Spring AOP实现
概念简介
- Aspect:系统中,功能模块或者类的横切面的一种抽象。举例来说,web应用常见的事务管理即是典型的Aspect。各个服务功能(或类方法),都需要实现事务管理(一般指数据库事务),这种横跨多个功能的相同逻辑,可以称之为Aspect。
- Join Point:系统功能的执行点,方法调用或者方法抛出的异常处理,都可以称之为Join Point。AOP的目的就是在方法某处执行自定义的功能,归纳为在【哪里】执行【什么功能】,这个【哪里】就是指Join Point。Spring中,Join Point指的是方法调用,从方法层级来切入。
- Advice:在Join Point执行的具体动作,即【什么功能】。Advice分为多种类型,around、before、after等。通常,Advice以拦截器Interceptor的方式实现,某个方法的Advice的interceptor会组成一个链,来执行多个Advice的功能。
- Pointcut:匹配Join Point的规则。例如,可以指定匹配带有【add】前缀的所有方法。Advice要关联Pointcut使用,来确定动作具体在哪里执行。Spring使用的是AspectJ的表达式。
- Introduction:通常意义上的Advice都是附加在某个已有的方法上来指定额外的功能,Introduction可以在指定类上增加方法或者属性。通过Introduction可以帮指定bean引入新的接口,实现新的功能。
Spring代理实现技术
Spring代理的实现方式有两种:
JDK代理:如果代理目标类实现了至少一个接口,那么接口的方法代理就可以使用JDK代理来实现。如果目标类没有实现任何接口,那么将使用CGLIB来实现代理功能
CGLIB:主要实现方式是对生成一个目标类的子类,来对方法实行覆盖,所以不可覆盖的方法无法利用此方式来代理。
Spring内部依赖于这两种方式来实现代理,下面简单举例,说明一下二者的实现方式的区别
JDK代理
由于JDK代理需要接口的实现,所以先自定义一个简单的接口:
public interface Fly {
void fly();
}
定义一个简单类实现接口:
public class Bird implements Fly{
@Override
public void fly() {
System.out.println("this is bird flying");
}
}
JDK代理主要使用InvocationHandler
接口来实现方法的代理:
public class FlyInvocationHandler implements InvocationHandler {
/**
* 代理目标类
*/
private Object target;
public FlyInvocationHandler(Object target) {
super();
this.target = target;
}
@Override
public Object invoke(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args) throws Throwable {
// 代理方式执行前后,自定义逻辑
System.out.println("invocation interceptor, before");
Object invokeResult = method.invoke(target, args);
System.out.println("invocation interceptor, after");
return invokeResult;
}
/**
* 返回代理类对象
*
* @return the proxy
* @author liuxinxing5 2018年11月30日 11:05
*/
public Object getProxy() {
return Proxy.newProxyInstance(Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader(),
target.getClass().getInterfaces(), this);
}
}
测试代理类:
public class JdkProxyTest {
public static void main(String[] args) {
FlyInvocationHandler handler = new FlyInvocationHandler(new Bird());
Fly fly = (Fly) handler.getProxy();
fly.fly();
}
}
测试输出:
invocation interceptor, before
this is bird flying
invocation interceptor, after
CGLIB
public class EnhancerDemo {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Enhancer enhancer = new Enhancer();
// 设置代理目标
enhancer.setSuperclass(EnhancerDemo.class);
// 设置代理的action,即Advice
enhancer.setCallback(new MethodInterceptorImpl());
EnhancerDemo demo = (EnhancerDemo) enhancer.create();
demo.test(100);
}
public void test(int i) {
System.out.println("inside enhancer demo " + i);
}
private static class MethodInterceptorImpl implements MethodInterceptor {
@Override
public Object intercept(Object o, Method method, Object[] objects, MethodProxy methodProxy) throws Throwable {
System.out.println("interceptor begin ");
Object res = methodProxy.invokeSuper(o, objects);
System.out.println("interceptor end ");
return res;
}
}
}
测试输出:
interceptor begin
inside enhancer demo 100
interceptor end
Spring代理实现逻辑
简单示例
首先先定义一个简单的Bean:
public class TestBean {
// 被代理方法
public void test() {
System.out.println("inside test bean");
}
}
test()
方法是被代理的测试方法,下面需要定义代理的配置。Spring代理配置可以使用两种方式,XML配置和注解配置。
XML配置
新增一个aop的配置类,XMLAop.java
public class XMLAop {
// 用于before Advice测试
public void before() {
System.out.println("inside xml configured before method");
}
// 用于around Advice测试
public Object around(ProceedingJoinPoint point) throws Throwable {
System.out.println("inside xml configured around method 1");
Object result = point.proceed(point.getArgs());
System.out.println("inside xml configured around method 2");
return result;
}
}
XML配置aop.xml
:
测试test()
方法输出:
public static void main(String[] args) {
ApplicationContext c = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("aop.xml");
// 获取test bean
TestBean test = (TestBean)c.getBean("test");
// 指定test方法
test.test();
}
测试输出:
inside xml configured around method 1
inside xml configured before method
inside test bean
inside xml configured around method 2
注解配置
注解配置方式就是对XMLAop
类作简单修改,增加注解:
@Aspect
public class XMLAop {
@Pointcut("execution(* com.sscon.aop.spring.*.test(..))")
