
setIntMember(
int
i) {
57
intMember
=
i;
58
}
59
60
public
void
setStringMember(String s) {
61
stringMember
=
s;
62
}
63
64
public
void
setB(B b) {
65
supportCloneMember
=
b;
66
}
67
68
public
void
setC(C c) {
69
notSupportCloneMember
=
c;
70
}
71
72
public
Object clone()
throws
CloneNotSupportedException {
73
A clonedObject
=
null
;
74
75
//
Firstly, call super.clone to return new object
76
clonedObject
=
(A)
super
.clone();
77
78
//
Secondly, clone members here
79
80
//
For basic type member, directly set it to clonedObject
81
//
Because basic type parameter passes value. Modify
82
//
clonedObject.intMember can not effect the intMember
83
//
of itself.
84
clonedObject.setIntMember(intMember);
85
//
For immutable member, directly set it to clonedObject.
86
//
Becasue we can not change the value of immutable
87
//
variable once it was setted.
88
clonedObject.setStringMember(stringMember);
89
//
For member which support clone, we just clone it and
90
//
set the return object to the member of new object.
91
B clonedB
=
(B) supportCloneMember.clone();
92
clonedObject.setB(clonedB);
93
//
For member which do not support clone, we need to create
94
//
new object.
95
C clonedC
=
new
C(notSupportCloneMember.getIntMember());
96
clonedObject.setC(clonedC);
97
98
//
The end, return new object
99
return
clonedObject;
100
}
101
}