本文内容:分析TCP接收窗口的调整算法,主要是接收窗口的调整算法和总结。
内核版本:3.2.12
作者:zhangskd @ csdn blog
经过一系列的前奏,我们终于到了最关键的地方。接下来我们可以看到,接收窗口的大小
主要取决于剩余的接收缓存,以及接收窗口当前阈值。
决定接收窗口大小的函数tcp_select_window()在tcp_transmit_skb()中调用,也就是说每次我们要发送数据
包时,都要使用tcp_select_window()来决定通告的接收窗口大小。
static int tcp_transmit_skb (struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int clone_it, gfp_t gfp_mask) { const struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk); struct inet_sock *inet; struct tcp_sock *tp; struct tcp_skb_cb *tcb; struct tcphdr *th; ... /* Build TCP header and checksum it,以下是TCP头的赋值*/ th = tcp_hdr(skb); /* skb->transport_header */ th->source = inet->inet_sport; th->dest = inet->inet_dport; th->seq = htonl(tcb->seq); th->ack_seq = htonl(tp->rcv_nxt); /* 这个语句可以看出C语言的强大*/ *(((__be16 *) th) + 6) = htons(((tcp_header_size >> 2) << 12) | tcb->tcp_flags); if (unlikely(tcb->tcp_flags & TCPHDR_SYN)) { /* RFC1323: The window in SYN & SYN/ACK segments in never scaled. * 从这里我们可以看到,在三次握手阶段,接收窗口并没有按扩大因子缩放。 */ th->window = htons(min(tp->rcv_wnd, 65535U)); } else { th->window = htons(tcp_select_window(sk)); /* 更新接收窗口的大小*/ } th->check = 0; th->urg_ptr = 0; ... }
来看下tcp_select_window()。
注意,接收窗口的返回值只有16位,所以如果不使用窗口扩大选项,那么接收窗口的最大值为65535。
static u16 tcp_select_window(struct sock *sk) { struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk); u32 cur_win = tcp_receive_window(tp); /* 当前接收窗口的剩余大小*/ u32 new_win = __tcp_select_window(sk); /*根据剩余的接收缓存,计算新的接收窗口的大小 */ /* Never shrink the offered window,不允许缩小已分配的接收窗口*/ if (new_win < cur_win) { /* Danger Will Robinson! * Don't update rcv_wup/rcv_wnd here or else * we will not be able to advertise a zero window in time. --DaveM * Relax Will Robinson. */ new_win = ALIGN(cur_win, 1 << tp->rx_opt.rcv_wscale); } /* 更新接收窗口大小。个人觉得这句代码应该后移,因为此时接收窗口的大小还未最终确定!*/ tp->rcv_wnd = new_win; tp->rcv_wup = tp->rcv_nxt; /* 更新接收窗口的左边界,把未确认的数据累积确认*/ /* 确保接收窗口大小不超过规定的最大值。 * Make sure we do not exceed the maximum possible scaled window. */ if (! tp->rx_opt.rcv_wscale && sysctl_tcp_workaround_signed_windows) /* 不能超过32767,因为一些奇葩协议采用有符号的接收窗口大小*/ new_win = min(new_win, MAX_TCP_WINDOW); else new_win = min(new_win, (65535U << tp->rx_opt.rcv_wscale)); /* RFC1323 scaling applied. 按比例因子缩小接收窗口,这样最多能表示30位*/ new_win >>= tp->rx_opt.rcv_wscale; /* If we advertise zero window, disable fast path. */ if (new_win == 0) tp->pred_flags = 0; return new_win; /* 返回最终的接收窗口大小*/ }
每次发送一个TCP数据段,都要构建TCP首部,这时会调用tcp_select_window选择接收窗口大小。
窗口大小选择的基本算法:
1. 计算当前接收窗口的剩余大小cur_win。
2. 计算新的接收窗口大小new_win,这个值为剩余接收缓存的3/4,且不能超过rcv_ssthresh。
3. 取cur_win和new_win中值较大者作为接收窗口大小。
tcp_workaround_signed_windows
标识在未启用窗口扩大因子选项时,是否使用初始值不超过32767的TCP窗口,默认值为0(不启用)。
我们知道在不启用窗口扩大因子选项时,接收窗口有16位,最大值为65535。但是有些很糟糕的协议
采用的是有符号的窗口大小,所以最大值只能为32767。当然,这种协议并不多见:)。
@include/net/tcp.h: /* * Never offer a window over 32767 without using window scaling. * Some poor stacks do signed 16bit maths! */ #define MAX_TCP_WINDOW 32767U
计算当前接收窗口的剩余大小cur_win。
/* * Compute the actual receive window we are currently advertising. * rcv_nxt can be after the window if our peer push more data than * the offered window. */ static inline u32 tcp_receive_window (const struct tcp_sock *tp) { s32 win = tp->rcv_wup + tp->rcv_wnd - tp->rcv_nxt; if (win < 0) win = 0; return (u32) win; }
详细说明:
This is calculated as the last advertised window minus unacknowledged data length:
tp->rcv_wnd - (tp->rcv_nxt - tp->rcv_wup)
tp->rcv_wup is synced with next byte to be received (tp->rcv_nxt) only when we are sending ACK in
tcp_select_window(). If there is no unacknowledged bytes, the routine returns the exact receive
window advertised last.
