Spring MVC @Transactional注解方式事务失效的解决办法
分类: SPRING-MVC 事务2014-07-15 17:14 8265人阅读 评论(5) 收藏 举报
前文提到,最新换了框架,新项目用SpringMVC + Spring JdbcTemplate。搭框架时,发现了一个事务无法正常回滚的问题,记录如下:
首先展示问题:
Spring applicationContext.xml配置:
- <bean id="dataSource" class="org.springframework.jndi.JndiObjectFactoryBean">
- <property name="jndiName">
- <value>java:comp/env/jdbc/willvalue>
- property>
- bean>
- <bean id="jdbcTemplate" class="org.springframework.jdbc.core.JdbcTemplate">
- <property name="dataSource" ref="dataSource" />
- bean>
- <bean id="txManager"
- class="org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager">
- <property name="dataSource" ref="dataSource" />
- bean>
- <tx:annotation-driven transaction-manager="txManager" />
Spring mvc.dispatcher.xml配置:
- <context:component-scan base-package="com.will" >
- context:component-scan>
- <mvc:annotation-driven />
- <mvc:default-servlet-handler/>
- <bean id="viewResolver"
- class="org.springframework.web.servlet.view.UrlBasedViewResolver">
- <property name="viewClass" value="org.springframework.web.servlet.view.JstlView" />
- <property name="prefix" value="/WEB-INF/pages/" />
- <property name="suffix" value=".jsp" />
- bean>
然后在Service层模拟了一个事务回滚的method case:
- @Transactional
- public boolean save(Person person)
- {
- for(int id: new int[]{2,3})
- {
- personDao.del(id);
- int j = 1/0;
- }
- return false;
- }
本以为大功告成,在运行save方法时,由于1/0 抛出 java.lang.ArithmeticException: / by zero RuntimeException,导致事务回归。However,no way! So crazy~
查了下,发现Spring MVC对于事务配置比较讲究,需要额外的配置。解决办法如下:
需要在 applicationContext.xml增加:
- <context:component-scan base-package="com.will">
- <context:exclude-filter type="annotation" expression="org.springframework.stereotype.Controller" />
- context:component-scan>
在 Spring mvc.dispatcher.xml增加:
- <context:component-scan base-package="com.will" >
- <context:include-filter type="annotation" expression="org.springframework.stereotype.Controller" />
- <context:exclude-filter type="annotation" expression="org.springframework.stereotype.Service" />
- context:component-scan>
由于web.xml中配置:
- <context-param>
- <param-name>contextConfigLocationparam-name>
- <param-value>
- classpath:applicationContext.xml
- param-value>
- context-param>
- <listener>
- <listener-class>org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoaderListenerlistener-class>
- listener>
- <servlet>
- <servlet-name>dispatcherservlet-name>
- <servlet-class>org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServletservlet-class>
- <init-param>
- <param-name>contextConfigLocationparam-name>
- <param-value>classpath*:/mvc_dispatcher_servlet.xmlparam-value>
- init-param>
- <load-on-startup>1load-on-startup>
- servlet>
- <servlet-mapping>
- <servlet-name>dispatcherservlet-name>
- <url-pattern>*.dourl-pattern>
- servlet-mapping>
Spring容器优先加载由ServletContextListener(对应applicationContext.xml)产生的父容器,而SpringMVC(对应mvc_dispatcher_servlet.xml)产生的是子容器。子容器Controller进行扫描装配时装配的@Service注解的实例是没有经过事务加强处理,即没有事务处理能力的Service,而父容器进行初始化的Service是保证事务的增强处理能力的。如果不在子容器中将Service exclude掉,此时得到的将是原样的无事务处理能力的Service。
( update 2014.05.27 今天看见一种说法:key word =双亲上下文。不使用ContextLoaderListener监听器来加载spring的配置,改用DispatcherServlet来加载spring的配置,不要双亲上下文,只使用一个DispatcherServlet就不会出现上述问题。笔者这里未测过这个办法,因为我自己的业务需要一个extends ContextLoaderListener的selfListener,有兴趣的朋友可以自己测试下这个说法,并欢迎把测试的结果与我交流 :) )
经过以上分析,故可以优化上述配置:
在 applicationContext.xml增加:
- <context:component-scan base-package="com.will">
- context:component-scan>
在 Spring mvc.dispatcher.xml增加:
- <context:component-scan base-package="com.will" >
- <context:exclude-filter type="annotation" expression="org.springframework.stereotype.Service" />
- context:component-scan>
经过如上配置,可以发现事务控制部分的日志如下:
- 2013-09-25 09:53:13,031 [http-8080-2] DEBUG [org.springframework.transaction.annotation.AnnotationTransactionAttributeSource] - Adding transactional method 'save' with attribute: PROPAGATION_REQUIRED,ISOLATION_DEFAULT; ''
- 2013-09-25 09:53:13,037 [http-8080-2] DEBUG [org.springframework.beans.factory.support.DefaultListableBeanFactory] - Returning cached instance of singleton bean 'txManager'
- 2013-09-25 09:53:13,050 [http-8080-2] DEBUG [org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager] - Creating new transaction with name [com.will.service.impl.PersonServiceImpl.save]: PROPAGATION_REQUIRED,ISOLATION_DEFAULT; ''
- 2013-09-25 09:53:13,313 [http-8080-2] DEBUG [org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager] - Acquired Connection [jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/mvc?useUnicode=true&characterEncoding=UTF-8, UserName=root@localhost, MySQL-AB JDBC Driver] for JDBC transaction
- 2013-09-25 09:53:13,323 [http-8080-2] DEBUG [org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager] - Switching JDBC Connection [jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/mvc?useUnicode=true&characterEncoding=UTF-8, UserName=root@localhost, MySQL-AB JDBC Driver] to manual commit
- 2013-09-25 09:53:13,327 [http-8080-2] DEBUG [org.springframework.jdbc.core.JdbcTemplate] - Executing prepared SQL update
- 2013-09-25 09:53:13,328 [http-8080-2] DEBUG [org.springframework.jdbc.core.JdbcTemplate] - Executing prepared SQL statement [delete from person where id=?]
- 2013-09-25 09:53:13,348 [http-8080-2] DEBUG [org.springframework.jdbc.core.JdbcTemplate] - SQL update affected 1 rows
- 2013-09-25 09:53:13,363 [http-8080-2] DEBUG [org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager] - Initiating transaction rollback
- 2013-09-25 09:53:13,364 [http-8080-2] DEBUG [org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager] - Rolling back JDBC transaction on Connection [jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/mvc?useUnicode=true&characterEncoding=UTF-8, UserName=root@localhost, MySQL-AB JDBC Driver]
- 2013-09-25 09:53:13,377 [http-8080-2] DEBUG [org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager] - Releasing JDBC Connection [jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/mvc?useUnicode=true&characterEncoding=UTF-8, UserName=root@localhost, MySQL-AB JDBC Driver] after transaction
- 2013-09-25 09:53:13,378 [http-8080-2] DEBUG [org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceUtils] - Returning JDBC Connection to DataSource
在2013-09-25 09:53:13,363处进行了rollback。
PS:习惯了Structs,对事务处理有点思维定式,这次花费不少时间来解决这个问题。颇为尴尬!