继续延续坑爹标题系列。其实只是把apress.pro.asp.net.mvc.4.framework里的CHAPTER 13翻译过来罢了,当做自己总结吧。内容看看就好,排版就不要吐槽了,反正我知道你也不会反对的。
XD 首先说URL的构造。 其实这个也谈不上构造,只是语法特性吧。
命名参数规范+匿名对象
routes.MapRoute( name:
"Default"
, url:
"{controller}/{action}/{id}"
, defaults:
new
{ controller =
"Home"
, action =
"Index"
, id = UrlParameter.Optional } );
|
构造路由然后添加
1
|
Route myRoute =
new
Route(
"{controller}/{action}"
,
new
MvcRouteHandler()); routes.Add(
"MyRoute"
, myRoute);
|
直接方法重载+匿名对象
1
|
routes.MapRoute(
"ShopSchema"
,
"Shop/{action}"
,
new
{ controller =
"Home"
});
|
个人觉得第一种比较易懂,第二种方便调试,第三种写起来比较效率吧。各取所需吧。本文行文偏向于第三种。
1.默认路由(MVC自带)
1
|
routes.MapRoute(
"Default"
,
// 路由名称 "{controller}/{action}/{id}", // 带有参数的 URL new { controller = "Home", action = "Index", id = UrlParameter.Optional } // 参数默认值 (UrlParameter.Optional-可选的意思) );
|
2.静态URL段
1
2
3
|
routes.MapRoute(
"ShopSchema2"
,
"Shop/OldAction"
,
new
{ controller =
"Home"
, action =
"Index"
});
routes.MapRoute(
"ShopSchema"
,
"Shop/{action}"
,
new
{ controller =
"Home"
});
"ShopSchema2"
,
"Shop/OldAction.js"
,
new
{ controller =
"Home"
, action =
"Index"
});
|
没有占位符路由就是现成的写死的。
比如这样写然后去访问http://localhost:XXX/Shop/OldAction.js,response也是完全没问题的。 controller , action , area这三个保留字就别设静态变量里面了。
3.自定义常规变量URL段(好吧这翻译暴露智商了)
1
|
routes.MapRoute(
"MyRoute2"
,
"{controller}/{action}/{id}"
,
new
{ controller =
"Home"
, action =
"Index"
, id =
"DefaultId"
});
|
这种情况如果访问 /Home/Index 的话,因为第三段(id)没有值,根据路由规则这个参数会被设为DefaultId
这个用viewbag给title赋值就能很明显看出
1
|
ViewBag.Title = RouteData.Values[
"id"
];
|
图不贴了,结果是标题显示为DefaultId。 注意要在控制器里面赋值,在视图赋值没法编译的。
4.再述默认路由
然后再回到默认路由。 UrlParameter.Optional这个叫可选URL段.路由里没有这个参数的话id为null。 照原文大致说法,这个可选URL段能用来实现一个关注点的分离。刚才在路由里直接设定参数默认值其实不是很好。照我的理解,实际参数是用户发来的,我们做 的只是定义形式参数名。但是,如果硬要给参数赋默认值的话,建议用语法糖写到action参数里面。比如:
1
|
public
ActionResult Index(
string
id =
"abcd"
) { ViewBag.Title = RouteData.Values[
"id"
];
return
View(); }
|
5.可变长度路由。
1
|
routes.MapRoute(
"MyRoute"
,
"{controller}/{action}/{id}/{*catchall}"
,
new
{ controller =
"Home"
, action =
"Index"
, id = UrlParameter.Optional });
|
在这里id和最后一段都是可变的,所以 /Home/Index/dabdafdaf 等效于 /Home/Index//abcdefdjldfiaeahfoeiho 等效于 /Home/Index/All/Delete/Perm/.....
