Nginx + PHP CGI的一个可能的安全漏洞

现在普遍的Nginx + PHP cgi的做法是在配置文件中, 通过正则匹配Nginx(PHP/fastcgi的PATH_INFO问题,设置SCRIPT_FILENAME, 今天发现了一个这种方式的安全漏洞.

比如, 有http://www.laruence.com/fake.jpg, 那么通过构造如下的URL, 就可以看到fake.jpg的二进制内容:
http://www.laruence.com/fake.jpg/foo.php

为什么会这样呢?
比如, 如下的nginx conf:

location ~ .php($|/) {
fastcgi_pass 127.0.0.1:9000;
fastcgi_index index.php;

 set $script    $uri;
 set $path_info "";
 if ($uri ~ "^(.+\.php)(/.*)") {
      set  $script     $1;
      set  $path_info  $2;
 }

 include       fastcgi_params;
 fastcgi_param SCRIPT_FILENAME   $document_root$script;
 fastcgi_param SCRIPT_NAME       $script;
 fastcgi_param PATH_INFO         $path_info;

}

通过正则匹配以后, SCRIPT_NAME会被设置为”fake.jpg/foo.php”, 继而构造成SCRIPT_FILENAME传递个PHP CGI, 但是PHP又为什么会接受这样的参数, 并且把a.jpg解析呢?

这就要说到PHP的cgi SAPI中的参数, fix_pathinfo了:
; cgi.fix_pathinfo provides real PATH_INFO/PATH_TRANSLATED support for CGI. PHP's
; previous behaviour was to set PATH_TRANSLATED to SCRIPT_FILENAME, and to not grok
; what PATH_INFO is. For more information on PATH_INFO, see the cgi specs. Setting
; this to 1 will cause PHP CGI to fix it's paths to conform to the spec. A setting
; of zero causes PHP to behave as before. Default is 1. You should fix your scripts
; to use SCRIPT_FILENAME rather than PATH_TRANSLATED.
cgi.fix_pathinfo=1

如果开启了这个选项, 那么就会触发在PHP中的如下逻辑:

/*

  • if the file doesn't exist, try to extract PATH_INFO out
  • of it by stat'ing back through the '/'
  • this fixes url's like /info.php/test
    */
    if (script_path_translated &&
    (script_path_translated_len = strlen(script_path_translated)) > 0 &&
    (script_path_translated[script_path_translated_len-1] == '/' ||
    ....//以下省略.

到这里, PHP会认为SCRIPT_FILENAME是fake.jpg, 而foo.php是PATH_INFO, 然后PHP就把fake.jpg当作一个PHP文件来解释执行… So…

这个隐患的危害用小顿的话来说, 是巨大的.

对于一些论坛来说, 如果上传一个图片(实际上是恶意的PHP脚本), 继而构造这样的访问请求…

所以, 大家如果有用这种服务器搭配的, 请排查, 如果有隐患,

请关闭fix_pathinfo(默认是开启的).
cgi.fix_pathinfo=0

你可能感兴趣的:(Nginx + PHP CGI的一个可能的安全漏洞)