public void test() {
}
@Before("test()")
public void before() {
System.out.println("inside xml configured before method");
}
@Around("test()")
public Object around(ProceedingJoinPoint point) throws Throwable {
System.out.println("inside xml configured around method 1");
Object result = point.proceed();
System.out.println("inside xml configured around method 2");
return result;
}
}
关键注解:
@Aspect:表明此类是一个Aspect配置
@Pointcut:注解于
void
返回值的方法,用于定义join point的匹配规则@Before:定义before类型的Advice,方法内指定执行的逻辑
@Aroud:定义around类型的Advice,方法内指定执行的逻辑,注解的方法的参数第一个必须为
ProceedingJoinPoint
,使用ProceedingJoinPoint.proceed
方法类实现对被代理目标方法的调用...
XML配置aop.xml
移除aspect的相关配置:
测试test()
方法输出:
inside xml configured around method 1
inside xml configured before method
inside test bean
inside xml configured around method 2
源码分析
AOP功能入口,创建ProxyCreator
Spring xml配置文件中,
是开启aop功能的入口,所以我们从此xml标签的解析来分析Spring的处理流程。
在AopNamespaceHandler
类中,Spring注册了aop标签配置的解析器,AspectJAutoProxyBeanDefinitionParser
:
// AopNamespaceHandler.java
public void init() {
// In 2.0 XSD as well as in 2.1 XSD.
registerBeanDefinitionParser("config", new ConfigBeanDefinitionParser());
// 注册处理aspectj-autoproxy标签的处理器
registerBeanDefinitionParser("aspectj-autoproxy", new AspectJAutoProxyBeanDefinitionParser());
registerBeanDefinitionDecorator("scoped-proxy", new ScopedProxyBeanDefinitionDecorator());
// Only in 2.0 XSD: moved to context namespace as of 2.1
registerBeanDefinitionParser("spring-configured", new SpringConfiguredBeanDefinitionParser());
}
AspectJAutoProxyBeanDefinitionParser
类实现了BeanDefinitionParser
接口,BeanDefinitionParser
是Spring用来解析
直接子节点的接口,主要逻辑是parse
方法:
// AspectJAutoProxyBeanDefinitionParser.java
public BeanDefinition parse(Element element, ParserContext parserContext) {
AopNamespaceUtils.
registerAspectJAnnotationAutoProxyCreatorIfNecessary(parserContext, element);
extendBeanDefinition(element, parserContext);
return null;
}
// AopNamespaceUtils.java
public static void registerAspectJAnnotationAutoProxyCreatorIfNecessary(
ParserContext parserContext, Element sourceElement) {
// 注册代理的creator
BeanDefinition beanDefinition = AopConfigUtils.
registerAspectJAnnotationAutoProxyCreatorIfNecessary(
parserContext.getRegistry(), parserContext.extractSource(sourceElement));
// 处理proxy-target-class 和 expose-proxy属性
useClassProxyingIfNecessary(parserContext.getRegistry(), sourceElement);
registerComponentIfNecessary(beanDefinition, parserContext);
}
// AopConfigUtils.java
public static BeanDefinition registerAspectJAnnotationAutoProxyCreatorIfNecessary(
BeanDefinitionRegistry registry, Object source) {
return registerOrEscalateApcAsRequired(
AnnotationAwareAspectJAutoProxyCreator.class, registry, source);
}
跟踪到AopConfigUtils
的registerOrEscalateApcAsRequired
方法,可以看到Spring注册代理creator的逻辑,其中参数cls
是AnnotationAwareAspectJAutoProxyCreator.class
,这个方法的主要逻辑是注册一个创建代理的工具类:
如果当前没有注册AUTO_PROXY_CREATOR_BEAN_NAME的代理Creator,那么使用cls参数指定的类作为工具创建
如果当前注册了AUTO_PROXY_CREATOR_BEAN_NAME的Creator,那么要进行优先级排序,确定具体使用AnnotationAwareAspectJAutoProxyCreator还是已经创建的Creator
Spring默认使用AnnotationAwareAspectJAutoProxyCreator
// AopConfigUtils.java
public static final String AUTO_PROXY_CREATOR_BEAN_NAME =
"org.springframework.aop.config.internalAutoProxyCreator";
static {
APC_PRIORITY_LIST.add(InfrastructureAdvisorAutoProxyCreator.class);
APC_PRIORITY_LIST.add(AspectJAwareAdvisorAutoProxyCreator.class);
APC_PRIORITY_LIST.add(AnnotationAwareAspectJAutoProxyCreator.class);
}
private static BeanDefinition registerOrEscalateApcAsRequired(
Class> cls, BeanDefinitionRegistry registry, Object source) {
Assert.notNull(registry, "BeanDefinitionRegistry must not be null");
