#想写小组S2#70篇 Aamnda K. Kibler and Christine Hardigree. Empirical study_Using Evidence in L2 Argumentative Writing: A Longitudinal Case Study Across High School and University. Language learning2016

跑步前看了一点儿文秋芳.应用语言学研究方法与论文写作中文版，第一章 有关研究的定义、过程和分类。课后题提到找一篇国际期刊的论文，讨论一下，研究的问题，采用的方法。研究问题的答案。

我选了去年国庆节从金老师那里得到的一篇文章。早该看了，一直没有勇气看。

研究问题： the changing evidential types during  the  argumentative writing of a Spanish-English bilingual  .

研究方法：tracking reasearch from the Grade 9 to the university.

研究内容：36 writing samples and interview transcripts

结论：Evidentials were found to vary according to course type, but more dramatic changes (in type, function, and range of reporting verbs used) were found over time as language proficiency and writing expertise developed, providing longitudinal support for other studies that have examined writers at only one point in time.

Conclusion:

In this study of the relatively underresearched phenomenon of how a lanuage-minoritzed L2 witer developed argumentative writing expertise across high school and university, it is imprtant to note certain limitations. For example,^ Additionally, ^^

Nevertheless, notable features of Fabiola's evidential use over time included the increasingly sophisticated use of evidential resources for a range of rhetorical purposes and the development from unincorporated to incprporated and paraphrased evidence over time.