synchronized原理

说下自己体会：

1.synchronized是可重入锁，举例如下：

public void test1(){
   sychroniezd(this){
     test2();
   }
}

public void test2(){
   sychroniezd(this){
     sout("xxxx")
  }
}

test1和test2都是对象加锁，针对同一个线程，是可以调用成功的，其本质也是monitor监听器机制，monitorenter 加1，monitorexit 减1， 进入test2也会加1 操作。
可参考：

关于这两条指令的作用，我们直接参考JVM规范中描述：

monitorenter ：

Each object is associated with a monitor. A monitor is locked if and only if it has an owner. The thread that executes monitorenter attempts to gain ownership of the monitor associated with objectref, as follows:
• If the entry count of the monitor associated with objectref is zero, the thread enters the monitor and sets its entry count to one. The thread is then the owner of the monitor.
• If the thread already owns the monitor associated with objectref, it reenters the monitor, incrementing its entry count.
• If another thread already owns the monitor associated with objectref, the thread blocks until the monitor's entry count is zero, then tries again to gain ownership.

这段话的大概意思为：

每个对象有一个监视器锁（monitor）。当monitor被占用时就会处于锁定状态，线程执行monitorenter指令时尝试获取monitor的所有权，过程如下：

1、如果monitor的进入数为0，则该线程进入monitor，然后将进入数设置为1，该线程即为monitor的所有者。

2、如果线程已经占有该monitor，只是重新进入，则进入monitor的进入数加1.

3.如果其他线程已经占用了monitor，则该线程进入阻塞状态，直到monitor的进入数为0，再重新尝试获取monitor的所有权。

monitorexit：

The thread that executes monitorexit must be the owner of the monitor associated with the instance referenced by objectref.
The thread decrements the entry count of the monitor associated with objectref. If as a result the value of the entry count is zero, the thread exits the monitor and is no longer its owner. Other threads that are blocking to enter the monitor are allowed to attempt to do so.

这段话的大概意思为：

执行monitorexit的线程必须是objectref所对应的monitor的所有者。

指令执行时，monitor的进入数减1，如果减1后进入数为0，那线程退出monitor，不再是这个monitor的所有者。其他被这个monitor阻塞的线程可以尝试去获取这个 monitor 的所有权。

通过这两段描述，我们应该能很清楚的看出Synchronized的实现原理，Synchronized的语义底层是通过一个monitor的对象来完成，其实wait/notify等方法也依赖于monitor对象，这就是为什么只有在同步的块或者方法中才能调用wait/notify等方法，否则会抛出java.lang.IllegalMonitorStateException的异常的原因。

参考：
http://www.cnblogs.com/paddix/p/5367116.html