// 如果当前已注册AUTO_PROXY_CREATOR_BEAN_NAME的creator,那么需要做一下选择
if (registry.containsBeanDefinition(AUTO_PROXY_CREATOR_BEAN_NAME)) {
BeanDefinition apcDefinition =
registry.getBeanDefinition(AUTO_PROXY_CREATOR_BEAN_NAME);
if (!cls.getName().equals(apcDefinition.getBeanClassName())) {
// 已注册的creator和指定cls不同,根据优先级排序选择
int currentPriority =
// 当前已注册的creator的优先级,优先级根据APC_PRIORITY_LIST中的
// 序号来表示,AnnotationAwareAspectJAutoProxyCreator位于序号2
// 是最高的优先级
findPriorityForClass(apcDefinition.getBeanClassName());
// cls指定的creator的优先级
int requiredPriority = findPriorityForClass(cls);
if (currentPriority < requiredPriority) {
// 如果cls指定的优先级高,那么更换为cls的creator
apcDefinition.setBeanClassName(cls.getName());
}
}
return null;
}
RootBeanDefinition beanDefinition = new RootBeanDefinition(cls);
beanDefinition.setSource(source);
beanDefinition.getPropertyValues().add("order", Ordered.HIGHEST_PRECEDENCE);
beanDefinition.setRole(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE);
registry.registerBeanDefinition(AUTO_PROXY_CREATOR_BEAN_NAME, beanDefinition);
return beanDefinition;
}
代理配置处理
注册完代理的Creator后,还需要处理指定的配置信息,读取用户的配置信息后,保存:
// AopNamespaceUtils.java
public static void registerAspectJAnnotationAutoProxyCreatorIfNecessary(
ParserContext parserContext, Element sourceElement) {
// 注册代理的creator
BeanDefinition beanDefinition = AopConfigUtils.
registerAspectJAnnotationAutoProxyCreatorIfNecessary(
parserContext.getRegistry(), parserContext.extractSource(sourceElement));
// 处理proxy-target-class 和 expose-proxy属性
useClassProxyingIfNecessary(parserContext.getRegistry(), sourceElement);
registerComponentIfNecessary(beanDefinition, parserContext);
}
// AopConfigUtils.java
private static void useClassProxyingIfNecessary(
BeanDefinitionRegistry registry, Element sourceElement) {
if (sourceElement != null) {
// PROXY_TARGET_CLASS_ATTRIBUTE = "proxy-target-class"
boolean proxyTargetClass = Boolean.parseBoolean(
sourceElement.getAttribute(PROXY_TARGET_CLASS_ATTRIBUTE));
if (proxyTargetClass) {
AopConfigUtils.forceAutoProxyCreatorToUseClassProxying(registry);
}
// EXPOSE_PROXY_ATTRIBUTE = "expose-proxy"
boolean exposeProxy = Boolean.parseBoolean(
sourceElement.getAttribute(EXPOSE_PROXY_ATTRIBUTE));
if (exposeProxy) {
AopConfigUtils.forceAutoProxyCreatorToExposeProxy(registry);
}
}
}
// AopConfigUtils.java
public static void forceAutoProxyCreatorToUseClassProxying(
BeanDefinitionRegistry registry) {
if (registry.containsBeanDefinition(AUTO_PROXY_CREATOR_BEAN_NAME)) {
BeanDefinition definition =
registry.getBeanDefinition(AUTO_PROXY_CREATOR_BEAN_NAME);
definition.getPropertyValues().add("proxyTargetClass", Boolean.TRUE);
}
}
// AopConfigUtils.java
public static void forceAutoProxyCreatorToExposeProxy(
BeanDefinitionRegistry registry) {
if (registry.containsBeanDefinition(AUTO_PROXY_CREATOR_BEAN_NAME)) {
BeanDefinition definition =
registry.getBeanDefinition(AUTO_PROXY_CREATOR_BEAN_NAME);
definition.getPropertyValues().add("exposeProxy", Boolean.TRUE);
}
}
proxy-target-class与expose-proxy属性:
proxy-target-class:Spring默认使用JDK代理来实现代理功能(前提是类至少实现了一个接口),该属性可以强制指定使用CGLIB来实现代理功能
expose-proxy:被代理对象如果存在自我调用,例如a方法调用b方法,两个方法都被代理,那么b方法是无法执行代理逻辑的。
被代理对象内部方法调用的问题
拿一个简单的例子来描述这个问题,TestBean
有方法被代理,test()
与test2()
,test内部调用test2,test2方法配置的代理逻辑不会执行:
public class TestBean {
// 被代理方法
public void test() {
System.out.println("inside test bean");
test2();
}
// 被代理方法
public void test2() {
System.out.println("inside test2 bean ");
}
}
如果代理的配置如下:
@Aspect
public class XMLAop {
// test test2方法都会匹配
@Pointcut("execution(* com.sscon.aop.spring.*.test*(..))")