计算新的接收窗口大小new_win,这个是关键函数,我们将看到rcv_ssthresh所起的作用。
/* * calculate the new window to be advertised. */ u32 __tcp_select_window(struct sock *sk) { struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk); struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk); /* MSS for the peer's data. Previous versions used mss_clamp here. * I don't know if the value based on our guesses of peer's MSS is better * for the performance. It's more correct but may be worse for the performance * because of rcv_mss fluctuations. —— SAW 1998/11/1 */ int mss = icsk->icsk_ack.rcv_mss;/*这个是估计目前对端有效的发送mss,而不是最大的*/ int free_space = tcp_space(sk); /* 剩余接收缓存的3/4 */ int full_space = min_t(int, tp->window_clamp, tcp_full_space(sk)); /* 总的接收缓存 */ int window; if (mss > full_space) mss = full_space; /* 减小mss,因为接收缓存太小了*/ /* receive buffer is half full,接收缓存使用一半以上时要小心了 */ if (free_space < (full_space >> 1)) { icsk->icsk_ack.quick = 0; /* 可以快速发送ACK段的数量置零*/ if (tcp_memory_pressure)/*有内存压力时,把接收窗口限制在5840字节以下*/ tp->rcv_ssthresh = min(tp->rcv_ssthresh, 4U * tp->advmss); if (free_space < mss) /* 剩余接收缓存不足以接收mss的数据*/ return 0; } if (free_space > tp->rcv_ssthresh) /* 看!不能超过当前接收窗口阈值,这可以达接收窗口平滑增长的效果*/ free_space = tp->rcv_ssthresh; /* Don't do rounding if we are using window scaling, since the scaled window will * not line up with the MSS boundary anyway. */ window = tp->rcv_wnd; if (tp->rx_opt.rcv_wscale) { /* 接收窗口扩大因子不为零*/ window = free_space; /* Advertise enough space so that it won't get scaled away. * Import case: prevent zero window announcement if 1 << rcv_wscale > mss. * 防止四舍五入造通告的接收窗口偏小。 */ if (((window >> tp->rx_opt.rcv_wscale) << tp->rx_opt.rcv_wscale) != window) window =(((window >> tp->rx_opt.rcv_wscale) + 1) << tp->rx_opt.rcv_wscale); } else { /* Get the largest window that is a nice multiple of mss. * Window clamp already applied above. * If our current window offering is within 1 mss of the free space we just keep it. * This prevents the divide and multiply from happening most of the time. * We also don't do any window rounding when the free space is too small. */ /* 截取free_space中整数个mss,如果rcv_wnd和free_space的差距在一个mss以上*/ if (window <= free_space - mss || window > free_space) window = (free_space / mss) * mss; /* 如果free space过小,则直接取free space值*/ else if (mss = full_space && free_space > window + (full_space >> 1)) window = free_space; /* 当free_space -mss < window < free_space时,直接使用rcv_wnd,不做修改*/ } return window; }
/* 剩余接收缓存的3/4。 * Note: caller must be prepared to deal with negative returns. */ static inline int tcp_space (const struct sock *sk) { return tcp_win_from_space(sk->sk_rcvbuf - atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc)); } static inline int tcp_win_from_space(int space) { return sysctl_tcp_adv_win_scale <= 0 ? (space >> (-sysctl_tcp_adv_win_scale)) : space - (space >> sysctl_tcp_adv_win_scale); } /* 最大的接收缓存的3/4 */ static inline int tcp_full_space(const struct sock *sk) { return tcp_win_from_space(sk->sk_rcvbuf); }
总体来说,新的接收窗口大小值为:剩余接收缓存的3/4,但不能超过接收缓存的阈值。
接收窗口的调整算法主要涉及:
(1)window_clamp和sk_rcvbuf的调整,在之前的blog《TCP接收缓存大小的动态调整》中有分析。
(2)rcv_ssthresh接收窗口当前阈值的动态调整,一般增长2*advmss。
(3)rcv_wnd接收窗口的动态调整,一般为min(3/4 free space in sk_rcvbuf, rcv_ssthresh)。
如果剩余的接收缓存够大,rcv_wnd受限于rcv_ssthresh。这个时候每收到一个大的数据包,rcv_wnd就增大
2920字节(由于缩放原因这个值可能波动)。这就像慢启动一样,接收窗口指数增长。
接收窗口当然不能无限制增长,当它增长到一定大小时,就会受到一系列因素的限制,比如window_clamp和
sk_rcvbuf,或者剩余接收缓存区大小。
当应用程序读取接收缓冲区数据不够快时,或者发生了丢包时,接收窗口会变小,这主要受限于剩余的接收缓存
的大小。
总的来说,接收窗口的调整算法涉及到一些变量,由于这些变量本身又是动态变化的,所以分析起来比较复杂,
笔者也还需要再进行深入了解:)