6.跨命名空间路由
这个提醒一下记得引用命名空间,开启IIS网站不然就是404。这个非常非主流,不建议瞎搞。
1
|
routes.MapRoute(
"MyRoute"
,
"{controller}/{action}/{id}/{*catchall}"
,
new
{ controller =
"Home"
, action =
"Index"
, id = UrlParameter.Optional },
new
[] {
"URLsAndRoutes.AdditionalControllers"
,
"UrlsAndRoutes.Controllers"
});
|
但是这样写的话数组排名不分先后的,如果有多个匹配的路由会报错。 然后作者提出了一种改进写法。
1
2
3
|
routes.MapRoute(
"AddContollerRoute"
,
"Home/{action}/{id}/{*catchall}"
,
new
{ controller =
"Home"
, action =
"Index"
, id = UrlParameter.Optional },
new
[] {
"URLsAndRoutes.AdditionalControllers"
});
routes.MapRoute(
"MyRoute"
,
"{controller}/{action}/{id}/{*catchall}"
,
new
{ controller =
"Home"
, action =
"Index"
, id = UrlParameter.Optional },
new
[] {
"URLsAndRoutes.Controllers"
});
|
这样第一个URL段不是Home的都交给第二个处理 最后还可以设定这个路由找不到的话就不给后面的路由留后路啦,也就不再往下找啦。
1
|
Route myRoute = routes.MapRoute(
"AddContollerRoute"
,
"Home/{action}/{id}/{*catchall}"
,
new
{ controller =
"Home"
, action =
"Index"
, id = UrlParameter.Optional },
new
[] {
"URLsAndRoutes.AdditionalControllers"
});
"UseNamespaceFallback"
] =
false
;
|
7.正则表达式匹配路由
1
2
3
4
|
routes.MapRoute(
"MyRoute"
,
"{controller}/{action}/{id}/{*catchall}"
,
new
{ controller =
"Home"
, action =
"Index"
, id = UrlParameter.Optional },
new
{ controller =
"^H.*"
},
new
[] {
"URLsAndRoutes.Controllers"
});
|
约束多个URL
1
2
3
4
|
routes.MapRoute(
"MyRoute"
,
"{controller}/{action}/{id}/{*catchall}"
,
new
{ controller =
"Home"
, action =
"Index"
, id = UrlParameter.Optional },
new
{ controller =
"^H.*"
, action =
"^Index$|^About$"
},
new
[] {
"URLsAndRoutes.Controllers"
});
|
8.指定请求方法
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
|
routes.MapRoute(
"MyRoute"
,
"{controller}/{action}/{id}/{*catchall}"
,
new
{ controller =
"Home"
, action =
"Index"
, id = UrlParameter.Optional },
new
{ controller =
"^H.*"
, action =
"Index|About"
, httpMethod =
new
HttpMethodConstraint(
"GET"
) },
new
[] {
"URLsAndRoutes.Controllers"
});
|
9.最后还是不爽的话自己写个类实现 IRouteConstraint的匹配方法。
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
|
using
System;
using
System.Collections.Generic;
using
System.Linq;
using
System.Web;
using
System.Web.Routing;
///
/// If the standard constraints are not sufficient for your needs, you can define your own custom constraints by implementing the IRouteConstraint interface.
///
public
class
UserAgentConstraint : IRouteConstraint
{
private
string
requiredUserAgent;
public
UserAgentConstraint(
string
agentParam)
{
requiredUserAgent = agentParam;
}
public
bool
Match(HttpContextBase httpContext, Route route,
string
parameterName,
RouteValueDictionary values, RouteDirection routeDirection)
{
return
httpContext.Request.UserAgent !=
null
&&
httpContext.Request.UserAgent.Contains(requiredUserAgent);
}
}
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
|
routes.MapRoute(
"ChromeRoute"
,
"{*catchall}"
,
new
{ controller =
"Home"
, action =
"Index"
},
new
{ customConstraint =
new
UserAgentConstraint(
"Chrome"
) },
new
[] {
"UrlsAndRoutes.AdditionalControllers"
});
|
比如这个就用来匹配是否是用谷歌浏览器访问网页的。
10.访问本地文档
1
2
3
|
routes.RouteExistingFiles =
true
;
routes.MapRoute(
"DiskFile"
,
"Content/StaticContent.html"
,
new
{ controller =
"Customer"
, action =
"List"
, });
|
浏览网站,以开启 IIS Express,然后点显示所有应用程序-点击网站名称-配置(applicationhost.config)-搜索UrlRoutingModule节点
1
|
|
把这个节点里的preCondition删除,变成
1
|
|
11.直接访问本地资源,绕过了路由系统
1
|
routes.IgnoreRoute(
"Content/{filename}.html"
);
|
文件名还可以用 {filename}占位符。
IgnoreRoute方法是RouteCollection里面StopRoutingHandler类的一个实例。路由系统通过硬-编码识别这 个Handler。如果这个规则匹配的话,后面的规则都无效了。 这也就是默认的路由里面routes.IgnoreRoute("{resource}.axd/{*pathInfo}");写最前面的原因。