public void test() {
}
@Before("test()")
public void before() {
System.out.println("inside xml configured before method");
}
}
输出如下:
inside xml configured before method
inside test bean
inside test2 bean
如果希望test2()
方法也执行代理的逻辑,Spring给出一个解决办法是,将expose-proxy
修改为true吗,暴露Spring生成的代理实体,且修改test()
方法的逻辑:
public class TestBean {
public void test() {
System.out.println("inside test bean ");
// 拿到Spring生成的代理,指定test2()的方法,如果不修改expose-proxy配置,会报错
((TestBean)AopContext.currentProxy()).test2();
}
public void test2() {
System.out.println("inside test2 bean ");
}
}
使用代理Creator创建代理
Spring默认使用AnnotationAwareAspectJAutoProxyCreator
来对Spring管理的Bean做代理创建处理,此类实现了BeanPostProcessor
,BeanPostProcessor
的关键方法是postProcessAfterInitialization
。Bean初始化完成之后会调用此方法对Bean进行处理。该方法的实现在抽象父类AbstractAutoProxyCreator
:
// AbstractAutoProxyCreator.java
public Object postProcessAfterInitialization(Object bean, String beanName)
throws BeansException {
if (bean != null) {
Object cacheKey = getCacheKey(bean.getClass(), beanName);
if (!this.earlyProxyReferences.contains(cacheKey)) {
// 没有缓存存在时,初始化代理
return wrapIfNecessary(bean, beanName, cacheKey);
}
}
return bean;
}
从上面的逻辑可以看到,当没有缓存时,使用wrapIfNecessary
方法进行代理初始化:
// AbstractAutoProxyCreator.java
protected Object wrapIfNecessary(Object bean, String beanName, Object cacheKey) {
// 判断是否已经处理过
if (beanName != null && this.targetSourcedBeans.contains(beanName)) {
return bean;
}
if (Boolean.FALSE.equals(this.advisedBeans.get(cacheKey))) {
return bean;
}
if (isInfrastructureClass(bean.getClass())
|| shouldSkip(bean.getClass(), beanName)) {
this.advisedBeans.put(cacheKey, Boolean.FALSE);
return bean;
}
// 拿到Bean所有配置的interceptors
Object[] specificInterceptors = getAdvicesAndAdvisorsForBean(
bean.getClass(), beanName, null);
if (specificInterceptors != DO_NOT_PROXY) {
this.advisedBeans.put(cacheKey, Boolean.TRUE);
// 根据interceptors创建代理并缓存
Object proxy = createProxy(
bean.getClass(), beanName, specificInterceptors,
new SingletonTargetSource(bean));
this.proxyTypes.put(cacheKey, proxy.getClass());
return proxy;
}
this.advisedBeans.put(cacheKey, Boolean.FALSE);
return bean;
}
获取Bean所有配置的interceptors
Spring内部使用Advisor
类来保存Advice和Pointcut的配置信息,获取Bean所有可用的Advisor的基本逻辑是:
首先拿到所有的advice配置,保留xml配置与注解配置
根据被代理类的实体,决定具体哪些advice可以应用于当前实体类
对advice排序,返回
// AbstractAdvisorAutoProxyCreator.java
protected Object[] getAdvicesAndAdvisorsForBean(Class> beanClass, String beanName,
TargetSource targetSource) {
List advisors = findEligibleAdvisors(beanClass, beanName);
if (advisors.isEmpty()) {
return DO_NOT_PROXY;
}
return advisors.toArray();
}
protected List findEligibleAdvisors(Class> beanClass, String beanName) {
// 查找所有可能的advice配置
List candidateAdvisors = findCandidateAdvisors();
// 过滤处理,拿到所有匹配的advice配置
List eligibleAdvisors = findAdvisorsThatCanApply(
candidateAdvisors, beanClass, beanName);
extendAdvisors(eligibleAdvisors);
if (!eligibleAdvisors.isEmpty()) {
// 多个advisor需要进行排序,确定所有代理的advice逻辑的执行顺序
eligibleAdvisors = sortAdvisors(eligibleAdvisors);
}
return eligibleAdvisors;
}
findCandidateAdvisors,主要负责读取所有配置的Advice,包括两个部分,一种是xml配置,一种的注解配置:
// AnnotationAwareAspectJAutoProxyCreator.java
protected List findCandidateAdvisors() {
// 将父类读取的advisor也保存到结果中,这里主要是xml配置的advice
List advisors = super.findCandidateAdvisors();
// 读取注解配置的advice
advisors.addAll(this.aspectJAdvisorsBuilder.buildAspectJAdvisors());
return advisors;
}
查询注解配置的advice信息的基本逻辑是:
首先获取所有的Bean信息,遍历
判断Bean是否具有Aspect注解,如果有,获取Advisor信息,其中包括配置的Pointcut规则,Advice配置等
缓存查询结果,方便下次查询
// BeanFactoryAspectJAdvisorsBuilder.java
public List buildAspectJAdvisors() {
List aspectNames = this.aspectBeanNames;
if (aspectNames == null) {
// 缓存结果
synchronized (this) {
aspectNames = this.aspectBeanNames;
if (aspectNames == null) {
List advisors = new LinkedList();
aspectNames = new LinkedList();
// 查询所有的bean
String[] beanNames =
BeanFactoryUtils.beanNamesForTypeIncludingAncestors(
this.beanFactory, Object.class, true, false);
for (String beanName : beanNames) {
// 是否合法,默认返回true
if (!isEligibleBean(beanName)) {
continue;
}
// 拿到Bean的Class对象
Class> beanType = this.beanFactory.getType(beanName);
if (beanType == null) {
continue;
}
// 如果有Aspect注解
if (this.advisorFactory.isAspect(beanType)) {
aspectNames.add(beanName);
AspectMetadata amd = new AspectMetadata(beanType, beanName);
if (amd.getAjType().getPerClause().getKind()
== PerClauseKind.SINGLETON) {
MetadataAwareAspectInstanceFactory factory =
new BeanFactoryAspectInstanceFactory(
this.beanFactory, beanName);
// 获取所有的advice信息并保存到列表
List classAdvisors =
this.advisorFactory.getAdvisors(factory);
if (this.beanFactory.isSingleton(beanName)) {
this.advisorsCache.put(beanName, classAdvisors);
}
else {
this.aspectFactoryCache.put(beanName, factory);
}
advisors.addAll(classAdvisors);
}
else {
// Per target or per this.
if (this.beanFactory.isSingleton(beanName)) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(
"Bean with name '" + beanName +
"' is a singleton, but aspect instantiation model is not singleton");
}
MetadataAwareAspectInstanceFactory factory =
new PrototypeAspectInstanceFactory(
this.beanFactory, beanName);
this.aspectFactoryCache.put(beanName, factory);
advisors.addAll(this.advisorFactory
.getAdvisors(factory));
}
}
}
this.aspectBeanNames = aspectNames;
return advisors;
}
}
}
if (aspectNames.isEmpty()) {
return Collections.emptyList();
}
// 从缓存中获取advice信息并返回
List advisors = new LinkedList();
for (String aspectName : aspectNames) {
List cachedAdvisors = this.advisorsCache.get(aspectName);
if (cachedAdvisors != null) {
advisors.addAll(cachedAdvisors);
}
else {
MetadataAwareAspectInstanceFactory factory =
this.aspectFactoryCache.get(aspectName);
advisors.addAll(this.advisorFactory.getAdvisors(factory));
}
}
return advisors;
}
获取Bean类的Advisor的逻辑:
遍历Bean的方法,带有@Pointcut注解的方法除外,因为@Pointcut配置的是join point的匹配规则,单独处理
如果该方法有配置@Before等注解,那么构造Advisor,放入结果列表中
如果属性有配置@DeclareParents,那么构造Advisor,放入结果列表中
// ReflectiveAspectJAdvisorFactory.java
public List getAdvisors(
MetadataAwareAspectInstanceFactory aspectInstanceFactory) {
Class> aspectClass = aspectInstanceFactory
.getAspectMetadata().getAspectClass();
String aspectName = aspectInstanceFactory
.getAspectMetadata().getAspectName();
validate(aspectClass);
MetadataAwareAspectInstanceFactory lazySingletonAspectInstanceFactory =
new LazySingletonAspectInstanceFactoryDecorator(aspectInstanceFactory);
// 保存Advisor信息
List advisors = new LinkedList();
// 遍历当前Bean类的非Pointcut注解的方法,判断是否有@Before等注解配置
for (Method method : getAdvisorMethods(aspectClass)) {
// 尝试获取方法的Advisor,如果当前类没有@Pointcut配置或者方法没有任何Advice配置
// 都会直接返回null
Advisor advisor = getAdvisor(method, lazySingletonAspectInstanceFactory,
advisors.size(), aspectName);
if (advisor != null) {
advisors.add(advisor);
}
}
if (!advisors.isEmpty()
&& lazySingletonAspectInstanceFactory.