路由测试(在测试项目的基础上,要装moq)
1
|
PM> Install-Package Moq
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
|
using
System;
using
Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting;
using
System.Web;
using
Moq;
using
System.Web.Routing;
using
System.Reflection;
[TestClass]
public
class
RoutesTest
{
private
HttpContextBase CreateHttpContext(
string
targetUrl =
null
,
string
HttpMethod =
"GET"
)
{
// create the mock request
Mock
new
Mock
mockRequest.Setup(m => m.AppRelativeCurrentExecutionFilePath)
.Returns(targetUrl);
mockRequest.Setup(m => m.HttpMethod).Returns(HttpMethod);
// create the mock response
Mock
new
Mock
mockResponse.Setup(m => m.ApplyAppPathModifier(
It.IsAny<
string
>())).Returns<
string
>(s => s);
// create the mock context, using the request and response
Mock
new
Mock
mockContext.Setup(m => m.Request).Returns(mockRequest.Object);
mockContext.Setup(m => m.Response).Returns(mockResponse.Object);
// return the mocked context
return
mockContext.Object;
}
private
void
TestRouteMatch(
string
url,
string
controller,
string
action,
object
routeProperties =
null
,
string
httpMethod =
"GET"
)
{
// Arrange
RouteCollection routes =
new
RouteCollection();
RouteConfig.RegisterRoutes(routes);
// Act - process the route
RouteData result = routes.GetRouteData(CreateHttpContext(url, httpMethod));
// Assert
Assert.IsNotNull(result);
Assert.IsTrue(TestIncomingRouteResult(result, controller, action, routeProperties));
}
private
bool
TestIncomingRouteResult(RouteData routeResult,
string
controller,
string
action,
object
propertySet =
null
)
{
Func<
object
,
object
,
bool
> valCompare = (v1, v2) =>
{
return
StringComparer.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase
.Compare(v1, v2) == 0;
};
bool
result = valCompare(routeResult.Values[
"controller"
], controller)
&& valCompare(routeResult.Values[
"action"
], action);
if
(propertySet !=
null
)
{
PropertyInfo[] propInfo = propertySet.GetType().GetProperties();
foreach
(PropertyInfo pi
in
propInfo)
{
if
(!(routeResult.Values.ContainsKey(pi.Name)
&& valCompare(routeResult.Values[pi.Name],
pi.GetValue(propertySet,
null
))))
{
result =
false
;
break
;
}
}
}
return
result;
}
private
void
TestRouteFail(
string
url)
{
// Arrange
RouteCollection routes =
new
RouteCollection();
RouteConfig.RegisterRoutes(routes);
// Act - process the route
RouteData result = routes.GetRouteData(CreateHttpContext(url));
// Assert
Assert.IsTrue(result ==
null
|| result.Route ==
null
);
}
[TestMethod]
public
void
TestIncomingRoutes()
{
// check for the URL that we hope to receive
TestRouteMatch(
"~/Admin/Index"
,
"Admin"
,
"Index"
);
// check that the values are being obtained from the segments
TestRouteMatch(
"~/One/Two"
,
"One"
,
"Two"
);
// ensure that too many or too few segments fails to match
TestRouteFail(
"~/Admin/Index/Segment"
);
//失败
TestRouteFail(
"~/Admin"
);
//失败
TestRouteMatch(
"~/"
,
"Home"
,
"Index"
);
TestRouteMatch(
"~/Customer"
,
"Customer"
,
"Index"
);
TestRouteMatch(
"~/Customer/List"
,
"Customer"
,
"List"
);
TestRouteFail(
"~/Customer/List/All"
);
//失败
TestRouteMatch(
"~/Customer/List/All"
,
"Customer"
,
"List"
,
new
{ id =
"All"
});
TestRouteMatch(
"~/Customer/List/All/Delete"
,
"Customer"
,
"List"
,
new
{ id =
"All"
, catchall =
"Delete"
});
TestRouteMatch(
"~/Customer/List/All/Delete/Perm"
,
"Customer"
,
"List"
,
new
{ id =
"All"
, catchall =
"Delete/Perm"
});
}
}
|
最后还是再推荐一下Adam Freeman写的apress.pro.asp.net.mvc.4这本书。稍微熟悉MVC的从第二部分开始读好了。前面都是入门(对我来说是扯淡)。 但总比国内某些写书的人好吧——把个开源项目的源代码下载下来帖到书上面来,然后标题起个深入解析XXXX,然后净瞎扯淡。最后一千多页的巨著又诞生了。 Adam Freeman的风格我就很喜欢,都是实例写作,然后还在那边书里面专门写了大量的测试。
哎没办法啊,技术差距就是这样了。