getAspectMetadata().isLazilyInstantiated()) {
Advisor instantiationAdvisor = new
SyntheticInstantiationAdvisor(lazySingletonAspectInstanceFactory);
advisors.add(0, instantiationAdvisor);
}
// 构造@DeclareParents注解的Advisor,这个配置是附加在属性上,所以单独处理
// @DeclareParents主要是用于给Bean类增加新的方法,而不是在已有方法上附加行为
for (Field field : aspectClass.getDeclaredFields()) {
Advisor advisor = getDeclareParentsAdvisor(field);
if (advisor != null) {
advisors.add(advisor);
}
}
return advisors;
}
接着上述逻辑,获取方法的Advisor的逻辑为:
// ReflectiveAspectJAdvisorFactory.java
public Advisor getAdvisor(Method candidateAdviceMethod,
MetadataAwareAspectInstanceFactory aspectInstanceFactory,
int declarationOrderInAspect, String aspectName) {
validate(aspectInstanceFactory.getAspectMetadata().getAspectClass());
// 获取Pointcut配置
AspectJExpressionPointcut expressionPointcut = getPointcut(
candidateAdviceMethod,
aspectInstanceFactory.getAspectMetadata().getAspectClass());
if (expressionPointcut == null) {
return null;
}
// 根据查询到的注解初初始化Advisor
return new InstantiationModelAwarePointcutAdvisorImpl(
expressionPointcut, candidateAdviceMethod,
this, aspectInstanceFactory, declarationOrderInAspect, aspectName);
}
private AspectJExpressionPointcut getPointcut(
Method candidateAdviceMethod, Class> candidateAspectClass) {
// 获取@Before等注解
AspectJAnnotation> aspectJAnnotation =
AbstractAspectJAdvisorFactory
.findAspectJAnnotationOnMethod(candidateAdviceMethod);
if (aspectJAnnotation == null) {
return null;
}
AspectJExpressionPointcut ajexp =
new AspectJExpressionPointcut(
candidateAspectClass, new String[0], new Class>[0]);
ajexp.setExpression(aspectJAnnotation.getPointcutExpression());
ajexp.setBeanFactory(this.beanFactory);
return ajexp;
}
// AbstractAspectJAdvisorFactory.java
protected static AspectJAnnotation> findAspectJAnnotationOnMethod(Method method) {
Class>[] classesToLookFor = new Class>[] {
Before.class, Around.class, After.class,
AfterReturning.class, AfterThrowing.class, Pointcut.class};
for (Class> c : classesToLookFor) {
AspectJAnnotation> foundAnnotation =
findAnnotation(method, (Class) c);
if (foundAnnotation != null) {
return foundAnnotation;
}
}
return null;
}
由查询到的注解配置信息构造Advisor(包含Advice,Pointcut等信息):
// InstantiationModelAwarePointcutAdvisorImpl.java
public InstantiationModelAwarePointcutAdvisorImpl(
AspectJExpressionPointcut declaredPointcut,
Method aspectJAdviceMethod, AspectJAdvisorFactory aspectJAdvisorFactory,
MetadataAwareAspectInstanceFactory aspectInstanceFactory,
int declarationOrder, String aspectName) {
...
if (aspectInstanceFactory.getAspectMetadata().isLazilyInstantiated()) {
...
}
else {
this.pointcut = this.declaredPointcut;
this.lazy = false;
// 根据@Before等初始化Advice
this.instantiatedAdvice = instantiateAdvice(this.declaredPointcut);
}
}
private Advice instantiateAdvice(AspectJExpressionPointcut pcut) {
return this.aspectJAdvisorFactory.getAdvice(
this.aspectJAdviceMethod, pcut,
this.aspectInstanceFactory, this.declarationOrder, this.aspectName);
}
初始化Advice的逻辑,可以看到是根据不同的注解生成不同的Advice对象,主要由工厂生成:
public Advice getAdvice(Method candidateAdviceMethod, AspectJExpressionPointcut expressionPointcut,
MetadataAwareAspectInstanceFactory aspectInstanceFactory, int declarationOrder, String aspectName) {
....
AbstractAspectJAdvice springAdvice;
switch (aspectJAnnotation.getAnnotationType()) {
case AtBefore:
springAdvice = new AspectJMethodBeforeAdvice(
candidateAdviceMethod, expressionPointcut, aspectInstanceFactory);
break;
case AtAfter:
springAdvice = new AspectJAfterAdvice(
candidateAdviceMethod, expressionPointcut, aspectInstanceFactory);
break;
case AtAfterReturning:
springAdvice = new AspectJAfterReturningAdvice(
candidateAdviceMethod, expressionPointcut, aspectInstanceFactory);
AfterReturning afterReturningAnnotation =
(AfterReturning) aspectJAnnotation.getAnnotation();
if (StringUtils.hasText(afterReturningAnnotation.returning())) {
springAdvice.setReturningName(afterReturningAnnotation.returning());
}
break;
...
return null;
default:
throw new UnsupportedOperationException(
"Unsupported advice type on method: " + candidateAdviceMethod);
}
...
}
到此逻辑,Spring已经可以拿到用户配置的所有Aspect,接下来是遍历这些配置,过滤出哪些Aspect配置可以应用于当前Bean类
过滤可应用于Bean的interceptors
上一步查询出已经配置的所有的Aspect的配置,Advisor列表,根据Advisor中的Pointcut配置,来比对Bean中的方法,如果可以匹配,那么Advisor可应用于当前Bean:
// AbstractAdvisorAutoProxyCreator.java
protected List findAdvisorsThatCanApply(
List candidateAdvisors, Class> beanClass, String beanName) {
ProxyCreationContext.setCurrentProxiedBeanName(beanName);
try {
return AopUtils.findAdvisorsThatCanApply(candidateAdvisors, beanClass);
}
finally {
ProxyCreationContext.setCurrentProxiedBeanName(null);
}
}
// AopUtils.java
public static List findAdvisorsThatCanApply(
List candidateAdvisors, Class> clazz) {
if (candidateAdvisors.isEmpty()) {
return candidateAdvisors;
}
List eligibleAdvisors = new LinkedList();
for (Advisor candidate : candidateAdvisors) {
// @DeclareParents类型
if (candidate instanceof IntroductionAdvisor
&& canApply(candidate, clazz)) {
eligibleAdvisors.add(candidate);
}
}
boolean hasIntroductions = !eligibleAdvisors.isEmpty();
for (Advisor candidate : candidateAdvisors) {
if (candidate instanceof IntroductionAdvisor) {
// introduction类型已经处理
continue;
}
if (canApply(candidate, clazz, hasIntroductions)) {
eligibleAdvisors.add(candidate);
}
}
return eligibleAdvisors;
}
主要判断逻辑处于canApply方法,主要逻辑是判断Bean的所有接口与Bean自己的所有方法是否可以应用Advisor中的Pointcut规则,如果任一方法可以,那就可以认为Advisor可以用于当前Bean:
// AopUtils.java
public static boolean canApply(Advisor advisor, Class> targetClass, boolean hasIntroductions) {
if (advisor instanceof IntroductionAdvisor) {
return ((IntroductionAdvisor) advisor)
.getClassFilter().matches(targetClass);
}
else if (advisor instanceof PointcutAdvisor) {
PointcutAdvisor pca = (PointcutAdvisor) advisor;
return canApply(pca.getPointcut(), targetClass, hasIntroductions);
}
else {
return true;
}
}
public static boolean canApply(Pointcut pc, Class> targetClass, boolean hasIntroductions) {
Assert.notNull(pc, "Pointcut must not be null");
if (!pc.getClassFilter().matches(targetClass)) {
return false;
}
// Pointcut配置的方法过滤为默认True类型,直接返回即可
MethodMatcher methodMatcher = pc.getMethodMatcher();
if (methodMatcher == MethodMatcher.TRUE) {
return true;
}
IntroductionAwareMethodMatcher introductionAwareMethodMatcher = null;
if (methodMatcher instanceof IntroductionAwareMethodMatcher) {
introductionAwareMethodMatcher =
(IntroductionAwareMethodMatcher) methodMatcher;
}
// 存放代理目标类的所有接口类
Set> classes = new LinkedHashSet>(
ClassUtils.getAllInterfacesForClassAsSet(targetClass));
// 把代理目标类也放入set
classes.add(targetClass);
// 上述所有类的任一方法可以匹配Pointcut,认为此Advisor可以应用于当前被代理类
for (Class> clazz : classes) {
Method[] methods = ReflectionUtils.getAllDeclaredMethods(clazz);
for (Method method : methods) {
if ((introductionAwareMethodMatcher != null
&& introductionAwareMethodMatcher.matches(
method, targetClass, hasIntroductions))
|| methodMatcher.matches(method, targetClass)) {
return true;
}
}
}
return false;
}
至此,Spring已经拿到当前Bean可应用的Advisor列表,接下来就是利用Advisor和Bean来创建代理类
代理创建逻辑
前文提到的AbstractAutoProxyCreator
的wrapIfNecessary
方法中包含了实际代理创建的逻辑:
// AbstractAutoProxyCreator.java
protected Object createProxy(
Class> beanClass, String beanName, Object[] specificInterceptors, TargetSource targetSource) {
... proxyFactory的初始化逻辑
// 利用proxyFactory创建代理
return proxyFactory.getProxy(getProxyClassLoader());
}
// ProxyFactory.java
public Object getProxy(ClassLoader classLoader) {
return createAopProxy().getProxy(classLoader);
}
// ProxyCreatorSupport.java
protected final synchronized AopProxy createAopProxy() {
if (!this.active) {
activate();
}
return getAopProxyFactory().createAopProxy(this);
}
// DefaultAopProxyFactory.java
public AopProxy createAopProxy(AdvisedSupport config) throws AopConfigException {
if (config.isOptimize() || config.isProxyTargetClass()
|| hasNoUserSuppliedProxyInterfaces(config)) {
Class> targetClass = config.getTargetClass();
if (targetClass == null) {
throw new AopConfigException(
"TargetSource cannot determine target class: " +
"Either an interface or a target is required for proxy creation.");
}
// 这里判断使用哪一种代理创建方式
if (targetClass.isInterface() || Proxy.isProxyClass(targetClass)) {
return new JdkDynamicAopProxy(config);
}
// ObjenesisCglibAopProxy是CglibAopProxy子类,做了一些逻辑优化
return new ObjenesisCglibAopProxy(config);
}
else {
return new JdkDynamicAopProxy(config);
}
}
可以看到,Spring根据代理目标类是否实现接口,配置中是否强制开启CGLIB,来决定使用哪一种方式来创建代理。
JdkDynamicAopProxy
JdkDynamicAopProxy与JDK代理简单实例中的一致,实现了InvocationHandler接口,主要逻辑位于invoke方法中,主要是将所有interceptor组成一个链,然后调用链执行,最后执行被代理方法:
// JdkDynamicAopProxy.java
public Object invoke(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args) throws Throwable {
MethodInvocation invocation;
...
try {
Object retVal;
...
// interceptor组成一个链,链式调用
List
interceptor链执行:
// ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java
public Object proceed() throws Throwable {
// 最后执行join point方法,也就是被代理方法
if (this.currentInterceptorIndex == this.interceptorsAndDynamicMethodMatchers.size() - 1) {
return invokeJoinpoint();
}
Object interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice =
this.interceptorsAndDynamicMethodMatchers
.get(++this.currentInterceptorIndex);
if (interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice
instanceof InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatcher) {
// 匹配当前方法,执行拦截的代理逻辑
InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatcher dm =
(InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatcher) interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice;
if (dm.methodMatcher.matches(this.method,
this.targetClass, this.arguments)) {
return dm.interceptor.invoke(this);
}
else {
// 不匹配当前方法,跳过
return proceed();
}
}
else {
return ((MethodInterceptor) interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice).invoke(this);
}
}
CglibAopProxy
CGLIB构造代理的方式与示例类似,都是利用Enhancer类来进行构造:
// CglibAopProxy.java
public Object getProxy(ClassLoader classLoader) {
try {
...
// 配置Enhancer...
Enhancer enhancer = createEnhancer();
...
enhancer.setSuperclass(proxySuperClass);
enhancer.setInterfaces(
AopProxyUtils.completeProxiedInterfaces(this.advised));
enhancer.setNamingPolicy(SpringNamingPolicy.INSTANCE);
enhancer.setStrategy(
new ClassLoaderAwareUndeclaredThrowableStrategy(classLoader));
// 获取关键的代理执行逻辑方法,callback方法
Callback[] callbacks = getCallbacks(rootClass);
Class>[] types = new Class>[callbacks.length];
for (int x = 0; x < types.length; x++) {
types[x] = callbacks[x].getClass();
}
// 设置CallBackFilter
enhancer.setCallbackFilter(new ProxyCallbackFilter(
this.advised.getConfigurationOnlyCopy(),
this.fixedInterceptorMap, this.fixedInterceptorOffset));
enhancer.setCallbackTypes(types);
// 设置CallBack方法
return createProxyClassAndInstance(enhancer, callbacks);
}...
}
获取CallBack方法的主要逻辑为:
// CglibAopProxy.java
private Callback[] getCallbacks(Class> rootClass) throws Exception {
boolean exposeProxy = this.advised.isExposeProxy();
boolean isFrozen = this.advised.isFrozen();
boolean isStatic = this.advised.getTargetSource().isStatic();
// 获取aop配置的CallBack
Callback aopInterceptor = new DynamicAdvisedInterceptor(this.advised);
// 一些优化策略
...
Callback[] mainCallbacks = new Callback[] {
aopInterceptor, // xml和注解配置的aop代理逻辑
targetInterceptor, // 优化
new SerializableNoOp(), // 优化
targetDispatcher, this.advisedDispatcher,
new EqualsInterceptor(this.advised),
new HashCodeInterceptor(this.advised)
};
Callback[] callbacks;
// 一些优化策略
...
return callbacks;
}
DynamicAdvisedInterceptor
实现了MethodInterceptor
接口,也就是CGLIB示例中的CallBack方法的实现:
// DynamicAdvisedInterceptor.java
public Object intercept(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args, MethodProxy methodProxy) throws Throwable {
Object oldProxy = null;
boolean setProxyContext = false;
Class> targetClass = null;
Object target = null;
try {
if (this.advised.exposeProxy) {
oldProxy = AopContext.setCurrentProxy(proxy);
setProxyContext = true;
}
target = getTarget();
if (target != null) {
targetClass = target.getClass();
}
List
使用JDK或CGLIB创建代理后,Bean在AOP的Postprocess的流程就结束了。后续调用Bean方法时,就可以实现AOP方法的调用。